-
Schönherr, M.: Bestechend brillant : die Schönheit der Algorithmen (2016)
0.06
0.061029315 = product of:
0.1763069 = sum of:
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=2762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=2762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
0.021025274 = weight(_text_:die in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021025274 = score(doc=2762,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.46739984 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=2762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
0.008317715 = product of:
0.024953144 = sum of:
0.024953144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024953144 = score(doc=2762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06449488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2762)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.34615386 = coord(9/26)
- Abstract
- Algorithmen sind Rezepte, aus denen Computerprogramme entstehen. Es gibt keine Software ohne Algorithmen. Je eleganter ein Algorithmus ist, desto weniger Rechenpower benötigt er, um zum Ziel zu kommen. Algorithmen können allerdings teuer sein - und die Nachfrage zur Lösung neuer und alter Probleme ist riesig.
- Date
- 10. 2.2016 17:22:23
- Source
- http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/die-schoenheit-der-algorithmen-bestechend-brillant.740.de.html?dram:article_id=341464
-
Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020)
0.06
0.059443638 = product of:
0.15455346 = sum of:
0.024376534 = product of:
0.0731296 = sum of:
0.0731296 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0731296 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1561436 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.013069402 = weight(_text_:23 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013069402 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.0070681153 = weight(_text_:und in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070681153 = score(doc=5669,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.013069402 = weight(_text_:23 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013069402 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.0070681153 = weight(_text_:und in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070681153 = score(doc=5669,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.013069402 = weight(_text_:23 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013069402 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.020130169 = weight(_text_:die in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020130169 = score(doc=5669,freq=22.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.44750127 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.0070681153 = weight(_text_:und in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070681153 = score(doc=5669,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.013069402 = weight(_text_:23 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013069402 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.0365648 = product of:
0.0731296 = sum of:
0.0731296 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0731296 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1561436 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3846154 = coord(10/26)
- Content
- "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
-
Frank, S.; Frank, M.: Spannungsfeld zwischen Bibliotheks-/Informationswissenschaft und Bibliotheksinformatik : Teil 1 von: Bibliothekarische Studiengänge an der HTWK Leipzig: Veränderung und Kontinuität (2019)
0.06
0.059028514 = product of:
0.17052682 = sum of:
0.02217951 = weight(_text_:23 in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02217951 = score(doc=5366,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
0.0146908015 = weight(_text_:und in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0146908015 = score(doc=5366,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
0.02217951 = weight(_text_:23 in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02217951 = score(doc=5366,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
0.0146908015 = weight(_text_:und in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0146908015 = score(doc=5366,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
0.02217951 = weight(_text_:23 in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02217951 = score(doc=5366,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
0.012615166 = weight(_text_:die in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012615166 = score(doc=5366,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.2804399 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
0.0146908015 = weight(_text_:und in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0146908015 = score(doc=5366,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
0.02217951 = weight(_text_:23 in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02217951 = score(doc=5366,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
0.025121208 = weight(_text_:art in 5366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025121208 = score(doc=5366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08354246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3006999 = fieldWeight in 5366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5366)
0.34615386 = coord(9/26)
- Abstract
- Die bibliothekarische Ausbildung in Leipzig blickt auf eine über hundertjährige Geschichte zurück - ein Zeitraum, in dem Bibliotheken tiefgreifende Veränderungen erfahren haben. Der Übergang von der Thekenbücherei zur Freihandbibliothek beispielsweise erzwang Anpassungen in Organisation und Arbeitsabläufen, definierte das Verhältnis zwischen Bibliothek und Nutzer neu und wirkte sich letztlich auch auf die Bibliotheksbestände aus. Einschnitte dieser Art werden auch im Zusammenhang mit der Umbruchsituation diskutiert, in der wir uns derzeit befinden: der Digitalisierung. Ihre Auswirkungen sind noch nicht klar abzusehen, wodurch die bibliothekarische Hochschulbildung vor neue Herausforderungen gestellt wird.
- Content
- Fortsetzung als 'Inhaltserschließung, spartenübergreifendes Studium und integrierende Möglichkeiten von Informationssystemen' unter: https://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=774&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045.
- Date
- 23. 8.2019 14:01:27
- Source
- Open Password. 2019, Nr.615 vom 23. August 2019. [https://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=770&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045]
-
Deutsch Korrekt : Das Prüfprogramm für Texte (1996)
0.06
0.05874568 = product of:
0.19092345 = sum of:
0.031366564 = weight(_text_:23 in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031366564 = score(doc=5968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
0.016963478 = weight(_text_:und in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016963478 = score(doc=5968,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
0.031366564 = weight(_text_:23 in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031366564 = score(doc=5968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
0.016963478 = weight(_text_:und in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016963478 = score(doc=5968,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
0.031366564 = weight(_text_:23 in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031366564 = score(doc=5968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
0.014566738 = weight(_text_:die in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014566738 = score(doc=5968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3238241 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
0.016963478 = weight(_text_:und in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016963478 = score(doc=5968,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
0.031366564 = weight(_text_:23 in 5968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031366564 = score(doc=5968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 5968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5968)
0.30769232 = coord(8/26)
- Abstract
- Automatisches Prüfprogramm zur deutschen Rechtschreibung; kontrolliert die Rechtschreibung nach den neuen Regeln - inklusive korrekter Silbentrennungen, Wortzusammensetzungen und Wortableitungen
- Date
- 21.12.1996 10:23:29
- Issue
- Für Windows 3.x und Windows95
-
Barrierefreies E-Government : Leitfaden für Entscheidungsträger, Grafiker und Programmierer (2005)
0.06
0.05859943 = product of:
0.15235852 = sum of:
0.014786341 = weight(_text_:23 in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014786341 = score(doc=4881,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.22400373 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.018322648 = weight(_text_:und in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018322648 = score(doc=4881,freq=42.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.44886562 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
42.0 = termFreq=42.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.014786341 = weight(_text_:23 in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014786341 = score(doc=4881,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.22400373 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.018322648 = weight(_text_:und in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018322648 = score(doc=4881,freq=42.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.44886562 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
42.0 = termFreq=42.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.014786341 = weight(_text_:23 in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014786341 = score(doc=4881,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.22400373 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.014566736 = weight(_text_:die in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014566736 = score(doc=4881,freq=18.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.32382408 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.018322648 = weight(_text_:und in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018322648 = score(doc=4881,freq=42.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.44886562 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
42.0 = termFreq=42.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.014786341 = weight(_text_:23 in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014786341 = score(doc=4881,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.22400373 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.016747471 = weight(_text_:art in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016747471 = score(doc=4881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08354246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.20046659 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.0069309925 = weight(_text_:5 in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0069309925 = score(doc=4881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.128963 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.3846154 = coord(10/26)
- Date
- 26.11.2005 19:23:50
23. 1.2006 13:04:54
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 56(2005) H.8, S.459 (W. Schweibenz): "Der Leitfaden ist Teil des Handbuchs für sicheres E-Govemment, das vom Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik herausgegeben wird und als Nachschlagewerk und zentrale Informationsbörse mit Empfehlungscharakter konzipiert ist. Die Publikation stellt in sechs Abschnitten alle wichtigen Aspekte für ein barrierefreies EGovernment dar, die inhaltlich auch auf private Web-Angebote übertragen werden können. Ein besonderes Anliegen des Leitfadens ist es, den Entscheidungsträgern die Notwendigkeit eines barrierefreien Internets zu erklären. Dies geschieht im ersten Abschnitt, in dem ausgehend von der mangelhafte Benutzungsfreundlichkeit des Internets im Allgemeinen die Bedürfnisse behinderter Menschen im Besonderen beschrieben werden. In anschaulicher Weise mit Beispielen und Bildern werden die Probleme folgender Benutzergruppen dargestellt: - sehbehinderte und blinde Menschen, - hörgeschädigte und gehörlose Menschen, - kognitiv eingeschränkte und konzentrationsschwache Menschen, - Menschen mit Epilepsie, - manuell-motorisch eingeschränkte Menschen. Dies kann Lesern helfen, sich die Probleme von Menschen mit Behinderungen zu vergegenwärtigen, bevor sie im zweiten Abschnitt auf zehn Seiten mit dem deutschen Gesetze und Richtlinien konfrontiert werden. Der Abschnitt 3 Anleitung zur Gestaltung barrierefreier Internet-Seiten gibt Programmierern und Designem konkrete Hinweise welche Techniken in HTML und CSS wie eingesetzt werden müssen, um Barrierefreiheit zu erreichen. Dies reicht von Fragen der Wahmehmbarkeit (Textäquivalente für Audio- und visuelle Inhalte, Schrift und Farbe) über generelle Aspekte der Bedienbarkeit (Orientierung und Navigation, Frames, eingebettete Benutzerschnittstellen, Formulare) und der allgemeinen Verständlichkeit (Sprache, Abkürzungen, Akronyme) bis zur Einhaltung von Standards (W3C unterstützte Formate, Einhaltung von Markup-Standards, Rückwärtskompatibilität, Geräteunabhängigkeit, Kompatibilität mit assistiven Technologien). Im Abschnitt 4 wird die Kommunikation im Internet betrachtet, wobei vor allem auf Fragen des E-Mail-Verkehrs und der Sicherheit eingegangen wird, Aspekte die für alle Internet-Benutzer interessant sind. Im Abschnitt 5 wird dargestellt, wie Internet-Seiten auf Barrierefreiheit geprüft werden können. Neben Testmethoden technischer Art (Evaluierung durch verschiedene Browser und Prüfprogramme) und mit behinderten Benutzern wird auch auf die Frage der Oualitätssiegel für Barrierefreiheit eingegangen und existierende Testsymbole werden vorgestellt. Ein sechster Abschnitt mit Links und Literatur rundet den Leitfaden ab und verweist interessierte Leser weiter."
-
Leighton, T.: ChatGPT und Künstliche Intelligenz : Utopie oder Dystopie? (2023)
0.06
0.056537904 = product of:
0.18374819 = sum of:
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
0.022351343 = weight(_text_:und in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022351343 = score(doc=908,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.54756 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
0.022351343 = weight(_text_:und in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022351343 = score(doc=908,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.54756 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
0.012138948 = weight(_text_:die in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012138948 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.2698534 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
0.022351343 = weight(_text_:und in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022351343 = score(doc=908,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.54756 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
0.30769232 = coord(8/26)
- Abstract
- Das Tool wird immer ausgefeilter; es erstellt Software und erfindet die unglaublichsten Fiktionen. Wie "klug" ist es? Wie sieht es mit den Ängsten aus? Und mit Moral?
- Date
- 6. 1.2023 21:19:23
- Series
- Telepolis / Kultur und Medien
- Source
- https://www.heise.de/tp/features/ChatGPT-und-Kuenstliche-Intelligenz-Utopie-oder-Dystopie-7445181.html?view=print
-
Scobel, G.: GPT: Eine Software, die die Welt verändert (2023)
0.05
0.05357152 = product of:
0.17410743 = sum of:
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=839,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=839,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.027143514 = weight(_text_:die in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027143514 = score(doc=839,freq=10.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.6034106 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=839,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.30769232 = coord(8/26)
- Abstract
- GPT-3 ist eine jener Entwicklungen, die binnen weniger Monate an Einfluss und Reichweite zulegen. Die Software wird sich massiv auf Ökonomie und Gesellschaft auswirken.
- Date
- 23. 1.2023 17:28:51
- Series
- Terra X - die Wissens-Kolumne
-
Rötzer, F.: Computerspiele verbessern die Aufmerksamkeit : Nach einer Untersuchung von Kognitionswissenschaftlern schulen Shooter-Spiele manche Leistungen der visuellen Aufmerksamkeit (2003)
0.05
0.052861698 = product of:
0.13744041 = sum of:
0.007841641 = weight(_text_:23 in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007841641 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.11879592 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.014381487 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014381487 = score(doc=1643,freq=46.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3523156 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.007841641 = weight(_text_:23 in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007841641 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.11879592 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.014381487 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014381487 = score(doc=1643,freq=46.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3523156 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.007841641 = weight(_text_:23 in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007841641 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.11879592 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.022151502 = weight(_text_:die in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022151502 = score(doc=1643,freq=74.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.4924363 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
8.602325 = tf(freq=74.0), with freq of:
74.0 = termFreq=74.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.023014503 = weight(_text_:grund in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023014503 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11308442 = queryWeight, product of:
6.140059 = idf(docFreq=258, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.20351613 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.140059 = idf(docFreq=258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.014381487 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014381487 = score(doc=1643,freq=46.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3523156 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.007841641 = weight(_text_:23 in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007841641 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.11879592 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.017763376 = weight(_text_:art in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017763376 = score(doc=1643,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08354246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.21262693 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.3846154 = coord(10/26)
- Abstract
- Jede Art von Tätigkeit, die ein wenig Geschick erfordert, fördert und trainiert körperliche und geistige Leistungen. Es wäre also schon sonderlich, wenn dies bei Computerspielen und gerade den umstrittenen Action- oder Ego-Shooter-Spielen nicht der Fall sein würde. Es ist schwierig, komplexe Verhaltensweisen oder Einstellungen wie Gewaltbereitschaft zu erfassen. Viel leichter lassen sich hingegen Einflüsse von Spielen auf ganz bestimmte, abgrenzbare kognitive Leistungen empirisch feststellen. Und so haben jetzt US-Wissenschaftler nachweisen können, dass Computerspieler im Hinblick auf Aufgaben, die visuelle Aufmerksamkeit erfordern, bis zu 50 Prozent besser sind als Nichtspieler - wenn sie sich an Ballerspielen wie Counter-Strike üben.
- Content
- Wer stundenlang und täglich vor dem Computer sitzt und spielt, trainiert bestimmte Fähigkeiten (und vernachlässigt andere, die verkümmern, was aber schon sehr viel schwieriger nachzuweisen wäre). Computerspiele erfordern, dass deren Benutzer sich beispielsweise aktiv visuell orientieren müssen - und dies schnell sowie mit anhaltender Konzentration. Zudem muss das Gesehene (oder Gehörte) schnell in Reaktionen umgesetzt werden, was senso-motorische Fähigkeiten, also beispielsweise die Koordination von Auge und Hand, fördert. Das aber war nicht Gegenstand der Studie. Nach den Experimenten der Kognitionswissenschaftler vom Center for Visual Sciences an der University of Rochester, New York, lernen die Computerspieler sogar nicht nur die Bewältigung von bestimmten Aufgaben, sondern können das Gelernte auf andere Aufgaben übertragen, wodurch sie allgemein die visuelle Aufmerksamkeit stärken. Untersucht wurden dabei, wie C. Shawn Green und Daphne Bavellier in [[External Link]] Nature schreiben, Personen zwischen 18 und 23 Jahren, die Action-Spiele wie Grand Theft Auto3, Half-Life, Counter-Strike, 007 oder Spider-Man während des letzten halben Jahres mindestens an vier Tagen in der Woche und mindestens eine Stunde am Tag gespielt haben. Darunter befanden sich allerdings keine Frauen! Die Wissenschaftler hatten keine Studentinnen mit der notwendigen Shooter-Spiele--Praxis finden können. Verglichen wurden die Leistungen in den Tests mit denen von Nichtspielern. Zur Kontrolle mussten Nichtspieler - darunter dann auch Frauen - an 10 aufeinander folgenden Tagen jeweils mindestens eine Stunde sich an Shooter-Spielen trainieren, wodurch sich tatsächlich die visuellen Aufmerksamkeitsleistungen steigerten. Das mag schließlich in der Tat bei manchen Aufgaben hilfreich sein, verbessert aber weder allgemein die Aufmerksamkeit noch andere kognitive Fähigkeiten, die nicht mit der visuellen Orientierung und Reaktion zu tun haben. Computerspieler, die Action-Spiele-Erfahrung haben, besitzen beispielsweise eine höhere Aufmerksamkeitskapazität, die sich weit weniger schnell erschöpft wie bei den Nichtspielern. So haben sie auch nach einer anstrengenden Bewältigung von Aufgaben noch die Fähigkeit, neben der Aufgabe Ablenkungen zu verarbeiten. Sie können sich beispielsweise auch längere Zahlenreihen, die den Versuchspersonen kurz auf dem Bildschirm gezeigt werden, merken. Zudem konnten die Spieler ihre Aufmerksamkeit weitaus besser auch in ungewohnten Situationen auf die Erfassung eines räumlichen Feldes erstrecken als Nichtspieler. Dabei mussten zuerst Objekte in einem dichten Feld identifiziert und dann schnell durch Umschalten der Fokussierung ein weiteres Umfeld erkundet werden. Der Druck, schnell auf mehrere visuelle Reize reagieren zu müssen, fördert, so die Wissenschaftler, die Fähigkeit, Reize über die Zeit hinweg zu verarbeiten und "Flaschenhals"-Situationen der Aufmerksamkeit zu vermeiden. Sie sind auch besser in der Lage, von einer Aufgabe zur nächsten zu springen. Wie die Wissenschaftler selbst feststellen, könnte man natürlich angesichts dieser Ergebnisse einwenden, dass die Fähigkeiten nicht mit der Beschäftigung mit Computerspielen entstehen, sondern dass Menschen, deren visuelle Aufmerksamkeit und senso-motorische Koordination besser ist, sich lieber mit dieser Art von Spielen beschäftigen, weil sie dort auch besser belohnt werden als die Ungeschickten. Aus diesem Grund hat man eine Gruppe von Nichtspielern gebeten, mindesten eine Stunde am Tag während zehn aufeinander folgenden Tagen, "Medal of Honor" zu spielen, während eine Kontrollgruppe "Tetris" bekam. Tetris verlangt ganz andere Leistungen wie ein Shooter-Spiel. Der Benutzer muss seine Aufmerksamkeit zu jeder Zeit auf jeweils ein Objekt richten, während die Aufmerksamkeit der Shooter-Spieler auf den ganzen Raum verteilt sein und ständig mit Unvorgesehenem rechnen muss, das aus irgendeiner Ecke auftaucht. Tetris-Spieler müssten also, wenn Aufmerksamkeit spezifisch von Spieleanforderungen trainiert wird, in den Tests zur visuellen Aufmerksamkeit anders abschneiden.
Tatsächlich waren die "Medal of Honor"-Spieler nach der Trainingsphase bei den Aufgaben, bei denen auch die Langzeitspieler besser abschnitten, den "Tetris"-Spielern und den Nichtspielern überlegen: "Zehn Tage des Trainings mit einem Action-Spiel", so die Wissenschaftler, "reicht aus, um die Fähigkeiten der visuellen Aufmerksamkeit, ihrer räumlichen Verteilung und ihrer zeitlichen Auflösung zu verbessern." Unklar ist jedoch, wie diese Verbesserung zustande kommt. Vielleicht werden durch das Training bestimmte Formen des "Flaschenhalses", die zu einem "Stau" bei der Verarbeitung führen und daher die Leistung herabsetzen, verändert. Möglicherweise aber werden einfach Wahrnehmungs- und Aufmerksamkeitsprozesse beschleunigt, so dass geübte Spieler beispielsweise schneller Reize selektieren können. Vielleicht fördern Spiele zudem das Multitasking, so dass die Trainierten mehr "Aufmerksamkeitsfenster" gleichzeitig offen halten können als Menschen, die sich nicht an Shooter-Spielen üben. Für bestimmte Arbeiten, beispielsweise Autofahren, Fliegen, Überwachen von vielen Monitoren, Beobachtung von Radar, Kontrolle von Menschen und Gepäck an Grenzen, Fernsteuerung von Objekten - oder natürlich für Soldaten oder Terroristen, die sich schnell auf unbekanntem Territorium orientieren, Feinde erkennen und auf diese reagieren müssen, wären also wohl Shooter-Spiele eine gute Übung. Gleichwohl sagen visuelle Fähigkeiten freilich nichts über die Gewaltbereitschaft im wirklichen Leben aus.
-
Strauss, S.: Und wo sind hier die Bücher? : Bibliothek der Zukunft (2015)
0.05
0.052689794 = product of:
0.17124182 = sum of:
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=4688,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=4688,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.024277896 = weight(_text_:die in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024277896 = score(doc=4688,freq=8.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.5397068 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=4688,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 4688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=4688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 4688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4688)
0.30769232 = coord(8/26)
- Abstract
- Die öffentliche Bibliothek erfährt gerade eine gewaltige Transformation von der altehrwürdigen Bildungsstätte zum multiplen Kultur- und Veranstaltungsort. Im dänischen Aarhus kann man die Zukunft schon besichtigen.
- Date
- 6.10.2015 16:23:20
- Source
- http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/buecher/themen/die-zukunft-der-bibliothek-das-dokk1-in-aarhus-13834316.html
-
Ball, R.: Digitale Disruption (2016)
0.05
0.051688984 = product of:
0.1679892 = sum of:
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=3114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=3114,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=3114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=3114,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=3114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.021025274 = weight(_text_:die in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021025274 = score(doc=3114,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.46739984 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.014136231 = weight(_text_:und in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014136231 = score(doc=3114,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=3114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.30769232 = coord(8/26)
- Abstract
- Gelingt es, die Bibliothek als Gedächtnisinstitution sukzessive an die Bedingungen der neuen digitalen Welt anzupassen? Oder muss die Bibliothek des 21. Jahrhunderts "radikal" neu gedacht werden?
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.forschung-und-lehre.de/wordpress/?p=21891&print=1.
- Source
- Forschung und Lehre. 23(2016) H.9, S.xx-xx
-
Gutknecht, C.: Zahlungen der ETH Zürich an Elsevier, Springer und Wiley nun öffentlich (2015)
0.05
0.05151899 = product of:
0.16743672 = sum of:
0.025876096 = weight(_text_:23 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025876096 = score(doc=4324,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.015645942 = weight(_text_:und in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015645942 = score(doc=4324,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.025876096 = weight(_text_:23 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025876096 = score(doc=4324,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.015645942 = weight(_text_:und in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015645942 = score(doc=4324,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.025876096 = weight(_text_:23 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025876096 = score(doc=4324,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.016994527 = weight(_text_:die in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016994527 = score(doc=4324,freq=8.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.37779477 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.015645942 = weight(_text_:und in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015645942 = score(doc=4324,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.025876096 = weight(_text_:23 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025876096 = score(doc=4324,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.30769232 = coord(8/26)
- Abstract
- Was bezahlt die ETH Bibliothek an Elsevier, Springer und Wiley? Die Antwort auf diese einfache Frage liegt nun nach gut 14 Monaten und einem Entscheid der ersten Rekursinstanz (EDÖB) vor. Werfen wir nun also einen Blick in diese nun erstmals öffentlich zugänglichen Daten (auch als XLSX). Die ETH-Bibliothek schlüsselte die Ausgaben wie von mir gewünscht in Datenbanken, E-Books und Zeitschriften auf.
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://wisspub.net/2018/06/23/transparenz-bei-subskriptionskosten-in-der-schweiz-bilanz-nach-vier-jahren/ <https://wisspub.net/2018/06/23/transparenz-bei-subskriptionskosten-in-der-schweiz-bilanz-nach-vier-jahren/>.
- Source
- http://wisspub.net/2015/08/29/zahlungen-der-eth-zuerich-an-elsevier-springer-und-wiley-nun-oeffentlich/
-
Stumpf, G.: "Kerngeschäft" Sacherschließung in neuer Sicht : was gezielte intellektuelle Arbeit und maschinelle Verfahren gemeinsam bewirken können (2015)
0.05
0.05103118 = product of:
0.1474234 = sum of:
0.018297164 = weight(_text_:23 in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018297164 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.017139269 = weight(_text_:und in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017139269 = score(doc=1703,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.018297164 = weight(_text_:23 in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018297164 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.017139269 = weight(_text_:und in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017139269 = score(doc=1703,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.018297164 = weight(_text_:23 in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018297164 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.016994527 = weight(_text_:die in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016994527 = score(doc=1703,freq=8.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.37779477 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.017139269 = weight(_text_:und in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017139269 = score(doc=1703,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.018297164 = weight(_text_:23 in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018297164 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.0058224006 = product of:
0.0174672 = sum of:
0.0174672 = weight(_text_:22 in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0174672 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06449488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.34615386 = coord(9/26)
- Abstract
- Als "Kerngeschäft" des bibliothekarischen Berufsbildes ist die Sacherschließung starken Veränderungen unterworfen; als Kern des Metadatenangebots ist ein intellektueller Input unverzichtbar, gerade weil mit maschinellen Verfahren sehr viel Mehrwert daraus generiert werden kann. In dem Vortrag wird versucht, aus allgemeiner Perspektive den funktionellen Mehrwert der Sacherschließung zu beleuchten. Das Zusammenwirken der intellektuellen Erschließung und verschiedener Formen automatischer Metadatenerzeugung und -vermehrung muss neu justiert und standardisiert werden. Besondere Bedeutung haben Normdaten mit ihrem Potenzial für die Linked-Data-Welt; zugleich muss aber auch die Datenbasis für die durch Suchmaschinentechnologie geprägten Rechercheumgebungen quantitativ verbreitert und qualitativ aufgewertet werden.
- Content
- Es handelt sich um den leicht überarbeiteten Text eines Vortrags bei der VDB-Fortbildungsveranstaltung "Wandel als Konstante: neue Aufgaben und Herausforderungen für sozialwissenschaftliche Bibliotheken" am 22./23. Januar 2015 in Berlin.
-
¬Das multimediale Kombipaket : Planet Erde und Großer Atlas der Welt (1998)
0.05
0.05071225 = product of:
0.18835978 = sum of:
0.036594328 = weight(_text_:23 in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036594328 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.0139941545 = weight(_text_:und in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0139941545 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.036594328 = weight(_text_:23 in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036594328 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.0139941545 = weight(_text_:und in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0139941545 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.036594328 = weight(_text_:23 in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036594328 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.0139941545 = weight(_text_:und in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0139941545 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.036594328 = weight(_text_:23 in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036594328 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.26923078 = coord(7/26)
- Date
- 31. 1.1999 10:54:23
-
HTML-Wizard (1996)
0.05
0.05071225 = product of:
0.18835978 = sum of:
0.036594328 = weight(_text_:23 in 877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036594328 = score(doc=877,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 877, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=877)
0.0139941545 = weight(_text_:und in 877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0139941545 = score(doc=877,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 877, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=877)
0.036594328 = weight(_text_:23 in 877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036594328 = score(doc=877,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 877, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=877)
0.0139941545 = weight(_text_:und in 877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0139941545 = score(doc=877,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 877, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=877)
0.036594328 = weight(_text_:23 in 877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036594328 = score(doc=877,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 877, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=877)
0.0139941545 = weight(_text_:und in 877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0139941545 = score(doc=877,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 877, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=877)
0.036594328 = weight(_text_:23 in 877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036594328 = score(doc=877,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 877, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=877)
0.26923078 = coord(7/26)
- Content
- Enthält: Vollversion des HTML-Editor für WinWord in den Versionen 6 und 7; Offline-Version des Projektes Gutenberg DE
- Pages
- CD + 23 S. (Handbuch)
-
Reiser, W.: Two Riders were approaching : Der Anfang vom Ende der deutschen Medien (2018)
0.05
0.05070928 = product of:
0.14649348 = sum of:
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=4446,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
0.0146908015 = weight(_text_:und in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0146908015 = score(doc=4446,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=4446,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
0.0146908015 = weight(_text_:und in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0146908015 = score(doc=4446,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=4446,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
0.014566738 = weight(_text_:die in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014566738 = score(doc=4446,freq=8.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3238241 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
0.0146908015 = weight(_text_:und in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0146908015 = score(doc=4446,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=4446,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
0.025121208 = weight(_text_:art in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025121208 = score(doc=4446,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08354246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3006999 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5360413 = idf(docFreq=1287, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
0.34615386 = coord(9/26)
- Abstract
- Es gehört zum Komplettversagen der Linken, dass sie sich die Sache mit der Lügenpresse von den Dumpfbacken der Pegida aus der Hand nehmen ließ. Seit dem experimentellen Kosovo-Fake haben sich "unsere" Medien von ihrer grundsätzlichen Funktion verabschiedet und sich schrittweise von ihrer Existenzberechtigung befreit. Wer die "Arbeit" der öffentlich-rechtlichen Sender und der "führenden" Tageszeitungen&Magazine über den Zeitraum 1990- 2018 verfolgen konnte oder musste und noch einen Funken historisches Bewusstsein in sich trägt, weiß . Menschen, die in diesem frühen September 2018 in meinem Schwabinger Kaffeehaus nach wenigen Minuten eines Leseversuchs ihre einst so geliebte SZ zu Seite legen, fragen mich immer wieder - da sie gehört haben, dass ich für eine sehr lange Zeit für viele nennenswerte Printorgane gearbeitet habe, was eigentlich aus uns Journalisten geworden ist, wann das "irgendwie" alles begann mit dem sittlichen Zerfall und ob sich die Branche irgendwann einmal wieder von dieser Implosion erholen wird und ob das eine Delle ist oder eine Art Grippe, wie Aids halt und man das wieder in den Griff bekommt.
- Date
- 20. 9.2018 17:01:23
-
Hartmann, S.; Haffner, A.: Linked-RDA-Data in der Praxis (2010)
0.05
0.049002014 = product of:
0.14156137 = sum of:
0.020911044 = weight(_text_:23 in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020911044 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.013850621 = weight(_text_:und in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013850621 = score(doc=1679,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.020911044 = weight(_text_:23 in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020911044 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.013850621 = weight(_text_:und in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013850621 = score(doc=1679,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.020911044 = weight(_text_:23 in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020911044 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.009711158 = weight(_text_:die in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009711158 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.21588273 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.013850621 = weight(_text_:und in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013850621 = score(doc=1679,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.020911044 = weight(_text_:23 in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020911044 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.0066541713 = product of:
0.019962514 = sum of:
0.019962514 = weight(_text_:22 in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019962514 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06449488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.34615386 = coord(9/26)
- Abstract
- Durch den neuen Erschließungsstandard "Resource Description and Access" (RDA) lassen sich bibliografische Daten sowie Normdaten Semantic-Web-konform repräsentieren. Der Vortrag soll aufzeigen, welche Auswirkungen RDA auf die Katalogisierung in Bibliotheken und den Zugang zu den erschlossenen Ressourcen im Semantic Web hat. Anhand erster Erfahrungen aus praktischen Umsetzungen wird erläutert, wie bibliografische Daten durch RDA und Linked-Data-Technologien besser zugänglich gemacht und vor allem nachgenutzt werden können.
