Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Miller, U.; Teitelbaum, R.: Pre-coordination and post-coordination : past and future (2002) 0.01 
    0.0074416846 = product of:
  0.09302106 = sum of:
    0.008907119 = product of:
      0.017814238 = sum of:
        0.017814238 = weight(_text_:29 in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017814238 = score(doc=1395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.08411394 = weight(_text_:post in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08411394 = score(doc=1395,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.77802044 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
  0.08 = coord(2/25)
    Abstract
    This article deals with the meaningful processing of information in relation to two systems of Information processing: pre-coordination and post-coordination. The different approaches are discussed, with emphasis an the need for a controlled vocabulary in information retrieval. Assigned indexing, which employs a controlled vocabulary, is described in detail. Types of indexing language can be divided into two broad groups - those using pre-coordinated terms and those depending an post-coordination. They represent two different basic approaches in processing and Information retrieval. The historical development of these two approaches is described, as well as the two tools that apply to these approaches: thesauri and subject headings.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.87-93
  2. Geißelmann, F. (Hrsg.): Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen (1994) 0.01 
    0.0060941223 = product of:
  0.07617653 = sum of:
    0.0062982845 = product of:
      0.012596569 = sum of:
        0.012596569 = weight(_text_:29 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012596569 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.19237353 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.06987825 = sum of:
      0.057395 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057395 = score(doc=4360,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.10620318 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.018614428 = queryNorm
          0.5404264 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
      0.012483254 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012483254 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.018614428 = queryNorm
          0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
  0.08 = coord(2/25)
    Classification
    AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines
    AN 50200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliographien, Sammelschriften / Schriftenreihen (Indiv.-Sign.)
    Date
    15. 7.2018 16:22:16
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .
    RVK
    AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines
    AN 50200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliographien, Sammelschriften / Schriftenreihen (Indiv.-Sign.)
  3. Blair, D.C.: Language and representation in information retrieval (1991) 0.00 
    0.0047390405 = product of:
  0.05923801 = sum of:
    0.04030257 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04030257 = score(doc=1545,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1095598 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.36785913 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
    0.01893544 = product of:
      0.03787088 = sum of:
        0.03787088 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03787088 = score(doc=1545,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10620318 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.35658893 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08 = coord(2/25)
    Classification
    ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
    AN 95000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Bibliographische Erfassung, Suchpraxis
    RVK
    ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
    AN 95000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Bibliographische Erfassung, Suchpraxis
  4. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012) 0.00 
    0.003940822 = product of:
  0.049260277 = sum of:
    0.0076346733 = product of:
      0.015269347 = sum of:
        0.015269347 = weight(_text_:29 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015269347 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.041625604 = weight(_text_:post in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041625604 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
  0.08 = coord(2/25)
    Date
    29. 5.2015 20:57:41
    Source
    Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn
  5. Cooey, N.; Phillips, A.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : a post-coordinated future (2023) 0.00 
    0.0038850564 = product of:
  0.09712641 = sum of:
    0.09712641 = weight(_text_:post in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09712641 = score(doc=1163,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.8983806 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Abstract
    This paper is the result of a request from Library of Congress leadership to assess pre-coordinated versus post-coordinated subject cataloging. It argues that the disadvantages of pre-coordinated subject strings are perennial and continue to hinder progress, while the advantages of post-coordinated subject cataloging have expanded, resulting in new opportunities to serve the needs of catalogers and end users alike. The consequences of retaining pre-coordinated headings will have long-term impacts that heavily out-weigh the short-term challenges of transitioning to new cataloging practices. By implementing post-coordinated, faceted vocabularies, the Library of Congress will be investing in the future of libraries.
  6. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.00 
    0.0033542216 = product of:
  0.04192777 = sum of:
    0.035622776 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035622776 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1095598 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.3251446 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
    0.006304995 = product of:
      0.01260999 = sum of:
        0.01260999 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01260999 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08 = coord(2/25)
    Abstract
    Beschäftigt man sich mit Inhaltserschließung, so sind zunächst zwei Dimensionen zu unterscheiden - die Wissensorganisationssysteme selbst (z. B. Normdateien, Thesauri, Schlagwortsprachen, Klassifikationen und Ontologien) und die Metadaten für Dokumente, die mit diesen Wissensorganisationssystemen erschlossen sind. Beides steht in einer Wechselwirkung zueinander: Die Wissensorganisationssysteme sind die Werkzeuge für die Erschließungsarbeit und bilden die Grundlage für die Erstellung konkreter Erschließungsmetadaten. Die praktische Anwendung der Wissensorganisationssysteme in der Erschließung wiederum ist die Basis für deren Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Zugleich haben Wissensorganisationssysteme auch einen Eigenwert unabhängig von den Erschließungsmetadaten für einzelne Dokumente, indem sie bestimmte Bereiche von Welt- oder Fachwissen modellartig abbilden. Will man nun Aussagen über die Qualität von inhaltlicher Erschließung treffen, so genügt es nicht, den Input - also die Wissensorganisationssysteme und die damit generierten Metadaten - zu betrachten. Man muss auch den Output betrachten, also das, was die Recherchewerkzeuge daraus machen und was folglich bei den Nutzer:innen konkret ankommt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Überlegungen zur Qualität von Recherchewerkzeugen in diesem Bereich angestellt - gewissermaßen als Fortsetzung und Vertiefung der dazu im Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) gegebenen Hinweise. Im Zentrum steht die verbale Erschließung nach den Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung (RSWK), wie sie sich in Bibliothekskatalogen manifestiert - gleich, ob es sich dabei um herkömmliche Kataloge oder um Resource-Discovery-Systeme (RDS) handelt.
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
  7. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : I. The best of pre-coordination and post-coordination (1998) 0.00 
    0.0033300482 = product of:
  0.08325121 = sum of:
    0.08325121 = weight(_text_:post in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08325121 = score(doc=2322,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.7700405 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Abstract
    The introduction of computerized post-coordination has solved many of the problems of pre-coordinated subject access. However, the adoption of computerized post-coordination results in the loss of some pre-coordination benefits. Specifically, the effect of hiding terms within the context of others is lost in post-coodination which give lead status to every document term. This results in spurious matches of terms out of context. Library patrons and Internet searchers are increasingly dissatisfied with subject access performance, in part because of unmanageably large retrieval sets. The need to enhance precision and limit the size of retrieval sets motivates this work which proposes partial coordination, an approach which incorporates the advantages of computer search with the ability of pre-coordination to limit spurious partial matches and thereby enhance precision
  8. Gilchrist, A.: ¬The thesaurus in retrieval (1971) 0.00 
    0.001893544 = product of:
  0.0473386 = sum of:
    0.0473386 = product of:
      0.0946772 = sum of:
        0.0946772 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0946772 = score(doc=4593,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10620318 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.89147234 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Classification
    AN 94200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Thesauruskunde
    RVK
    AN 94200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Thesauruskunde
  9. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2014) 0.00 
    0.0013875201 = product of:
  0.034688003 = sum of:
    0.034688003 = weight(_text_:post in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034688003 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
  10. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.00 
    0.0012160534 = product of:
  0.015200667 = sum of:
    0.0076346733 = product of:
      0.015269347 = sum of:
        0.015269347 = weight(_text_:29 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015269347 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.007565994 = product of:
      0.015131988 = sum of:
        0.015131988 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015131988 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08 = coord(2/25)
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  11. Wiesenmüller, H.: Schlagwortketten in Online-Katalogen : Realität und Potenzial (2008) 0.00 
    0.0011399288 = product of:
  0.028498221 = sum of:
    0.028498221 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 2410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028498221 = score(doc=2410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1095598 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.26011568 = fieldWeight in 2410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2410)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Abstract
    Das Prinzip, zur Wiedergabe eines komplexen Gegenstands mehrere Schlagwörter in Form einer Schlagwortkette zu verknüpfen, gehört zum zentralen Kern der 'Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog' (RSWK). Während die Bildung solcher Schlagwortketten - also der Input - umfassend geregelt ist, verzichtet das Regelwerk jedoch darauf, auch für den Output nähere Vorgaben zu machen: "Die Gestaltung des Retrievals von Schlagwörtern und ihrer Anzeige im Online-Katalog" sei "Aufgabe des jeweiligen OPACs", weshalb man sich auf "einzelne Hinweise" beschränke (§ 20,1). Explizit genannt werden immerhin die "Suche nach Schlagwortketten" und das Browsing im Schlagwortkettenindex (5 20,5). Freilich ist seit langem bekannt, dass Schlagwortketten in vielen OPACs recht 'stiefmütterlich' behandelt werden. Eine aussagekräftige Bestandsaufnahme über die tatsächliche Nutzung der Schlagwortketten in aktuellen OPACs fehlte jedoch. Eine solche hat die Verfasserin im Februar 2008 unternommen. Den Hintergrund dafür bildeten die Überlegungen der vom Standardisierungsausschuss eingesetzten Ad-hoc-Arbeitsgruppe "Strategie der Sacherschließung" unter dem Vorsitz von Dr. Friedrich Geißelmann (UB Regensburg). In diesem Rahmen wurde auch über Wege diskutiert, um das große Potenzial der Schlagwortketten besser für das Retrieval nutzbar zu machen. Für die Untersuchung wurden - ohne Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit - 40 Online-Kataloge mit Schlagwortkettenfunktionalitäten analysiert. Zehn unterschiedliche Katalogsysteme waren dabei vertreten: Aleph, Allegro, Biber, Bond, Horizon, Libero, PICA, SISIS-Sunrise, Urica und Virtua. Eine Liste der betrachteten OPACs inkl. ihrer URLs und der im Folgenden verwendeten Siglen ist im Anhang zu finden. Die Darstellung stellt zwangsläufig eine Momentaufnahme dar, denn die OPACs sind natürlich keine statischen Systeme: Schon bei Abfassung des vorliegenden Beitrags im Juli 2008 waren einige Änderungen einzuarbeiten, die sich seit Februar ergeben hatten; weitere Umgestaltungen der Kataloge sind nur eine Frage der Zeit. Desungeachtet gibt die Studie einen Überblick über derzeit implementierte Funktionalitäten sowie aktuelle Trends, und ermöglicht auch das Aufzeigen von Problemfeldern und Verbesserungsmöglichkeiten.
  12. Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999) 0.00 
    0.0011361263 = product of:
  0.02840316 = sum of:
    0.02840316 = product of:
      0.05680632 = sum of:
        0.05680632 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05680632 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10620318 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.5348834 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Classification
    AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis
    RVK
    AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis
  13. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.00 
    6.1077386E-4 = product of:
  0.015269347 = sum of:
    0.015269347 = product of:
      0.030538693 = sum of:
        0.030538693 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030538693 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Date
    18. 5.2002 17:29:00
  14. Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007) 0.00 
    5.5500807E-4 = product of:
  0.013875201 = sum of:
    0.013875201 = weight(_text_:post in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013875201 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10811277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.018614428 = queryNorm
        0.12834008 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Footnote
    Now BNI is beginning to use the new language, pointing the way for the adoption of Nuovo soggettario in Italian libraries: a difficult challenge whose success is not assured. To name only one issue: including all fields of study requires particular care in treating terms with different specialized meanings; cooperation of other libraries and institutions is foreseen. At the same time, efforts are being made to assure the system's interoperability outside the library world. It is clear that a great commitment is required. "Too complex a system!" say the naysayers. "Only at the beginning," the proponents reply. The new system goes against the mainstream, compared with the imitation of the easy way offered by search engines - but we know that they must enrich their devices to improve quality, just repeating the work on semantic and syntactic relationships that leads formal expressions to the meanings they are intended to communicate - and also compared with research to create automated devices supporting human work, for the need to simplify cataloguing. Here AI is not involved, but automation is widely used to facilitate and to support the conscious work of indexers guided by rules as clear as possible. The advantage of Nuovo soggettario is its combination of a thesaurus (a much-appreciated tool used across the world) with the equally widespread technique of subject-string construction, which is to say: the rational and predictable combination of the terms used. The appearance of this original, unparalleled working model may well be a great occasion in the international development of indexing, as, on one hand, the Nuovo soggettario uses a recognized tool (the thesaurus) and, on the other, by permitting both pre-coordination and post-coordination, it attempts to overcome the fragmentation of increasingly complex and specialized subjects into isolated, single-term descriptors. This is a serious proposition that merits consideration from both theoretical and practical points of view - and outside Italy, too."
  15. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.00 
    4.0351966E-4 = product of:
  0.010087992 = sum of:
    0.010087992 = product of:
      0.020175984 = sum of:
        0.020175984 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020175984 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
  16. Lepsky, K.: RSWK - und was noch? : Stellungnahme zum Bericht 'Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen' der Expertengruppe Online-Kataloge (1995) 0.00 
    3.5628476E-4 = product of:
  0.008907119 = sum of:
    0.008907119 = product of:
      0.017814238 = sum of:
        0.017814238 = weight(_text_:29 in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017814238 = score(doc=772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519
  17. Turquet, B.: Que faire de Rameau? : Ou comment faire avec Rameau? (1997) 0.00 
    3.5628476E-4 = product of:
  0.008907119 = sum of:
    0.008907119 = product of:
      0.017814238 = sum of:
        0.017814238 = weight(_text_:29 in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017814238 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  18. Stone, A.T.: Up-ending Cutter's pyramid : the case for making subject references to broader terms (1996) 0.00 
    3.5307973E-4 = product of:
  0.008826993 = sum of:
    0.008826993 = product of:
      0.017653987 = sum of:
        0.017653987 = weight(_text_:22 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017653987 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.065184556 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Date
    22. 4.1997 20:43:23
  19. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00 
    3.0538693E-4 = product of:
  0.0076346733 = sum of:
    0.0076346733 = product of:
      0.015269347 = sum of:
        0.015269347 = weight(_text_:29 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015269347 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  20. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00 
    3.0538693E-4 = product of:
  0.0076346733 = sum of:
    0.0076346733 = product of:
      0.015269347 = sum of:
        0.015269347 = weight(_text_:29 in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015269347 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06547974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.018614428 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04 = coord(1/25)
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 26
  • d 5
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 26
  • m 6
  • s 3
  • el 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications