-
Soergel, D.E.: Klassifikationssysteme und Thesauri : Eine Anleitung zur Herstellung von Klassifikationssystemen und Thesauri im Bereich der Dokumentation (1969)
0.05
0.045927774 = product of:
0.09185555 = sum of:
0.09185555 = product of:
0.1837111 = sum of:
0.1837111 = weight(_text_:130 in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1837111 = score(doc=2020,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3225102 = queryWeight, product of:
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.5696288 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: ZfBB 18(1970) S.130-133 (L. Bösing)
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.02
0.02034056 = product of:
0.04068112 = sum of:
0.04068112 = product of:
0.08136224 = sum of:
0.08136224 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08136224 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.02
0.02034056 = product of:
0.04068112 = sum of:
0.04068112 = product of:
0.08136224 = sum of:
0.08136224 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08136224 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.02
0.02034056 = product of:
0.04068112 = sum of:
0.04068112 = product of:
0.08136224 = sum of:
0.08136224 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08136224 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
-
Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008)
0.01
0.014352429 = product of:
0.028704857 = sum of:
0.028704857 = product of:
0.057409715 = sum of:
0.057409715 = weight(_text_:130 in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057409715 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3225102 = queryWeight, product of:
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.17800899 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 36(2009) no.1, S.62-63 (K. La Barre): "This special issue of Axiomathes presents an ambitious dual agenda. It attempts to highlight aspects of facet analysis (as used in LIS) that are shared by cognate approaches in philosophy, psychology, linguistics and computer science. Secondarily, the issue aims to attract others to the study and use of facet analysis. The authors represent a blend of lifetime involvement with facet analysis, such as Vickery, Broughton, Beghtol, and Dahlberg; those with well developed research agendas such as Tudhope, and Priss; and relative newcomers such as Gnoli, Cheti and Paradisi, and Slavic. Omissions are inescapable, but a more balanced issue would have resulted from inclusion of at least one researcher from the Indian school of facet theory. Another valuable addition might have been a reaction to the issue by one of the chief critics of facet analysis. Potentially useful, but absent, is a comprehensive bibliography of resources for those wishing to engage in further study, that now lie scattered throughout the issue. Several of the papers assume relative familiarity with facet analytical concepts and definitions, some of which are contested even within LIS. Gnoli's introduction (p. 127-130) traces the trajectory, extensions and new developments of this analytico- synthetic approach to subject access, while providing a laundry list of cognate approaches that are similar to facet analysis. This brief essay and the article by Priss (p. 243-255) directly addresses this first part of Gnoli's agenda. Priss provides detailed discussion of facet-like structures in computer science (p. 245- 246), and outlines the similarity between Formal Concept Analysis and facets. This comparison is equally fruitful for researchers in computer science and library and information science. By bridging into a discussion of visualization challenges for facet display, further research is also invited. Many of the remaining papers comprehensively detail the intellectual heritage of facet analysis (Beghtol; Broughton, p. 195-198; Dahlberg; Tudhope and Binding, p. 213-215; Vickery). Beghtol's (p. 131-144) examination of the origins of facet theory through the lens of the textbooks written by Ranganathan's mentor W.C.B. Sayers (1881-1960), Manual of Classification (1926, 1944, 1955) and a textbook written by Mills A Modern Outline of Classification (1964), serves to reveal the deep intellectual heritage of the changes in classification theory over time, as well as Ranganathan's own influence on and debt to Sayers.
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.01
0.013560373 = product of:
0.027120747 = sum of:
0.027120747 = product of:
0.054241493 = sum of:
0.054241493 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054241493 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.013560373 = product of:
0.027120747 = sum of:
0.027120747 = product of:
0.054241493 = sum of:
0.054241493 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054241493 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.013560373 = product of:
0.027120747 = sum of:
0.027120747 = product of:
0.054241493 = sum of:
0.054241493 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054241493 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.01
0.013560373 = product of:
0.027120747 = sum of:
0.027120747 = product of:
0.054241493 = sum of:
0.054241493 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054241493 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
-
Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996)
0.01
0.011865326 = product of:
0.023730652 = sum of:
0.023730652 = product of:
0.047461305 = sum of:
0.047461305 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047461305 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
-
Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001)
0.01
0.011865326 = product of:
0.023730652 = sum of:
0.023730652 = product of:
0.047461305 = sum of:
0.047461305 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047461305 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.01
0.011865326 = product of:
0.023730652 = sum of:
0.023730652 = product of:
0.047461305 = sum of:
0.047461305 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047461305 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-36
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.01017028 = product of:
0.02034056 = sum of:
0.02034056 = product of:
0.04068112 = sum of:
0.04068112 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04068112 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.01
0.01017028 = product of:
0.02034056 = sum of:
0.02034056 = product of:
0.04068112 = sum of:
0.04068112 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04068112 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
-
Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010)
0.01
0.01017028 = product of:
0.02034056 = sum of:
0.02034056 = product of:
0.04068112 = sum of:
0.04068112 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04068112 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
-
Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014)
0.01
0.01017028 = product of:
0.02034056 = sum of:
0.02034056 = product of:
0.04068112 = sum of:
0.04068112 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04068112 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014)
0.01
0.01017028 = product of:
0.02034056 = sum of:
0.02034056 = product of:
0.04068112 = sum of:
0.04068112 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04068112 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018)
0.01
0.01017028 = product of:
0.02034056 = sum of:
0.02034056 = product of:
0.04068112 = sum of:
0.04068112 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04068112 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 18:22:25
-
Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995)
0.01
0.008475234 = product of:
0.016950468 = sum of:
0.016950468 = product of:
0.033900935 = sum of:
0.033900935 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033900935 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
-
Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004)
0.01
0.008475234 = product of:
0.016950468 = sum of:
0.016950468 = product of:
0.033900935 = sum of:
0.033900935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033900935 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.19-22
