Search (3654 results, page 1 of 183)

  1. ¬The virtual library : visions and realities (1993) 0.15 
    0.15353164 = product of:
  0.30706328 = sum of:
    0.30706328 = product of:
      0.61412656 = sum of:
        0.61412656 = weight(_text_:860 in 5809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.61412656 = score(doc=5809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            1.4125246 = fieldWeight in 5809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5809)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Isbn
    0-88736-860-3
  2. Lux, C.: Vom Bibliothekar zum Cybrarian : die Zukunft des Berufs in der virtuellen Bibliothek (1994) 0.15 
    0.15353164 = product of:
  0.30706328 = sum of:
    0.30706328 = product of:
      0.61412656 = sum of:
        0.61412656 = weight(_text_:860 in 8253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.61412656 = score(doc=8253,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            1.4125246 = fieldWeight in 8253, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8253)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    BuB. 46(1994) H.10/11, S.860-866
  3. Zhu, W.Z.; Allen, R.B.: Document clustering using the LSI subspace signature model (2013) 0.15 
    0.15095007 = product of:
  0.30190015 = sum of:
    0.30190015 = sum of:
      0.2631971 = weight(_text_:860 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2631971 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
            9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04761008 = queryNorm
          0.60536766 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
      0.038703054 = weight(_text_:22 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038703054 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1667224 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04761008 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    23. 3.2013 13:22:36
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.844-860
  4. Herring, S.C.: Computer-mediated communication : linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (1996) 0.13 
    0.13159855 = product of:
  0.2631971 = sum of:
    0.2631971 = product of:
      0.5263942 = sum of:
        0.5263942 = weight(_text_:860 in 3342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5263942 = score(doc=3342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            1.2107353 = fieldWeight in 3342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3342)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 49(1998) no.9, S.859-860 (G. Whitney)
  5. Bergman, O.; Whittaker, S.; Falk, N.: Shared files : the retrieval perspective (2014) 0.13 
    0.12579174 = product of:
  0.2515835 = sum of:
    0.2515835 = sum of:
      0.21933094 = weight(_text_:860 in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21933094 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
            9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04761008 = queryNorm
          0.5044731 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
      0.032252546 = weight(_text_:22 in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032252546 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1667224 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04761008 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    People who are collaborating can share files in two main ways: performing Group Information Management (GIM) using a common repository or performing Personal Information Management (PIM) by distributing files as e-mail attachments and storing them in personal repositories. There is a trend toward using common repositories with many organizations encouraging workers to use GIM to avoid duplication of files and management. So far, PIM and GIM have been studied by different research communities, so their effectiveness for file retrieval has not yet been systematically compared. We compared PIM and GIM in a large-scale elicited personal information retrieval study. We asked 275 users to retrieve 860 of their own shared files, testing the effect of sharing method on success and efficiency of retrieval. Participants preferred PIM over GIM. More important, PIM retrieval was more successful: Participants using GIM failed to find 22% of their files compared with 13% failures using PIM. This may be because active organization aids retrieval: When using personally created folders, the failure percentage was 65% lower than when using default folders (e.g., My Documents), and more than 5 times lower than when using folders created by others for GIM. Theoretical reasons for this are discussed.
  6. Schnelling, H.M.: Data analysis in literary studies (1990) 0.11 
    0.10856327 = product of:
  0.21712653 = sum of:
    0.21712653 = product of:
      0.43425307 = sum of:
        0.43425307 = weight(_text_:860 in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.43425307 = score(doc=859,freq=1.0), product of:
            0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            0.9988057 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
              1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                1.0 = termFreq=1.0
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    860
  7. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.09 
    0.09496896 = sum of:
  0.07561743 = product of:
    0.2268523 = sum of:
      0.2268523 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2268523 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4036388 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04761008 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.019351527 = product of:
    0.038703054 = sum of:
      0.038703054 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038703054 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1667224 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04761008 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  8. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.08 
    0.079140805 = sum of:
  0.06301453 = product of:
    0.18904358 = sum of:
      0.18904358 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18904358 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4036388 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04761008 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.016126273 = product of:
    0.032252546 = sum of:
      0.032252546 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032252546 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1667224 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04761008 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  9. Schmidt, E.; Rosenberg, J.: Wie Google tickt (2015) 0.08 
    0.077545196 = product of:
  0.15509039 = sum of:
    0.15509039 = product of:
      0.31018078 = sum of:
        0.31018078 = weight(_text_:860 in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31018078 = score(doc=2406,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            0.71343267 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    SR 860
    RVK
    SR 860
  10. Braun, T.; Dióspatonyi. I.: Gatekeeping indicators exemplified by the main players in the international gatekeeping orchestration of analytical chemistry journals (2005) 0.08 
    0.07676582 = product of:
  0.15353164 = sum of:
    0.15353164 = product of:
      0.30706328 = sum of:
        0.30706328 = weight(_text_:860 in 3557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30706328 = score(doc=3557,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            0.7062623 = fieldWeight in 3557, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3557)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.8, S.854-860
  11. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.07561743 = product of:
  0.15123487 = sum of:
    0.15123487 = product of:
      0.4537046 = sum of:
        0.4537046 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4537046 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4036388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  12. Leydesdorff, L.; Rafols, I.: Local emergence and global diffusion of research technologies : an exploration of patterns of network formation (2011) 0.07 
    0.06579927 = product of:
  0.13159855 = sum of:
    0.13159855 = product of:
      0.2631971 = sum of:
        0.2631971 = weight(_text_:860 in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2631971 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            0.60536766 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.5, S.846-860
  13. Neudecker, C.: Zur Kuratierung digitalisierter Dokumente mit Künstlicher Intelligenz : das Qurator-Projekt (2020) 0.07 
    0.06579927 = product of:
  0.13159855 = sum of:
    0.13159855 = product of:
      0.2631971 = sum of:
        0.2631971 = weight(_text_:860 in 47) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2631971 = score(doc=47,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            0.60536766 = fieldWeight in 47, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=47)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Open Password. 2020, Nr.851 vom 13.11.2020 (Teil 1) [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE5OCwiOGVkMWM5OGMyNWZjIiwwLDAsMTc5LDFd]. Open Password. 2020, Nr.854 vom 20.11.2020 (Teil 2) [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzIwMSwiNDgxN2YwNjUzYzM2IiwwLDAsMTgyLDFd]. Open Password. 2020, Nr.856 vom 25.11.2020 (Teil 3) [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzIwMiwiMTZiZGVkMWNjNDkwIiwwLDAsMTgzLDFd]. Open Password. 2020, Nr.860 vom 04.12.2020 (Teil 4) https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzIwOSwiN2UxYjUxOTAyMDRiIiwwLDAsMTg5LDFd
  14. #220 0.06 
    0.06385679 = product of:
  0.12771358 = sum of:
    0.12771358 = product of:
      0.25542715 = sum of:
        0.25542715 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25542715 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1667224 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  15. #1387 0.06 
    0.06385679 = product of:
  0.12771358 = sum of:
    0.12771358 = product of:
      0.25542715 = sum of:
        0.25542715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25542715 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1667224 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  16. #2103 0.06 
    0.06385679 = product of:
  0.12771358 = sum of:
    0.12771358 = product of:
      0.25542715 = sum of:
        0.25542715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25542715 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1667224 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  17. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.06 
    0.06301453 = product of:
  0.12602906 = sum of:
    0.12602906 = product of:
      0.37808716 = sum of:
        0.37808716 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37808716 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4036388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  18. Mohammadi, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? : a survey of user motivations (2016) 0.05 
    0.054832734 = product of:
  0.10966547 = sum of:
    0.10966547 = product of:
      0.21933094 = sum of:
        0.21933094 = weight(_text_:860 in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21933094 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            0.5044731 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Although Mendeley bookmarking counts appear to correlate moderately with conventional citation metrics, it is not known whether academic publications are bookmarked in Mendeley in order to be read or not. Without this information, it is not possible to give a confident interpretation of altmetrics derived from Mendeley. In response, a survey of 860 Mendeley users shows that it is reasonable to use Mendeley bookmarking counts as an indication of readership because most (55%) users with a Mendeley library had read or intended to read at least half of their bookmarked publications. This was true across all broad areas of scholarship except for the arts and humanities (42%). About 85% of the respondents also declared that they bookmarked articles in Mendeley to cite them in their publications, but some also bookmark articles for use in professional (50%), teaching (25%), and educational activities (13%). Of course, it is likely that most readers do not record articles in Mendeley and so these data do not represent all readers. In conclusion, Mendeley bookmark counts seem to be indicators of readership leading to a combination of scholarly impact and wider professional impact.
  19. Zhang, P.; Wang, OP.; Wu, Q.: How are the best JASIST papers cited? (2018) 0.05 
    0.054832734 = product of:
  0.10966547 = sum of:
    0.10966547 = product of:
      0.21933094 = sum of:
        0.21933094 = weight(_text_:860 in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21933094 = score(doc=4259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4347723 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            0.5044731 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.131938 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.6, S.857-860
  20. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.05 
    0.050411623 = product of:
  0.100823246 = sum of:
    0.100823246 = product of:
      0.30246973 = sum of:
        0.30246973 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30246973 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4036388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04761008 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3051
  • m 346
  • el 162
  • s 140
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications