Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Thelwall, M."
  1. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.05
    0.046100467 = product of:
      0.15366822 = sum of:
        0.016267197 = weight(_text_:und in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016267197 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04794192 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.016267197 = weight(_text_:und in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016267197 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04794192 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.026982948 = weight(_text_:der in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026982948 = score(doc=77,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.04831829 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.5584417 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.016267197 = weight(_text_:und in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016267197 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04794192 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.016267197 = weight(_text_:und in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016267197 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04794192 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.015277584 = weight(_text_:im in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015277584 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06114581 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.016267197 = weight(_text_:und in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016267197 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04794192 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.018348975 = weight(_text_:21 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018348975 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
        0.0117227305 = product of:
          0.023445461 = sum of:
            0.023445461 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023445461 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07574758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021630857 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3 = coord(9/30)
    
    Abstract
    Die Webometrie ist ein Teilbereich der Informationswissenschaft der zur Zeit auf die Analyse von Linkstrukturen konzentriert ist. Er ist stark von der Zitationsanalyse geprägt, wie der empirische Schwerpunkt auf der Wissenschaftsanalyse zeigt. In diesem Beitrag diskutieren wir die Nutzung linkbasierter Maße in einem breiten informetrischen Kontext und bewerten verschiedene Verfahren, auch im Hinblick auf ihr generelles Potentialfür die Sozialwissenschaften. Dabei wird auch ein allgemeiner Rahmenfür Linkanalysen mit den erforderlichen Arbeitsschritten vorgestellt. Abschließend werden vielversprechende zukünftige Anwendungsfelder der Webometrie benannt, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Analyse von Blogs.
    Date
    21. 2.1997 19:37:24
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.401-406
  2. Thelwall, M.; Wilkinson, D.; Uppal, S.: Data mining emotion in social network communication : gender differences in MySpace (2009) 0.00
    0.0016397723 = product of:
      0.024596583 = sum of:
        0.010834851 = weight(_text_:20 in 3322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010834851 = score(doc=3322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 3322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3322)
        0.013761732 = weight(_text_:21 in 3322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013761732 = score(doc=3322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 3322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3322)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Despite the rapid growth in social network sites and in data mining for emotion (sentiment analysis), little research has tied the two together, and none has had social science goals. This article examines the extent to which emotion is present in MySpace comments, using a combination of data mining and content analysis, and exploring age and gender. A random sample of 819 public comments to or from U.S. users was manually classified for strength of positive and negative emotion. Two thirds of the comments expressed positive emotion, but a minority (20%) contained negative emotion, confirming that MySpace is an extraordinarily emotion-rich environment. Females are likely to give and receive more positive comments than are males, but there is no difference for negative comments. It is thus possible that females are more successful social network site users partly because of their greater ability to textually harness positive affect.
    Date
    4. 2.2010 21:03:41
  3. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.00
    0.0010903834 = product of:
      0.01635575 = sum of:
        0.009029042 = weight(_text_:20 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009029042 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.15185234 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
        0.007326707 = product of:
          0.014653414 = sum of:
            0.014653414 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014653414 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07574758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021630857 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  4. Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017) 0.00
    0.0010903834 = product of:
      0.01635575 = sum of:
        0.009029042 = weight(_text_:20 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009029042 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.15185234 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
        0.007326707 = product of:
          0.014653414 = sum of:
            0.014653414 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014653414 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07574758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021630857 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  5. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.00
    0.0010903834 = product of:
      0.01635575 = sum of:
        0.009029042 = weight(_text_:20 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009029042 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.15185234 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.007326707 = product of:
          0.014653414 = sum of:
            0.014653414 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014653414 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07574758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021630857 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.00
    0.0010903834 = product of:
      0.01635575 = sum of:
        0.009029042 = weight(_text_:20 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009029042 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.15185234 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
        0.007326707 = product of:
          0.014653414 = sum of:
            0.014653414 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014653414 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07574758 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021630857 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Collaboration is encouraged because it is believed to improve academic research, supported by indirect evidence in the form of more coauthored articles being more cited. Nevertheless, this might not reflect quality but increased self-citations or the "audience effect": citations from increased awareness through multiple author networks. We address this with the first science wide investigation into whether author numbers associate with journal article quality, using expert peer quality judgments for 122,331 articles from the 2014-20 UK national assessment. Spearman correlations between author numbers and quality scores show moderately strong positive associations (0.2-0.4) in the health, life, and physical sciences, but weak or no positive associations in engineering and social sciences, with weak negative/positive or no associations in various arts and humanities, and a possible negative association for decision sciences. This gives the first systematic evidence that greater numbers of authors associates with higher quality journal articles in the majority of academia outside the arts and humanities, at least for the UK. Positive associations between team size and citation counts in areas with little association between team size and quality also show that audience effects or other nonquality factors account for the higher citation rates of coauthored articles in some fields.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:11:50
  7. Thelwall, M.: Social networks, gender, and friending : an analysis of MySpace member profiles (2008) 0.00
    5.406119E-4 = product of:
      0.016218357 = sum of:
        0.016218357 = weight(_text_:21 in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016218357 = score(doc=1883,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.24202576 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Abstract
    In 2007, the social networking Web site MySpace apparently overthrew Google as the most visited Web site for U.S. Web users. If this heralds a new era of widespread online social networking, then it is important to investigate user behaviour and attributes. Although there has been some research into social networking already, basic demographic data is essential to set previous results in a wider context and to give insights to researchers, marketers and developers. In this article, the demographics of MySpace members are explored through data extracted from two samples of 15,043 and 7,627 member profiles. The median declared age of users was surprisingly high at 21, with a small majority of females. The analysis confirmed some previously reported findings and conjectures about social networking, for example, that female members tend to be more interested in friendship and males more interested in dating. In addition, there was some evidence of three different friending dynamics, oriented towards close friends, acquaintances, or strangers. Perhaps unsurprisingly, female and younger members had more friends than others, and females were more likely to maintain private profiles, but both males and females seemed to prefer female friends, with this tendency more marked in females for their closest friend. The typical MySpace user is apparently female, 21, single, with a public profile, interested in online friendship and logging on weekly to engage with a mixed list of mainly female friends who are predominantly acquaintances.
  8. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: New versions of PageRank employing alternative Web document models (2004) 0.00
    5.1075977E-4 = product of:
      0.015322792 = sum of:
        0.015322792 = weight(_text_:20 in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015322792 = score(doc=674,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.25770196 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    12. 3.2001 11:34:20
    20. 1.2007 18:32:28
  9. Thelwall, M.: Web impact factors and search engine coverage (2000) 0.00
    4.8154892E-4 = product of:
      0.014446467 = sum of:
        0.014446467 = weight(_text_:20 in 4539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014446467 = score(doc=4539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.24296375 = fieldWeight in 4539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4539)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    10. 3.1997 20:31:13
  10. Thelwall, M.: Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles : an analysis of 45 fields (2016) 0.00
    4.5872442E-4 = product of:
      0.013761732 = sum of:
        0.013761732 = weight(_text_:21 in 3055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013761732 = score(doc=3055,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 3055, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3055)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    21. 7.2016 10:14:41
  11. Thelwall, M.; Binns, R.; Harries, G.; Page-Kennedy, T.; Price, L.; Wilkinson, D.: Custom interfaces for advanced queries in search engines (2001) 0.00
    4.2563316E-4 = product of:
      0.012768994 = sum of:
        0.012768994 = weight(_text_:20 in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012768994 = score(doc=697,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.21475165 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    12. 3.2001 11:34:20
    20. 1.2007 19:24:48
  12. Thelwall, M.: Bibliometrics to webometrics (2009) 0.00
    4.213553E-4 = product of:
      0.012640659 = sum of:
        0.012640659 = weight(_text_:20 in 4239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012640659 = score(doc=4239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 4239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4239)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    20. 8.2009 14:17:42
  13. Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: ¬A modelling approach to uncover hyperlink patterns : the case of Canadian universities (2005) 0.00
    4.213553E-4 = product of:
      0.012640659 = sum of:
        0.012640659 = weight(_text_:20 in 1014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012640659 = score(doc=1014,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059459355 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 1014, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1014)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 20:17:31
  14. Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Scholarly use of the Web : what are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? (2003) 0.00
    3.8227034E-4 = product of:
      0.01146811 = sum of:
        0.01146811 = weight(_text_:21 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01146811 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2003 14:51:27
  15. Thelwall, M.; Harries, G.: Do the Web Sites of Higher Rated Scholars Have Significantly More Online Impact? (2004) 0.00
    3.8227034E-4 = product of:
      0.01146811 = sum of:
        0.01146811 = weight(_text_:21 in 2123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01146811 = score(doc=2123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 2123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2123)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2004 16:53:21
  16. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: ¬The role of online videos in research communication : a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications (2012) 0.00
    3.8227034E-4 = product of:
      0.01146811 = sum of:
        0.01146811 = weight(_text_:21 in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01146811 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2012 14:21:19
  17. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Disseminating research with web CV hyperlinks (2014) 0.00
    3.8227034E-4 = product of:
      0.01146811 = sum of:
        0.01146811 = weight(_text_:21 in 1331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01146811 = score(doc=1331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 1331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1331)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Abstract
    Some curricula vitae (web CVs) of academics on the web, including homepages and publication lists, link to open-access (OA) articles, resources, abstracts in publishers' websites, or academic discussions, helping to disseminate research. To assess how common such practices are and whether they vary by discipline, gender, and country, the authors conducted a large-scale e-mail survey of astronomy and astrophysics, public health, environmental engineering, and philosophy across 15 European countries and analyzed hyperlinks from web CVs of academics. About 60% of the 2,154 survey responses reported having a web CV or something similar, and there were differences between disciplines, genders, and countries. A follow-up outlink analysis of 2,700 web CVs found that a third had at least one outlink to an OA target, typically a public eprint archive or an individual self-archived file. This proportion was considerably higher in astronomy (48%) and philosophy (37%) than in environmental engineering (29%) and public health (21%). There were also differences in linking to publishers' websites, resources, and discussions. Perhaps most important, however, the amount of linking to OA publications seems to be much lower than allowed by publishers and journals, suggesting that many opportunities for disseminating full-text research online are being missed, especially in disciplines without established repositories. Moreover, few academics seem to be exploiting their CVs to link to discussions, resources, or article abstracts, which seems to be another missed opportunity for publicizing research.
  18. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books (2015) 0.00
    3.8227034E-4 = product of:
      0.01146811 = sum of:
        0.01146811 = weight(_text_:21 in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01146811 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    21. 1.2015 14:52:30
  19. Mohammadi, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? : a survey of user motivations (2016) 0.00
    3.8227034E-4 = product of:
      0.01146811 = sum of:
        0.01146811 = weight(_text_:21 in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01146811 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2016 12:52:40
  20. Thelwall, M.; Wilson, P.: Does research with statistics have more impact? : the citation rank advantage of structural equation modeling (2016) 0.00
    3.8227034E-4 = product of:
      0.01146811 = sum of:
        0.01146811 = weight(_text_:21 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01146811 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06701087 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021630857 = queryNorm
            0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2016 16:17:44