-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011)
0.01
0.0050570234 = product of:
0.050570235 = sum of:
0.0098013915 = product of:
0.019602783 = sum of:
0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019602783 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.026296193 = weight(_text_:neue in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026296193 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.36011383 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.014472648 = product of:
0.02170897 = sum of:
0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021061886 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019602783 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Pages
- S.29-53
- Source
- Handbuch Internet-Suchmaschinen, 2: Neue Entwicklungen in der Web-Suche. Hrsg.: D. Lewandowski
- Type
- a
-
Lee, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Q.: Folksonomies as subject access : a survey of tagging in library online catalogs and discovery layers (2012)
0.00
0.004660402 = product of:
0.04660402 = sum of:
0.040079206 = weight(_text_:post in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040079206 = score(doc=309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
0.0054717176 = product of:
0.010943435 = sum of:
0.010943435 = weight(_text_:online in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010943435 = score(doc=309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0010530944 = product of:
0.003159283 = sum of:
0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003159283 = score(doc=309,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a survey on how system vendors and libraries handled tagging in OPACs and discovery layers. Tags are user added subject metadata, also called folksonomies. This survey also investigated user behavior when they face the possibility to tag. The findings indicate that legacy/classic systems have no tagging capability. About 47% of the discovery tools provide tagging function. About 49% of the libraries that have a system with tagging capability have turned the tagging function on in their OPACs and discovery tools. Only 40% of the libraries that turned tagging on actually utilized user added subject metadata as access point to collections. Academic library users are less active in tagging than public library users.
- Source
- Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn
- Type
- a
-
Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval (2008)
0.00
0.003440813 = product of:
0.03440813 = sum of:
0.02092435 = product of:
0.0418487 = sum of:
0.0418487 = weight(_text_:dienste in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0418487 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.106369466 = queryWeight, product of:
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.39342776 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012739129 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
7.446501E-4 = product of:
0.0022339502 = sum of:
0.0022339502 = weight(_text_:a in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0022339502 = score(doc=1597,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Abstract
- Die populären Web 2.0-Dienste werden von Prosumern - Produzenten und gleichsam Konsumenten - nicht nur dazu genutzt, Inhalte zu produzieren, sondern auch, um sie inhaltlich zu erschließen. Folksonomies erlauben es dem Nutzer, Dokumente mit eigenen Schlagworten, sog. Tags, zu beschreiben, ohne dabei auf gewisse Regeln oder Vorgaben achten zu müssen. Neben einigen Vorteilen zeigen Folksonomies aber auch zahlreiche Schwächen (u. a. einen Mangel an Präzision). Um diesen Nachteilen größtenteils entgegenzuwirken, schlagen wir eine Interpretation der Tags als natürlichsprachige Wörter vor. Dadurch ist es uns möglich, Methoden des Natural Language Processing (NLP) auf die Tags anzuwenden und so linguistische Probleme der Tags zu beseitigen. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir Ansätze und weitere Vorschläge (Tagverteilungen, Kollaboration und akteurspezifische Aspekte) hinsichtlich eines Relevance Rankings von getaggten Dokumenten. Neben Vorschlägen auf ähnliche Dokumente ("more like this!") erlauben Folksonomies auch Hinweise auf verwandte Nutzer und damit auf Communities ("more like me!").
- Type
- a
-
Hayman, S.; Lothian, N.: Taxonomy directed folksonomies : integrating user tagging and controlled vocabularies for Australian education networks (2007)
0.00
0.0017997868 = product of:
0.017997868 = sum of:
0.0049006958 = product of:
0.0098013915 = sum of:
0.0098013915 = weight(_text_:29 in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0098013915 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0051587853 = product of:
0.0103175705 = sum of:
0.0103175705 = weight(_text_:online in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0103175705 = score(doc=705,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.18968134 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007938387 = product of:
0.01190758 = sum of:
0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021061886 = score(doc=705,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.0098013915 = weight(_text_:29 in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0098013915 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Abstract
- What is the role of controlled vocabulary in a Web 2.0 world? Can we have the best of both worlds: balancing folksonomies and controlled vocabularies to help communities of users find and share information and resources most relevant to them? education.au develops and manages Australian online services for education and training. Its goal is to bring people, learning and technology together. education.au projects are increasingly involved in exploring the use of Web 2.0 developments building on user ideas, knowledge and experience, and how these might be integrated with existing information management systems. This paper presents work being undertaken in this area, particularly in relation to controlled vocabularies, and discusses the challenges faced. Education Network Australia (edna) is a leading online resource collection and collaborative network for education, with an extensive repository of selected educational resources with metadata created by educators and information specialists. It uses controlled vocabularies for metadata creation and searching, where users receive suggested related terms from an education thesaurus, with their results. We recognise that no formal thesaurus can keep pace with user needs so are interested in exploiting the power of folksonomies. We describe a proof of concept project to develop community contributions to managing information and resources, using Taxonomy-Directed Folksonomy. An established taxonomy from the Australian education sector suggests terms for tagging and users can suggest terms. Importantly, the folksonomy will feed back into the taxonomy showing gaps in coverage and helping us to monitor new terms and usage to improve and develop our formal taxonomies. This model would initially sit alongside the current edna repositories, tools and services but will give us valuable user contributed resources as well as information about how users manage resources. Observing terms suggested, chosen and used in folksonomies is a rich source of information for developing our formal systems so that we can indeed get the best of both worlds.
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:29:46
-
Güntner, G.; Sint, R.; Westenthaler, R.: ¬Ein Ansatz zur Unterstützung traditioneller Klassifikation durch Social Tagging (2008)
0.00
0.0017897654 = product of:
0.02684648 = sum of:
0.026319932 = weight(_text_:medien in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026319932 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
5.265472E-4 = product of:
0.0015796415 = sum of:
0.0015796415 = weight(_text_:a in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0015796415 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Series
- Medien in der Wissenschaft; Bd.47
- Type
- a
-
Peters, I.: Benutzerzentrierte Erschließungsverfahren (2013)
0.00
0.0014739641 = product of:
0.02210946 = sum of:
0.021231882 = weight(_text_:u in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021231882 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
8.775785E-4 = product of:
0.0026327355 = sum of:
0.0026327355 = weight(_text_:a in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026327355 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
- Type
- a
-
Spiteri, L.: ¬The structure and form of folksonomy tags : the road to the public library catalogue (2007)
0.00
0.0011791713 = product of:
0.017687568 = sum of:
0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016985506 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
7.0206285E-4 = product of:
0.0021061886 = sum of:
0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021061886 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Source
- ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
- Type
- a
-
Fiala, S.: Deutscher Bibliothekartag Leipzig 2007 : Sacherschließung - Informationsdienstleistung nach Mass (2007)
0.00
0.0011562102 = product of:
0.017343152 = sum of:
0.017079879 = weight(_text_:neue in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017079879 = score(doc=415,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23390082 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
2.632736E-4 = product of:
7.8982074E-4 = sum of:
7.8982074E-4 = weight(_text_:a in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
7.8982074E-4 = score(doc=415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.03821847 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Content
- ""Sacherschließung - Informationsdienstleistung nach Maß": unter diesem Titel fand am 3. Leipziger Kongress für Information und Bibliothek ("Information und Ethik") eine sehr aufschlussreiche Vortragsreihe statt. Neue Projekte der Vernetzung unterschiedlichst erschlossener Bestände wurden vorgestellt. Auch die Frage, inwieweit man die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer in die Erschließung einbinden kann, wurde behandelt. Die Arbeit der Bibliothekare kann wertvolle Ausgangssituationen für alternative Methoden bieten. Das Zusammenwirken von intellektueller und maschineller Erschließung wird in Zukunft eine große Rolle spielen. Ein Ausweg, um die Erschließung der ständig wachsenden Informationsquellen zu ermöglichen, könnte eine arbeitsteilige Erschließung und eine Kooperation mit anderen Informationseinrichtungen darstellen. Im Mittelpunkt all dieser Überlegungen standen die Heterogenitätsprobleme, die sich durch unterschiedliche Erschließungsregeln, verschiedene Arbeitsinstrumente, verschiedene Sprachen und durch die unterschiedliche Bedeutung der Begriffe ergeben können. Der Nachmittag begann mit einem konkreten Beispiel: "Zum Stand der Heterogenitätsbehandlung in vascoda" (Philipp Mayr, Bonn und Anne-Kathrin Walter, Bonn). Das Wissenschaftsportal vascoda beinhaltet verschiedene Fachportale, und es kann entweder interdisziplinär oder fachspezifisch gesucht werden. Durch die verschiedenen Informationsangebote, die in einem Fachportal vorhanden sind und die in dem Wissenschaftsportal vascoda zusammengefasst sind, entsteht semantische Heterogenität. Oberstes Ziel ist somit die Heterogenitätsbehandlung. Die Erstellung von Crosskonkordanzen (zwischen Indexierungssprachen innerhalb eines Fachgebiets und zwischen Indexierungssprachen unterschiedlicher Fachgebiete) und dem sogenannten Heterogenitätsservice (Term-Umschlüsselungs-Dienst) wurden anhand dieses Wissenschaftsportals vorgestellt. "Crosskonkordanzen sind gerichtete, relevanzbewertete Relationen zwischen Termen zweier Thesauri, Klassifikationen oder auch anderer kontrollierter Vokabulare." Im Heterogenitätsservice soll die Suchanfrage so transformiert werden, dass sie alle relevanten Dokumente in den verschiedenen Datenbanken erreicht. Bei der Evaluierung der Crosskonkordanzen stellt sich die Frage der Zielgenauigkeit der Relationen, sowie die Frage nach der Relevanz der durch die Crosskonkordanz zusätzlich gefundenen Treffer. Drei Schritte der Evaluation werden durchgeführt: Zum einen mit natürlicher Sprache in der Freitextsuche, dann übersetzt in Deskriptoren in der Schlagwortsuche und zuletzt mit Deskriptoren in der Schlagwortsuche mit Einsatz der Crosskonkordanzen. Im Laufe des Sommers werden erste Ergebnisse der Evaluation der Crosskonkordanzen erwartet.
Jan Lüth (Kiel) zeigte mit seinem Vortrag "Inhaltserschließung durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer: Ergebnisse eines Tests mit Internetquellen der Virtuellen Fachbibliothek EconBiz" als letzter an diesem Nachmittag eine alternative neue Methode der Erschließung. Für diesen Test wurde eine Teilmenge der im EconBiz-Fachinformationsführer enthaltenen Internetquellen in Social-Bookmarking-Webseiten angeboten, und es wurde beobachtet, inwieweit diese Internetquellen nachgenutzt und durch Schlagworte (Tags) ergänzt wurden. Social-Bookmarking-Webseiten ermöglichen eine private, aber auch öffentliche Verwaltung von Lesezeichen im Internet, welche mit freien Schlagwörtern (Tags), einem Titel und/oder einer Beschreibung versehen werden können. Diese Inhalte werden indexiert und somit werden verschiedene Sprachen, Begriffe und Schreibweisen suchbar. Ziel des Tests sollen Ergebnisse über Potenzial und Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Social-Bookmarking-Systemen im Kontext einer virtuellen Fachbibliothek sein. Als Fazit lässt sich sagen, dass Social Bookmarking sehr aufschlussreich sein kann, um neue Quellen zu erschließen und auszuwählen, und dass ein sehr großes Potenzial vorhanden ist, wenn viele Anwender viele Inhalte einbringen."
- Type
- a
-
Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012)
0.00
0.0010911368 = product of:
0.016367052 = sum of:
0.014862318 = weight(_text_:u in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014862318 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.0015047337 = product of:
0.004514201 = sum of:
0.004514201 = weight(_text_:a in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004514201 = score(doc=828,freq=12.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- There are close to a billion websites on the Internet with approximately 400 million users worldwide [www.internetworldstats.com]. People go to websites for a wide variety of different information tasks, from finding a restaurant to serious research. Many of the difficulties with searching the Web, as it is structured currently, can be attributed to increases to scale. The content of the Web is now so large that we only have a rough estimate of the number of sites and the range of information is extremely diverse, from blogs and photos to research articles and news videos.
- Source
- Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
- Type
- a
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies, social tagging and information retrieval (2011)
0.00
9.3526015E-4 = product of:
0.014028901 = sum of:
0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012739129 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.0012897718 = product of:
0.0038693151 = sum of:
0.0038693151 = weight(_text_:a in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0038693151 = score(doc=4907,freq=12.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Services in Web 2.0 generate a large quantity of information, distributed over a range of resources (e.g. photos, URLs, videos) and integrated into different platforms (e.g. social bookmarking systems, sharing platforms (Peters, 2009). To adequately use this mass of information and to extract it from the platforms, users must be equipped with suitable tools and knowledge. After all, the best information is useless if users cannot find it: 'The model of information consumption relies on the information being found' (Vander Wal, 2004). In Web 2.0, the retrieval component has been established through so-called folksonomies (Vander Wal, 2005a), which are considered as several combinations of an information resource, one or more freely chosen keywords ('tags') and a user. Web 2.0 services that use folksonomies as an indexing and retrieval tool are defined as 'collaborative information services' because they allow for the collaborative creation of a public database that is accessible to all users (registered, where necessary) via the tags of the folksonomy (Ding et al., 2009; Heymann, Paepcke and Garcia-Molina, 2010).
- Source
- Innovations in information retrieval: perspectives for theory and practice. Eds.: A. Foster, u. P. Rafferty
- Type
- a
-
Yi, K.; Chan, L.M.: Linking folksonomy to Library of Congress subject headings : an exploratory study (2009)
0.00
9.1033836E-4 = product of:
0.013655075 = sum of:
0.0049006958 = product of:
0.0098013915 = sum of:
0.0098013915 = weight(_text_:29 in 3616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0098013915 = score(doc=3616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3616)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008754379 = product of:
0.013131568 = sum of:
0.0033301765 = weight(_text_:a in 3616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033301765 = score(doc=3616,freq=20.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.16114321 = fieldWeight in 3616, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3616)
0.0098013915 = weight(_text_:29 in 3616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0098013915 = score(doc=3616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3616)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the linking of a folksonomy (user vocabulary) and LCSH (controlled vocabulary) on the basis of word matching, for the potential use of LCSH in bringing order to folksonomies. Design/methodology/approach - A selected sample of a folksonomy from a popular collaborative tagging system, Delicious, was word-matched with LCSH. LCSH was transformed into a tree structure called an LCSH tree for the matching. A close examination was conducted on the characteristics of folksonomies, the overlap of folksonomies with LCSH, and the distribution of folksonomies over the LCSH tree. Findings - The experimental results showed that the total proportion of tags being matched with LC subject headings constituted approximately two-thirds of all tags involved, with an additional 10 percent of the remaining tags having potential matches. A number of barriers for the linking as well as two areas in need of improving the matching are identified and described. Three important tag distribution patterns over the LCSH tree were identified and supported: skewedness, multifacet, and Zipfian-pattern. Research limitations/implications - The results of the study can be adopted for the development of innovative methods of mapping between folksonomy and LCSH, which directly contributes to effective access and retrieval of tagged web resources and to the integration of multiple information repositories based on the two vocabularies. Practical implications - The linking of controlled vocabularies can be applicable to enhance information retrieval capability within collaborative tagging systems as well as across various tagging system information depositories and bibliographic databases. Originality/value - This is among frontier works that examines the potential of linking a folksonomy, extracted from a collaborative tagging system, to an authority-maintained subject heading system. It provides exploratory data to support further advanced mapping methods for linking the two vocabularies.
- Date
- 20. 6.2010 14:29:15
- Type
- a
-
Lüth, J.: Inhaltserschließung durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer : Ergebnisse eines Tests mit Internetquellen der virtuellen Fachbibliothek EconBiz (2007)
0.00
7.669723E-4 = product of:
0.023009168 = sum of:
0.023009168 = weight(_text_:neue in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023009168 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.3150996 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- - ViFas können Social Bookmarking nutzen, um neue Quellen zu erschließen (Personalknappheit). - Der Erfolg ist allerdings davon abhängig, dass eine kritische Masse an Nutzerinnen und Nutzern erreicht wird. Bei den zu erwartenden fachlich spezialisierten Nutzerinnen und Nutzern einer ViFa kann diese sicherlich vergleichsweise niedriger sein. - Delicious erfährt derzeit bereits eine intensive Nutzung, so dass hier deutliche Überschneidungen mit den EconBiz Internetquellen erkennbar sind. Bei Mister Wong ist dies noch zu gering ausgeprägt. - Großes Potential ist vorhanden wenn viele Nutzerinnen und Nutzer viele Inhalte einbringen.
-
Kim, H.H.: Toward video semantic search based on a structured folksonomy (2011)
0.00
7.662347E-4 = product of:
0.01149352 = sum of:
0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010615941 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
8.775785E-4 = product of:
0.0026327355 = sum of:
0.0026327355 = weight(_text_:a in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026327355 = score(doc=4350,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This study investigated the effectiveness of query expansion using synonymous and co-occurrence tags in users' video searches as well as the effect of visual storyboard surrogates on users' relevance judgments when browsing videos. To do so, we designed a structured folksonomy-based system in which tag queries can be expanded via synonyms or co-occurrence words, based on the use of WordNet 2.1 synonyms and Flickr's related tags. To evaluate the structured folksonomy-based system, we conducted an experiment, the results of which suggest that the mean recall rate in the structured folksonomy-based system is statistically higher than that in a tag-based system without query expansion; however, the mean precision rate in the structured folksonomy-based system is not statistically higher than that in the tag-based system. Next, we compared the precision rates of the proposed system with storyboards (SB), in which SB and text metadata are shown to users when they browse video search results, with those of the proposed system without SB, in which only text metadata are shown. Our result showed that browsing only text surrogates-including tags without multimedia surrogates-is not sufficient for users' relevance judgments.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
- Type
- a
-
Carlin, S.A.: Schlagwortvergabe durch Nutzende (Tagging) als Hilfsmittel zur Suche im Web : Ansatz, Modelle, Realisierungen (2006)
0.00
5.4783735E-4 = product of:
0.01643512 = sum of:
0.01643512 = weight(_text_:neue in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01643512 = score(doc=2476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.22507115 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- Nach dem zu Beginn der Ära des World Wide Web von Hand gepflegte Linklisten und -Verzeichnisse und an Freunde und Kollegen per E-Mail verschickte Links genügten, um die Informationen zu finden, nach denen man suchte, waren schon bald Volltextsuchmaschinen und halbautomatisch betriebene Kataloge notwendig, um den mehr und mehr anschwellenden Informationsfluten des Web Herr zu werden. Heute bereits sind diese Dämme gebrochen und viele Millionen Websites halten Billionen an Einzelseiten mit Informationen vor, von Datenbanken und anderweitig versteckten Informationen ganz zu schweigen. Mit Volltextsuchmaschinen erreicht man bei dieser Masse keine befriedigenden Ergebnisse mehr. Entweder man erzeugt lange Suchterme mit vielen Ausschließungen und ebenso vielen nicht-exklusiven ODER-Verknüpfungen um verschiedene Schreibweisen für den gleichen Term abzudecken oder man wählt von vornherein die Daten-Quelle, an die man seine Fragen stellt, genau aus. Doch oft bleiben nur klassische Web-Suchmaschinen übrig, zumal wenn der Fragende kein Informationsspezialist mit Kenntnissen von Spezialdatenbanken ist, sondern, von dieser Warte aus gesehenen, ein Laie. Und nicht nur im Web selbst, auch in unternehmensinternen Intranets steht man vor diesem Problem. Tausende von indizierten Dokumente mögen ein Eckdatum sein, nach dem sich der Erfolg der Einführung eines Intranets bemessen lässt, aber eine Aussage über die Nützlichkeit ist damit nicht getroffen. Und die bleibt meist hinter den Erwartungen zurück, vor allem bei denen Mitarbeitern, die tatsächlich mit dem Intranet arbeiten müssen. Entscheidend ist für die Informationsauffindung in Inter- und Intranet eine einfach zu nutzende und leicht anpassbare Möglichkeit, neue interessante Inhalte zu entdecken. Mit Tags steht eine mögliche Lösung bereit.
