-
Hjoerland, B.: Theory and metatheory of information science : a new interpretation (1998)
0.02
0.016407289 = product of:
0.085317895 = sum of:
0.018297164 = weight(_text_:23 in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018297164 = score(doc=4723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
0.018297164 = weight(_text_:23 in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018297164 = score(doc=4723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
0.018297164 = weight(_text_:23 in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018297164 = score(doc=4723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
0.018297164 = weight(_text_:23 in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018297164 = score(doc=4723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
0.012129237 = weight(_text_:5 in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012129237 = score(doc=4723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
0.1923077 = coord(5/26)
- Date
- 6. 9.2000 14:23:30
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 54(1998) no.5, S.606-621
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.01
0.011525789 = product of:
0.059934102 = sum of:
0.0139941545 = weight(_text_:und in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0139941545 = score(doc=3494,freq=8.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.0139941545 = weight(_text_:und in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0139941545 = score(doc=3494,freq=8.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.0139941545 = weight(_text_:und in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0139941545 = score(doc=3494,freq=8.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.012129237 = weight(_text_:5 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012129237 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.0058224006 = product of:
0.0174672 = sum of:
0.0174672 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0174672 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06449488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1923077 = coord(5/26)
- Date
- 5. 6.2017 11:03:15
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Hjoerland, B.: Epistemology and the socio-cognitive persepctive in information science (2002)
0.01
0.009651251 = product of:
0.06273313 = sum of:
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
0.15384616 = coord(4/26)
- Date
- 23. 3.2002 9:38:24
-
Hjoerland, B.: Concepts, paradigms and knowledge organization (2010)
0.01
0.009651251 = product of:
0.06273313 = sum of:
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 3512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=3512,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3512, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3512)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 3512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=3512,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3512, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3512)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 3512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=3512,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3512, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3512)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 3512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=3512,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3512, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3512)
0.15384616 = coord(4/26)
- Source
- Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The importance of theories of knowledge : browsing as an example (2011)
0.01
0.00804271 = product of:
0.05227761 = sum of:
0.013069402 = weight(_text_:23 in 4774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013069402 = score(doc=4774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4774)
0.013069402 = weight(_text_:23 in 4774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013069402 = score(doc=4774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4774)
0.013069402 = weight(_text_:23 in 4774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013069402 = score(doc=4774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4774)
0.013069402 = weight(_text_:23 in 4774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013069402 = score(doc=4774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4774)
0.15384616 = coord(4/26)
- Date
- 3.10.2011 19:38:23
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theory of information science : Reply to Professor Gernot Wersig (1998)
0.01
0.0077771856 = product of:
0.050551705 = sum of:
0.01199499 = weight(_text_:und in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01199499 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
0.01199499 = weight(_text_:und in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01199499 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
0.014566738 = weight(_text_:die in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014566738 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3238241 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
0.01199499 = weight(_text_:und in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01199499 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
0.15384616 = coord(4/26)
- Abstract
- Erwiderung auf die Rezension des gleichbetitelten Buches des Autors durch G. Wersig in nfd 49(1998) H.1
- Source
- nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.2, S.122-126
-
Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory (2009)
0.01
0.0057167215 = product of:
0.029726952 = sum of:
0.0049979123 = weight(_text_:und in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049979123 = score(doc=3461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
0.0049979123 = weight(_text_:und in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049979123 = score(doc=3461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
0.006069474 = weight(_text_:die in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006069474 = score(doc=3461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.1349267 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
0.0049979123 = weight(_text_:und in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049979123 = score(doc=3461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
0.00866374 = weight(_text_:5 in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00866374 = score(doc=3461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
0.1923077 = coord(5/26)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S. 1076-1077 und die Erwiderung darauf von B. Hjoerland (S.1078-1080)
-
Hjoerland, B.; Scerri, E.; Dupré, J.: Forum: The Philosophy of Classification : The Periodic Table and the Philosophy of Classification - What is the Nature of the Periodic Table as a Classification System? - A Note on the Debate Between Hjørland and Scerri on the Significance of the Periodic Table (2011)
0.00
0.0038885928 = product of:
0.025275853 = sum of:
0.005997495 = weight(_text_:und in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005997495 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
0.005997495 = weight(_text_:und in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005997495 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
0.007283369 = weight(_text_:die in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007283369 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.16191205 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
0.005997495 = weight(_text_:und in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005997495 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
0.15384616 = coord(4/26)
- Abstract
- Thanks to Professor Eric Scerri for engaging in debate in this journal (Scerri 2011) by replying to my review (Hjørland 2008a) of his book (Scerri 2007). One of my points has been that we in our community (Knowledge Organization, KO / Library and Information Science, LIS) have been too isolated from broader academic fields related to classification and the organization of knowledge. The present debate is a step towards reversing this situation. Bezug zu: Scerri, E.R.: The periodic table: its story and its significance. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007. xxii, 346 S. und die Rezension dazu in: KO 35(2008) no.4, S.251-254 (B. Hjoerland).
-
Hjoerland, B.: Information: objective or subjective/situational? (2007)
0.00
0.002076056 = product of:
0.017992485 = sum of:
0.005997495 = weight(_text_:und in 5074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005997495 = score(doc=5074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5074)
0.005997495 = weight(_text_:und in 5074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005997495 = score(doc=5074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5074)
0.005997495 = weight(_text_:und in 5074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005997495 = score(doc=5074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5074)
0.115384616 = coord(3/26)
- Content
- Bezugnahme auf: Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2006), no.8, S.1033-1045 und Bates, M.J.: Information and knowledge: an evolutionary framework for information science. In: Information research, 10(2005) no.4.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Are relations in thesauri "context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds"? (2015)
0.00
0.0017300466 = product of:
0.0149937365 = sum of:
0.0049979123 = weight(_text_:und in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049979123 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
0.0049979123 = weight(_text_:und in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049979123 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
0.0049979123 = weight(_text_:und in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049979123 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
0.115384616 = coord(3/26)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Hjoerland, B.: Does the traditional thesaurus have a place in modern information retrieval? (2016)
0.00
0.0017300466 = product of:
0.0149937365 = sum of:
0.0049979123 = weight(_text_:und in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049979123 = score(doc=2915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
0.0049979123 = weight(_text_:und in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049979123 = score(doc=2915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
0.0049979123 = weight(_text_:und in 2915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049979123 = score(doc=2915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2915)
0.115384616 = coord(3/26)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The special competency of information specialists (2002)
0.00
0.0013660653 = product of:
0.017758848 = sum of:
0.012560604 = weight(_text_:art in 1265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012560604 = score(doc=1265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08354246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.15034994 = fieldWeight in 1265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1265)
0.0051982445 = weight(_text_:5 in 1265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0051982445 = score(doc=1265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.096722245 = fieldWeight in 1265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1265)
0.07692308 = coord(2/26)
- Content
- "In a new article published in Journal of Documentation, 2002, I claim that the special competency of information specialists and information scientists are related to "domain analysis." Information science grew out of special librarianship and documentation (cf. Williams, 1997), and implicit in its tradition has in my opinion been a focus an subject knowledge. Although domain analysis has earlier been introduced in JASIST (Hjoerland & Albrechtsen, 1995), the new article introduces 11 Specific approaches to domain analysis, which I Claim together define the Specific competencies of information specialists. The approaches are (I) Producing and evaluating literature guides and subject gateways, (2) Producing and evaluating special classifications and thesauri, (3) Research an and competencies in indexing and retrieving information specialties, (4) Knowledge about empirical user studies in subject areas, (5) Producing and interpreting bibliometrical studies, (6) Historical studies of information structures and Services in domains, (7) Studies of documents and genres in knowledge domains, (8) Epistemological and critical studies of different paradigms, assumptions, and interests in domains, (9) Knowledge about terminological studies, LSP (Languages for Special Purposes), and discourse analysis in knowledge fields, (10) Knowledge about and studies of structures and institutions in scientific and professional communication in a domain, (11) Knowledge about methods and results from domain analytic studies about professional cognition, knowledge representation in computer science and artificial intelligence. By bringing these approaches together, the paper advocates a view which may have been implicit in previous literature but which has not before been Set out systematically. The approaches presented here are neither exhaustive nor mutually exhaustve, but an attempt is made to present the state of the art. Specific examples and selective reviews of literature are provided, and the strength and drawback of each of these approaches are being discussed. It is my Claim that the information specialist who has worked with these 1 1 approaches in a given domain (e.g., music, sociology, or chemistry) has a special expertise that should not be mixed up with the kind of expertise taught at universities in corresponding subjects. Some of these 11 approaches are today well-known in schools of LIS. Bibliometrics is an example, Other approaches are new and represent a view of what should be introduced in the training of information professionals. First and foremost does the article advocates the view that these 1 1 approaches should be seen as supplementary. That the Professional identity is best maintained if Chose methods are applied to the same examples (same domain). Somebody would perhaps feel that this would make the education of information professionals too narrow. The Counter argument is that you can only understand and use these methods properly in a new domain, if you already have a deep knowledge of the Specific information problems in at least orte domain. It is a dangerous illusion to believe that one becomes more competent to work in any field if orte does not know anything about any domain. The special challenge in our science is to provide general background for use in Specific fields. This is what domain analysis is developed for. Study programs that allow the students to specialize and to work independent in the selected field (such as, for example, the Curriculum at the Royal School of LIS in Denmark) should fit well with the intentions in domain analysis. In this connection it should be emphasized that the 11 approaches are presented as general approaches that may be used in about any domain whatsoever. They should, however, be seen in connection. If this is not the case, then their relative strengths and weaknesses cannot be evaluated. The approaches do not have the same status. Some (e.g., empirical user studies) are dependent an others (e.g., epistemological studies).
-
Hjoerland, B.: Domain analysis (2017)
0.00
0.0012882671 = product of:
0.033494942 = sum of:
0.033494942 = weight(_text_:art in 3852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033494942 = score(doc=3852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08354246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.40093318 = fieldWeight in 3852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3852)
0.03846154 = coord(1/26)
- Abstract
- The domain-analytic approach to knowledge organization (KO) (and to the broader field of library and information science, LIS) is outlined. The article reviews the discussions and proposals on the definition of domains, and provides an example of a domain-analytic study in the field of art studies. Varieties of domain analysis as well as criticism and controversies are presented and discussed.
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The methodology of constructing classification schemes : a discussion of the state-of-the-art (2003)
0.00
9.109424E-4 = product of:
0.023684502 = sum of:
0.023684502 = weight(_text_:art in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023684502 = score(doc=2760,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08354246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.28350258 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
0.03846154 = coord(1/26)
- Abstract
- Special classifications have been somewhat neglected in KO compared to general classifications. The methodology of constructing special classifications is important, however, also for the methodology of constructing general classification schemes. The methodology of constructing special classifications can be regarded as one among about a dozen approaches to domain analysis. The methodology of (special) classification in LIS has been dominated by the rationalistic facet-analytic tradition, which, however, neglects the question of the empirical basis of classification. The empirical basis is much better grasped by, for example, bibliometric methods. Even the combination of rational and empirical methods is insufficient. This presentation will provide evidence for the necessity of historical and pragmatic methods for the methodology of classification and will point to the necessity of analyzing "paradigms". The presentation covers the methods of constructing classifications from Ranganathan to the design of ontologies in computer science and further to the recent "paradigm shift" in classification research. 1. Introduction Classification of a subject field is one among about eleven approaches to analyzing a domain that are specific for information science and in my opinion define the special competencies of information specialists (Hjoerland, 2002a). Classification and knowledge organization are commonly regarded as core qualifications of librarians and information specialists. Seen from this perspective one expects a firm methodological basis for the field. This paper tries to explore the state-of-the-art conceming the methodology of classification. 2. Classification: Science or non-science? As it is part of the curriculum at universities and subject in scientific journals and conferences like ISKO, orte expects classification/knowledge organization to be a scientific or scholarly activity and a scientific field. However, very often when information specialists classify or index documents and when they revise classification system, the methods seem to be rather ad hoc. Research libraries or scientific databases may employ people with adequate subject knowledge. When information scientists construct or evaluate systems, they very often elicit the knowledge from "experts" (Hjorland, 2002b, p. 260). Mostly no specific arguments are provided for the specific decisions in these processes.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Answer to Professor Szostak (concept theory) (2010)
0.00
7.539925E-4 = product of:
0.019603806 = sum of:
0.019603806 = weight(_text_:5 in 3323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019603806 = score(doc=3323,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.36476243 = fieldWeight in 3323, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3323)
0.03846154 = coord(1/26)
- Footnote
- Erwiderung zu: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S.1076-1077.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S.1078-1080
-
Hjoerland, B.; Hartel, J.: Introduction to a Special Issue of Knowledge Organization (2003)
0.00
6.9729507E-4 = product of:
0.018129671 = sum of:
0.018129671 = weight(_text_:art in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018129671 = score(doc=3013,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08354246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.21701145 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
0.03846154 = coord(1/26)
- Abstract
- It is with very great pleasure that we introduce this special issue of Knowledge Organization on Domain Analysis (DA). Domain analysis is an approach to information science (IS) that emphasizes the social, historical, and cultural dimensions of information. It asserts that collective fields of knowledge, or "domains," form the unit of analysis of information science (IS). DA, elsewhere referred to as a sociocognitive (Hjoerland, 2002b; Jacob & Shaw, 1998) or collectivist (Talja et al, 2004) approach, is one of the major metatheoretical perspectives available to IS scholars to orient their thinking and research. DA's focus an domains stands in contrast to the alternative metatheories of cognitivism and information systems, which direct attention to psychological processes and technological processes, respectively. The first comprehensive international formulation of DA as an explicit point of view was Hjoerland and Albrechtsen (1995). However, a concern for information in the context of a community can be traced back to American library historian and visionary Jesse Shera, and is visible a century ago in the earliest practices of special librarians and European documentalists. More recently, Hjoerland (1998) produced a domain analytic study of the field of psychology; Jacob and Shaw (1998) made an important interpretation and historical review of DA; while Hjoerland (2002a) offered a seminal formulation of eleven approaches to the study of domains, receiving the ASLIB 2003 Award. Fjordback Soendergaard; Andersen and Hjoerland (2003) suggested an approach based an an updated version of the UNISIST-model of scientific communication. In fall 2003, under the conference theme of "Humanizing Information Technology" DA was featured in a keynote address at the annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Hjorland, 2004). These publications and events are evidence of growth in representation of the DA view. To date, informal criticism of domain analysis has followed two tracks. Firstly, that DA assumes its communities to be academic in nature, leaving much of human experience unexplored. Secondly, that there is a lack of case studies illustrating the methods of domain analytic empirical research. Importantly, this special collection marks progress by addressing both issues. In the articles that follow, domains are perceived to be hobbies, professions, and realms of popular culture. Further, other papers serve as models of different ways to execute domain analytic scholarship, whether through traditional empirical methods, or historical and philosophical techniques. Eleven authors have contributed to this special issue, and their backgrounds reflect the diversity of interest in DA. Contributors come from North America, Europe, and the Middle East. Academics from leading research universities are represented. One writer is newly retired, several are in their heyday as scholars, and some are doctoral students just entering this field. This range of perspectives enriches the collection. The first two papers in this issue are invited papers and are, in our opinion, very important. Anders Oerom was a senior lecturer at the Royal Scbool of 'Library and Information Science in Denmark, Aalborg Branch. He retired from this position an March 1, 2004, and this paper is his last contribution in this position. We are grateful that he took the time to complete "Knowledge Organization in the Domain of Art Studies - History, Transition and Conceptual Changes" in spite of many other duties. Versions of the paper have previously been presented at a Ph.D-course in knowledge organization and related versions have been published in Danish and Spanish. In many respects, it represents a model of how a domain could, or should, be investigated from the DA point of view.
It uncovers the main theoretical influences that have affected the representation of art in systems of knowledge organization such as LCC, DDC, UDC and the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, and it provides a deep basis for evaluating such systems. Knut Tore Abrahamsen's "Indexing of Musical Genres. An Epistemological Perspective" is a modified version of a thesis written at the Royal School of Library and Information Science in Copenhagen. As a thesis it is a major achievement which successfully combines knowledge of music, epistemology, and knowledge organization. This paper may also be seen as an example of how domains can be analyzed and how knowledge organization may be improved in practice. We would like to thank Sanna Talja of the University of Tampere, among other people, for Input an this piece. And now to the rest of the issue: Olof Sundin's "Towards an Understanding of Symbolic Aspects of Professional Information: an Analysis of the Nursing Knowledge Domain" contributes to DA by introducing a deeper understanding of the notion of professions and by uncovering how in some domains, "symbolic" functions of information may be more important than instrumental functions. Rich Gazan's: "Metadata as a Realm of Translation: Merging Knowledge Domains in the Design of an Environmental Information System" demonstrates the problems of merging data collections in interdisciplinary fields, rohen the perceived informational value of different access points varies with disciplinary membership. This is important for the design of systems of metadata. Joe Tennis': "Two Axes of Domains for Domain Analysis" suggests that the notion of domain is underdeveloped in DA. Tennis states, "Hjoerland has provided a hammer, but rohere are the nails?" In addition he raises a question concerning the degree of specialization within a domain. He resolves these issues by proposing two new "axes" to DA. Chaim Zins & David Guttmann's: "Domain Analysis of Social Work: An Example of an Integrated Methodological Approach" represents an empirical approach to the construction of knowledge maps based an representative samples of the literature an social work. In a way, this paper is the most traditional or straightforward approach to knowledge organization in the issue: It suggests a concrete classification based an scientific norms of representation and objectivity.
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009)
0.00
4.9317686E-4 = product of:
0.0064112986 = sum of:
0.00433187 = weight(_text_:5 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00433187 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.08060187 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
0.0020794286 = product of:
0.006238286 = sum of:
0.006238286 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006238286 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06449488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.07692308 = coord(2/26)
- Content
- References Bates, M.J. (2005). Information and knowledge: An evolutionary framework for information science. Information Research, 10(4), paper 239. Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/10-4/paper239.html. Bates, M.J. (2006). Fundamental forms of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1033-1045. Bates, M.J. (2008). Hjorland's critique of Bates' work on defining information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 842-844. Hjoerland, B. (2000). Documents, memory institutions, and information science. Journal of Documentation, 56, 27-41. Hjoerland, B. (2007). Information: Objective or subjective-situational? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1448-1456. Karpatschof, B. (2000). Human activity. Contributions to the anthropological sciences from a perspective of activity theory. Copenhagen: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag. Retrieved May 14, 2007, from http://informationr.net/ir/ 12-3/Karpatschof/Karp00.html.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:13:27
-
Hjoerland, B.: Library and information science and the philosophy of science (2005)
0.00
3.9986498E-4 = product of:
0.010396489 = sum of:
0.010396489 = weight(_text_:5 in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010396489 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.19344449 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
0.03846154 = coord(1/26)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.1, S.5-10
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The paradox of atheoretical classification (2016)
0.00
3.9986498E-4 = product of:
0.010396489 = sum of:
0.010396489 = weight(_text_:5 in 3169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010396489 = score(doc=3169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.19344449 = fieldWeight in 3169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3169)
0.03846154 = coord(1/26)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.5, S.313-323
-
Hjoerland, B.; Pedersen, K.N.: ¬A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval (2005)
0.00
3.3322079E-4 = product of:
0.00866374 = sum of:
0.00866374 = weight(_text_:5 in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00866374 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
0.03846154 = coord(1/26)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.5, S.582-597
