-
Dammeyer, A.; Jürgensen, W.; Krüwel, C.; Poliak, E.; Ruttkowski, S.; Schäfer, Th.; Sirava, M.; Hermes, T.: Videoanalyse mit DiVA (1998)
0.02
0.01549259 = product of:
0.08262715 = sum of:
0.020656787 = product of:
0.041313574 = sum of:
0.041313574 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 23) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041313574 = score(doc=23,freq=2.0), product of:
0.111489825 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.37055913 = fieldWeight in 23, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=23)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020656787 = product of:
0.041313574 = sum of:
0.041313574 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 23) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041313574 = score(doc=23,freq=2.0), product of:
0.111489825 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.37055913 = fieldWeight in 23, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=23)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041313574 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 23) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041313574 = score(doc=23,freq=2.0), product of:
0.111489825 = queryWeight, product of:
5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.37055913 = fieldWeight in 23, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=23)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Imprint
- Bremen : Universität Bremen / Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik
-
Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996)
0.01
0.009843151 = product of:
0.052496806 = sum of:
0.022645373 = weight(_text_:23 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022645373 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.022645373 = weight(_text_:23 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022645373 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.007206058 = product of:
0.021618174 = sum of:
0.021618174 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021618174 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.069843985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Su, H.: Automatic abstracting (1996)
0.01
0.007076679 = product of:
0.05661343 = sum of:
0.028306715 = weight(_text_:23 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028306715 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.028306715 = weight(_text_:23 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028306715 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 13. 5.1996 21:43:23
-
Xianghao, G.; Yixin, Z.; Li, Y.: ¬A new method of news test understanding and abstracting based on speech acts theory (1998)
0.01
0.005661343 = product of:
0.045290746 = sum of:
0.022645373 = weight(_text_:23 in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022645373 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
0.022645373 = weight(_text_:23 in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022645373 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 13. 5.1996 21:43:23
-
Kuhlen, R.: In Richtung Summarizing für Diskurse in K3 (2006)
0.00
0.004953675 = product of:
0.0396294 = sum of:
0.0198147 = weight(_text_:23 in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0198147 = score(doc=6067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
0.0198147 = weight(_text_:23 in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0198147 = score(doc=6067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 13.10.2006 9:35:23
-
Lee, J.-H.; Park, S.; Ahn, C.-M.; Kim, D.: Automatic generic document summarization based on non-negative matrix factorization (2009)
0.00
0.004953675 = product of:
0.0396294 = sum of:
0.0198147 = weight(_text_:23 in 2448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0198147 = score(doc=2448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2448)
0.0198147 = weight(_text_:23 in 2448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0198147 = score(doc=2448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2448)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 23. 3.2013 13:24:19
-
Yeh, J.-Y.; Ke, H.-R.; Yang, W.-P.; Meng, I.-H.: Text summarization using a trainable summarizer and latent semantic analysis (2005)
0.00
0.0046151727 = product of:
0.036921382 = sum of:
0.031086719 = weight(_text_:100 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031086719 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1059417 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.29343233 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.0058346624 = product of:
0.017503986 = sum of:
0.017503986 = weight(_text_:f in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017503986 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07949649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes two approaches to address text summarization: modified corpus-based approach (MCBA) and LSA-based T.R.M. approach (LSA + T.R.M.). The first is a trainable summarizer, which takes into account several features, including position, positive keyword, negative keyword, centrality, and the resemblance to the title, to generate summaries. Two new ideas are exploited: (1) sentence positions are ranked to emphasize the significances of different sentence positions, and (2) the score function is trained by the genetic algorithm (GA) to obtain a suitable combination of feature weights. The second uses latent semantic analysis (LSA) to derive the semantic matrix of a document or a corpus and uses semantic sentence representation to construct a semantic text relationship map. We evaluate LSA + T.R.M. both with single documents and at the corpus level to investigate the competence of LSA in text summarization. The two novel approaches were measured at several compression rates on a data corpus composed of 100 political articles. When the compression rate was 30%, an average f-measure of 49% for MCBA, 52% for MCBA + GA, 44% and 40% for LSA + T.R.M. in single-document and corpus level were achieved respectively.
-
Haag, M.: Automatic text summarization : Evaluation des Copernic Summarizer und mögliche Einsatzfelder in der Fachinformation der DaimlerCrysler AG (2002)
0.00
0.004246007 = product of:
0.033968057 = sum of:
0.016984029 = weight(_text_:23 in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016984029 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
0.016984029 = weight(_text_:23 in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016984029 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 16:23:24
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Automatic summarising : the state of the art (2007)
0.00
0.004246007 = product of:
0.033968057 = sum of:
0.016984029 = weight(_text_:23 in 932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016984029 = score(doc=932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=932)
0.016984029 = weight(_text_:23 in 932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016984029 = score(doc=932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=932)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 14:40:23
-
Díaz, A.; Gervás, P.: User-model based personalized summarization (2007)
0.00
0.004246007 = product of:
0.033968057 = sum of:
0.016984029 = weight(_text_:23 in 952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016984029 = score(doc=952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=952)
0.016984029 = weight(_text_:23 in 952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016984029 = score(doc=952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07148406 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=952)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 16:27:23
-
Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Video summarization using event-related potential responses to shot boundaries in real-time video watching (2019)
0.00
0.0019429199 = product of:
0.031086719 = sum of:
0.031086719 = weight(_text_:100 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031086719 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1059417 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.29343233 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- Our aim was to develop an event-related potential (ERP)-based method to construct a video skim consisting of key shots to bridge the semantic gap between the topic inferred from a whole video and that from its summary. Mayer's cognitive model was examined, wherein the topic integration process of a user evoked by a visual stimulus can be associated with long-latency ERP components. We determined that long-latency ERP components are suitable for measuring a user's neuronal response through a literature review. We hypothesized that N300 is specific to the categorization of all shots regardless of topic relevance, N400 is specific for the semantic mismatching process for topic-irrelevant shots, and P600 is specific for the context updating process for topic-relevant shots. In our experiment, the N400 component led to more negative ERP signals in response to topic-irrelevant shots than to topic-relevant shots and showed a fronto-central scalp pattern. P600 elicited more positive ERP signals for topic-relevant shots than for topic-irrelevant shots and showed a fronto-central scalp pattern. We used discriminant and artificial neural network (ANN) analyses to decode video shot relevance and observed that the ANN produced particularly high success rates: 91.3% from the training set and 100% from the test set.
-
Meyer, R.: Allein, es wär' so schön gewesen : Der Copernic Summarzier kann Internettexte leider nicht befriedigend und sinnvoll zusammenfassen (2002)
0.00
0.001360044 = product of:
0.021760704 = sum of:
0.021760704 = weight(_text_:100 in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021760704 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1059417 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.20540263 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3116927 = idf(docFreq=592, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- Das Netz hat die Jagd nach textlichen Inhalten erheblich erleichtert. Es ist so ein-fach, irgendeinen Beitrag über ein bestimmtes Thema zu finden, daß man eher über Fülle als über Mangel klagt. Suchmaschinen und Kataloge helfen beim Sichten, indem sie eine Vorauswahl von Links treffen. Das Programm "Copernic Summarizer" geht einen anderen Weg: Es erstellt Exzerpte beliebiger Texte und will damit die Lesezeit verkürzen. Decken wir über die lästige Zwangsregistrierung (unter Pflichtangabe einer Mailadresse) das Mäntelchen des Schweigens. Was folgt, geht rasch, nicht nur die ersten Schritte sind schnell vollzogen. Die Software läßt sich in verschiedenen Umgebungen einsetzen. Unterstützt werden Microsoft Office, einige Mailprogramme sowie der Acrobat Reader für PDF-Dateien. Besonders eignet sich das Verfahren freilich für Internetseiten. Der "Summarizer" nistet sich im Browser als Symbol ein. Und mit einem Klick faßt er einen Online Text in einem Extrafenster zusammen. Es handelt sich dabei nicht im eigentlichen Sinne um eine Zusammenfassung mit eigenen Worten, die in Kürze den Gesamtgehalt wiedergibt. Das Ergebnis ist schlichtes Kürzen, das sich noch dazu ziemlich brutal vollzieht, da grundsätzlich vollständige Sätze gestrichen werden. Die Software erfaßt den Text, versucht Schlüsselwörter zu ermitteln und entscheidet danach, welche Sätze wichtig sind und welche nicht. Das Verfahren mag den Entwicklungsaufwand verringert haben, dem Anwender hingegen bereitet es Probleme. Oftmals beziehen sich Sätze auf frühere Aussagen, etwa in Formulierungen wie "Diese Methode wird . . ." oder "Ein Jahr später . . ." In der Zusammenfassung fehlt entweder der Kontext dazu oder man kann nicht darauf vertrauen, daß der Bezug sich tatsächlich im voranstehenden Satz findet. Die Liste der Schlüsselwörter, die links eingeblendet wird, wirkt nicht immer glücklich. Teilweise finden sich unauffällige Begriffe wie "Anlaß" oder "zudem". Wenigstens lassen sich einzelne Begriffe entfernen, um das Ergebnis zu verfeinern. Hilfreich ist das mögliche Markieren der Schlüsselbegriffe im Text. Unverständlich bleibt hingegen, weshalb man nicht selbst relevante Wörter festlegen darf, die als Basis für die Zusammenfassung dienen. Das Kürzen des Textes ist in mehreren Stufen möglich, von fünf bis fünfzig Prozent. Fünf Prozent sind unbrauchbar; ein guter Kompromiß sind fünfundzwanzig. Allerdings nimmt es die Software nicht genau mit den eigenen Vorgaben. Bei kürzeren Texten ist die Zusammenfassung von angeblich einem Viertel fast genauso lang wie das Original; noch bei zwei Seiten eng bedrucktem Text (8 Kilobyte) entspricht das Exzerpt einem Drittel des Originals. Für gewöhnlich sind Webseiten geschmückt mit einem Menü, mit Werbung, mit Hinweiskästen und allerlei mehr. Sehr zuverlässig erkennt die Software, was überhaupt Fließtext ist; alles andere wird ausgefiltert. Da bedauert man es zuweilen, daß der Summarizer nicht den kompletten Text listet, damit er in einer angenehmen Umgebung schwarz auf weiß gelesen oder gedruckt wird. Wahlweise zum manuellen Auslösen der Zusammenfassung wird der "LiveSummarizer" aktiviert. Er verdichtet Text zeitgleich mit dem Aufrufen einer Seite, nimmt dafür aber ein Drittel der Bildschirmfläche ein - ein zu hoher Preis. Insgesamt fragen wir uns, wie man das Programm sinnvoll nutzen soll. Beim Verdichten von Nachrichten ist unsicher, ob Summarizer nicht wichtige Details unterschlägt. Bei langen Texten sorgen Fragen zum Kontext für Verwirrung. Sucht man nach der Antwort auf eine Detailfrage, hilft die Suchfunktion des Browsers oft schneller. Eine Zusammenfassung hätte auch dem Preis gutgetan: 100 Euro verlangt der deutsche Verleger Softline. Das scheint deutlich zu hoch gegriffen. Zumal das Zusammenfassen der einzige Zweck des Summarizers ist. Das Verwalten von Bookmarks und das Archivieren von Texten wären sinnvolle Ergänzungen gewesen.
-
Johnson, F.: Automatic abstracting research (1995)
0.00
5.834662E-4 = product of:
0.009335459 = sum of:
0.009335459 = product of:
0.028006377 = sum of:
0.028006377 = weight(_text_:f in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028006377 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07949649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Harabagiu, S.; Hickl, A.; Lacatusu, F.: Satisfying information needs with multi-document summaries (2007)
0.00
5.834662E-4 = product of:
0.009335459 = sum of:
0.009335459 = product of:
0.028006377 = sum of:
0.028006377 = weight(_text_:f in 939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028006377 = score(doc=939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07949649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=939)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Uyttendaele, C.; Moens, M.-F.; Dumortier, J.: SALOMON: automatic abstracting of legal cases for effective access to court decisions (1998)
0.00
5.1053293E-4 = product of:
0.008168527 = sum of:
0.008168527 = product of:
0.02450558 = sum of:
0.02450558 = weight(_text_:f in 495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02450558 = score(doc=495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07949649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=495)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Moens, M.-F.: Summarizing court decisions (2007)
0.00
5.1053293E-4 = product of:
0.008168527 = sum of:
0.008168527 = product of:
0.02450558 = sum of:
0.02450558 = weight(_text_:f in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02450558 = score(doc=954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07949649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996)
0.00
4.5037863E-4 = product of:
0.007206058 = sum of:
0.007206058 = product of:
0.021618174 = sum of:
0.021618174 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021618174 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.069843985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 26. 2.1997 10:22:43
-
Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996)
0.00
4.5037863E-4 = product of:
0.007206058 = sum of:
0.007206058 = product of:
0.021618174 = sum of:
0.021618174 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021618174 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.069843985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Moens, M.-F.; Uyttendaele, C.: Automatic text structuring and categorization as a first step in summarizing legal cases (1997)
0.00
4.3759967E-4 = product of:
0.0070015946 = sum of:
0.0070015946 = product of:
0.021004783 = sum of:
0.021004783 = weight(_text_:f in 2256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021004783 = score(doc=2256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07949649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 2256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2256)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
-
Moens, M.-F.; Uyttendaele, C.; Dumotier, J.: Abstracting of legal cases : the potential of clustering based on the selection of representative objects (1999)
0.00
4.3759967E-4 = product of:
0.0070015946 = sum of:
0.0070015946 = product of:
0.021004783 = sum of:
0.021004783 = weight(_text_:f in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021004783 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07949649 = queryWeight, product of:
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.019944998 = queryNorm
0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