-
Furner, J.: Folksonomies (2009)
0.00
5.331791E-4 = product of:
0.007997686 = sum of:
0.0072956234 = product of:
0.014591247 = sum of:
0.014591247 = weight(_text_:online in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014591247 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
7.0206285E-4 = product of:
0.0021061886 = sum of:
0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021061886 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Folksonomies are indexing languages that emerge from the distributed resource-description activity of multiple agents who make use of online tagging services to assign tags (i.e., category labels) to the resources in collections. Although individuals' motivations for engaging in tagging activity vary widely, folksonomy-based retrieval systems can be evaluated by measuring the degree to which taggers and searchers agree on tag-resource pairings.
- Type
- a
-
Noruzi, A.: Folksonomies : (un)controlled vocabulary? (2006)
0.00
5.1715324E-4 = product of:
0.007757298 = sum of:
0.0063836705 = product of:
0.012767341 = sum of:
0.012767341 = weight(_text_:online in 404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012767341 = score(doc=404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0013736277 = product of:
0.004120883 = sum of:
0.004120883 = weight(_text_:a in 404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004120883 = score(doc=404,freq=10.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 404, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=404)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Folksonomy, a free-form tagging, is a user-generated classification system of web contents that allows users to tag their favorite web resources with their chosen words or phrases selected from natural language. These tags (also called concepts, categories, facets or entities) can be used to classify web resources and to express users' preferences. Folksonomy-based systems allow users to classify web resources through tagging bookmarks, photos or other web resources and saving them to a public web site like Del.icio.us. Thus information about web resources and online articles can be shared in an easy way. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the folksonomy tagging phenomenon (also called social tagging and social bookmarking) and explore some of the reasons why we need controlled vocabularies, discussing the problems associated with folksonomy.
- Type
- a
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.00
4.4698227E-4 = product of:
0.013409467 = sum of:
0.013409467 = product of:
0.0201142 = sum of:
0.002943488 = weight(_text_:a in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002943488 = score(doc=2652,freq=10.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.017170712 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017170712 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- Folksonomy is the result of describing Web resources with tags created by Web users. Although it has become a popular application for the description of resources, in general terms Folksonomies are not being conveniently integrated in metadata. However, if the appropriate metadata elements are identified, then further work may be conducted to automatically assign tags to these elements (RDF properties) and use them in Semantic Web applications. This article presents research carried out to continue the project Kinds of Tags, which intends to identify elements required for metadata originating from folksonomies and to propose an application profile for DC Social Tagging. The work provides information that may be used by software applications to assign tags to metadata elements and, therefore, means for tags to be conveniently gathered by metadata interoperability tools. Despite the unquestionably high value of DC and the significance of the already existing properties in DC Terms, the pilot study show revealed a significant number of tags for which no corresponding properties yet existed. A need for new properties, such as Action, Depth, Rate, and Utility was determined. Those potential new properties will have to be validated in a later stage by the DC Social Tagging Community.
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
- Type
- a
-
Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006)
0.00
4.186901E-4 = product of:
0.012560702 = sum of:
0.012560702 = product of:
0.018841052 = sum of:
0.001842915 = weight(_text_:a in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.001842915 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
0.016998138 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016998138 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- This video explores the changes in the way we find, store, create, critique, and share information. This video was created as a conversation starter, and works especially well when brainstorming with people about the near future and the skills needed in order to harness, evaluate, and create information effectively. Ein sehr schöner Kurzfilm von Michael Wesch, dem wir auch den Beitrag zu Web 2.0 (The Machine is Us/ing Us) verdanken (vor einiger Zeit hier besprochen), thematisiert die Veränderung der Handhabung von Information (insbesondere die Strukturierung und Ordnung, aber auch die Generierung und Speicherung), die auf ihre digitale Gestalt zurückzuführen ist. Kernaussage: Da die Informationen keine physikalischen Beschränkungen mehr unterworfen sind, wird die Ordnung der Informationen vielfältiger, flexibler und für jedermann einfacher zugänglich.
- Date
- 5. 1.2008 19:22:48
-
Chopin, K.: Finding communities : alternative viewpoints through weblogs and tagging (2008)
0.00
3.7563834E-4 = product of:
0.0056345747 = sum of:
0.0045597646 = product of:
0.009119529 = sum of:
0.009119529 = weight(_text_:online in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009119529 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0010748099 = product of:
0.0032244297 = sum of:
0.0032244297 = weight(_text_:a in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0032244297 = score(doc=2341,freq=12.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to discuss and test the claim that user-based tagging allows for access to a wider variety of viewpoints than is found using other forms of online searching. Design/methodology/approach - A general overview of the nature of weblogs and user-based tagging is given, along with other relevant concepts. A case is then analyzed where viewpoints towards a specific issue are searched for using both tag searching (Technorati) and general search engine searching (Google and Google Blog Search). Findings - The claim to greater accessibility through user-based tagging is not overtly supported with these experiments. Further results for both general and tag-specific searching goes against some common assumptions about the types of content found on weblogs as opposed to more general web sites. Research limitations/implications - User-based tagging is still not widespread enough to give conclusive data for analysis. As this changes, further research in this area, using a variety of search subjects, is warranted. Originality/value - Although proponents of user-based tagging attribute many qualities to the practice, these qualities have not been properly documented or demonstrated. This paper partially rectifies this gap by testing one of the claims made, that of accessibility to alternate views, thus adding to the discussion on tagging for both researchers and other interested parties.
- Type
- a
-
Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008)
0.00
3.734174E-4 = product of:
0.011202522 = sum of:
0.011202522 = product of:
0.016803782 = sum of:
0.0022339502 = weight(_text_:a in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0022339502 = score(doc=2109,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
0.014569832 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014569832 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- Many Web sites have begun allowing users to submit items to a collection and tag them with keywords. The folksonomies built from these tags are an interesting topic that has seen little empirical research. This study compared the search information retrieval (IR) performance of folksonomies from social bookmarking Web sites against search engines and subject directories. Thirty-four participants created 103 queries for various information needs. Results from each IR system were collected and participants judged relevance. Folksonomy search results overlapped with those from the other systems, and documents found by both search engines and folksonomies were significantly more likely to be judged relevant than those returned by any single IR system type. The search engines in the study had the highest precision and recall, but the folksonomies fared surprisingly well. Del.icio.us was statistically indistinguishable from the directories in many cases. Overall the directories were more precise than the folksonomies but they had similar recall scores. Better query handling may enhance folksonomy IR performance further. The folksonomies studied were promising, and may be able to improve Web search performance.
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 12:39:22
- Type
- a
