Search (48 results, page 1 of 3)

0.003940822 = product of:
  0.049260277 = sum of:
    0.0076346733 = product of:
      0.015269347 = sum of:
        0.015269347 = weight(_text_:29 in 2739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015269347 = score(doc=2739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.041625604 = weight(_text_:post in 2739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041625604 = score(doc=2739,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 2739, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2739)
  0.08 = coord(2/25)

Abstract

This study investigated whether and how different factors in relation to task, user-perceived knowledge, search process, and system affect users' search tactic selection. Thirty-one participants, representing the general public with their own tasks, were recruited for this study. Multiple methods were employed to collect data, including pre-questionnaire, verbal protocols, log analysis, diaries, and post-questionnaires. Statistical analysis revealed that seven factors were significantly associated with tactic selection. These factors consist of work task types, search task types, familiarity with topic, search skills, search session length, search phases, and system types. Moreover, the study also discovered, qualitatively, in what ways these factors influence the selection of search tactics. Based on the findings, the authors discuss practical implications for system design to support users' application of multiple search tactics for each factor.

Date

29. 1.2016 19:02:38

0.0032794396 = product of:
  0.040992998 = sum of:
    0.034688003 = weight(_text_:post in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034688003 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
    0.006304995 = product of:
      0.01260999 = sum of:
        0.01260999 = weight(_text_:22 in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01260999 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08 = coord(2/25)

Abstract

The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.

0.002837458 = product of:
  0.035468224 = sum of:
    0.017814238 = product of:
      0.035628475 = sum of:
        0.035628475 = weight(_text_:29 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035628475 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.017653987 = product of:
      0.035307974 = sum of:
        0.035307974 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035307974 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08 = coord(2/25)

Date

22. 5.2005 19:52:29

0.0020125331 = product of:
  0.025156664 = sum of:
    0.021373667 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021373667 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1095598 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.19508676 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.003782997 = product of:
      0.007565994 = sum of:
        0.007565994 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007565994 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08 = coord(2/25)

Content

Im Online-Katalog erfahren Studenten auch, ob das Buch verfügbar oder verliehen ist. Ist es gerade vergriffen, kann man es vormerken lassen, er- klärt Monika Ziller, Vorsitzen- de des Deutschen Bibliotheksverbands in Berlin. Dann werden die Studenten entsprechend benachrichtigt, wenn es zurückgegeben wurde. Außerdem könnten Studenten virtuelle Fachbibliotheken nutzen, erklärt Grau. Um das Thema Slavistik kümmert sich etwa die Staatsbibliothek in Berlin. Auf der Internetseite kann man über Suchbegriffe alle elektronischen Slavistik-Angebote wie Zeitschriften, E-Books oder Bibliografien durchforsten. Die virtuelle Fachbibliothek spuckt dann eine Titelliste aus. Bestenfalls können Studenten gleich auf einzelne Volltexte der Liste zugreifen. Oder sie müssen schauen, ob die eigene Bibliothek das gesuchte Werk hat. Vor allem Zeitschriften sind oft online im Volltext abrufbar, aber auch Enzyklopädien. "Die sind auch aktueller als der Brockhaus von 1990, der zu Hause im Regal steht" sagt Grau. Manchmal ließen sich die Texte aus Gründen des Urheberrechts aber nur auf den Rechnern auf dem Unicampus lesen, ergänzt Hohoff. Findet man ein Buch nicht, ist der Grund dafür oft ein Fehler, der sich bei der Suche eingeschlichen hat. Das fängt bei der Rechtschreibung an: "Bibliothekskataloge verfügen über keine fehlertolerante Suche wie Google", erklärt Ziller.

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22

0.0016650241 = product of:
  0.041625604 = sum of:
    0.041625604 = weight(_text_:post in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041625604 = score(doc=5160,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Abstract

Choi and Rasmussen collect queries to the Library of Congress's American Memory photo archive from 48 scholars in American History by way of interviews and pre and post search questionnaires. Their interest is in the types of information need common in the visual domain, and the categories of terms most often used or indicated as appropriate for the description of image contents. Each search resulted in the provision of 20 items for evaluation by the searcher. Terms in queries and acceptable retrievals were categorized by a who, what, when, where faceted classification and queries into four needs categories; specific, general, abstract, and subjective. Two out of three analysts assigned all 38 requests into the same one of the four categories and in 19 cases all three agreed. General/nameable needs accounted for 60.5%, specific needs 26.3%, 7.9% for general/abstract, and 5.3% for subjective needs. The facet analysis indicated most content was of the form person/thing or event/condition limited by geography or time.

0.0016650241 = product of:
  0.041625604 = sum of:
    0.041625604 = weight(_text_:post in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041625604 = score(doc=5232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Abstract

In "Part 2. Uncertainty and Its Correlates,'' where Wilson is the primary author, after a review of uncertainty as a concept in information seeking and decision research, it is hypothesized that if the Kuhlthau problem solving stage model is appropriate the searchers will recognize the stage in which they currently are operating. Secondly to test Wilson's contention that operationalized uncertainty would be useful in characterizing users, it is hypothesized that uncertainty will decrease as the searcher proceeds through problem stages and after the completion of the search. A review of pre and post search interviews reveals that uncertainty can be operationalized, and that academic researchers have no difficulty with a stage model of the information seeking process. Uncertainty is unrelated to sex, age, or discipline, but is related to problem stage and domain knowledge. Both concepts appear robust.

0.0016650241 = product of:
  0.041625604 = sum of:
    0.041625604 = weight(_text_:post in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041625604 = score(doc=5240,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Abstract

In this issue we begin with the first of four parts of a five part series of papers by Spink, Wilson, Ford, Foster, and Ellis. Spink, et alia, in the first section of this report set forth the design of a project to test whether existing models of the information search process are appropriate for an environment of mediated successive searching which they believe characterizes much information seeking behavior. Their goal is to develop an integrated model of the process. Data were collected from 198 individuals, 87 in Texas and 111 in Sheffield in the U.K., with individuals with real information needs engaged in interaction with operational information retrieval systems by use of transaction logs, recordings of interactions with intermediaries, pre, and post search interviews, questionnaire responses, relevance judgments of retrieved text, and responses to a test of cognitive styles. Questionnaires were based upon the Kuhlthau model, the Saracevic model, the Ellis model, and incorporated a visual analog scale to avoid a consistency bias.

0.0013875201 = product of:
  0.034688003 = sum of:
    0.034688003 = weight(_text_:post in 1104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034688003 = score(doc=1104,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 1104, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1104)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Abstract

In most intent recognition studies, annotations of query intent are created post hoc by external assessors who are not the searchers themselves. It is important for the field to get a better understanding of the quality of this process as an approximation for determining the searcher's actual intent. Some studies have investigated the reliability of the query intent annotation process by measuring the interassessor agreement. However, these studies did not measure the validity of the judgments, that is, to what extent the annotations match the searcher's actual intent. In this study, we asked both the searchers themselves and external assessors to classify queries using the same intent classification scheme. We show that of the seven dimensions in our intent classification scheme, four can reliably be used for query annotation. Of these four, only the annotations on the topic and spatial sensitivity dimension are valid when compared with the searcher's annotations. The difference between the interassessor agreement and the assessor-searcher agreement was significant on all dimensions, showing that the agreement between external assessors is not a good estimator of the validity of the intent classifications. Therefore, we encourage the research community to consider using query intent classifications by the searchers themselves as test data.

0.0013875201 = product of:
  0.034688003 = sum of:
    0.034688003 = weight(_text_:post in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034688003 = score(doc=2726,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Abstract

This research investigates how people's perceptions of information retrieval (IR) systems, their perceptions of search tasks, and their perceptions of self-efficacy influence the amount of invested mental effort (AIME) they put into using two different IR systems: a Web search engine and a library system. It also explores the impact of mental effort on an end user's search experience. To assess AIME in online searching, two experiments were conducted using these methods: Experiment 1 relied on self-reports and Experiment 2 employed the dual-task technique. In both experiments, data were collected through search transaction logs, a pre-search background questionnaire, a post-search questionnaire and an interview. Important findings are these: (1) subjects invested greater mental effort searching a library system than searching the Web; (2) subjects put little effort into Web searching because of their high sense of self-efficacy in their searching ability and their perception of the easiness of the Web; (3) subjects did not recognize that putting mental effort into searching was something needed to improve the search results; and (4) data collected from multiple sources proved to be effective for assessing mental effort in online searching.

0.0013250748 = product of:
  0.033126872 = sum of:
    0.033126872 = weight(_text_:700 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033126872 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1363961 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.3274393 = idf(docFreq=78, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.2428726 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.3274393 = idf(docFreq=78, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.7, S.695-697 (R. Savolainen): "Donald O. Case has written an ambitious book to create an overall picture of the major approaches to information needs and seeking (INS) studies. The aim to write an extensive review is reflected in the list of references containing about 700 items. The high ambitions are explained an p. 14, where Case states that he is aiming at a multidisciplinary understanding of the concept of information seeking. In the Preface, the author characterizes his book as an introduction to the topic for students at the graduate level, as well as as a review and handbook for scholars engagged in information behavior research. In my view, Looking for Information is particularly welcome as an academic textbook because the field of INS studies suffers from the lack of monographs. Along with the continuous growth of the number of journal articles and conference papers, there is a genuine need for a book that picks up the numerous pieces and puts them together. The use of the study as a textbook is facilitated by clearly delineated sections an major themes and the wealth of concrete examples of information seeking in everyday contexts. The book is lucidly written and it is accessible to novice readers, too. At first glance, the idea of providing a comprehensive review of INS studies may seem a mission impossible because the current number of articles, papers, and other contributions in this field is nearing the 10,000 range (p. 224). Donald Case is not alone in the task of coming to grips with an increasing number of studies; similar problems have been faced by those writing INS-related chapters for the Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST). Case has solved the problem of "too many publications to be reviewed" by concentrating an the INS literature published during the last two decades. Secondly, studies an library use and information retrieval are discussed only to a limited extent. In addition, Case is highly selective as to studies focusing an the use of specific sources and channels such as WWW. These delineations are reasonable, even though they beg some questions. First, how should one draw the line between studies an information seeking and information retrieval? Case does not discuss this question in greater detail, although in recent years, the overlapping areas of information seeking and retrieval studies have been broadened, along with the growing importance of WWW in information seeking/retrieval. Secondly, how can one define the concept of information searching (or, more specifically, Internet or Web searching) in relation to information seeking and information retrieval? In the field of Web searching studies, there is an increasing number of contributions that are of direct relevance to information-seeking studies. Clearly, the advent of the Internet, particularly, the Web, has blurred the previous lines between INS and IR literature, making them less clear cut. The book consists of five main sections, and comprises 13 chapters. There is an Appendix serving the needs of an INS textbook (questions for discussion and application). The structure of the book is meticulously planned and, as a whole, it offers a sufficiently balanced contribution to theoretical, methodological, and empirical issues of INS. The title, Looking for Information: A Survey of Research an Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior aptly describes the main substance of the book. . . . It is easy to agree with Case about the significance of the problem of specialization and fragmentation. This problem seems to be concomitant with the broadening field of INS research. In itself, Case's book can be interpreted as a struggle against this fragmentation. His book suggests that this struggle is not hopeless and that it is still possible to draw an overall picture of the evolving research field. The major pieces of the puzzle were found and the book will provide a useful overview of INS studies for many years."

0.0012160534 = product of:
  0.015200667 = sum of:
    0.0076346733 = product of:
      0.015269347 = sum of:
        0.015269347 = weight(_text_:29 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015269347 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.007565994 = product of:
      0.015131988 = sum of:
        0.015131988 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015131988 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08 = coord(2/25)

Date

2. 7.2005 12:22:50

Source

Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase

9.46772E-4 = product of:
  0.0236693 = sum of:
    0.0236693 = product of:
      0.0473386 = sum of:
        0.0473386 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0473386 = score(doc=3803,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10620318 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.44573617 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

BK

06.30 (Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines)

Classification

06.30 (Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines)

8.070393E-4 = product of:
  0.020175984 = sum of:
    0.020175984 = product of:
      0.04035197 = sum of:
        0.04035197 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04035197 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Date

22. 5.2005 19:53:09

7.0615945E-4 = product of:
  0.017653987 = sum of:
    0.017653987 = product of:
      0.035307974 = sum of:
        0.035307974 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035307974 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Source

Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382

5.0897826E-4 = product of:
  0.012724456 = sum of:
    0.012724456 = product of:
      0.025448913 = sum of:
        0.025448913 = weight(_text_:29 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025448913 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Source

Proceedings of the 15th National IASLIC Conference, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, India, 26-29 December 1992. Ed. by. A. Chatterjee et al

5.043996E-4 = product of:
  0.01260999 = sum of:
    0.01260999 = product of:
      0.02521998 = sum of:
        0.02521998 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02521998 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Date

5. 8.2006 13:22:44

4.0718255E-4 = product of:
  0.010179564 = sum of:
    0.010179564 = product of:
      0.020359129 = sum of:
        0.020359129 = weight(_text_:29 in 2791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020359129 = score(doc=2791,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2791, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2791)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Date

14.12.1995 20:51:29

4.0718255E-4 = product of:
  0.010179564 = sum of:
    0.010179564 = product of:
      0.020359129 = sum of:
        0.020359129 = weight(_text_:29 in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020359129 = score(doc=3136,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Date

29. 1.1996 19:58:10

4.0718255E-4 = product of:
  0.010179564 = sum of:
    0.010179564 = product of:
      0.020359129 = sum of:
        0.020359129 = weight(_text_:29 in 7255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020359129 = score(doc=7255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 7255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7255)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Source

Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 33(1996) no.1, S.29-38

4.0718255E-4 = product of:
  0.010179564 = sum of:
    0.010179564 = product of:
      0.020359129 = sum of:
        0.020359129 = weight(_text_:29 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020359129 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)

Abstract

As part of the study of human information search strategy, the concept of the search tactic, or move made to futher a search, is introduced. 29 search tactics are named, defined, and discussed in 4 categories: monitoring, file structure, search formulation, and term. Implications of the search tactics for research in search strategy are considered. The search tactics are inteded to be practically useful in information searching. This approach to searching is designed to be general, yet nontrivial; it is applicable to both bibliographic and reference searches and in both manual and on-line systems