Search (39 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Trivison, D.: Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity (1987) 0.05 
    0.052015435 = product of:
  0.20806174 = sum of:
    0.052015435 = weight(_text_:23 in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052015435 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
    0.052015435 = weight(_text_:23 in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052015435 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
    0.052015435 = weight(_text_:23 in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052015435 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
    0.052015435 = weight(_text_:23 in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052015435 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 23(1987), S.183-194
  2. Sen, B.K.; Pandalai, T.A.; Karanjai, A.: Ranking of scientists - a new approach (1998) 0.03 
    0.026007717 = product of:
  0.10403087 = sum of:
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=5113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=5113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=5113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=5113,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Date
    6. 9.2000 14:23:30
  3. Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.03 
    0.026007717 = product of:
  0.10403087 = sum of:
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:52:23
  4. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.03 
    0.026007717 = product of:
  0.10403087 = sum of:
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:15:23
  5. Vanclay, J.K.: On the robustness of the h-index (2007) 0.03 
    0.026007717 = product of:
  0.10403087 = sum of:
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
    0.026007717 = weight(_text_:23 in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026007717 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Date
    1.11.2007 19:16:23
  6. Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996) 0.02 
    0.022756753 = product of:
  0.091027014 = sum of:
    0.022756753 = weight(_text_:23 in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022756753 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
    0.022756753 = weight(_text_:23 in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022756753 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
    0.022756753 = weight(_text_:23 in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022756753 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
    0.022756753 = weight(_text_:23 in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022756753 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Source
    Towards a worldwide library: a ten year forecast. Proceedings of the 19th International Essen Symposium, 23-26 Sept 1996. Ed.: A.H. Helal u. J.W. Weiss
  7. Trkulja, V.: Weltgrößte Abstracts- und Zitationsdatenbank aus dem wissenschaftlichen Web (2005) 0.02 
    0.022756753 = product of:
  0.091027014 = sum of:
    0.022756753 = weight(_text_:23 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022756753 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
    0.022756753 = weight(_text_:23 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022756753 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
    0.022756753 = weight(_text_:23 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022756753 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
    0.022756753 = weight(_text_:23 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022756753 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Date
    23. 5.2005 11:38:28
  8. MacCain, K.W.: Descriptor and citation retrieval in the medical behavioral sciences literature : retrieval overlaps and novelty distribution (1989) 0.02 
    0.019505788 = product of:
  0.07802315 = sum of:
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    Search results for nine topics in the medical behavioral sciences are reanalyzed to compare the overall perfor-mance of descriptor and citation search strategies in identifying relevant and novel documents. Overlap per- centages between an aggregate "descriptor-based" database (MEDLINE, EXERPTA MEDICA, PSYCINFO) and an aggregate "citation-based" database (SCISEARCH, SOCIAL SCISEARCH) ranged from 1% to 26%, with a median overlap of 8% relevant retrievals found using both search strategies. For seven topics in which both descriptor and citation strategies produced reasonably substantial retrievals, two patterns of search performance and novelty distribution were observed: (1) where descriptor and citation retrieval showed little overlap, novelty retrieval percentages differed by 17-23% between the two strategies; (2) topics with a relatively high percentage retrieval overlap shoed little difference (1-4%) in descriptor and citation novelty retrieval percentages. These results reflect the varying partial congruence of two literature networks and represent two different types of subject relevance
  9. Moed, H.F.; Bruin, R.E.D.; Leeuwen, T.N.V.: New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance : database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995) 0.02 
    0.019505788 = product of:
  0.07802315 = sum of:
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Date
    23. 2.1996 18:31:20
  10. Leydesdorff, L.; Bihui, J.: Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations (2005) 0.02 
    0.019505788 = product of:
  0.07802315 = sum of:
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 4813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=4813,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4813, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4813)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 4813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=4813,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4813, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4813)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 4813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=4813,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4813, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4813)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 4813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=4813,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4813, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4813)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Date
    8. 1.2006 18:53:23
  11. Sidiropoulos, A.; Manolopoulos, Y.: ¬A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries (2005) 0.02 
    0.019505788 = product of:
  0.07802315 = sum of:
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
    0.019505788 = weight(_text_:23 in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019505788 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:40:23
  12. Johnson, B.; Oppenheim, C.: How socially connected are citers to those that they cite? (2007) 0.02 
    0.016254824 = product of:
  0.065019295 = sum of:
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Date
    23.12.2007 14:07:23
  13. Leydesdorff, L.; Moya-Anegón, F.de; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.: Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data : a comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI (2010) 0.02 
    0.016254824 = product of:
  0.065019295 = sum of:
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Date
    31. 5.2010 15:02:23
  14. Safder, I.; Ali, M.; Aljohani, N.R.; Nawaz, R.; Hassan, S.-U.: Neural machine translation for in-text citation classification (2023) 0.02 
    0.016254824 = product of:
  0.065019295 = sum of:
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
    0.016254824 = weight(_text_:23 in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016254824 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Date
    23. 9.2023 14:37:41
  15. Frohlich, C.; Resler, L.: Analysis of publications and citations from a geophysics research institute (2001) 0.01 
    0.013003859 = product of:
  0.052015435 = sum of:
    0.013003859 = weight(_text_:23 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013003859 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
    0.013003859 = weight(_text_:23 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013003859 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
    0.013003859 = weight(_text_:23 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013003859 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
    0.013003859 = weight(_text_:23 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013003859 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08209789 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
  0.25 = coord(4/16)
    Abstract
    We here perform an analysis of all 1128 publications produced by scientists during their employment at the University of Texas Institute for Geophysics, a geophysical research laboratory founded in 1972 that currently employs 23 Ph.D.-level scientists. We thus assess research performance using as bibliometric indicators such statistics as publications per year, citations per paper, and cited half-lives. To characterize the research style of individual scientists and to obtain insight into the origin of certain publication-counting discrepancies, we classified the 1128 publications into four categories that differed significantly with respect to statistics such as lifetime citation rates, fraction of papers never-cited after 10 years, and cited half-life. The categories were: mainstream (prestige journal) publications -32.6 lifetime cit/pap, 2.4% never cited, and 6.9 year half-life; archival (other refereed)-12.0 lifetime cit/pap. 21.5% never cited, and 9.5 years half-life; articles published as proceedings of conferences-5.4 lifetime cit/pap, 26.6% never cited, and 5.4 years half-life; and "other" publications (news articles, book reviews, etc.)-4.2 lifetime cit/pap, 57.1% never cited, and 1.9 years half-life. Because determining cited half-lives is highly similar to a well-studied phenomenon in earthquake seismology, which was familiar to us, we thoroughly evaluate five different methods for determining the cited half-life and discuss the robustness and limitations of the various methods. Unfortunately, even when data are numerous the various methods often obtain very different values for the half-life. Our preferred method determines halflife from the ratio of citations appearing in back-to-back 5-year periods. We also evaluate the reliability of the citation count data used for these kinds of analysis and conclude that citation count data are often imprecise. All observations suggest that reported differences in cited half-lives must be quite large to be significant
  16. Wildner, B.: Web of Science - Scopus : Auf der Suche nach Zitierungen (2006) 0.00 
    0.003915504 = product of:
  0.031324033 = sum of:
    0.027186032 = weight(_text_:weitere in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027186032 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11870494 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.22902192 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
    0.0041380003 = product of:
      0.012414001 = sum of:
        0.012414001 = weight(_text_:22 in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012414001 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08021429 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.022906395 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Evaluation ist an der Medizinischen Universität Wien ein wichtiges Thema. So werden die Ressourcen innerhalb der Universität entsprechend der in den Leistungskriterien definierten Bewertungsmethode verteilt, deren Grundlage ein für jeden Fachbereich eigens berechneter normierter Impact Factor darstellt. Wissenschaftliche Leistung kann aber auch auf andere Art gemessen werden. Innerhalb einer Universitätsklinik oder Forschungsgruppe werden die Publikationen der wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeiter mittels Zitierungsanalyse bewertet. Für eine Bewerbung auf bestimmte Stellen müssen die einzelnen Wissenschaftler jeweils aktuelle Zitierungsanalysen vorlegen. Seit 2005 stellt die Universitätsbibliothek der Medizinischen Universität Wien am Campus die Datenbank Scopus zur Verfügung. Dabei handelt es sich nicht nur um eine weitere naturwissenschaftliche Literaturdatenbank, sondern um ein Konkurrenzprodukt zum Web of Science, dessen Schwerpunkt in der Suche der Referenzfelder liegt und so die Beantwortung der Fragestellung, wie oft eine wissenschaftliche Publikation zitiert wird, ermöglicht. Im seltenen Idealfall liegt eine vollständige Publikationsliste vor, von der ausgehend man eine Zitierungsanalyse starten kann. Meist aber besteht der Wunsch, nur anhand eines Autorennamens und dem Wissen, in welchem Fachgebiet jemand wissenschaftlich tätig ist, rasch die Suche nach Zitierungen zu beginnen. Im Web of Science führt der Weg über eine Cited Reference Search zu einem Cited Reference Index, aus dem man die Zitierzahlen (Times Cited) zu den einzelnen Publikationen eines Autors entnehmen kann. Als Cited Author scheinen neben dem Erstautor auch alle Mitautoren auf, vorausgesetzt die Zitierung bezieht sich auf eine Publikation, die als Source Item im Web of Science in dem Zeitraum erscheint, der für die Institution subskribiert wurde. Abschließend müssen die einzelnen Zitierzahlen eigenhändig addiert werden und ergeben so die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen für einen bestimmten Autor. In Scopus wird nach einer Autorensuche ein Document Citation Overview geboten, der die Publikationen nach Erscheinungsjahr gereiht auflistet und gleichzeitig in einer Übersichtstabelle die Zitierzahlen pro Publikation und Jahr sowie die jeweiligen Gesamtzahlen angibt.
    Date
    4. 6.2006 17:22:15
  17. Schneider, K.: Scopus contra ISI-WOS : Versuch einer vergleichenden Bewertung aus pharmakognostischer Sicht (2006) 0.00 
    0.0025486907 = product of:
  0.04077905 = sum of:
    0.04077905 = weight(_text_:weitere in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04077905 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11870494 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.3435329 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Bei der vorliegenden Präsentation handelt es sich ausdrücklich um keine umfassende statistisch-bibliometrische Vergleichsanalyse der beiden Datenbanken, sondern um die Darstellung einiger subjektiv ausgewählter, punktueller, jedoch durchaus praxisnaher Suchanfragen (Zeitraum: 23.11. - 06.12.2005). Es wurde dazu nach in Fachzeitschriften publizierten, persönlich bekannten Arbeiten österreichischer Autoren mit vorwiegend "selteneren" deutschsprachigen Namen bzw. Doppelnamen (Wolfgang Wlach, Johannes Saukel, Ulrike Kastner, Karin Zitterl-Eglseer und Roswitha SchrutkaRechtenstamm) gesucht, die am Department für Pharmakognosie / Fakultät für Lebenswissenschaften / Universität Wien wissenschaftlich arbeiten bzw. gearbeitet haben. Weitere Suchanfragen galten (aus der Mitarbeit an Hagers Handbuch der Pharmazeutischen Praxis) persönlich bekannten Arbeiten über in der Phytotherapie, Homöopathie oder Volksheilkunde genutzte Pflanzen (Adlumia, Alchornea cordifolia, Siderits scardica). Zur vergleichenden Bewertung wurden die absolute Anzahl der "relevanten, gesuchten Treffer", die Anzahl der "Dubletten-Treffer" in beiden Datenbanken sowie die in der jeweiligen Datenbank "exklusiven Treffer" tabellarisch zusammen mit eigenen Anmerkungen angeführt.
  18. Stock, W.G.: Publikation und Zitat : Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung (2001) 0.00 
    0.0021239088 = product of:
  0.03398254 = sum of:
    0.03398254 = weight(_text_:weitere in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03398254 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11870494 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.2862774 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Die empirische Wissenschaftsforschung arbeitet bei den Indikatoren wissenschaftlicher Leistung und wissenschaftlicher Wirkung mit Publikations- und Zitationsraten. Die vorliegende Arbeit befaßt sich mit dabei auftretenden methodischen Problemen. Was ist überhaupt eine Publikation? Was heißt Zitation? Zentral ist auch die Zählbasis, d.h. die Einheitenbildung: Was ist 1 Publikation? und: Was ist 1 Zitation? Bei Printpublikationen gibt es eine Reihe von beachtenswerten Faktoren (u.a. Mehrautorenwerke, Gewichtungsfaktoren wie den Impact Factor, Dokumenttypen). Bei elektronischen Publikationen im Internet mit ihrem dynamischen Charakter ist die Einheitenbildung noch weitaus problematischer. Zitationen, verstanden als zitierte Publikationen, werfen alle methodischen Probleme der Publikationseinheiten auf, hinzu kommen weitere, spezifische Probleme. Lösungsmöglichkeiten im syntaktischen Bereich (Relativierung auf Textseiten oder Zeichen) ändern am grundlegenden Problem nur wenig, Lösungsversuche im semantischen Bereich (etwa im Rahmen der semantischen Informationstheorie) sind im Rahmen der Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen nicht durchführbar und verweisen sowohl auf themenanalytische Methoden als auch auf die Wissenschaftstheorie. Mit diesem Working Paper wollen wir vor allem auf offene Probleme hinweisen; "endgültige" Lösungen wird der Leser nicht finden, wohl aber Lösungsvorschläge, die meist durchaus noch diskussionswürdig sind. In der Informationswissenschaft wie in der Wissenschaftsforschung sind wir bisher viel zu sicher davon ausgegangen, daß wir wissen, was Publikationen und Zitationen sind
  19. Czepel, R.: ¬Die Geographie der wissenschaftlichen Zitierung (2003) 0.00 
    0.001699127 = product of:
  0.027186032 = sum of:
    0.027186032 = weight(_text_:weitere in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027186032 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11870494 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.22902192 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Ein britischer Forscher hat sich die Mühe gemacht, die geografischen Muster der Zitierungen von 1981 bis zur Gegenwart freizulegen. Das Ergebnis: Die publizistische Wahrnehmung ist in der Wissenschaft äußerst ungleich verteilt. Die USA dominieren mit großem Abstand vor dem Rest der WeIt. Und auch dort konzentrieren sich die Verweise auf einige wenige Ballungsräume der Forschung. Michael Batty vom Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis in London bediente sich für seine Analyse der Datenbank "ISIHighlyCited.com" (http: //www.isihighlycited.com/), in der Forscher aus verschiedenen Disziplinen aufgelistet werden, die die weltweit meisten Zitate auf sich gezogen haben. In diesen Ranglisten nehmen die akademischen Edelschmieden aus den USA etwa jene Rolle ein, die Österreichische Athleten im Alpinschisport besetzen. Einzig der Forschungsraum London kann mit der Konkurrenz aus Übersee halbwegs mithalten. Der Artikel "Citation Geography: It's About Location" von Michael Batty erschien im Magazin "The Scientist" (Band 17, Heft 16/10, Ausgabe vom 25.8.03; http://www.thescientist.com/yr2003/aug/opinion 030825.html). Die Zeitschrift ist nach individueller Registrierung frei zugänglich. Der Homepage des Autors http: //www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/citations/ können weitere Details entnommen werden. Ob die Anzahl derZitate auch etwas über die wissenschaftliche Qualität aussagt, ist genau so Gegenstand von Diskussionen, wie dies etwa bei den "Impact-Faktoren" von Journalen der Fall ist (vgl. "Kann wissenschaftliche Qualität gemessen werden?", http://science.orf.at/science/news/58648). Ganz wertfrei kann man die ISI-Daten jedenfalls dazu verwenden, um herauszufinden, in welchem Land, in welcher Stadt und in welcher Institution die meist zitierten Forscher dieses Erdballs sitzen. Das Ergebnis dieser von Michael Batty erstellten "Geografie derwissenschaftlichen Zitierung" ist eindeutig: Einige Wenige ziehen den Großteil der publizistischen Aufmerksamkeit auf sich - und lassen für den Rest nur wenig über. Diese Aussage gilt gleichermaßen für Ranglisten von Städten, Institutionen und Ländern. Und: In allen drei Fällen kommen die Spitzereiter aus dem US-amerikanischen Raum.
  20. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.00 
    0.001699127 = product of:
  0.027186032 = sum of:
    0.027186032 = weight(_text_:weitere in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027186032 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11870494 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.022906395 = queryNorm
        0.22902192 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 30
  • d 9

Types

  • a 37
  • el 3
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications