Search (114 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.05 
    0.04922616 = product of:
  0.18459809 = sum of:
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
    0.017702768 = product of:
      0.0531083 = sum of:
        0.0531083 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0531083 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09804701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027998796 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  2. Over, P.: ¬The TREC interactive track : an annotated bibliography (2001) 0.03 
    0.033379063 = product of:
  0.16689532 = sum of:
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    27.12.2007 19:14:23
  3. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; McKenzie, L.; Irving, A.: Evaluative protocols for searching behaviour in online library catalogues (1991) 0.03 
    0.033379063 = product of:
  0.16689532 = sum of:
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:52:29
  4. Smeaton, A.F.: TREC-6: personal highlights (2000) 0.03 
    0.033379063 = product of:
  0.16689532 = sum of:
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 6439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=6439,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6439, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6439)
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 6439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=6439,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6439, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6439)
    0.05563177 = weight(_text_:23 in 6439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05563177 = score(doc=6439,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6439, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6439)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:23:02
  5. Hofmann, M.: TREC Konferenzbericht (7.10.93) (1995) 0.03 
    0.030088538 = product of:
  0.11283201 = sum of:
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=5005,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
    0.017463248 = weight(_text_:der in 5005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017463248 = score(doc=5005,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06254278 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 5005, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5005)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Ziel der US-amerikanischen TREC (Texte REtrieval Conference) Initiative ist es, zum einen Standard-Kollektionen von Teten zu erstellen, auf deren Basis verschiedene Retrieval-Ansätze verglichen werden können. Zum anderen sollen Kollektionen einer Grösse aufgebaut werden, die realistischen Anwendungen nahe kommen. Damit soll das alte Vorurteil der Untauglichkeit neuerer IR-Methoden (bzgl. Effizienz und Effektivität) für größere Darenbasen widerlegt werden.
    Date
    23. 8.1996 9:04:36
  6. Wolff, C.: Leistungsvergleich der Retrievaloberflächen zwischen Web und klassischen Expertensystemen (2001) 0.03 
    0.029875884 = product of:
  0.11203456 = sum of:
    0.027815886 = weight(_text_:23 in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027815886 = score(doc=5870,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
    0.027815886 = weight(_text_:23 in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027815886 = score(doc=5870,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
    0.027815886 = weight(_text_:23 in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027815886 = score(doc=5870,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
    0.028586904 = weight(_text_:der in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028586904 = score(doc=5870,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06254278 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.4570776 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Die meisten Web-Auftritte der Hosts waren bisher für den Retrieval-Laien gedacht. Im Hintergrund steht dabei das Ziel: mehr Nutzung durch einfacheres Retrieval. Dieser Ansatz steht aber im Konflikt mit der wachsenden Datenmenge und Dokumentgröße, die eigentlich ein immer ausgefeilteres Retrieval verlangen. Häufig wird von Information Professionals die Kritik geäußert, dass die Webanwendungen einen Verlust an Relevanz bringen. Wie weit der Nutzer tatsächlich einen Kompromiss zwischen Relevanz und Vollständigkeit eingehen muss, soll in diesem Beitrag anhand verschiedener Host-Rechner quantifiziert werden
    Series
    Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis; 4
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  7. Harman, D.K.: Overview of the fourth Text Retrieval Conference : TREC-4 (1996) 0.03 
    0.028610626 = product of:
  0.14305313 = sum of:
    0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 7573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047684375 = score(doc=7573,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 7573, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7573)
    0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 7573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047684375 = score(doc=7573,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 7573, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7573)
    0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 7573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047684375 = score(doc=7573,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 7573, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7573)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Pages
    S.1-23
  8. Cleverdon, C.W.; Mills, J.: ¬The testing of index language devices (1963) 0.03 
    0.028610626 = product of:
  0.14305313 = sum of:
    0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047684375 = score(doc=577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
    0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047684375 = score(doc=577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
    0.047684375 = weight(_text_:23 in 577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047684375 = score(doc=577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=577)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    13. 3.1999 18:23:11
  9. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.03 
    0.028129235 = product of:
  0.10548463 = sum of:
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
    0.0101158675 = product of:
      0.030347602 = sum of:
        0.030347602 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030347602 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09804701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027998796 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  10. Gillman, P.: Text retrieval (1998) 0.03 
    0.026974356 = product of:
  0.13487178 = sum of:
    0.04495726 = weight(_text_:23 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04495726 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.44800746 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
    0.04495726 = weight(_text_:23 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04495726 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.44800746 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
    0.04495726 = weight(_text_:23 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04495726 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.44800746 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    23. 7.1998 10:35:23
  11. Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: OPAC-Erweiterung durch automatische Indexierung : Empirische Untersuchung mit Daten aus dem Österreichischen Verbundkatalog (2002) 0.02 
    0.024013104 = product of:
  0.09004913 = sum of:
    0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023842188 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023842188 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023842188 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.018522572 = weight(_text_:der in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018522572 = score(doc=883,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06254278 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    In Anlehnung an die in den neunziger Jahren durchgeführten Erschließungsprojekte MILOS I und MILOS II, die die Eignung eines Verfahrens zur automatischen Indexierung für Bibliothekskataloge zum Thema hatten, wurde eine empirische Untersuchung anhand einer repräsentativen Stichprobe von Titelsätzen aus dem Österreichischen Verbundkatalog durchgeführt. Ziel war die Prüfung und Bewertung der Einsatzmöglichkeit dieses Verfahrens in den Online-Katalogen des Verbundes. Der Realsituation der OPAC-Benutzung gemäß wurde ausschließlich die Auswirkung auf den automatisch generierten Begriffen angereicherten Basic Index ("Alle Felder") untersucht. Dazu wurden 100 Suchanfragen zunächst im ursprünglichen Basic Index und sodann im angereicherten Basic Index in einem OPAC unter Aleph 500 durchgeführt. Die Tests erbrachten einen Zuwachs an relevanten Treffern bei nur leichten Verlusten an Precision, eine Reduktion der Nulltreffer-Ergebnisse sowie Aufschlüsse über die Auswirkung einer vorhandenen verbalen Sacherschließung.
    Source
    ABI-Technik. 23(2003) H.4, S.305-314
  12. Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985) 0.02 
    0.02384219 = product of:
  0.11921094 = sum of:
    0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039736982 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
    0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039736982 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
    0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039736982 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  13. Huang, M.-H.: ¬The evaluation of information retrieval systems (1997) 0.02 
    0.02384219 = product of:
  0.11921094 = sum of:
    0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039736982 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
    0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039736982 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
    0.039736982 = weight(_text_:23 in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039736982 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    13. 5.1996 21:43:23
  14. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.02 
    0.022720618 = product of:
  0.085202314 = sum of:
    0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019868491 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
    0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019868491 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
    0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019868491 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
    0.025596842 = weight(_text_:der in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025596842 = score(doc=5863,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.06254278 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.40926933 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Series
    Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis; 4
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  15. Wartena, C.; Golub, K.: Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext des Information Retrievals (2021) 0.02 
    0.022068985 = product of:
  0.08275869 = sum of:
    0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019868491 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
    0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019868491 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
    0.019868491 = weight(_text_:23 in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019868491 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
    0.023153216 = weight(_text_:der in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023153216 = score(doc=376,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06254278 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.37019804 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag möchte einen Überblick über die in der Literatur diskutierten Möglichkeiten, Herausforderungen und Grenzen geben, Retrieval als eine extrinsische Evaluierungsmethode für die Ergebnisse verbaler Sacherschließung zu nutzen. Die inhaltliche Erschließung im Allgemeinen und die Verschlagwortung im Besonderen können intrinsisch oder extrinsisch evaluiert werden. Die intrinsische Evaluierung bezieht sich auf Eigenschaften der Erschließung, von denen vermutet wird, dass sie geeignete Indikatoren für die Qualität der Erschließung sind, wie formale Einheitlichkeit (im Hinblick auf die Anzahl zugewiesener Deskriptoren pro Dokument, auf die Granularität usw.), Konsistenz oder Übereinstimmung der Ergebnisse verschiedener Erschließer:innen. Bei einer extrinsischen Evaluierung geht es darum, die Qualität der gewählten Deskriptoren daran zu messen, wie gut sie sich tatsächlich bei der Suche bewähren. Obwohl die extrinsische Evaluierung direktere Auskunft darüber gibt, ob die Erschließung ihren Zweck erfüllt, und daher den Vorzug verdienen sollte, ist sie kompliziert und oft problematisch. In einem Retrievalsystem greifen verschiedene Algorithmen und Datenquellen in vielschichtiger Weise ineinander und interagieren bei der Evaluierung darüber hinaus noch mit Nutzer:innen und Rechercheaufgaben. Die Evaluierung einer Komponente im System kann nicht einfach dadurch vorgenommen werden, dass man sie austauscht und mit einer anderen Komponente vergleicht, da die gleiche Ressource oder der gleiche Algorithmus sich in unterschiedlichen Umgebungen unterschiedlich verhalten kann. Wir werden relevante Evaluierungsansätze vorstellen und diskutieren, und zum Abschluss einige Empfehlungen für die Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext von Retrieval geben.
    Date
    23. 9.2021 16:09:53
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
  16. Crestani, F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Information retrieval by imaging (1996) 0.02 
    0.021096926 = product of:
  0.07911347 = sum of:
    0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023842188 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
    0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023842188 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
    0.023842188 = weight(_text_:23 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023842188 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
    0.0075869 = product of:
      0.0227607 = sum of:
        0.0227607 = weight(_text_:22 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0227607 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09804701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027998796 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  17. Sullivan, M.V.; Borgman, C.L.: Bibliographic searching by end-users and intermediaries : front-end software vs native DIALOG commands (1988) 0.02 
    0.020230768 = product of:
  0.101153836 = sum of:
    0.033717945 = weight(_text_:23 in 3560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033717945 = score(doc=3560,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 3560, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3560)
    0.033717945 = weight(_text_:23 in 3560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033717945 = score(doc=3560,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 3560, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3560)
    0.033717945 = weight(_text_:23 in 3560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033717945 = score(doc=3560,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 3560, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3560)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    7. 1.1996 23:35:06
    Source
    ASIS '88. Information Technology: planning for the next fifty years. Proceedings of the 51st annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Atlanta, Georgia, 23-27.10.1988. Vol.25. Ed. by C.L. Borgman and E.Y.H. Pai
  18. Smeaton, A.F.; Harman, D.: ¬The TREC experiments and their impact on Europe (1997) 0.02 
    0.019073753 = product of:
  0.09536876 = sum of:
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 7702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=7702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7702)
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 7702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=7702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7702)
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 7702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=7702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7702)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 23(1997) no.2, S.169-174
  19. Frei, H.P.; Meienberg, S.; Schäuble, P.: ¬The perils of interpreting recall and precision values (1991) 0.02 
    0.019073753 = product of:
  0.09536876 = sum of:
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Source
    Information retrieval: GI/GMD-Workshop, Darmstadt, 23.-24.6.1991: Proceedings. Ed.: N. Fuhr
  20. Keen, E.M.; Hartley, R.J.: Phrase processing in text retrieval (1994) 0.02 
    0.019073753 = product of:
  0.09536876 = sum of:
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 1316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=1316,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1316, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1316)
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 1316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=1316,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1316, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1316)
    0.031789586 = weight(_text_:23 in 1316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031789586 = score(doc=1316,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10034936 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027998796 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1316, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1316)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.23-34

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 63
  • d 46
  • chi 1
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 93
  • r 6
  • s 6
  • el 5
  • x 5
  • m 4
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications