Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: Measuring typographical errors' impact on retrieval in bibliographic databases (2007)
0.00
2.8085895E-4 = product of:
0.0061788964 = sum of:
0.0061788964 = weight(_text_:in in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0061788964 = score(doc=261,freq=12.0), product of:
0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02056547 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
0.045454547 = coord(1/22)
- Abstract
- Typographical errors can block access to records in online catalogs; but, when a word contains a typo and is also spelled correctly elsewhere in the same record, access may not be blocked. To quantify the effect of typographical errors in records on information retrieval, we conducted a study to measure the proportion of records that contain a typographical error but that do not also contain a correct spelling of the same word. This article presents the experimental design, results of the study, and a statistical analysis of the results.We find that the average proportion of records that are blocked by the presence of a typo (that is, records in which a correct spelling of the word does not also occur) ranges from 35% to 99%, depending upon the frequency of the word being searched and the likelihood of the word being misspelled.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Cataloger, Editor, and Scholar: Essays in Honor of Ruth C. Carter
