Search (58 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"chi"
  1. Li, Z.: Research on dynamic morphological indexing (1998) 0.01
    0.0052462346 = product of:
      0.057708576 = sum of:
        0.051883057 = weight(_text_:notes in 3242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051883057 = score(doc=3242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.47221628 = fieldWeight in 3242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3242)
        0.0058255196 = weight(_text_:in in 3242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058255196 = score(doc=3242,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 3242, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3242)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Notes that in automatic indexing of Chinese words using dictionary matching methods, there is some difficulty in the indexing of proper nouns. Presents a solution called dynamic morphological indexing, based on work using automatic indexing of archive documents. Presents the algorithm for this solution
    Footnote
    [In Chinesisch]
  2. Wei, M.; Xu, L.: Boolean mapping algorithms across heterogeneous information sources (1998) 0.01
    0.0051490525 = product of:
      0.056639574 = sum of:
        0.051883057 = weight(_text_:notes in 3293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051883057 = score(doc=3293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.47221628 = fieldWeight in 3293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3293)
        0.004756517 = weight(_text_:in in 3293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004756517 = score(doc=3293,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3293, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3293)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Notes the difficulties of searching over heterogeneous information sources where query languages are not unifrom. Presents a model where Boolean queries are composed in one rich front end language. For each query and target source, the query is transformed into a subsuming query that can be supported by the source but may return extra documents. The results are then processed by a filter query to yield the correct results
    Footnote
    [In Chinesisch]
  3. Xianghao, G.; Yixin, Z.; Li, Y.: ¬A new method of news test understanding and abstracting based on speech acts theory (1998) 0.01
    0.005022402 = product of:
      0.05524642 = sum of:
        0.051883057 = weight(_text_:notes in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051883057 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.47221628 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
        0.003363365 = weight(_text_:in in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003363365 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a method for the automated analysis and comprehension of foreign affairs news produced by a Chinese news agency. Notes that the development of the method was prededed by a study of the structuring rules of the news. Describes how an abstract of the news story is produced automatically from the analysis. Stresses the main aim of the work which is to use specch act theory to analyse and classify sentences
    Footnote
    [In Chinesisch]
  4. Chen, P.: ¬The access to Internet : an explorative study (1997) 0.00
    0.004819041 = product of:
      0.035339635 = sum of:
        0.004756517 = weight(_text_:in in 522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004756517 = score(doc=522,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 522, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=522)
        0.024276821 = weight(_text_:computer in 522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024276821 = score(doc=522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.32301605 = fieldWeight in 522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=522)
        0.0063062985 = product of:
          0.012612597 = sum of:
            0.012612597 = weight(_text_:science in 522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012612597 = score(doc=522,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 522, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=522)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses access to the Internet. Although the number of Internet users has increased since 1993, the technology is still unavailable to many. High income, highly educated people are more easily able to access new media than those who are less well off. Such a knowledge gap may contribute more to social disparity in future. To ensure that most people have access to computer networks, future national policy should move from universal service to universal access. Network policy should offer not only to make networks available to all but also to ansure people's ability to access the content
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.20, S.1-12
  5. Huang, M.-h.: Factors affecting relevance judgement : a preliminary study (1998) 0.00
    0.004819041 = product of:
      0.035339635 = sum of:
        0.004756517 = weight(_text_:in in 926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004756517 = score(doc=926,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 926, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=926)
        0.024276821 = weight(_text_:computer in 926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024276821 = score(doc=926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.32301605 = fieldWeight in 926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=926)
        0.0063062985 = product of:
          0.012612597 = sum of:
            0.012612597 = weight(_text_:science in 926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012612597 = score(doc=926,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 926, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=926)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to investigate situational variables which can affect the results of relevance judgements, including computer experience, search experience, familiarity with search topic, preparation time, research objecttives, and research stages. The results show only the search experience will affect relevance judgements. Concerning research objectives, students writing term papers yield less relevance odds but a higher precision rate. concerning research stage, searchers in the early research stage yield more relevance odds and a higher precision rate
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1998) no.3, S.39-50
  6. Shuiqing, H.; Hanqing, H.: ¬The realizing of Chinese PRECIS on computer (1991) 0.00
    0.0043973024 = product of:
      0.048370324 = sum of:
        0.0058858884 = weight(_text_:in in 2129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058858884 = score(doc=2129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2129)
        0.042484436 = weight(_text_:computer in 2129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042484436 = score(doc=2129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.56527805 = fieldWeight in 2129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2129)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
  7. Lee, Y.-R.: ¬A study on the conditions of using OPAC access points and subject searching by users (1997) 0.00
    0.0036054377 = product of:
      0.039659813 = sum of:
        0.004756517 = weight(_text_:in in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004756517 = score(doc=933,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
        0.034903295 = sum of:
          0.012612597 = weight(_text_:science in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012612597 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02056547 = queryNorm
              0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.0222907 = weight(_text_:22 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0222907 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02056547 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Uses the results of various user studies to offer some insight into user behaviour in connection with OPAC access points and to explore conditions for subject searching, the difficulties involved and the matching of queries to subject headings. Sums up suggestions for the improvement of subject access to OPACs
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.22, S.39-55
  8. Huang, S.-L.: ¬The conceptual model of computer aided Chinese classification system (1997) 0.00
    0.0029025776 = product of:
      0.031928353 = sum of:
        0.0061788964 = weight(_text_:in in 1807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061788964 = score(doc=1807,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 1807, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1807)
        0.025749456 = weight(_text_:computer in 1807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025749456 = score(doc=1807,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.34261024 = fieldWeight in 1807, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1807)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    In a prototype model of a computer aided Chinese classification system, 4 different modules were included: the keyword searching type, user's predomination type, expert wizard type and versatile type. These 4 modules work in different ways whilst sharing the same concept. The keyword searching type finds the most suitable category by scanning the keywords of all categories in a database; it is useful for entrance level staff. The user's predomination type allows the user to key in the proper category to size down the number of returning data; the user then picks the best category by browsing the built in keywords. This module is suitable for professional librarians. The expert wizard type actively leads the user to choose the best category one by one. The versatile type is a mixture of the other 3 types
    Footnote
    [In Chinesisch]
  9. Yi, H.; Shubai, L.: Application of classification in information organization under the networking environment (1998) 0.00
    0.0016969148 = product of:
      0.018666063 = sum of:
        0.0075207134 = weight(_text_:in in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0075207134 = score(doc=3236,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
        0.01114535 = product of:
          0.0222907 = sum of:
            0.0222907 = weight(_text_:22 in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0222907 = score(doc=3236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Classification plays a very important role in the traditional organization and manual retrieval of documents. The advantages of classification are becoming evident again in the networked environment, in the areas of online browsing, organization of non text information, management of hypertext, and as a common language for the organization of information, which will promote the integration of classification schemes and thesauri
    Footnote
    [In Chinesisch]
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.1, S.19-22
  10. Lu, S.J.: ¬A study on the principles of Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (2000) 0.00
    0.0015383556 = product of:
      0.016921911 = sum of:
        0.0058858884 = weight(_text_:in in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058858884 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
        0.011036023 = product of:
          0.022072045 = sum of:
            0.022072045 = weight(_text_:science in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022072045 = score(doc=2872,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 2000, no.32, S.16-44
  11. Tsay, M.-Y.: From Science Citation Index to Journal Citation Reports, amd criteria for journals evaluation (1997) 0.00
    0.0014666686 = product of:
      0.016133353 = sum of:
        0.0050973296 = weight(_text_:in in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050973296 = score(doc=657,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
        0.011036023 = product of:
          0.022072045 = sum of:
            0.022072045 = weight(_text_:science in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022072045 = score(doc=657,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates the characteristics of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) through the study of the Science Citation Index (SCI). Other criteria for evaluating a journal are also discussed. The compilation process of SCI data, and the characteristics, applications and limitations of SCI are studied. A detailed description of JCR is provided including: journal ranking listing, citing journal listing, cited journal listing, subject category listing, source data, impact factor, immediacy index, cited half-life and citing half-life. The applications and limitations of JCR are also explored. In addition to the criteria listed in JCR, the size, circulation and influence of journals are also considered significant criteria fir evaluation purposes
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
    Object
    Science Citation Index
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.2, S.27-41
  12. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.00
    0.0014456244 = product of:
      0.015901867 = sum of:
        0.004756517 = weight(_text_:in in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004756517 = score(doc=5083,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
        0.01114535 = product of:
          0.0222907 = sum of:
            0.0222907 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0222907 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of faceted classification has its long history and importance in the human civilization. Recently, more and more consumer Web sites adopt the idea of facet analysis to organize and display their products or services. The aim of this article is to review the origin and develpment of faceted classification, as well as its concepts, essence, advantage and limitation. Further, the applications of faceted classification in various domians have been explored.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  13. Meng, L.: ¬The creation of [the] Chinese Science Citation Database : status quo and future development (1997) 0.00
    0.0014253954 = product of:
      0.015679348 = sum of:
        0.004756517 = weight(_text_:in in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004756517 = score(doc=954,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
        0.010922831 = product of:
          0.021845661 = sum of:
            0.021845661 = weight(_text_:science in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021845661 = score(doc=954,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.40326554 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    The Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) is a significant document database on mainland China, which has been built up by the Documentation and Information Centre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Briefly introduces the background to CSCD, and discusses in detail its development and application, source journals and citation data, data processing methods, subject scope, compilation regulations, stylistic rules and layout, and usage directions for both the printed and CD-ROM editions of CSCD which have been published from the data
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 3(1997) no.4, S.39-54
  14. Huang, M.-H.: Developing an ideal online thesaurus display format (1994) 0.00
    0.0014205693 = product of:
      0.015626261 = sum of:
        0.0078131305 = weight(_text_:und in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0078131305 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
        0.0078131305 = weight(_text_:und in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0078131305 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  15. Chen, S.-f.: ¬A general description of the automation in cataloguing (1995) 0.00
    0.0013786159 = product of:
      0.015164774 = sum of:
        0.0072819 = weight(_text_:in in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072819 = score(doc=5099,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
        0.0078828735 = product of:
          0.015765747 = sum of:
            0.015765747 = weight(_text_:science in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015765747 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the growth of automated catalogues in Taiwan and the rest of the world. Considers an automated catalogue as the prerequisite for a complete bibliographical database. Covers the meaning, functions, scope, pre-operation, post-project and future development of automated cataloguing
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1995, no.15, S.77-84
  16. Huang, M.-h.: Five fundamental concepts in information retrieval (1996) 0.00
    0.0013786159 = product of:
      0.015164774 = sum of:
        0.0072819 = weight(_text_:in in 7689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072819 = score(doc=7689,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 7689, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7689)
        0.0078828735 = product of:
          0.015765747 = sum of:
            0.015765747 = weight(_text_:science in 7689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015765747 = score(doc=7689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 7689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the 5 fundamental concepts of information retrieval addressed by Patrick Wilson - information, aboutness, relevance, need and use. Although it is impossible to reach consensus definitions for these concepts it can be helpful for future discussions in information retrieval researches
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1996, no.19, S.7-21
  17. Pu, H.-T.: Exploration of personalized information service for OPAC (1997) 0.00
    0.0013499554 = product of:
      0.01484951 = sum of:
        0.0050973296 = weight(_text_:in in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050973296 = score(doc=1772,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
        0.00975218 = product of:
          0.01950436 = sum of:
            0.01950436 = weight(_text_:22 in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01950436 = score(doc=1772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Library OPACs have long been the gateways between users and information. They present to users the achievements of library automation, and are the most widely available automated retrieval systems and the first that many user encounter. Current trends in OPAC design are toward a user oriented, individual information service which can meet the different needs of users with a variety of background and interests. Compared with the rather inactive, short term and general information service of conventional systems, this type of system focuses on active, long term and personalized service. Proposes a framework for the design of such an OPAC and discusses some recent developments in personalized information service
    Date
    4. 8.1998 19:36:22
    Footnote
    [In Chinesisch]
  18. Chen, K.H.; Chiang, Y.T.: ¬The design and implementation of the Chinese IR benchmark (2000) 0.00
    0.0013185904 = product of:
      0.014504494 = sum of:
        0.0050450475 = weight(_text_:in in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050450475 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
        0.009459447 = product of:
          0.018918894 = sum of:
            0.018918894 = weight(_text_:science in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018918894 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 6(2000) no.3, S.61-80
  19. Xiong, L.J.: On the compiling of cataloguing rules for Chinese document(s) (1997) 0.00
    0.0012571382 = product of:
      0.01382852 = sum of:
        0.0059456457 = weight(_text_:in in 3199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059456457 = score(doc=3199,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 3199, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3199)
        0.0078828735 = product of:
          0.015765747 = sum of:
            0.015765747 = weight(_text_:science in 3199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015765747 = score(doc=3199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the author's practice and experience in compiling 'Cataloguing rules for Chinese documents', explains the background to the rules and their style, highlighting various points which need attention when using them
    Footnote
    [In Chinesisch]
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.1, S.32-37
  20. Huang, M.-h.: End-users' searching behaviour : changes in search type over time (1996) 0.00
    0.0011028926 = product of:
      0.012131818 = sum of:
        0.0058255196 = weight(_text_:in in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058255196 = score(doc=5128,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
        0.0063062985 = product of:
          0.012612597 = sum of:
            0.012612597 = weight(_text_:science in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012612597 = score(doc=5128,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies 6 types of searches on the basis of paudsing behaviour by using cluster analysis. The 6 types of search were highly associated with search fleuncy and the construction of a mental model. Examines learning during multiple searches on the basis of the 6 types. Finds that searchers gain more experience, increase their searching proficiency and become more fluent at searching while online. The changes of search level in multiple searches showed that most searchers moved towards greater fleuncy
    Footnote
    In Chinesisch
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1996, no.16, S.7-20