- Date
- 13. 2.2011 20:22:23
-
Klußmann, N.: Lexikon der Kommunikations- und Informationstechnik : Telekommunikation, Datenkommunikation, Multimedia, Computer (1999)
0.05
0.047480654 = product of:
0.1763567 = sum of:
0.031366564 = weight(_text_:23 in 7096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031366564 = score(doc=7096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 7096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7096)
0.016963478 = weight(_text_:und in 7096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016963478 = score(doc=7096,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 7096, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7096)
0.031366564 = weight(_text_:23 in 7096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031366564 = score(doc=7096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 7096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7096)
0.016963478 = weight(_text_:und in 7096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016963478 = score(doc=7096,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 7096, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7096)
0.031366564 = weight(_text_:23 in 7096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031366564 = score(doc=7096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 7096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7096)
0.016963478 = weight(_text_:und in 7096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016963478 = score(doc=7096,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 7096, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7096)
0.031366564 = weight(_text_:23 in 7096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031366564 = score(doc=7096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 7096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7096)
0.26923078 = coord(7/26)
- Date
- 17. 7.2002 14:59:23
- Issue
- CD-ROM-Ausg. der 2., erw. und aktualisierten Aufl.
-
Mainzer, K.; Pöppel, E.; Ritter, H.: Was hat uns die Zukunft gebracht? : eine Diskussion. Die Fragen stellten Dieter Beste und Marion Kälke (2017)
0.05
0.046745505 = product of:
0.13504256 = sum of:
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=4103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.0146908015 = weight(_text_:und in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0146908015 = score(doc=4103,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=4103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.0146908015 = weight(_text_:und in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0146908015 = score(doc=4103,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=4103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.017840536 = weight(_text_:die in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017840536 = score(doc=4103,freq=12.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3966019 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.0146908015 = weight(_text_:und in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0146908015 = score(doc=4103,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.015683282 = weight(_text_:23 in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015683282 = score(doc=4103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.010396489 = weight(_text_:5 in 4103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010396489 = score(doc=4103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.19344449 = fieldWeight in 4103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4103)
0.34615386 = coord(9/26)
- Abstract
- Im Jahr 1997 besiegte der Schachcomputer Deep Blue den Weltmeister Garri Kasparow. Über die Bedeutung dieser Großtat der künstlichen Intelligenz diskutierten damals drei Experten in "Spektrum der Wissenschaft" (Heft 10/1997). Heute, fast genau 20 Jahre später, fielen mit Go und Poker zwei weitere Bastionen menschlicher Überlegenheit im Spiel. Und erneut bitten wir Klaus Mainzer, Ernst Pöppel und Helge Ritter um ihre Einschätzung. Auf dem 3. Zukunftskongress "Technik zum Menschen bringen" des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) diskutieren die drei Wissenschaftler über Durchbrüche, die keiner auf dem Plan hatte, mangelnden Erkenntnisfortschritt und ob der digitale Neandertaler überhaupt noch eine Zukunft hat.
- Date
- 5. 2.2018 10:54:23
- Source
- http://www.spektrum.de/news/was-hat-uns-die-zukunft-gebracht/1512575
-
Protokoll der Sitzung der AG Sacherschließung am 12.12.1994 (1995)
0.05
0.046729293 = product of:
0.15187019 = sum of:
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=3216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
0.009995825 = weight(_text_:und in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009995825 = score(doc=3216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=3216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
0.009995825 = weight(_text_:und in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009995825 = score(doc=3216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=3216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
0.009995825 = weight(_text_:und in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009995825 = score(doc=3216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=3216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
0.01732748 = weight(_text_:5 in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01732748 = score(doc=3216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05374404 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.32240748 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
0.30769232 = coord(8/26)
- Content
- Enthält Aussagen zu: Sacherschließung im OLIX-OPAC; Stellungnahme der AG zu den Empfehlungen der EG Online-Kataloge 'Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen'; Bericht SWD-Kolloquium 1994 und EG RSWK
- Date
- 5. 2.1996 9:32:23
-
Hurz, S.: Google verfolgt Nutzer, auch wenn sie explizit widersprechen (2018)
0.05
0.04667993 = product of:
0.15170977 = sum of:
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
0.009995825 = weight(_text_:und in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009995825 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
0.009995825 = weight(_text_:und in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009995825 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
0.017167065 = weight(_text_:die in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017167065 = score(doc=4404,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044983488 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.38163036 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4424343 = idf(docFreq=10450, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
0.009995825 = weight(_text_:und in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009995825 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0408199 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
0.026138805 = weight(_text_:23 in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026138805 = score(doc=4404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06600935 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.018417481 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
0.30769232 = coord(8/26)
- Abstract
- Wenn Google-Nutzer den Standortverlauf ausschalten, speichert das Unternehmen trotzdem Bewegungsdaten. Betroffen sind mehr als zwei Milliarden Menschen, die Android-Smartphones oder iPhones mit Google-Diensten verwenden. Wer das Tracking verhindern will, muss die "Web- und App-Aktivitäten" komplett deaktivieren.
- Date
- 23. 8.2018 12:08:32
