Search (1272 results, page 1 of 64)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Scientometrics pioneer Eugene Garfield dies : Eugene Garfield, founder of the Institute for Scientific Information and The Scientist, has passed away at age 91 (2017) 0.05
    0.046289567 = product of:
      0.15944184 = sum of:
        0.01575722 = weight(_text_:und in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01575722 = score(doc=3460,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.33194062 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
        0.026875755 = weight(_text_:literatur in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026875755 = score(doc=3460,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594726 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.2619604 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
        0.026875755 = weight(_text_:literatur in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026875755 = score(doc=3460,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594726 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.2619604 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
        0.013236298 = weight(_text_:im in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013236298 = score(doc=3460,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.060543913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
        0.0062581147 = weight(_text_:20 in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062581147 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.106296636 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
        0.026130773 = weight(_text_:autoren in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026130773 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12030353 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.616954 = idf(docFreq=436, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.21720704 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.616954 = idf(docFreq=436, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
        0.026130773 = weight(_text_:autoren in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026130773 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12030353 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.616954 = idf(docFreq=436, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.21720704 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.616954 = idf(docFreq=436, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
        0.0024199293 = weight(_text_:e in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024199293 = score(doc=3460,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.078606166 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
        0.01575722 = weight(_text_:und in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01575722 = score(doc=3460,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.33194062 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
      0.29032257 = coord(9/31)
    
    Biographed
    Garfield, E.
    Content
    Vgl. auch Open Password, Nr.167 vom 01.03.2017 :"Eugene Garfield, Begründer und Pionier der Zitationsindexierung und der Ziationsanalyse, ohne den die Informationswissenschaft heute anders aussähe, ist im Alter von 91 Jahren gestorben. Er hinterlässt Frau, drei Söhne, eine Tochter, eine Stieftochter, zwei Enkeltöchter und zwei Großelternkinder. Garfield machte seinen ersten Abschluss als Bachelor in Chemie an der Columbia University in New York City im Jahre 1949. 1954 sattelte er einen Abschluss in Bibliothekswissenschaft drauf. 1961 sollte er im Fach strukturelle Linguistik promovieren. Als Chemie-Student war er nach eigenen Angaben weder besonders gut noch besonders glücklich. Sein "Erweckungserlebnis" hatte er auf einer Tagung der American Chemical Society, als er entdeckte, dass sich mit der Suche nach Literatur womöglich ein Lebensunterhalt bestreiten lasse. "So I went to the Chairman of the meeting and said: "How do you get a job in this racket?" Ab 1955 war Garfield zunächst als Berater für pharmazeutische Unternehmen tätig. Dort spezialisierte er sich auf Fachinformationen, indem er Inhalte relevanter Fachzeitschriften erarbeitete. 1955 schlug er in "Science" seine bahnbrechende Idee vor, Zitationen wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen systematisch zu erfassen und Zusammenhänge zwischen Zitaten deutlich zu machen. 1960 gründete Garfield das Institute für Scientific Informationen, dessen CEO er bis 1992 blieb. 1964 brachte er den Scientific Information Index heraus. Weitere Maßgrößen wie der Social Science Index (ab 1973), der Arts and Humanities Citation Index (ab 1978) und der Journal Citation Index folgten. Diese Verzeichnisse wurden in dem "Web of Science" zusammengefasst und als Datenbank elektronisch zugänglich gemacht. Damit wurde es den Forschern ermöglich, die für sie relevante Literatur "at their fingertips" zu finden und sich in ihr zurechtzufinden. Darüber hinaus wurde es mit Hilfe der Rankings von Garfields Messgrößen möglich, die relative wissenschaftliche Bedeutung wissenschaftlicher Beiträge, Autoren, wissenschaftlicher Einrichtungen, Regionen und Länder zu messen.
    Garfield wandte sich im Zusammenhang mit seinen Messgrößen gegen "Bibliographic Negligence" und "Citation Amnesia", Er schrieb 2002: "There will never be a perfect solution to the problem of acknowledging intellectual debts. But a beginning can be made if journal editors will demand a signed pledge from authors that they have searched Medline, Science Citation Index, or other appropriate print and electronic databases." Er warnte aber auch vor einen unsachgemäßen Umgang mit seinen Messgößen und vor übertriebenen Erwartungen an sie in Zusammenhang mit Karriereentscheidungen über Wissenschaftler und Überlebensentscheidungen für wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen. 1982 übernahm die Thomson Corporation ISI für 210 Millionen Dollar. In der heutigen Nachfolgeorganisation Clarivate Analytics sind mehr als 4000 Mitarbeitern in über hundert Ländern beschäftigt. Garfield gründete auch eine Zeitung für Wissenschaftler, speziell für Biowissenschaftler, "The Scientist", die weiterbesteht und als kostenfreier Pushdienst bezogen werden kann. In seinen Beiträgen zur Wissenschaftspolitik kritisierte er beispielsweise die Wissenschaftsberater von Präsident Reagen 1986 als "Advocats of the administration´s science policies, rather than as objective conduits for communication between the president and the science community." Seinen Beitrag, mit dem er darum warb, die Förderung von UNESCO-Forschungsprogrammen fortzusetzen, gab er den Titel: "Let´s stand up für Global Science". Das ist auch in Trump-Zeiten ein guter Titel, da die US-Regierung den Wahrheitsbegriff, auf der Wissenschaft basiert, als bedeutungslos verwirft und sich auf Nationalismus und Abschottung statt auf internationale Kommunikation, Kooperation und gemeinsame Ausschöpfung von Interessen fokussiert."
    Date
    1. 3.2017 10:44:20
    Language
    e
  2. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.04
    0.035020966 = product of:
      0.18094166 = sum of:
        0.073409244 = weight(_text_:italienische in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073409244 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18861735 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.38919666 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
        0.012301977 = weight(_text_:und in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012301977 = score(doc=3585,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.25915268 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
        0.073409244 = weight(_text_:italienische in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073409244 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18861735 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.38919666 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
        0.007563599 = weight(_text_:im in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007563599 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060543913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.12492748 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
        0.0019555981 = weight(_text_:e in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019555981 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
        0.012301977 = weight(_text_:und in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012301977 = score(doc=3585,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.25915268 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
      0.19354838 = coord(6/31)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
    Language
    e
  3. Dobrota, M.; Dobrota, M.: ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity : what if the award factor was Excluded? (2016) 0.02
    0.022292757 = product of:
      0.11517925 = sum of:
        0.0069745653 = weight(_text_:und in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069745653 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
        0.04479561 = weight(_text_:autoren in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04479561 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12030353 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.616954 = idf(docFreq=436, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.37235492 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.616954 = idf(docFreq=436, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
        0.04479561 = weight(_text_:autoren in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04479561 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12030353 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.616954 = idf(docFreq=436, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.37235492 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.616954 = idf(docFreq=436, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
        0.0029333972 = weight(_text_:e in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029333972 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
        0.0069745653 = weight(_text_:und in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069745653 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
        0.008705502 = product of:
          0.017411005 = sum of:
            0.017411005 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017411005 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07500195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.19354838 = coord(6/31)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:40:53
    Footnote
    Autoren: Milan Dobrota und Marina Dobrota
    Language
    e
  4. Ball, R.: Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel : die Verwendung von Fragezeichen im Titel von wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriftenbeiträgen in der Medizin, den Lebenswissenschaften und in der Physik von 1966 bis 2005 (2007) 0.01
    0.012709817 = product of:
      0.078800865 = sum of:
        0.018194871 = weight(_text_:und in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018194871 = score(doc=635,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
        0.026472596 = weight(_text_:im in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026472596 = score(doc=635,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.060543913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.4372462 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
        0.012516229 = weight(_text_:20 in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012516229 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
        0.0034222968 = weight(_text_:e in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034222968 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
        0.018194871 = weight(_text_:und in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018194871 = score(doc=635,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
      0.16129032 = coord(5/31)
    
    Abstract
    Die Titel wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen sind von besonderer Bedeutung. Wir haben fast 20 Millionen wissenschaftliche Artikel untersucht und den Anteil von Artikeln mit einem Fragezeichen am Ende des Titels im Laufe der letzten 40 Jahre analysiert. Unsere Studie beschränkte sich auf die Disziplinen Physik, Lebenswissenschaften und Medizin. Dabei haben wir eine deutliche Zunahme der Fragezeichen-Artikel von 50 Prozent auf mehr als 200 Prozent feststellten können. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden im vorliegenden Beitrag die grundsätzlichen Funktionen und Strukturen der Titel wissenschaftlicher Publikationen untersucht. Wir gehen davon aus, dass Marketing-Aspekte die entscheidenden Beweggründe sind für die zunehmende Nutzung von Fragezeichen-Titeln bei wissenschaftlichen Publikationen.
    Language
    e
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.6/7, S.371-375
  5. Dees, W.: "Publication power approach" (2013) 0.01
    0.0072931037 = product of:
      0.056521557 = sum of:
        0.019931482 = weight(_text_:und in 924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019931482 = score(doc=924,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 924, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=924)
        0.013236298 = weight(_text_:im in 924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013236298 = score(doc=924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060543913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=924)
        0.0034222968 = weight(_text_:e in 924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034222968 = score(doc=924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=924)
        0.019931482 = weight(_text_:und in 924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019931482 = score(doc=924,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 924, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=924)
      0.12903225 = coord(4/31)
    
    Abstract
    Die Publikationslandschaft der Erziehungswissenschaft ist durch eine enorme Breite undVielfalt sowie zahlreiche Verbindungen in benachbarte Felder gekennzeichnet. Aktuelle Analysen zum Publikationsverhalten von Erziehungswissenschaftlern zeigen, dass diese Hunderte von verschiedenen Zeitschriften und Verlagen zur Veröffentlichung nutzen. Um aus dieser Fülle an Publikationsorten die bedeutendsten zu ermitteln, wird ein neuer Ansatz zur Zeitschriftenbewertung, der "publication power approach" von Holsapple, auf die deutsche Erziehungswissenschaft übertragen. Dieser Ansatz basiert auf dem Publikationsverhalten von Forschern an ausgewählten Institutionen und stellt eine Alternative zu Expertenbefragungen und Zitationsanalysen dar. Der Beitrag stellt wesentlich Ergebnisse zur "publication power" von Zeitschriften und Verlagen der Erziehungswissenschaft vor und diskutiert Vor- und Nachteile dieses Ansatzes im Vergleich zu den herkömmlichen Bewertungsmethoden.
    Language
    e
  6. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.01
    0.0053594187 = product of:
      0.041535497 = sum of:
        0.014304262 = weight(_text_:20 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014304262 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.24296375 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
        0.0039111963 = weight(_text_:e in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039111963 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
        0.011712699 = product of:
          0.023425398 = sum of:
            0.023425398 = weight(_text_:29 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023425398 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07534158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011607336 = product of:
          0.023214672 = sum of:
            0.023214672 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023214672 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07500195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.12903225 = coord(4/31)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
    Language
    e
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  7. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.01
    0.0051891985 = product of:
      0.05362172 = sum of:
        0.030343922 = weight(_text_:20 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030343922 = score(doc=4890,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.5154039 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
        0.0058667944 = weight(_text_:e in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058667944 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
        0.017411005 = product of:
          0.03482201 = sum of:
            0.03482201 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03482201 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07500195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09677419 = coord(3/31)
    
    Date
    12. 3.2001 11:34:20
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
    Language
    e
  8. Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017) 0.00
    0.0049696877 = product of:
      0.03851508 = sum of:
        0.014703675 = weight(_text_:und in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014703675 = score(doc=3081,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
        0.007152131 = weight(_text_:20 in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007152131 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.12148187 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
        0.0019555981 = weight(_text_:e in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019555981 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
        0.014703675 = weight(_text_:und in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014703675 = score(doc=3081,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.12903225 = coord(4/31)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.ibi.hu-berlin.de/de/archiv/forschung/prom_habil/dissertationen/Tavakolizadeh-Ravari2007. Vgl. auch: http://mravari.blogfa.com/post-20.aspxgl.
    Footnote
    Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin - Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft.
    Imprint
    Berlin : Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin / Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
    Language
    e
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  9. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.00
    0.004733652 = product of:
      0.036685802 = sum of:
        0.011507446 = weight(_text_:und in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011507446 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
        0.0034222968 = weight(_text_:e in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034222968 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
        0.010248612 = product of:
          0.020497223 = sum of:
            0.020497223 = weight(_text_:29 in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020497223 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07534158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011507446 = weight(_text_:und in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011507446 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
      0.12903225 = coord(4/31)
    
    Classification
    AN 70400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksverwaltung / Bibliotheksanalyse, -statistik
    Date
    29. 2.2008 19:02:46
    Language
    e
    RVK
    AN 70400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksverwaltung / Bibliotheksanalyse, -statistik
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.00
    0.004611741 = product of:
      0.047654655 = sum of:
        0.0068445937 = weight(_text_:e in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068445937 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
        0.020497223 = product of:
          0.040994447 = sum of:
            0.040994447 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040994447 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07534158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.020312838 = product of:
          0.040625677 = sum of:
            0.040625677 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040625677 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07500195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09677419 = coord(3/31)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
    Language
    e
  11. Bonitz, M.; Scharnhorst, A.: National science systems and the Matthew effect for countries (2000) 0.00
    0.004308212 = product of:
      0.033388644 = sum of:
        0.009863526 = weight(_text_:und in 6643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009863526 = score(doc=6643,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 6643, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6643)
        0.010728197 = weight(_text_:20 in 6643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010728197 = score(doc=6643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 6643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6643)
        0.0029333972 = weight(_text_:e in 6643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029333972 = score(doc=6643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 6643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6643)
        0.009863526 = weight(_text_:und in 6643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009863526 = score(doc=6643,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 6643, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6643)
      0.12903225 = coord(4/31)
    
    Date
    9.10.2001 20:15:59
    Language
    e
    Source
    Globalisierung und Wissensorganisation: Neue Aspekte für Wissen, Wissenschaft und Informationssysteme: Proceedings der 6. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Hamburg, 23.-25.9.1999. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly, G. Rahmstorf u. A. Sigel
  12. Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998) 0.00
    0.003620342 = product of:
      0.0374102 = sum of:
        0.017880328 = weight(_text_:20 in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017880328 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.30370468 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
        0.0048889956 = weight(_text_:e in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048889956 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
        0.014640874 = product of:
          0.029281748 = sum of:
            0.029281748 = weight(_text_:29 in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029281748 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07534158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09677419 = coord(3/31)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 23(1998) no.2, S.20-29
  13. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri : methodical considerations (2004) 0.00
    0.0035626742 = product of:
      0.027610725 = sum of:
        0.0069745653 = weight(_text_:und in 4423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069745653 = score(doc=4423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4423)
        0.010728197 = weight(_text_:20 in 4423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010728197 = score(doc=4423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 4423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4423)
        0.0029333972 = weight(_text_:e in 4423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029333972 = score(doc=4423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4423)
        0.0069745653 = weight(_text_:und in 4423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069745653 = score(doc=4423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4423)
      0.12903225 = coord(4/31)
    
    Date
    10. 3.1997 20:31:13
    Language
    e
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  14. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.00
    0.0033496367 = product of:
      0.025959685 = sum of:
        0.008940164 = weight(_text_:20 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008940164 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.15185234 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.0024444978 = weight(_text_:e in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024444978 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.007320437 = product of:
          0.014640874 = sum of:
            0.014640874 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014640874 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07534158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007254585 = product of:
          0.01450917 = sum of:
            0.01450917 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01450917 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07500195 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.12903225 = coord(4/31)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Language
    e
  15. Vasiljev, A.: ¬The law of requisite variety as applied to subject indexing and retrieval (1989) 0.00
    0.003267586 = product of:
      0.033765055 = sum of:
        0.013949131 = weight(_text_:und in 5069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013949131 = score(doc=5069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5069)
        0.0058667944 = weight(_text_:e in 5069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058667944 = score(doc=5069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 5069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5069)
        0.013949131 = weight(_text_:und in 5069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013949131 = score(doc=5069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5069)
      0.09677419 = coord(3/31)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Klassifikation und Ordnung. Tagungsband 12. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Darmstadt 17.-19.3.1988. Hrsg.: R. Wille
  16. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Mingers, J.: Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the Leiden rankings (2019) 0.00
    0.0030473555 = product of:
      0.04723401 = sum of:
        0.0024444978 = weight(_text_:e in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024444978 = score(doc=5225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
        0.04478951 = product of:
          0.08957902 = sum of:
            0.08957902 = weight(_text_:eco in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08957902 = score(doc=5225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18636073 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.48067543 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
    
    Abstract
    The Leiden Rankings can be used for grouping research universities by considering universities which are not statistically significantly different as homogeneous sets. The groups and intergroup relations can be analyzed and visualized using tools from network analysis. Using the so-called "excellence indicator" PPtop-10%-the proportion of the top-10% most-highly-cited papers assigned to a university-we pursue a classification using (a) overlapping stability intervals, (b) statistical-significance tests, and (c) effect sizes of differences among 902 universities in 54 countries; we focus on the UK, Germany, Brazil, and the USA as national examples. Although the groupings remain largely the same using different statistical significance levels or overlapping stability intervals, these classifications are uncorrelated with those based on effect sizes. Effect sizes for the differences between universities are small (w < .2). The more detailed analysis of universities at the country level suggests that distinctions beyond three or perhaps four groups of universities (high, middle, low) may not be meaningful. Given similar institutional incentives, isomorphism within each eco-system of universities should not be underestimated. Our results suggest that networks based on overlapping stability intervals can provide a first impression of the relevant groupings among universities. However, the clusters are not well-defined divisions between groups of universities.
    Language
    e
  17. Kretschmer, H.; Kretschmer, T.: Well-ordered collaboration structures of co-author pairs in journals (2006) 0.00
    0.0030352608 = product of:
      0.023523273 = sum of:
        0.005812138 = weight(_text_:und in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005812138 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
        0.009454499 = weight(_text_:im in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009454499 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060543913 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.15615936 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
        0.0024444978 = weight(_text_:e in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024444978 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
        0.005812138 = weight(_text_:und in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005812138 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
      0.12903225 = coord(4/31)
    
    Language
    e
    Series
    Beiträge zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; 1
    Source
    Vom Wandel der Wissensorganisation im Informationszeitalter: Festschrift für Walther Umstätter zum 65. Geburtstag, hrsg. von P. Hauke u. K. Umlauf
  18. Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009) 0.00
    0.0028962733 = product of:
      0.029928159 = sum of:
        0.014304262 = weight(_text_:20 in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014304262 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.24296375 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
        0.0039111963 = weight(_text_:e in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039111963 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
        0.011712699 = product of:
          0.023425398 = sum of:
            0.023425398 = weight(_text_:29 in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023425398 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07534158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09677419 = coord(3/31)
    
    Date
    4. 2.2010 20:56:29
    Language
    e
  19. Zhang, L.; Thijs, B.; Glänzel, W.: What does scientometrics share with other "metrics" sciences? (2013) 0.00
    0.0028962733 = product of:
      0.029928159 = sum of:
        0.014304262 = weight(_text_:20 in 960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014304262 = score(doc=960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.24296375 = fieldWeight in 960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=960)
        0.0039111963 = weight(_text_:e in 960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039111963 = score(doc=960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=960)
        0.011712699 = product of:
          0.023425398 = sum of:
            0.023425398 = weight(_text_:29 in 960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023425398 = score(doc=960,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07534158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 960, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=960)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09677419 = coord(3/31)
    
    Date
    25. 6.2013 20:29:05
    Language
    e
  20. Ridenour, L.: Practical applications of citation analysis to examine interdisciplinary knowledge (2016) 0.00
    0.0028962733 = product of:
      0.029928159 = sum of:
        0.014304262 = weight(_text_:20 in 4938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014304262 = score(doc=4938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.24296375 = fieldWeight in 4938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4938)
        0.0039111963 = weight(_text_:e in 4938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039111963 = score(doc=4938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02141793 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 4938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4938)
        0.011712699 = product of:
          0.023425398 = sum of:
            0.023425398 = weight(_text_:29 in 4938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023425398 = score(doc=4938,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07534158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02141793 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4938, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4938)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09677419 = coord(3/31)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:26:48
    Language
    e
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

Authors

Types

  • a 1230
  • m 20
  • s 17
  • el 16
  • b 2
  • r 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…