Search (265 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01
    0.005942628 = product of:
      0.08913941 = sum of:
        0.017152434 = product of:
          0.03430487 = sum of:
            0.03430487 = weight(_text_:29 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03430487 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.07198697 = sum of:
          0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.00368583 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.03430487 = weight(_text_:29 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03430487 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.033996277 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033996277 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    20. 4.2002 19:29:54
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
    Type
    a
  2. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.01
    0.005942628 = product of:
      0.08913941 = sum of:
        0.017152434 = product of:
          0.03430487 = sum of:
            0.03430487 = weight(_text_:29 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03430487 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.07198697 = sum of:
          0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.00368583 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.03430487 = weight(_text_:29 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03430487 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.033996277 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033996277 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2002 9:29:38
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
    Type
    a
  3. Diesing, K.: Register zu Büchern : Bedeutung, Beschaffenheit, Evaluation. Dargestellt an ausgewählten Beispielen aus dem Bereich der Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1997) 0.00
    0.0037259532 = product of:
      0.11177859 = sum of:
        0.11177859 = weight(_text_:wirtschaftswissenschaften in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11177859 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11380646 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.98218143 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.3497796 = idf(docFreq=209, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
  4. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.00
    0.003453948 = product of:
      0.051809218 = sum of:
        0.0098013915 = product of:
          0.019602783 = sum of:
            0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019602783 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.042007826 = sum of:
          0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029786006 = score(doc=4824,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
          0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019602783 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
          0.019426443 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019426443 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
    Type
    a
  5. Bernier, C.L.: Subject indexes (1980) 0.00
    0.0032365387 = product of:
      0.04854808 = sum of:
        0.019602783 = product of:
          0.039205566 = sum of:
            0.039205566 = weight(_text_:29 in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039205566 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028945295 = product of:
          0.04341794 = sum of:
            0.004212377 = weight(_text_:a in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004212377 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
            0.039205566 = weight(_text_:29 in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039205566 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.29
    Type
    a
  6. Roberts, C.: HyperIndex : new indexing software for the Mac (1996) 0.00
    0.0032365387 = product of:
      0.04854808 = sum of:
        0.019602783 = product of:
          0.039205566 = sum of:
            0.039205566 = weight(_text_:29 in 6808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039205566 = score(doc=6808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 6808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028945295 = product of:
          0.04341794 = sum of:
            0.004212377 = weight(_text_:a in 6808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004212377 = score(doc=6808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6808)
            0.039205566 = weight(_text_:29 in 6808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039205566 = score(doc=6808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 6808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6808)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Keywords. 4(1996) nos.3/4, S.29-31
    Type
    a
  7. Holbert, S.: How to index Windows-based online help (2000) 0.00
    0.0030207378 = product of:
      0.030207377 = sum of:
        0.016415153 = product of:
          0.032830305 = sum of:
            0.032830305 = weight(_text_:online in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032830305 = score(doc=224,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.6035623 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012739129 = score(doc=224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
        0.0010530944 = product of:
          0.003159283 = sum of:
            0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003159283 = score(doc=224,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Today, more and more software packages come with online documentation. Some have complete manuals as well. Others have basic documentation on paper and more advanced information online. I recently purchased a computer that came with 20 software programs and not one page of written documentation. More and more, users have to find information by searching online. Most documentation teams focus on writing and ignore the problems of information retrieval, making information in printed documents difficult to find, and online information impossible to find. With online Help, you cannot browse the documentation. You cannot even browse more than a couple of inches of the index at a time. If online users do not get superb guidance into the jungle of online Help, they go away like the hero of Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, saying "Oh, the horror! The horror!" How does an online Help index work? The following examples are based on the Windows 95 Help-type system, but do not represent actual Help screens
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
    Type
    a
  8. Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992) 0.00
    0.002971314 = product of:
      0.044569705 = sum of:
        0.008576217 = product of:
          0.017152434 = sum of:
            0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017152434 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.035993487 = sum of:
          0.001842915 = weight(_text_:a in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.001842915 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
          0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017152434 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
          0.016998138 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016998138 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Content
    Automated support to indexing forms a continuum from computer support to clerical activities, quality control, intellectual activities and to full automatic indexing. Describes the current indexing environment and examines the need for automated support. Reports on case studies of various indexing services which are at different stages along the continuum. Describes academic and corporate research projects and commercial indexing software. Examines the future of related technologies and offers advice on how to get started on the continuum
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
  9. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.00
    0.0028453742 = product of:
      0.028453741 = sum of:
        0.0073510436 = product of:
          0.014702087 = sum of:
            0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014702087 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009477294 = product of:
          0.018954588 = sum of:
            0.018954588 = weight(_text_:online in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018954588 = score(doc=5612,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.34846687 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0116254045 = product of:
          0.017438106 = sum of:
            0.0027360192 = weight(_text_:a in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0027360192 = score(doc=5612,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
            0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014702087 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subjecl Headings retrieved as the results of a search in an online catalog are likely to be filed in straight alphabetical, word-by-word order, ignoring the semantic structures of these headings and scattering headings of a similar type. This practice makes LC headings unnecessarily difficult to use and negates much of their indexing power. Enthusiasm for filing simplicity and postcoordinate indexing are likely contributing factors to this phenomenon. Since the report Headings for Tomorrow (1992) first raised this issue, filing practices favoring postcoordination over precoordination appear to have become more widespread and more entrenched
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
    Type
    a
  10. Hodges, J.E.: Automated systems for the generation of document indexes (2000) 0.00
    0.0028319713 = product of:
      0.042479567 = sum of:
        0.017152434 = product of:
          0.03430487 = sum of:
            0.03430487 = weight(_text_:29 in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03430487 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.025327131 = product of:
          0.037990697 = sum of:
            0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00368583 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
            0.03430487 = weight(_text_:29 in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03430487 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.66, [=Suppl.29]
    Type
    a
  11. Fayen, E.G.: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies : a revision of ANSI/NISO Z39.19 for the 21st century (2007) 0.00
    0.0025454203 = product of:
      0.0381813 = sum of:
        0.037188433 = weight(_text_:neue in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037188433 = score(doc=744,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.5092779 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
        9.928669E-4 = product of:
          0.0029786006 = sum of:
            0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029786006 = score(doc=744,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Die National Information Standards Organization (NISO) begann im Jahre 2003 mit der Überarbeitung der Norm Z39.19. Die neue Norm erweiterte den Geltungsbereich von Dokumenten auf Inhaltsobjekte und die Abdeckung von Thesauri auf alle Arten kontrollierter Vokabulare. Sie bezieht sich zudem über das reine Papierumfeld hinaus auf geeignete Formate für elektronische Inhalte. Dieser Artikel beschreibt diese Arbeit und die daraus resultierende neue Norm.
    Type
    a
  12. Beyond book indexing : how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media (2000) 0.00
    0.0024753278 = product of:
      0.024753278 = sum of:
        0.009119529 = product of:
          0.018239059 = sum of:
            0.018239059 = weight(_text_:online in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018239059 = score(doc=215,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015013208 = weight(_text_:u in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015013208 = score(doc=215,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.25581595 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
        6.205418E-4 = product of:
          0.0018616254 = sum of:
            0.0018616254 = weight(_text_:a in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0018616254 = score(doc=215,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Are you curious about new indexing technologies? Would you like to develop and create innovative indexes that provide access to online resources, multimedia, or online help? Do you want to learn new skills and expand your marketing possibilities? This book provides an in-depth look at current and emerging computer-based technologies and offers suggestions for obtaining work in these fields. Extensive refrences and a glossary round out this informative and exciting new book
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Part 1: Beyond stand-alone indexes: embedded indexing: WRIGHT; J.C.: The world of embedded indexing; MONCRIEF, L.: Indexing computer-related documents - Part 2: Beyond the book: Web indexing: WALKER, D.: Subject-oriented Web indexing; BROCCOLI, K. u. G.V. RAVENSWAAY: Web indexing - anchors away; MAISLIN, S.: Ripping out the pages; ROWLAND, M.J.: Plunging in: Creating a Web site index for an online newsletter - Part 3: Special topics in computer-based indexing: ROWLAND, M.J.: <Meta> tags; WOODS. X.B.: Envisioning the word: Multimedia CD-ROM indexing; HOLBERT, S.: How to index Windows-based online help - Part 4: Beyond traditional marketing - selling yourself in hyperspace: ROWLAND, M.J.: Web site design for indexers; RICE, R.: Putting sample indexes on your Web site; CONNOLLY, D.A.: The many uses of Email discussion lists
    Editor
    Brenner, D. u. M. Rowland
  13. Rosemann, L.: ¬Die Volltextabfrage und das Alleinstellungsmerkmal des physischen Buches (2006) 0.00
    0.0023060362 = product of:
      0.034590542 = sum of:
        0.03432727 = sum of:
          0.0134029165 = weight(_text_:online in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0134029165 = score(doc=5142,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.24640328 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
          0.02092435 = weight(_text_:dienste in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02092435 = score(doc=5142,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.106369466 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.19671388 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.934836 = idf(docFreq=317, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
        2.632736E-4 = product of:
          7.8982074E-4 = sum of:
            7.8982074E-4 = weight(_text_:a in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              7.8982074E-4 = score(doc=5142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.03821847 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Content
    "Mit Google Print bzw. mittlerweile Google Book Search und dem Projekt zur Übernahme eines brancheneigenen Portals zur Pflege und Bereitstellung digitaler Daten aus Büchern namens "Volltextsuche online" initiiert durch den Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels tritt ein Thema auf den Plan, das im deutschen Sprachraum lange vernachlässigt wurde: allgemein gesprochen, die Notwendigkeit der Texterschließung durch Indexierung - sei sie gedruckt in Form von Registern im Anhang von Sach- und wissenschaftlichen Büchern oder ungedruckt in Form sog. Volltextabfragen per Suchmaske am Computer. Angesichts der exponentiell wachsenden Menge an Wissen ist es gut, wenn hierzu Überlegungen angestellt werden und damit die Chance besteht, neben der wirtschaftlichen auch über die wissenstheoretische Dimension dieser Dienste nachzudenken. Zweifellos wird die Bedeutung der Indexierung von Fließtext aus wissenstheoretischer Sicht in Zukunft noch weiter wachsen und bedeutet im Falle einer Online-Plattform (wenn sie denn in naher Zukunft eine hinreichend große Menge an Büchern in ihrem Datenbestand aufweisen wird) die Erfüllung eines Traumes für die wissenschaftliche Arbeit: Es ist fantastisch, in Millisekunden das Vorhandensein von Personen, Termen, Phrasen und Wortkomposita zu ermitteln, um die Ein- bzw. Nichteinschlägigkeit eines Buches und - mehr noch -vieler Bücher für die eigene Arbeit eindeutig beantworten zu können. Es ist fantastisch, im Trefferfall die gesuchte Information sogleich auf dem Monitor exzerpieren zu können oder sich auch bei ausbleibenden Treffern das Durcharbeiten eines ganzen Buches, vielleicht sogar einer halben Bibliothek ersparen zu können. Dabei ist das letztere Resultat mindestens eine genauso wichtige Information wie die erste, denn auch sie wird- man darf fast sagen, so gut wie immer - zu einer unglaublichen Ersparnis an Zeit verhelfen; hier bedeutet allein schon die Verringerung der Datenmenge einen Zuwachs an Wissen unter minimalem Zeitaufwand. Angesichts dieser Diagnose ist die These zu wagen, die digitale Revolution beginnt erst wirklich bei der Nutzung der Volltexte selbst als Datenquelle zur Wissensabfrage.
    . . . Ich plädiere hier aus den oben genannten wissenstheoretischen Gründen nicht nur für die Aufrechterhaltung eines Mindestmaßes an Registern und Indexen im Anhang von physischen Büchern, sondern sogar für deren Ausbau, deren standardmäßige Zugabe bei Sach- und wissenschaftlichen Büchern gerade angesichts der Volltextnutzung durch Online-Abfragen. Warum? Hierzu sechs Argumente: 1. Wie oben bereits angerissen, lehrt die Erfahrung bei CD-ROM-Zugaben zu opulenten Werken, dass Parallelmedien mit Parallelinhalten von den Nutzern nicht wirklich angenommen werden; es ist umständlich, zur Auffindung bestimmter Textstellen den Computer befragen zu müssen und die Fundstellen dann zwischen zwei Buchdeckeln nachzuschlagen. 2. Über frei wählbare Suchbegriffe seitens des Nutzers ist noch keine Qualität der Suchergebnisse garantiert. Erst das Einrechnen entsprechender Verweisungsbegriffe und Synonyme in die Suchabfrage führt zu Qualität des Ergebnisses. Die scheinbar eingesparten Kosten einer einmaligen bzw. abonnementartigen Investition in eine Online-Verfügbarkeit der Buchinhalte vonseiten der Verlage werden dann über die Hintertür doch wieder fällig, wenn sich nämlich herausstellt, dass Nutzer bei der von ihnen gesuchten Information nicht fündig werden, weil sie unter dem "falschen", d.h. entweder ihnen nicht bekannten oder einem ihnen gerade nicht präsenten Schlagwort gesucht haben. Die Online-Suchabfrage, die auf den ersten Blick höchst nutzerfreundlich erscheint, da eine ungeheure Menge an Titeln die Abfrage umfasst, erweist sich womöglich als wenig brauchbar, wenn sich die Trefferqualität aus den genannten Gründen als beschränkt herausstellt. 3. Nur bei entsprechenden Restriktionen des Zugangs bzw. der präsentierten Textausschnitte werden die Verlage es gewährleistet sehen, dass die Nutzerin, der Nutzer nicht vom Kauf des physischen Buches Abstand nehmen. Nur wenn die Nutzer wissen, dass ihnen gerade jene Informationen am Bildschirm vorenthalten werden, die sie im zu erwerbenden Buch mit Gewissheit finden werden, werden sie das Buch noch erwerben wollen. Wer auf die Schnelle nur ein Kochrezept aus einem teuer bebilderten Kochbuch der Oberklasse abrufen kann, wird das teure Kochbuch eben nicht mehr kaufen. Analog stellt sich die Frage, ob nicht aus diesem Grunde auch Bibliotheken erwägen werden, angesichts der elektronischen Präsenz teuerer physischer Bücher auf den Erwerb der Letzteren zu verzichten, wohl wissend, dass den Wissenschaftlern im Zweifel einige Mausklicks genügen, um die gewünschte Begriffsrecherche erschöpfend beantwortet zu finden.
    4. Vermutlich wird sich aufgrund der genannten Gründe der Buchservice Volltextsuche als heterogen darstellen: Einige Verlage werden gar nicht mitspielen, andere werden ein Buch im Vollzugriff, ein anderes nur zum Teil, ein drittes nur als Metainformation usw. indizieren lassen. Dies wird letztlich ebenfalls die Trefferqualität schmälern, da der Nutzer dann wiederum wissen muss, genau welche Informationen und Texte ihm bei seiner Suche vorenthalten werden. Das gedruckte Sachbuch wird gegen seinen eigenen digitalen Klon ein Alleinstellungsmerkmal brauchen, um weiterhin attraktiv zu sein. 5. Ein solches Alleinstellungsmerkmal würde m.E. maßgeblich durch die Erstellung von gedruckten Registern bereits in der Druckausgabe erreicht werden. Damit würde die Druckausgabe tatsächlich an Wert gewinnen und der Buchkäufer erhielte einen echten Mehrwert. Zum einen spiegelt sich bereits in der Erstellung konventioneller gedruckter Register die zweite digitale Revolution wider: Moderne Registererstellung basiert heutzutage ebenfalls auf der digitalen Verwertung des Volltextes. Zum anderen erfordert das "Registermachen" zugleich die Erbringung jener o.g. sachdienlichen Mehrinformationen wie Verweisungsbegriffe, vernünftige Klassifizierungen, nicht-redundante Begriffsauswahl etc., die nur begrenzt automatisierbar sind und Fachwissen erfordern. Erst diese beiden Komponenten lassen die Indexierung schlussendlich zu einer hochwertigen Aufbereitung sequentieller Information werden. 6. Genau diese Mehr- und Metainformationen, die die vorausgegangene Erstellung eines Print-Vollregisters geliefert hat, lassen sich dann in den Suchalgorithmus der Online-Suche zur Qualitätssteigerung der Treffer einrechnen."
    Type
    a
  14. Rowland, M.J.: Plunging in : creating a Web site index for an online newsletter (2000) 0.00
    0.0020976556 = product of:
      0.020976555 = sum of:
        0.009119529 = product of:
          0.018239059 = sum of:
            0.018239059 = weight(_text_:online in 221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018239059 = score(doc=221,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 221, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010615941 = score(doc=221,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 221, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=221)
        0.0012410836 = product of:
          0.0037232507 = sum of:
            0.0037232507 = weight(_text_:a in 221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0037232507 = score(doc=221,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 221, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=221)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Creating an online index for a Web site is not a job for the timid. Those contemplating this form of Web indexing should already be accomplished indexers and should have strong experience in Web page creation. Knowledge of HTML is essential. In fact, depending on the nature of a Web indexing job, you may find that it requires more HTML knowledge than indexing skill. Like embedded indexing, Web site indexing is far more work than traditional indexing: the choice of terms is constrained, and the indexing process itself is slower and more challenging. Entries must be carefully chosen because the editing process can be tedious and time-consuming, sometimes more time-consuming than making the original entries. Hypertext links and anchors must be added, and the index itself must be tested to make sure that links work as intended. Adequate compensation for your project is imperative. Web indexing does have its rewards, though, especially for indexers who are intrigued by the Web and Web page design, for those who like a challenge, and, of course, for those who like to have their work online for all the world to see. This article provides a look at the process of creating a Web index for an online newsletter. It is also applicable to other forms of Web site indexing, and should give the beginning Web site indexer an idea of what to expect on that first job
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
    Type
    a
  15. Wheatley, A.: ¬A manual on printed subject indexes : report to the British Library Research and Development Department on Project SI/G/243 (1978) 0.00
    0.0020713042 = product of:
      0.031069562 = sum of:
        0.01225174 = product of:
          0.02450348 = sum of:
            0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02450348 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.018817822 = product of:
          0.028226731 = sum of:
            0.0037232507 = weight(_text_:a in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0037232507 = score(doc=571,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
            0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02450348 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    28. 5.2007 19:29:37
  16. Clarke, M.: Retrieving information from scientific periodicals (1996) 0.00
    0.0020228368 = product of:
      0.030342551 = sum of:
        0.01225174 = product of:
          0.02450348 = sum of:
            0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02450348 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01809081 = product of:
          0.027136216 = sum of:
            0.0026327355 = weight(_text_:a in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0026327355 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
            0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02450348 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Date
    25. 2.1997 10:29:16
    Type
    a
  17. Fassbender, J.: Professionelle Registererstellung : Das DNI informierte auf der Frankfurter Buchmesse 2006 (2007) 0.00
    0.0020174382 = product of:
      0.020174382 = sum of:
        0.015353293 = weight(_text_:medien in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015353293 = score(doc=778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.18200494 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
        0.004513937 = product of:
          0.009027874 = sum of:
            0.009027874 = weight(_text_:online in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009027874 = score(doc=778,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.16597117 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        3.071525E-4 = product of:
          9.214575E-4 = sum of:
            9.214575E-4 = weight(_text_:a in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              9.214575E-4 = score(doc=778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Content
    4. Ferner wurde darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass mit dem DNI auch im deutschsprachigen Raum eine Plattform für professionelles Indexing vorhanden ist, die sowohl hervorragende Kontakte zu den weltweit führenden angloamerikanischen Fachverbänden unterhält als auch Indexerinnen und Indexer für die Registererstellung für Fach- und Sachbücher als auch Periodika und Online-Medien bereitstellt. Maureen MacGlashan von der britischen Society of Indexers (SI) hielt einen Vortrag über die Fachzeitschrift The Indexer, das internationale Fachblatt der Indexing-Szene schlechthin. Maureen MacGlashan ist die derzeitige Hauptherausgeberin und erläuterte die Entstehungsgeschichte und Inhalte dieser bereits 1958 gegründeten Zeitschrift sowie deren Website www. theindexer.org, auf der ein Online-Index zur Verfügung steht. Ferner machte sie auf die im Oktober 2006 erscheinende Ausgabe aufmerksam, die als Schwerpunkt viele Aspekte des Indexing außerhalb des englischen Sprachraums beinhaltet. An dieser Ausgabe hatte auch das DNI als Gastherausgeber mitgearbeitet. Ein absolutes Debüt auf der Buchmesse war der Vortrag von Frances Lennie aus den USA, die mit CINDEX erstmals eine Dedicated Indexing Software vorstellte. Jede Person, die derartige Software kennen gelernt hat, weiß um den großen Unterschied zu der mühseligen Indexerstellung in Word. Frances Lennie zeigte, wie leicht und elegant Haupt- und Untereinträge sowie Querverweise mit CINDEX erstellt werden können. Die mit dieser Software viel effizienter erstellten Registereinträge lassen sich anschließend sogar in Word-Dokumente einbetten. Ein reichlich gedeckter Tisch mit InfoMaterial (z. B. Hefte von The Indexer, CDs mit einer Demo-Version von CINDEX) und der Hinweis, dass sowohl Mitglieder des DNI als auch die Society of Indexers Seminare zum professionellen Indexing anbieten, rundete die gelungene Veranstaltung ab. Weitere Informationen zum DNI und zur Registererstellung finden sich auf der DNI-Website www.d-indexer.org."
    Type
    a
  18. Walker, D.: Subject-oriented Web indexing (2000) 0.00
    0.0018955497 = product of:
      0.018955497 = sum of:
        0.0054717176 = product of:
          0.010943435 = sum of:
            0.010943435 = weight(_text_:online in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010943435 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012739129 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
        7.446501E-4 = product of:
          0.0022339502 = sum of:
            0.0022339502 = weight(_text_:a in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0022339502 = score(doc=218,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    My goal in this short article is to bring you up to speed on Web indexing. I assume you are a person with good word skills and an inquisitive mind. Also, I assume you have good keyboard skills, access to the Internet, and have already created some HTML pages using, say, Netscape Composer. You may need help from your Internet Service Provider (ISP) to upload pages onto your Web site. This article is based on my experience teaching an online interactive course in Web indexing for my company, WWWalker Web Development, in 1998. We develop Web sites, support Linux and Windows NT, write technical articles, and specialize in Web indexing.
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
    Type
    a
  19. Hartmann, K.: PDS: Retrievalsoftware für die Pressedatenbank (1984) 0.00
    0.0017998838 = product of:
      0.026998255 = sum of:
        0.026296193 = weight(_text_:neue in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026296193 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07302189 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.36011383 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.074223 = idf(docFreq=2043, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
        7.0206285E-4 = product of:
          0.0021061886 = sum of:
            0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0021061886 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Die PDS - Pressedatenbank Retrieval Software - ist eine neue Informationsdatenbank-Software. Sie ist einsatzfähig für Literaturhinweise und Volltextspeicherung. Sie läuft auf IBM-kompatiblem Rechnern. Sie wurde auf dem Hintergrund zehnjähriger Erfahrung im Umgang mit Datenbanken entworfen. PDS verfügt über eine einzigartige phonetische Abfragemöglichkeit, über ein Programm zur Herstellung gedruckter Register und eine Schnittstelle zu dem elektronischen Massenspeicher MEGADOC von Philips. In der G+J Pressedatenbank sind derzeit mehr als 1,4 Mio Datensätze gespeichert. Die G+J Dokumentation versorgt mehr als 800 Redakteure mit Textinformation und Bildern
    Type
    a
  20. Maislin, S.: Ripping out the pages (2000) 0.00
    0.0016492074 = product of:
      0.016492074 = sum of:
        0.0045597646 = product of:
          0.009119529 = sum of:
            0.009119529 = weight(_text_:online in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009119529 = score(doc=220,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010615941 = score(doc=220,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
        0.0013163679 = product of:
          0.0039491034 = sum of:
            0.0039491034 = weight(_text_:a in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0039491034 = score(doc=220,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    When the Web was invented, it was touted as a novel nonlinear medium for the written word. No longer would we be constrained by linear presentations! Hyperlinks would allow us to jump haphazardly from page to page, chapter to chapter, idea to idea! Texts would no longer need to run from beginning to end! This is misleading. A printed book is also multidimensional and potentially nonlinear. We can open it to any page, from any other page, for any reason. We can open several books at once. In fact, what makes a book special is its combination of linear structure (the order of the words) and nonlinear physicality (the bound papers). This linear/nonlinear duality is enhanced further by the index, which maps linearly sequenced pages in a nonlinear, informationally ordered structure (architecture). In truth, the online environment is crippled by an absence of linear structure. Imagine selecting a hard cover book, tearing off the covers, ripping pages into small pieces, and throwing them in a box. That box is like a computer file system, and the paper scraps are Web documents. Only one scrap can be retrieved from the box at a time, and it must be replaced before another can be accessed. Page numbers are meaningless. Global context is destroyed. And without page numbers or context, what happens to the index?
    Issue
    Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
    Type
    a

Languages

  • e 236
  • d 28
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 233
  • m 25
  • s 4
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • el 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…