Search (81 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.24 
    0.24257714 = product of:
  0.58218515 = sum of:
    0.044783473 = product of:
      0.13435042 = sum of:
        0.13435042 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13435042 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028196473 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13435042 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13435042 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.13435042 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13435042 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.13435042 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13435042 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.13435042 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13435042 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  2. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.24 
    0.2375736 = product of:
  0.4751472 = sum of:
    0.02985565 = product of:
      0.089566946 = sum of:
        0.089566946 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089566946 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028196473 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.08702374 = weight(_text_:wirtschaftswissenschaften in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08702374 = score(doc=701,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.17904139 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.48605376 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.089566946 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089566946 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.089566946 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089566946 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.089566946 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089566946 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.089566946 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089566946 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(6/12)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
    Footnote
    Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften (Dr. rer. pol.) von der Fakultaet fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universitaet Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe genehmigte Dissertation.
    Imprint
    Karlsruhe : Fakultaet fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universitaet Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe
  3. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.22 
    0.22355117 = product of:
  0.5365228 = sum of:
    0.02985565 = product of:
      0.089566946 = sum of:
        0.089566946 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089566946 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028196473 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1266668 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1266668 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.1266668 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1266668 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.1266668 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1266668 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.1266668 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1266668 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23905002 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  4. Handbook on ontologies (2004) 0.16 
    0.16084208 = product of:
  0.386021 = sum of:
    0.08881823 = weight(_text_:wirtschaftswissenschaften in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08881823 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17904139 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.49607652 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
    0.060669735 = weight(_text_:allgemeine in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060669735 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14797503 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.2479978 = idf(docFreq=631, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.40999982 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.2479978 = idf(docFreq=631, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
    0.14308023 = weight(_text_:betriebswirtschaftslehre in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14308023 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22724387 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.059301 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.62963295 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.059301 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
    0.05759935 = weight(_text_:organisation in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05759935 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14418204 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.39949048 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
    0.035853412 = product of:
      0.071706824 = sum of:
        0.071706824 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071706824 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1608728 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028196473 = queryNorm
            0.44573617 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    Classification
    ST 300 Informatik / Monographien / Künstliche Intelligenz / Allgemeines
    QP 345 Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre / Unternehmensführung / Organisation / Informationswesen. Informationssysteme
    RVK
    ST 300 Informatik / Monographien / Künstliche Intelligenz / Allgemeines
    QP 345 Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre / Unternehmensführung / Organisation / Informationswesen. Informationssysteme
  5. Hermans, J.: Ontologiebasiertes Information Retrieval für das Wissensmanagement (2008) 0.02 
    0.021863595 = product of:
  0.13118157 = sum of:
    0.050243177 = weight(_text_:wirtschaftswissenschaften in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050243177 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17904139 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.28062326 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
    0.0809384 = weight(_text_:betriebswirtschaftslehre in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0809384 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22724387 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.059301 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.35617417 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.059301 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Abstract
    Unternehmen sehen sich heutzutage regelmäßig der Herausforderung gegenübergestellt, aus umfangreichen Mengen an Dokumenten schnell relevante Informationen zu identifizieren. Dabei zeigt sich jedoch, dass Suchverfahren, die lediglich syntaktische Abgleiche von Informationsbedarfen mit potenziell relevanten Dokumenten durchführen, häufig nicht die an sie gestellten Erwartungen erfüllen. Viel versprechendes Potenzial bietet hier der Einsatz von Ontologien für das Information Retrieval. Beim ontologiebasierten Information Retrieval werden Ontologien eingesetzt, um Wissen in einer Form abzubilden, die durch Informationssysteme verarbeitet werden kann. Eine Berücksichtigung des so explizierten Wissens durch Suchalgorithmen führt dann zu einer optimierten Deckung von Informationsbedarfen. Jan Hermans stellt in seinem Buch ein adaptives Referenzmodell für die Entwicklung von ontologiebasierten Information Retrieval-Systemen vor. Zentrales Element seines Modells ist die einsatzkontextspezifische Adaption des Retrievalprozesses durch bewährte Techniken, die ausgewählte Aspekte des ontologiebasierten Information Retrievals bereits effektiv und effizient unterstützen. Die Anwendung des Referenzmodells wird anhand eines Fallbeispiels illustriert, bei dem ein Information Retrieval-System für die Suche nach Open Source-Komponenten entwickelt wird. Das Buch richtet sich gleichermaßen an Dozenten und Studierende der Wirtschaftsinformatik, Informatik und Betriebswirtschaftslehre sowie an Praktiker, die die Informationssuche im Unternehmen verbessern möchten. Jan Hermans, Jahrgang 1978, studierte Wirtschaftsinformatik an der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität in Münster. Seit 2003 war er als Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am European Research Center for Information Systems der WWU Münster tätig. Seine Forschungsschwerpunkte lagen in den Bereichen Wissensmanagement und Information Retrieval. Im Mai 2008 erfolgte seine Promotion zum Doktor der Wirtschaftswissenschaften.
  6. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01 
    0.012238464 = product of:
  0.073430784 = sum of:
    0.060059972 = weight(_text_:allgemeine in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060059972 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14797503 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.2479978 = idf(docFreq=631, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.4058791 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.2479978 = idf(docFreq=631, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
    0.013370815 = product of:
      0.02674163 = sum of:
        0.02674163 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02674163 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.098739244 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028196473 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  7. Kless, D.: Erstellung eines allgemeinen Standards zur Wissensorganisation : Nutzen, Möglichkeiten, Herausforderungen, Wege (2010) 0.01 
    0.008379914 = product of:
  0.05027948 = sum of:
    0.040728897 = weight(_text_:organisation in 4422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040728897 = score(doc=4422,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14418204 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.28248245 = fieldWeight in 4422, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4422)
    0.009550583 = product of:
      0.019101165 = sum of:
        0.019101165 = weight(_text_:22 in 4422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019101165 = score(doc=4422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.098739244 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028196473 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4422)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Abstract
    Zur Organisation und zum besseren Auffinden von Wissen werden häufig verschiedene Typen von Vokabularen verwendet. Aufgrund ihres Ursprungs in unterschiedlichen Communities werden die Vokabulare mit unterschiedlicher Terminologie sowie jeweils eigenen Methoden und Werkzeugen beschrieben und sind, wenn überhaupt, unterschiedlich stark und mit unterschiedlichem Fokus standardisiert. Um dieser Entwicklung zu entgegnen, müssen zum einen die Standards für die verschiedenen Vokabulartypen (weiter-)entwickelt werden und dabei auf gemeinsame, heute allgemein anerkannte Modellierungssprachen (z.B. UML) und XML-basierte Auszeichnungssprachen zurückgreifen. Zum anderen ist ein Meta-Standard nötig, der die Terminologie der verschiedenen Communities aufeinander abbildet und die Vokabulare vergleichbar macht. Dies würde nicht nur die qualifizierte Auswahl eines Vokabulartyps ermöglichen, sondern auch deren gegenseitiges Abbilden (Mappen) und allgemein der Wiederverwendung von Vokabularen nutzen. In Ansätzen wurde diese Strategie im jüngst veröffentlichten britischen Standard BS 8723 verfolgt, dessen Schwerpunkt (weiter) auf Thesauri liegt, der jedoch auch explizit Bezug zu anderen Vokabularen nimmt. Die im April 2007 begonnene Revision des Standards als internationale ISO-Norm 25964 erlaubt weitere, wenn auch vielleicht kleine Schritte hin zu einer langfristigen Vision von allgemeingültigen Standards zur Wissensorganisation.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  8. Voß, J.: ¬Das Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS) als Kodierungs- und Austauschformat der DDC für Anwendungen im Semantischen Web (2007) 0.01 
    0.008145779 = product of:
  0.097749345 = sum of:
    0.097749345 = weight(_text_:organisation in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.097749345 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14418204 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.67795783 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
  9. Ulrich, W.: Simple Knowledge Organisation System (2007) 0.01 
    0.008145779 = product of:
  0.097749345 = sum of:
    0.097749345 = weight(_text_:organisation in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.097749345 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14418204 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.67795783 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
  10. Curras, E.: Ontologies, taxonomy and thesauri in information organisation and retrieval (2010) 0.01 
    0.007589382 = product of:
  0.09107258 = sum of:
    0.09107258 = weight(_text_:organisation in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09107258 = score(doc=3276,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14418204 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.63165 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    The originality of this book, which deals with such a new subject matter, lies in the application of methods and concepts never used before - such as Ontologies and Taxonomies, as well as Thesauri - to the ordering of knowledge based on primary information. Chapters in the book also examine the study of Ontologies, Taxonomies and Thesauri from the perspective of Systematics and General Systems Theory. "Ontologies, Taxonomy and Thesauri in Information Organisation and Retrieval" will be extremely useful to those operating within the network of related fields, which includes Documentation and Information Science.
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. From classifications to ontologies Knowledge - A new concept of knowledge - Knowledge and information - Knowledge organisation - Knowledge organisation and representation - Cognitive sciences - Talent management - Learning systematisation - Historical evolution - From classification to knowledge organisation - Why ontologies exist - Ontologies - The structure of ontologies 2. Taxonomies and thesauri From ordering to taxonomy - The origins of taxonomy - Hierarchical and horizontal order - Correlation with classifications - Taxonomy in computer science - Computing taxonomy - Definitions - Virtual taxonomy, cybernetic taxonomy - Taxonomy in Information Science - Similarities between taxonomies and thesauri - ifferences between taxonomies and thesauri 3. Thesauri Terminology in classification systems - Terminological languages - Thesauri - Thesauri definitions - Conditions that a thesaurus must fulfil - Historical evolution - Classes of thesauri 4. Thesauri in (cladist) systematics Systematics - Systematics as a noun - Definitions and historic evolution over time - Differences between taxonomy and systematics - Systematics in thesaurus construction theory - Classic, numerical and cladist systematics - Classic systematics in information science - Numerical systematics in information science - Thesauri in cladist systematics - Systematics in information technology - Some examples 5. Thesauri in systems theory Historical evolution - Approach to systems - Systems theory applied to the construction of thesauri - Components - Classes of system - Peculiarities of these systems - Working methods - Systems theory applied to ontologies and taxonomies
  11. Kleineberg, M.: ¬The blind men and the elephant : towards an organization of epistemic contexts (2013) 0.01 
    0.0067870775 = product of:
  0.08144493 = sum of:
    0.08144493 = weight(_text_:340 in 1074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08144493 = score(doc=1074,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2038881 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.230979 = idf(docFreq=86, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.39945894 = fieldWeight in 1074, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.230979 = idf(docFreq=86, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1074)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.5, S.340-362
  12. Miles, A.; Pérez-Agüera, J.R.: SKOS: Simple Knowledge Organisation for the Web (2006) 0.01 
    0.0067199245 = product of:
  0.080639094 = sum of:
    0.080639094 = weight(_text_:organisation in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.080639094 = score(doc=504,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14418204 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.55928665 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    This article introduces the Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS), a Semantic Web language for representing controlled structured vocabularies, including thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading systems and taxonomies. SKOS provides a framework for publishing thesauri, classification schemes, and subject indexes on the Web, and for applying these systems to resource collections that are part of the SemanticWeb. SemanticWeb applications may harvest and merge SKOS data, to integrate and enhances retrieval service across multiple collections (e.g. libraries). This article also describes some alternatives for integrating Semantic Web services based on the Resource Description Framework (RDF) and SKOS into a distributed enterprise architecture.
  13. Wei, W.; Liu, Y.-P.; Wei, L-R.: Feature-level sentiment analysis based on rules and fine-grained domain ontology (2020) 0.01 
    0.0062803975 = product of:
  0.07536477 = sum of:
    0.07536477 = weight(_text_:wirtschaftswissenschaften in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07536477 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17904139 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.4209349 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Field
    Wirtschaftswissenschaften
  14. Sigel, A.: Organisation verteilten Wissens mit semantischen Wissensnetzen und der Aggregation semantischer Wissensdienste am Beispiel Digitale Bibliotheken/Kulturelles Erbe (2006) 0.01 
    0.0057599354 = product of:
  0.06911922 = sum of:
    0.06911922 = weight(_text_:organisation in 5890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06911922 = score(doc=5890,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14418204 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.4793886 = fieldWeight in 5890, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5890)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag berichtet über Grundideen in der Explorationsphase des Projektes kPeer (Knowledge Peers). Gegenstand ist die dezentrale Organisation, Integration und Aggregation von Wissen mit semantischen Wissenstechnologien in verteilten, heterogenen Umgebungen Dabei sollen Wissensarbeiter, die dezentral und voneinander unabhängig Wissen gemäß lokaler Schemata ausdrücken und organisieren, emergent zusammenwirken, so dass sich eine nützliche gemeinsame Wissensorganisation ergibt. Zudem sollen Aussagen zum selben Aussagegegenstand, die digitalisiert vorliegen, virtuell zusammengeführt werden, um so neue wissensintensive Produkte und Dienstleistungen zu ermöglichen. Als Inspirationsquelle für beabsichtigte Anwendungen im verteilten Wissensmanagement (DKM) und e-business werden Beispiele der Wissensintegration aus dem Bereich Digitale Bibliotheken und Kulturelles Erbe herangezogen.
  15. Networked Knowledge Organisation Systems and Services - TPDL 2011 : The 10th European Networked Knowledge Organisation Systems (NKOS) Workshop (2011) 0.01 
    0.0057599354 = product of:
  0.06911922 = sum of:
    0.06911922 = weight(_text_:organisation in 6033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06911922 = score(doc=6033,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14418204 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.4793886 = fieldWeight in 6033, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6033)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
  16. Giri, K.; Gokhale, P.: Developing a banking service ontology using Protégé, an open source software (2015) 0.01 
    0.005233664 = product of:
  0.06280397 = sum of:
    0.06280397 = weight(_text_:wirtschaftswissenschaften in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06280397 = score(doc=2793,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17904139 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.35077906 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Field
    Wirtschaftswissenschaften
  17. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.01 
    0.005004998 = product of:
  0.060059972 = sum of:
    0.060059972 = weight(_text_:allgemeine in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060059972 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14797503 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.2479978 = idf(docFreq=631, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.4058791 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.2479978 = idf(docFreq=631, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
  18. Breslin, J.G.: Social semantic information spaces (2009) 0.00 
    0.004799946 = product of:
  0.05759935 = sum of:
    0.05759935 = weight(_text_:organisation in 3377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05759935 = score(doc=3377,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14418204 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.39949048 = fieldWeight in 3377, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3377)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    The structural and syntactic web put in place in the early 90s is still much the same as what we use today: resources (web pages, files, etc.) connected by untyped hyperlinks. By untyped, we mean that there is no easy way for a computer to figure out what a link between two pages means - for example, on the W3C website, there are hundreds of links to the various organisations that are registered members of the association, but there is nothing explicitly saying that the link is to an organisation that is a "member of" the W3C or what type of organisation is represented by the link. On John's work page, he links to many papers he has written, but it does not explicitly say that he is the author of those papers or that he wrote such-and-such when he was working at a particular university. In fact, the Web was envisaged to be much more, as one can see from the image in Fig. 1 which is taken from Tim Berners Lee's original outline for the Web in 1989, entitled "Information Management: A Proposal". In this, all the resources are connected by links describing the type of relationships, e.g. "wrote", "describe", "refers to", etc. This is a precursor to the Semantic Web which we will come back to later.
  19. Voß, J.: Vom Social Tagging zum Semantic Tagging (2008) 0.00 
    0.004751704 = product of:
  0.05702045 = sum of:
    0.05702045 = weight(_text_:organisation in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05702045 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14418204 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.3954754 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Social Tagging als freie Verschlagwortung durch Nutzer im Web wird immer häufiger mit der Idee des Semantic Web in Zusammenhang gebracht. Wie beide Konzepte in der Praxis konkret zusammenkommen sollen, bleibt jedoch meist unklar. Dieser Artikel soll hier Aufklärung leisten, indem die Kombination von Social Tagging und Semantic Web in Form von Semantic Tagging mit dem Simple Knowledge Organisation System dargestellt und auf die konkreten Möglichkeiten, Vorteile und offenen Fragen der Semantischen Indexierung eingegangen wird.
  20. Veltman, K.H.: Towards a Semantic Web for culture 0.00 
    0.0047029676 = product of:
  0.05643561 = sum of:
    0.05643561 = weight(_text_:organisation in 4040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05643561 = score(doc=4040,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14418204 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028196473 = queryNorm
        0.39141914 = fieldWeight in 4040, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.113478 = idf(docFreq=722, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4040)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Today's semantic web deals with meaning in a very restricted sense and offers static solutions. This is adequate for many scientific, technical purposes and for business transactions requiring machine-to-machine communication, but does not answer the needs of culture. Science, technology and business are concerned primarily with the latest findings, the state of the art, i.e. the paradigm or dominant world-view of the day. In this context, history is considered non-essential because it deals with things that are out of date. By contrast, culture faces a much larger challenge, namely, to re-present changes in ways of knowing; changing meanings in different places at a given time (synchronically) and over time (diachronically). Culture is about both objects and the commentaries on them; about a cumulative body of knowledge; about collective memory and heritage. Here, history plays a central role and older does not mean less important or less relevant. Hence, a Leonardo painting that is 400 years old, or a Greek statue that is 2500 years old, typically have richer commentaries and are often more valuable than their contemporary equivalents. In this context, the science of meaning (semantics) is necessarily much more complex than semantic primitives. A semantic web in the cultural domain must enable us to trace how meaning and knowledge organisation have evolved historically in different cultures. This paper examines five issues to address this challenge: 1) different world-views (i.e. a shift from substance to function and from ontology to multiple ontologies); 2) developments in definitions and meaning; 3) distinctions between words and concepts; 4) new classes of relations; and 5) dynamic models of knowledge organisation. These issues reveal that historical dimensions of cultural diversity in knowledge organisation are also central to classification of biological diversity. New ways are proposed of visualizing knowledge using a time/space horizon to distinguish between universals and particulars. It is suggested that new visualization methods make possible a history of questions as well as of answers, thus enabling dynamic access to cultural and historical dimensions of knowledge. Unlike earlier media, which were limited to recording factual dimensions of collective memory, digital media enable us to explore theories, ways of perceiving, ways of knowing; to enter into other mindsets and world-views and thus to attain novel insights and new levels of tolerance. Some practical consequences are outlined.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 57
  • d 23

Types

  • a 52
  • el 21
  • m 7
  • x 7
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications