-
Shoham, S.; Kedar, R.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of keywords (2001)
0.00
0.0026272146 = product of:
0.032840185 = sum of:
0.005089782 = product of:
0.010179564 = sum of:
0.010179564 = weight(_text_:29 in 5442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010179564 = score(doc=5442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5442)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.027750403 = weight(_text_:post in 5442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027750403 = score(doc=5442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.25668016 = fieldWeight in 5442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5442)
0.08 = coord(2/25)
- Content
- The overall objective of this study was to examine the implementation of a different approach to the expression of the subject content of monographs in the cataloging record, i.e., the use of a post-coordinate, thesaurus of keywords, using inter-indexer consistency testing and in-depth analysis of mistakes in indexing. A sample of 50 non-fiction monographs was subject cataloged by 16 library science students (non-experienced indexers) using the new Hebrew Thesaurus of Indexing Terms (1996). The 800 indexing records of the non-experienced indexers were compared to the "correct indexing records" (prepared by a panel of three experienced indexers). Indexing consistency was measured using two different formulas used in previous inter-indexer studies. A medium level of inter-indexer consistency was found. In the analysis of mistakes, it was found that the most frequent mistake was the assignment of indexing terms to minor subject matter (i.e., subjects that were less than 20% of the content of the book). Among possible explanations offered for these finding are: sparseness of scope notes in the thesaurus, the priority given by Israeli public libraries to Hebrew language materials in the development of their non-fiction collection, and the size of the output of the Israeli publishing industry of non-fiction materials in Hebrew. The results of the consistency tests and the mistakes analysis were also examined in light of several factors: (1) the number of indexing terms assigned; (2) the length of the monographs (number of pages); and (3) subject area of each monograph. The same examinations were carried out for the subject cataloging records prepared by the Israeli Center for Libraries (ICL) for these monographs.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 33(2001) no.2, S.29-54
-
Kedar, R.; Shoham, S.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of a thesaurus (2003)
0.00
0.0016650241 = product of:
0.041625604 = sum of:
0.041625604 = weight(_text_:post in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041625604 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Abstract
- This paper presents the findings of a study of indexing procedure with the use of a thesaurus for post-coordination. In the first phase of the study, the indexing records of 50 books, prepared by a central cataloging service (the Israeli Center for Libraries), were compared with the indexing records for these books prepared by three independent indexers. In the second phase, indexing records for three books prepared by 51 librarians were studied. In both phases, indexing records were analyzed for mistakes and possible reasons for these mistakes are offered.
-
Chen, X.: Indexing consistency between online catalogues (2008)
0.00
7.4283255E-4 = product of:
0.018570814 = sum of:
0.018570814 = product of:
0.03714163 = sum of:
0.03714163 = weight(_text_:dienstleistungen in 2209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03714163 = score(doc=2209,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11187108 = queryWeight, product of:
6.009912 = idf(docFreq=294, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.33200386 = fieldWeight in 2209, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.009912 = idf(docFreq=294, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2209)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Abstract
- In der globalen Online-Umgebung stellen viele bibliographische Dienstleistungen integrierten Zugang zu unterschiedlichen internetbasierten OPACs zur Verfügung. In solch einer Umgebung erwarten Benutzer mehr Übereinstimmungen innerhalb und zwischen den Systemen zu sehen. Zweck dieser Studie ist, die Indexierungskonsistenz zwischen Systemen zu untersuchen. Währenddessen werden einige Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen können, untersucht. Wichtigstes Ziel dieser Studie ist, die Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen herauszufinden, damit sinnvolle Vorschläge gemacht werden können, um die Indexierungskonsistenz zu verbessern. Eine Auswahl von 3307 Monographien wurde aus zwei chinesischen bibliographischen Katalogen gewählt. Nach Hooper's Formel war die durchschnittliche Indexierungskonsistenz für Indexterme 64,2% und für Klassennummern 61,6%. Nach Rolling's Formel war sie für Indexterme 70,7% und für Klassennummern 63,4%. Mehrere Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen, wurden untersucht: (1) Indexierungsbereite; (2) Indexierungsspezifizität; (3) Länge der Monographien; (4) Kategorie der Indexierungssprache; (5) Sachgebiet der Monographien; (6) Entwicklung von Disziplinen; (7) Struktur des Thesaurus oder der Klassifikation; (8) Erscheinungsjahr. Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen wurden ebenfalls analysiert. Die Analyse ergab: (1) den Indexieren mangelt es an Fachwissen, Vertrautheit mit den Indexierungssprachen und den Indexierungsregeln, so dass viele Inkonsistenzen verursacht wurden; (2) der Mangel an vereinheitlichten oder präzisen Regeln brachte ebenfalls Inkonsistenzen hervor; (3) verzögerte Überarbeitungen der Indexierungssprachen, Mangel an terminologischer Kontrolle, zu wenige Erläuterungen und "siehe auch" Referenzen, sowie die hohe semantische Freiheit bei der Auswahl von Deskriptoren oder Klassen, verursachten Inkonsistenzen.
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.00
6.0527946E-4 = product of:
0.015131988 = sum of:
0.015131988 = product of:
0.030263975 = sum of:
0.030263975 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030263975 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Ladewig, C.; Rieger, M.: Ähnlichkeitsmessung mit und ohne aspektische Indexierung (1998)
0.00
4.0718255E-4 = product of:
0.010179564 = sum of:
0.010179564 = product of:
0.020359129 = sum of:
0.020359129 = weight(_text_:29 in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020359129 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Date
- 4. 1.1999 19:31:29
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.00
4.0535114E-4 = product of:
0.0050668893 = sum of:
0.002544891 = product of:
0.005089782 = sum of:
0.005089782 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005089782 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.002521998 = product of:
0.005043996 = sum of:
0.005043996 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005043996 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.08 = coord(2/25)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Footnote
- Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.00
4.0351966E-4 = product of:
0.010087992 = sum of:
0.010087992 = product of:
0.020175984 = sum of:
0.020175984 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020175984 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.00
3.5307973E-4 = product of:
0.008826993 = sum of:
0.008826993 = product of:
0.017653987 = sum of:
0.017653987 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017653987 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.00
3.5307973E-4 = product of:
0.008826993 = sum of:
0.008826993 = product of:
0.017653987 = sum of:
0.017653987 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017653987 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Iivonen, M.; Kivimäki, K.: Common entities and missing properties : similarities and differences in the indexing of concepts (1998)
0.00
3.0538693E-4 = product of:
0.0076346733 = sum of:
0.0076346733 = product of:
0.015269347 = sum of:
0.015269347 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015269347 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Date
- 24. 2.1999 21:29:51
-
Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004)
0.00
3.0538693E-4 = product of:
0.0076346733 = sum of:
0.0076346733 = product of:
0.015269347 = sum of:
0.015269347 = weight(_text_:29 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015269347 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 16:17:19
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.00
3.0263973E-4 = product of:
0.007565994 = sum of:
0.007565994 = product of:
0.015131988 = sum of:
0.015131988 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015131988 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000)
0.00
3.0263973E-4 = product of:
0.007565994 = sum of:
0.007565994 = product of:
0.015131988 = sum of:
0.015131988 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015131988 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Huffman, G.D.; Vital, D.A.; Bivins, R.G.: Generating indices with lexical association methods : term uniqueness (1990)
0.00
2.5448913E-4 = product of:
0.006362228 = sum of:
0.006362228 = product of:
0.012724456 = sum of:
0.012724456 = weight(_text_:29 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012724456 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Date
- 23.11.1995 11:29:46
-
Ansari, M.: Matching between assigned descriptors and title keywords in medical theses (2005)
0.00
2.5448913E-4 = product of:
0.006362228 = sum of:
0.006362228 = product of:
0.012724456 = sum of:
0.012724456 = weight(_text_:29 in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012724456 = score(doc=4739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Date
- 3.12.2005 19:38:29
-
Lee, D.H.; Schleyer, T.: Social tagging is no substitute for controlled indexing : a comparison of Medical Subject Headings and CiteULike tags assigned to 231,388 papers (2012)
0.00
2.5448913E-4 = product of:
0.006362228 = sum of:
0.006362228 = product of:
0.012724456 = sum of:
0.012724456 = weight(_text_:29 in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012724456 = score(doc=383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Date
- 26. 8.2012 14:29:37
-
Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006)
0.00
2.521998E-4 = product of:
0.006304995 = sum of:
0.006304995 = product of:
0.01260999 = sum of:
0.01260999 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01260999 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014)
0.00
2.521998E-4 = product of:
0.006304995 = sum of:
0.006304995 = product of:
0.01260999 = sum of:
0.01260999 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01260999 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.018614428 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04 = coord(1/25)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
