-
Larson, R.R.: Experiments in automatic Library of Congress Classification (1992)
0.03
0.034445833 = product of:
0.06889167 = sum of:
0.06889167 = product of:
0.13778333 = sum of:
0.13778333 = weight(_text_:130 in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13778333 = score(doc=1054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3225102 = queryWeight, product of:
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.4272216 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43(1992), S.130-148
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.01
0.013560373 = product of:
0.027120747 = sum of:
0.027120747 = product of:
0.054241493 = sum of:
0.054241493 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054241493 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.01
0.011865326 = product of:
0.023730652 = sum of:
0.023730652 = product of:
0.047461305 = sum of:
0.047461305 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047461305 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17524338 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050043374 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26