Search (123 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge"
  1. Stumpf, G.: RSWK - wirklich ein Relikt? (1995) 0.01 
    0.010125526 = product of:
  0.055690393 = sum of:
    0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013393938 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
    0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013393938 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
    0.02385747 = product of:
      0.04771494 = sum of:
        0.04771494 = weight(_text_:29 in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04771494 = score(doc=1351,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0050450475 = weight(_text_:in in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050450475 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Footnote
    Soll eine Erwiderung sein auf: Lepsky, K.: RSWK - und was noch in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.4/5, S.670-682
  2. Sears' list of subject headings (2018) 0.01 
    0.008492034 = product of:
  0.046706185 = sum of:
    0.006696969 = weight(_text_:und in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006696969 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
    0.006696969 = weight(_text_:und in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006696969 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
    0.007134775 = weight(_text_:in in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007134775 = score(doc=4652,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
    0.026177472 = sum of:
      0.009459447 = weight(_text_:science in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009459447 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02056547 = queryNorm
          0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
      0.016718024 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016718024 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02056547 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    The system is available both in print and online versions. Names a few new subject headings in areas like science, technology, engineering and medicine (STEM). In this edition, there are a total of 1,600 new headings making it a total of 12,000+ preferred headings meant for subject access in small and medium sized libraries. This unprecedented increase of about 1,600 headings is mostly due the complete incorporation of the Canadian Sears last published independently in 2006. Also critically examines inconsistencies in a few headings. Concludes to say the new edition in resplendent, hard binding maintains its stellar reputation of a handy list of general subject headings both for applications and a teaching resource.
    Date
    21.12.2018 18:22:12
    Footnote
    Introduction und Rez. in: Knowledge Organization 45(2018) no.8, S.712-714. u.d.T. "Satija, M. P. 2018: "The 22nd edition (2018) of the Sears List of Subject Headings: A brief introduction." (DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2018-8-712).
  3. Koblitz, J.: Schlagwortgebung in der Information und Dokumentation (1973) 0.01 
    0.008185192 = product of:
  0.06002474 = sum of:
    0.025255851 = weight(_text_:und in 1362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025255851 = score(doc=1362,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 1362, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1362)
    0.025255851 = weight(_text_:und in 1362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025255851 = score(doc=1362,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 1362, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1362)
    0.009513034 = weight(_text_:in in 1362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009513034 = score(doc=1362,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.34006363 = fieldWeight in 1362, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1362)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Series
    Einführung in die Information und Dokumentation; 2
  4. Cochrane, P.A.: Improving LCSH for use in online catalogs revisited : What progress has been made? What issues still remain? (2000) 0.01 
    0.007366521 = product of:
  0.05402115 = sum of:
    0.008434889 = product of:
      0.016869778 = sum of:
        0.016869778 = weight(_text_:29 in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016869778 = score(doc=5609,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.038912293 = weight(_text_:notes in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038912293 = score(doc=5609,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
    0.006673971 = weight(_text_:in in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006673971 = score(doc=5609,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    In 1986 Libraries Unlimited published Cochrane's book, Improving LCSH for Use in Online Catalogs; Exercises for Self-Help with a Selection of Background Readings. This was preceded in 1981 by an ERIC publication (ED 208 900) by Cochrane, with Monika Kirtland Bibliographic and Bibliometric Essay which documented critical views of LCSH and an analysis of vocabulary control in LCSH (parts of which were published in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly' 1(2/3) (1982), 71-94). Three features of LCSH will be re-examined to check on progress since the time of these earlier publications: notes, structure of relationships between headings in the list, and links between Library of Congress classification numbers and LCSH or other vocabularies
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  5. Sandner, M.: Neues aus der Kommission für Sacherschliessung (2005) 0.01 
    0.005446709 = product of:
  0.039942533 = sum of:
    0.017028322 = weight(_text_:und in 2183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017028322 = score(doc=2183,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.3735868 = fieldWeight in 2183, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2183)
    0.017028322 = weight(_text_:und in 2183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017028322 = score(doc=2183,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.3735868 = fieldWeight in 2183, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2183)
    0.0058858884 = weight(_text_:in in 2183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0058858884 = score(doc=2183,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2183, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2183)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Content
    "Unsere Sitzung fand diesmal am 13. 9. 2005 in Bozen im Rahmen der ODOK statt. Es waren daher auch viele interessierte Südtiroler und italienische Sacherschließungskollegen/-innen zu Gast. Eine der beiden Konferenzsprachen war Englisch, und so konnten wir Mehrsprachigkeit, das Thema unserer Sitzung und der beiden Gastvorträge, gleich selbst praktizieren. Patrice LANDRY, der Leiter der Sacherschließung an derSLB in Bern, der seit kurzem den Vorsitz der IFLA-Sektion "Classification and Indexing" und der Arbeitsgruppe "Guidelines for subject access for national bibliographic agencies" übernommen hatte, referierte über den jüngsten Stand des Projekts MACS (Multilingual Access to Subjects) und ließ uns am Nachmittag in seinem Workshop hinter die Kulissen der bereits mit echten Titeldaten operierenden Suchoberfläche blicken. Er zeigte die verschiedenen Recherche- und Editier-Funktionen im Management Linking System und brachte Beispiele für die kooperative Bearbeitung an einigen Datensätzen der bisher bereits miteinander verzahnten Normdateien SWD, LCSH und RAMEAU. Schließlich eröffnete er Ausblicke auf die künftige Einbindung weiterer Sprachen, etwa des Italienischen durch den Soggetario und auf die Anreicherung der Daten, etwa mit DDC-Notationen durch die Nähe zum DDB-Projekt "CrissCross". Federica PARADISI, die in der Sacherschließungsabteilung der BNC in Florenz sowohl für die italienische Übersetzung der DDC und deren Anwendung in ganz Italien als auch für die Überarbeitung des seit 1956 existierenden italienischen Wortschatzes für die verbale Erschließung und für dessen Aufbereitung zu einer modernen, bald auch elektronischen Normdatei zuständig ist und an der Erstellung der italienischen Nationalbibliografie mitwirkt, hat zuletzt gemeinsam mit Anna Lucarelli den Prototyp des "Nuovo Soggetario" erarbeitet und stellte dieses umfangreiche Projekt vor. Der von ihr skizzierte Zeitplan gibt Anlass zur Hoffnung, dass MACS für die Auffindung beschlagworteter Literatur in Bibliothekskatalogen schon in einem Jahr um einen sprachlichen Zugang reicher sein könnte. Beide Gastreferenten/-innen standen dem Auditorium im Anschluss an die Präsentationen für Fragen zur Verfügung, und die neuen fachlichen Kontakte vertieften sich in den Pausengesprächen noch mehr. Vor der Führung durch die Dewey-Ausstellung im Lichthof der UB Bozen demonstrierte Margit SANDNER zum Abschluss dieses multilingualen Sacherschließungsnachmittags mit einigen Beispielen in deutscherSprache die Suchfunktionen in den beiden Webversionen von DDC Deutsch MelvilSearch (für OPACs) und MelvilClass (für das Klassifizieren) und kündigte an, dass ab Oktober bis Jahresende kostenlose Testaccounts vergeben werden. Wer daran interessiert ist, diese deutschsprachigen Webtools bereits auszuprobieren, wendet sich am besten direkt an Herrn Dr. Lars Svensson in Der Deutschen Bibliothek in Frankfurt: svensson@dbf.ddb.de. Die ab Jänner 2006 gültigen Lizenzbedingungen für "Melvil" entnehmen Sie bitte: http//www.ddc-deutsch.de/licence-melvil.html Noch zwei aktuelle Hinweise: - Informationstag der Arbeitsstelle für Standardisierung (DDB) über aktuelle Tendenzen in Sachen Regelwerke f. Formal- und Sacherschließung, Formate, Normdateien und Datentausch am 15. November in Wien. - Aufsatz über die Zukunft der SWD von Esther Scheven (BD 2005, H. 6, S. 748-773), in dem u. a. auch auf unsere seinerzeitige KofSE-Studie: Schlagwort "Benutzerforschung" ... (VÖB-Mitt. 1997, H. 3-4, S. 28-49) rekurriert wird."
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.3, S.83-84
  6. Frommeyer, J.: Zeitbegriffe und Zeitcodierungen in allgemeinbibliographischen Datenbanken : eine Analyse von RSWK, LCSH und RAMEAU sowie Entwicklung eines theoretischen Modells für ein Zeitretrieval (2003) 0.01 
    0.0052024 = product of:
  0.038150933 = sum of:
    0.016973363 = weight(_text_:und in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016973363 = score(doc=2203,freq=74.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.37238106 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
          8.602325 = tf(freq=74.0), with freq of:
            74.0 = termFreq=74.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
    0.016973363 = weight(_text_:und in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016973363 = score(doc=2203,freq=74.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.37238106 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
          8.602325 = tf(freq=74.0), with freq of:
            74.0 = termFreq=74.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
    0.0042042066 = weight(_text_:in in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0042042066 = score(doc=2203,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ZfBB 50(2003) H.5, S.295-297 (E. Scheven):"In ihrem Buch »Zeitbegriffe und Zeitcodierungen in allgemeinbibliographischen Datenbanken« entwickelt die Autorin ein theoretisches Modell für ein Zeitretrieval in allgemeinbibliografischen Datenbanken. Dafür untersucht sie die Verwendung von Zeitbegriffen (Epochenbezeichnungen, historiografischen Begriffen) und Zeitcodierungen (Jahreszahlen, Datumsangaben) bei der Indexierung von Dokumenten in allgemeinbibliografischen Datenbanken und deren Retrievalmöglichkeiten. Durch Globalisierung und Internet ist der Zugang zu den Katalogen unterschiedlichster lnstitutionen weit überdie Landesgrenzen hinaus möglich geworden. Dadurch ist der Zwang zur Standardisierung der bibliothekarischen Regeln weltweit verschärft, um Daten-Interoperabilität zu gewährleisten. Hauptziel der Sacherschließung muss immer die optimale Befriedigung der Benutzerbedürfnisse sein. - Kompetente Einführung - Nach einer kurzen geschichtlichen Darstellung der Zeitrechnung an sich und der bibliothekarischen Regelentwicklung wendet sich die Autorin den wichtigsten Sacherschließungswerkzeugen der westlichen WeIt zu, zum einen den beiden internationalen Universalklassifikationen, DDC und UDK, und zum anderen den drei Schlagwortsystemen LCSH, Rameau und SWD,wobei sieden Schwerpunkt auf die verbalen Sacherschließungssysteme legt. LCSH, Rameau und SWD mit RSWK werden kompetent und ausführlich in 164 von 316 Seiten mit ihrer Entwicklungsgeschichte und ihren Unterschieden dargestellt. Jutta Frommeyer ist hier eine gute vergleichende Einführung in die großen verbalen Sacherschließungssysteme gelungen und zwar nicht nur für Anfänger, sondern auch für praxis-erfahrene Sacherschließer. Die Darstellung von Zeitaspekten nach LCSH kann nach sechs verschiedenen Varianten erfolgen. Es gibt keine allgemeinen subdivisions für Zeitangaben. Rameau stimmt in seiner Struktur mit den LCSH überein, weicht aber bei der Indexierung bezüglich der subdivisions von den LCSH ab. Rameau hat eine allgemein zu verwendende Liste (subdivision) mit ca. 40 Unterteilungen für den Zeitaspekt. Nach RSWK wird der Zeitaspekt durch so genannte Zeitschlagwörter wiedergegeben, die wie auch bestimmte Formalschlagwörter durch Jahreszahlen erweitert werden können. Der im Dokument behandelte Zeitabschnitt wird für die Beschlagwortung herangezogen. Vorgegebene Zeituntergliederungen für bestimmte Themenbereiche wie bei LCSH und Rameau gibt es bei RSWK nicht. Zwischen den Schlagwortsystemen gibt es unterschiedliche Indexierungsregeln, wann ein Zeitschlagwort benutzt werden soll oder nicht.
    - Retrievalmöglichkeiten - Ein Test der Retrievalmöglichkeiten von Zeitangaben in den Online-Katalogen der LoC, BnF und DDB zeigte, dass für ein optimales Suchergebnis viele Recherche-Schritte und Regelwerkskenntnisse notwendig sind, eine aus Nutzersicht unbefriedigende Bilanz. Zum Beispiel muss für Suchanfragen nach Jahreszahlen der Zeitraum genauso angegeben werden, wie es bei der Indexierung geschah, oder eine Suche mit Epochenbegriffen und zeitimmanenten Schlagwörtern erfordert die genaue Kenntnis der Ansetzungsregeln für solche Deskriptoren. Die angebotenen Schlagwortketten sind eine Suchhilfe, erlauben aber keine Sortierung nach der Zeitenabfolge. Der größte Mangel ist, dass alle Zeitcodierungen nur als Zeichen, nicht als Zahlen, erkennbar sind, sodass bei der Suche nur ein Zeichenabgleich erfolgt und keine Sortierung nach Zahlen möglich ist. Jutta Frommeyer stellt die Retrievalmöglichkeiten der drei genannten Bibliothekskataloge verschiedenen anderen Datenbanken gegenüber, die eine Suche nach Zeitangaben anbieten. Die Suchmöglichkeiten bei den Allgemeinenzyklopädien (»Encyclopedia Britannica«, »Brockhaus-Enzyklopädie«, »Encarta«) sind vielfältig und elaboriert. Zeitimmanente Begriffe sind chronologisch angeordnet und auch grafisch durch Zeitschienen dargestellt, von denen aus auf ein Jahr oder einen Zeitbegriff gesprungen werden kann. Die Datenbank »Historical abstracts« bietet den Zeitraum, der in einem Dokument behandelt wird, über eine spezielle Codierung an. Die »Jahresberichte für deutsche Geschichte« bieten für das Zeitretrieval eine Tabelle mit 14 verschiedenen Möglichkeiten; die weitere Differenzierung der Suchanfrage erfolgt hier durch andere Sacherschließungselemente wie eine ausgefeilte Klassifikation und eine Schlagwortliste. - Modell zum optimalen Zeitretrieval - Aufgrund ihrer Untersuchungen entwickelt die Autorin ein theoretisches Modell für ein optimales Zeitretrieval in allgemeinbibliografischen Datenbanken mit den drei Elementen Zeitcode, Chronikcode und Chroniknormdatei. Damit die Zeitcodierungen als Zahlen und nicht als Zeichen erkennbar sind, müssen sie in einem besonderen numerischen Feld (Zeitcode) abgelegt werden; mit der Möglichkeit, nach Zeiträumen zu suchen (Größer-, Kleiner- und Gleichoperatoren). Die Zeitspannen von Zeitbegriffen werden als Chronikcode in der gleichen Datenstruktur wie der Zeitcode bei den Normdatensätzen ergänzt. Für bestimmte Zeitbegriffe ist eine Normierung notwendig (z. B. Mittelalter). Bei kulturkreisabhängigen Zeitbegriffen kann die zeitliche Codierung verschieden aussehen. Die Chroniknormdatei soll die chronologische Relation der zeitimmanenten Begriffe darstellen und bei umfassenden Zeitspannen große Trefferzahlen vermeiden. Da zeitimmanente Begriffe über alle Sachgebiete streuen, muss für das Retrieval eine sachliche Einschränkung gegeben sein. Jutta Frommeyer schlägt dafür eine international angewandte Klassifikation vor. Die Autorin stellt ein Retrievalmodell dar, um das Zusammenwirken von Zeitcode,Chronikcode und Chroniknormdatei zu demonstrieren. Dabei hat sie sich an der heutigen Menü-Oberfläche für OPACs orientiert und ein neues Suchfeld »Zeitabschnitt« mit verschiedenen Unterteilungen eingeführt. Ihre Beispiele sind nachvollziehbar und verdeutlichen ihren Vorschlag. Die Umsetzung eines solchen Modells hat Auswirkungen auf die vorhandenen Datenstrukturen; auch wird eine Annäherung der Regeln für die Schlagwortvergabe nach RSWK, Rameau und LCSH notwendig sein, wenn so eine Suche international angeboten werden soll.
    - Zum Schluss - Das Buch liest sich gut und ist übersichtlich gegliedert mit zehn Kapiteln und einem Anhang für verschiedene, den Zeitaspekt betreffende Hilfstabellen der vorgestellten Sacherschließungssysteme. Wo möglich und angebracht, insbesondere bei der Darstellung der Retrievalmöglichkeiten der untersuchten elektronischen Informationsmittel, werden zur Veranschaulichung Abbildungen eingesetzt. Allerdings sind der Qualität Grenzen gesetzt, weil im Schwarz-Druck ein ursprünglich farbiges Benutzer-Interface manchmal fast seine ganze Aussagekraft verliert. Hier wäre es wahrscheinlich besser gewesen, die benötigten Abbildungen vorher über ein Grafik-Programm in eine richtige Schwarz-Weiß-Abbildung umgesetzt zu haben. Das Literaturverzeichnis ist umfangreich und sehr übersichtlich gestaltet. Das Buch bietet denjenigen, die sich mit Sacherschließung oder OPAC-Entwicklung beschäftigen, wichtige Anregungen. Die Notwendigkeit von Sacherschließung gerade im Zeitalter der Globalisierung und des Internets bedeutet, dass bei der Weiterentwicklung von nationalen Regelwerken die internationalen Bedürfnisse berücksichtigt werden müssen. Es bleibt zu hoffen, dass die Ideen von Frau Frommeyer aufgegriffen, die deutsche Sprachgrenze überwunden und bei den Regelwerksdiskussionen und Formatentwicklungen international berücksichtigt werden."
    Weitere Rez. in: Mitt. VÖB 57(2004) H.1, S.105 (M. Sandner)
  7. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.00 
    0.004980634 = product of:
  0.027393486 = sum of:
    0.006696969 = weight(_text_:und in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006696969 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
    0.006696969 = weight(_text_:und in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006696969 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
    0.005640535 = weight(_text_:in in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005640535 = score(doc=1181,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
    0.008359012 = product of:
      0.016718024 = sum of:
        0.016718024 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016718024 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in Themenheft: Implementation of Faceted Vocabularies.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Austin, D.: PRECIS: Introduction (1987) 0.00 
    0.0049428167 = product of:
  0.03624732 = sum of:
    0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013393938 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
    0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013393938 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
    0.009459447 = product of:
      0.018918894 = sum of:
        0.018918894 = weight(_text_:science in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018918894 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Footnote
    Zusammenfassende kompakte Darstellung des Systems PRECIS, seiner Geschichte, Eigenschaften und Möglichkeiten bis hin zum Online-Retrieval. - Als Einführung zu empfehlen
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.42, [=Suppl.7]
  9. Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007) 0.00 
    0.004885704 = product of:
  0.035828494 = sum of:
    0.012510579 = product of:
      0.025021158 = sum of:
        0.025021158 = weight(_text_:sign in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025021158 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15260035 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.16396527 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.018343432 = weight(_text_:notes in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018343432 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.16695367 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
    0.004974484 = weight(_text_:in in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004974484 = score(doc=664,freq=70.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.17782353 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
          8.3666 = tf(freq=70.0), with freq of:
            70.0 = termFreq=70.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 34(2007) no.1, S.58-60 (P. Buizza): "This Nuovo soggettario is the first sign of subject indexing renewal in Italy. Italian subject indexing has been based until now on Soggettario per i cataloghi delle biblioteche italiane (Firenze, 1956), a list of preferred terms and see references, with suitable hierarchical subdivisions and cross references, derived from the subject catalogue of the National Library in Florence (BNCF). New headings later used in Bibliografia nazionale italiana (BNI) were added without references, nor indeed with any real maintenance. Systematic instructions on how to combine the terms are lacking: the indexer using this instrument is obliged to infer the order of terms absent from the lists by consulting analogous entries. Italian libraries are suffering from the limits of this subject catalogue: vocabulary is inadequate, obsolete and inconsistent, the syndetic structure incomplete and inaccurate, and the syntax ill-defined, poorly explained and unable to reflect complex subjects. In the nineties, the Subject Indexing Research Group (Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto, GRIS) of the AIB (Italian Library Association) developed the indexing theory and some principles of PRECIS and drew up guidelines based on consistent principles for vocabulary, semantic relationships and subject string construction, the latter according to role syntax (Guida 1997). In overhauling the Soggettario, the National Library in Florence aimed at a comprehensive indexing system. (A report on the method and evolution of the work has been published in Knowledge Organization (Lucarelli 2005), while the feasibility study is available in Italian (Per un nuovo Soggettario 2002). Any usable terms from the old Soggettario will be transferred to the new system, while taking into consideration international norms and interlinguistic compatibility, as well as applications outside the immediate library context. The terms will be accessible via a suitable OPAC operating on the most advanced software.
    The guide Nuovo soggettario was presented on February 8' 2007 at a one-day seminar in the Palazzo Vecchio, Florence, in front of some 500 spellbound people. The Nuovo soggettario comes in two parts: the guide in book-form and an accompanying CD-ROM, by way of which a prototype of the thesaurus may be accessed on the Internet. In the former, rules are stated; the latter contains a pdf version of the guide and the first installment of the controlled vocabulary, which is to be further enriched and refined. Syntactic instructions (general application guidelines, as well as special annotations of particular terms) and the compiled subject strings file have yet to be added. The essentials of the new system are: 1) an analytic-synthetic approach, 2) use of terms (units of controlled vocabulary) and subject strings (which represent subjects by combining terms in linear order to form syntactic relationships), instead of main headings and subdivisions, 3) specificity of terms and strings, with a view to the co-extension of subject string and subject matter and 4) a clear distinction between semantic and syntactic relationships, with full control of them both. Basic features of the vocabulary include the uniformity and univocality of terms and thesaural management of a priori (semantic) relationships. Starting from its definition, each term can be categorially analyzed: four macro-categories are represented (agents, action, things, time), for which there are subcategories called facets (e.g., for actions: activities, disciplines, processes), which in turn have sub-facets. Morphological instructions conform to national and international standards, including BS 8723, ANSI/ NISO Z39.19 and the IFLA draft of Guidelines for multilingual thesauri, even for syntactic factorization. Different kinds of semantic relationships are represented thoroughly, and particular attention is paid to poly-hierarchies, which are used only in moderation: both top terms must actually be relevant. Node labels are used to specify the principle of division applied. Instance relationships are also used.
    An entry is structured so as to present all the essential elements of the indexing system. For each term are given: category, facet, related terms, Dewey interdisciplinary class number and, if necessary; definition or scope notes. Sources used are referenced (an appendix in the book lists those used in the current work). Historical notes indicate whenever a change of term has occurred, thus smoothing the transition from the old lists. In chapter 5, the longest one, detailed instructions with practical examples show how to create entries and how to relate terms; upper relationships must always be complete, right up to the top term, whereas hierarchies of related terms not yet fully developed may remain unfinished. Subject string construction consists in a double operation: analysis and synthesis. The former is the analysis of logical functions performed by single concepts in the definition of the subject (e.g., transitive actions, object, agent, etc.) or in syntactic relationships (transitive relationships and belonging relationship), so that each term for those concepts is assigned its role (e.g., key concept, transitive element, agent, instrument, etc.) in the subject string, where the core is distinct from the complementary roles (e.g., place, time, form, etc.). Synthesis is based on a scheme of nuclear and complementary roles, and citation order follows agreed-upon principles of one-to-one relationships and logical dependence. There is no standard citation order based on facets, in a categorial logic, but a flexible one, although thorough. For example, it is possible for a time term (subdivision) to precede an action term, when the former is related to the latter as the object of action: "Arazzi - Sec. 16.-17. - Restauro" [Tapestry - 16th-17th century - Restoration] (p. 126). So, even with more complex subjects, it is possible to produce perfectly readable strings covering the whole of the subject matter without splitting it into two incomplete and complementary headings. To this end, some unusual connectives are adopted, giving the strings a more discursive style.
    Thesaurus software is based on AgroVoc (http:// www.fao.org/aims/ag_intro.htm) provided by the FAO, but in modified form. Many searching options and contextualization within the full hierarchies are possible, so that the choice of morphology and syntax of terms and strings is made easier by the complete overview of semantic relationships. New controlled terms will be available soon, thanks to the work in progress - there are now 13,000 terms, of which 40 percent are non-preferred. In three months, free Internet access by CD-ROM will cease and a subscription will be needed. The digital version of old Soggettario and the corresponding unstructured lists of headings adopted in 1956-1985 are accessible together with the thesaurus, so that the whole vocabulary, old and new, will be at the fingertips of the indexer, who is forced to work with both tools during this transition period. In the future, it will be possible to integrate the thesaurus into library OPACs. The two parts form a very consistent and detailed resource. The guide is filled with examples; the accurate, clearly-expressed and consistent instructions are further enhanced by good use of fonts and type size, facilitating reading. The thesaurus is simple and quick to use, very rich, albeit only a prototype; see, for instance, a list of DDC numbers and related terms with their category and facet, and then entries, hierarchies and so on, and the capacity of the structure to show organized knowledge. The excellent outcome of a demanding experimentation, the intended guide welcomes in a new era of subject indexing in Italy and is highly recommended. The new method has been designed to be easily teachable to new and experimented indexers.
    Now BNI is beginning to use the new language, pointing the way for the adoption of Nuovo soggettario in Italian libraries: a difficult challenge whose success is not assured. To name only one issue: including all fields of study requires particular care in treating terms with different specialized meanings; cooperation of other libraries and institutions is foreseen. At the same time, efforts are being made to assure the system's interoperability outside the library world. It is clear that a great commitment is required. "Too complex a system!" say the naysayers. "Only at the beginning," the proponents reply. The new system goes against the mainstream, compared with the imitation of the easy way offered by search engines - but we know that they must enrich their devices to improve quality, just repeating the work on semantic and syntactic relationships that leads formal expressions to the meanings they are intended to communicate - and also compared with research to create automated devices supporting human work, for the need to simplify cataloguing. Here AI is not involved, but automation is widely used to facilitate and to support the conscious work of indexers guided by rules as clear as possible. The advantage of Nuovo soggettario is its combination of a thesaurus (a much-appreciated tool used across the world) with the equally widespread technique of subject-string construction, which is to say: the rational and predictable combination of the terms used. The appearance of this original, unparalleled working model may well be a great occasion in the international development of indexing, as, on one hand, the Nuovo soggettario uses a recognized tool (the thesaurus) and, on the other, by permitting both pre-coordination and post-coordination, it attempts to overcome the fragmentation of increasingly complex and specialized subjects into isolated, single-term descriptors. This is a serious proposition that merits consideration from both theoretical and practical points of view - and outside Italy, too."
  10. Hearn, S.: Machine-assisted validation of LC Subject Headings : implications for authority file structure (2000) 0.00 
    0.0048061195 = product of:
  0.035244875 = sum of:
    0.009840704 = product of:
      0.019681407 = sum of:
        0.019681407 = weight(_text_:29 in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019681407 = score(doc=5607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004161952 = weight(_text_:in in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004161952 = score(doc=5607,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
    0.021242218 = weight(_text_:computer in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021242218 = score(doc=5607,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Many kinds of structure can be discerned in the headings and rules governing the Library of Congress Subject Headings. By addressing these structures at different levels, librarians can develop different approaches to the machine-assisted validation of subject headings, from the checking of individual words to the validation of complex forms of heading/subdivision compatibility. Using computer programs to assist with maintenance of subject headings is becoming increasingly necessary as technical services librarians strive to create consistent and useful patterns of subject collocation in library catalogs
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  11. Heiner-Freiling, M.: Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies (2000) 0.00 
    0.0047632665 = product of:
  0.026197966 = sum of:
    0.006696969 = weight(_text_:und in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006696969 = score(doc=5921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
    0.006696969 = weight(_text_:und in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006696969 = score(doc=5921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
    0.008434889 = product of:
      0.016869778 = sum of:
        0.016869778 = weight(_text_:29 in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016869778 = score(doc=5921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0043691397 = weight(_text_:in in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0043691397 = score(doc=5921,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys
    Content
    Mit einer tabellarischen Übersicht der eingesetzten Systeme und Regeln
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  12. Maltese, D.: ¬Sul controllo dei termini di indicizzazione per soggetti : contributo al testo definitivo della Guida GRIS (1997) 0.00 
    0.004662142 = product of:
  0.05128356 = sum of:
    0.045397673 = weight(_text_:notes in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045397673 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.41318923 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
    0.0058858884 = weight(_text_:in in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0058858884 = score(doc=1166,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Abstract
    The 'Guida all'indicizzazione per soggetto', the outcome of the work of the GRIS collaborative project of Italian research and academic libraries on subject heading schemes for Italian libraries, was published in 1996, though not in a definitive form. Presents some notes as a contribution to the definitive version, particularly section 3. The latter is concerned with the control of terms, including the analysis of categories, the morphology of terms and the structure of vocabulary
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Danesi, D.: Chi ha paura dell'uomo nero? in: Bolletino AIB 37(1997) no.4, S.501-508.
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The control of terms in subject headings: a contribution to the definitive text of the GRIS Guide
  13. Studwell, W.E.: Why not an 'AACR' for subject headings? (1985) 0.00 
    0.0046278196 = product of:
  0.033937342 = sum of:
    0.0029429442 = weight(_text_:in in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0029429442 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
    0.021242218 = weight(_text_:computer in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021242218 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
    0.00975218 = product of:
      0.01950436 = sum of:
        0.01950436 = weight(_text_:22 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01950436 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Although the rules for descriptive cataloging have been recodified twice in the past twenty years, there never has been any kind of comprehensive theoretical code for subject headings, despite some suggestions for a code over the years. This essay explains the need for a code, provides historical background, and presents some broad proposals as to the philosophy, structure, and form of the code and what the code should cover. Included is the relation between the proposed code and the Library of Congress' 1984 Subject Cataloging Manual.
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:01
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Computer Software Cataloging: Techniques and Examples
  14. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.00 
    0.004562979 = product of:
  0.033461846 = sum of:
    0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013393938 = score(doc=1643,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
    0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013393938 = score(doc=1643,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
    0.006673971 = weight(_text_:in in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006673971 = score(doc=1643,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Die Diskussion um Vor- und Nachteile von Präkoordination oder Postkoordination wird unter den in der verbalen Sacherschließung Engagierten in Deutschland seit Jahren geführt. Mit zunehmender Verbreitung der RSWK gewinnen die Überlegungen, die sich angesichts der Ausbreitung des OPAC für das 'Zerschlagen' der Schlagwortketten aussprechen, an Bedeutung. In diesem Zusammenhang trägt eine Berücksichtigung der internationalen Debatte um Prä- und Postkoordination zur Erweiterung des nationalen Horizontes bei. Der Beitrag ist eine leicht gekürzte Übersetzung eines Referates, das die Autorin beim IFLA Satellite Meeting zum Thema 'Subject indexing in the 90's - principles and practices' im August 1993 in Lissabon gehalten hat
    Footnote
    Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 41(1994) H.3, S.279-294
  15. Badalamenti, G.: ¬L'¬introduzione del GRIS in un sistema multibiblioteche : realta e problemi aperti (1997) 0.00 
    0.004099199 = product of:
  0.04509119 = sum of:
    0.038912293 = weight(_text_:notes in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038912293 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
    0.0061788964 = weight(_text_:in in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061788964 = score(doc=1167,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Abstract
    The GRIS subject heading scheme is the outcome of a collaborative project of Italian research and academic libraries. Describes the efforts to introduce the scheme to a number of libraries in the Siena Library Service in Italy in the last 3 years. Notes the phases of this project, pricipally a series of trainign seminars and a year of experimentation, before agreement by most of the libraries to implement the scheme. Describes the main features of the electronic subject heading files as they now exist, as they cope with pre existing schemes and the new scheme. Provides statistical sata on these files and outlines the problems which remain to be solved in thre implementation of the scheme
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The introduction of the GRIS subject heading scheme in a multi library system: reality and continuing problems
  16. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : I. The best of pre-coordination and post-coordination (1998) 0.00 
    0.00381578 = product of:
  0.027982386 = sum of:
    0.0050450475 = weight(_text_:in in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050450475 = score(doc=2322,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
    0.018207615 = weight(_text_:computer in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018207615 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
    0.0047297236 = product of:
      0.009459447 = sum of:
        0.009459447 = weight(_text_:science in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009459447 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    The introduction of computerized post-coordination has solved many of the problems of pre-coordinated subject access. However, the adoption of computerized post-coordination results in the loss of some pre-coordination benefits. Specifically, the effect of hiding terms within the context of others is lost in post-coodination which give lead status to every document term. This results in spurious matches of terms out of context. Library patrons and Internet searchers are increasingly dissatisfied with subject access performance, in part because of unmanageably large retrieval sets. The need to enhance precision and limit the size of retrieval sets motivates this work which proposes partial coordination, an approach which incorporates the advantages of computer search with the ability of pre-coordination to limit spurious partial matches and thereby enhance precision
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.14, S.1254-1269
  17. Austin, D.; Digger, J.A.: PRECIS: The Preserved Context Index System (1985) 0.00 
    0.0038075335 = product of:
  0.027921911 = sum of:
    0.0052003157 = weight(_text_:in in 3652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052003157 = score(doc=3652,freq=34.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.18589637 = fieldWeight in 3652, product of:
          5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
            34.0 = termFreq=34.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3652)
    0.020356733 = weight(_text_:computer in 3652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020356733 = score(doc=3652,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.2708572 = fieldWeight in 3652, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3652)
    0.0023648618 = product of:
      0.0047297236 = sum of:
        0.0047297236 = weight(_text_:science in 3652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047297236 = score(doc=3652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.08730954 = fieldWeight in 3652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Probably the most interesting, original and controversial indexing system of the 1970s has been PRECIS (the Preserved Context Index System) developed by Derek Austin. It attracted such attention that the short courses given at the British National Bibliography offices in London -initiated as a means of teaching the staff of BNB who did subject indexing-were repeated all over the world, in the form of three-day or three-week sessions. A few fortunate non-BNB indexers were taken into London classes, taught by Austin and Digger, and had the advantage of a week's work with the regular staff theresomething that could not be done elsewhere. In addition, descriptions of the system were published from time to time as progress was made an the system itself and clarification or updating were needed. This article has been selected as an example of clarification. A second edition of the original 1974 Manual describing PRECIS appeared in early 1984, so the system may now be regarded as fully mature. PRECIS, which is the culmination of Austin's research for the Classification Research Group plus considerable additional input from the science of linguistics, is a highly sophisticated indexing system, deliberately created to be used with a computer. The motive behind it was that the indexer should do the brain work and the computer the nitty-gritty work of manipulating index terms. Chosen combinations and permutations are used as head words under strict rules to ensure that the context which defines the specific meaning of these words is always present, thus avoiding the ambiguity problem in indexing. The system also has classifi ation features, in part drawn from the Group's long interest in faceted classification. The actual index produces a large number of index entries, each carrying with it the basic context of the item being described. A weIl-defined terminology, in addition to contextdependency, is a feature of PRECIS. Role operators define the types of terms used and control the manipulations of the terms, which are originally entered as a string. The indexer is able to analyze and reduce to string form any document, process, or material that can be described in words, making it ideal for most audiovisual material.
    The system itself has two major aspects: - a syntactic approach in which relationships between terms are identified and tagged. Suitable algorithms for manipulation produce a very thorough index in which each head word is kept in context. - a semantic approach in which terminology is weIl defined by ensuring that the relationships of equivalence, hierarchy, and association are clearly established. Charts of relationships are created by inductive means (i.e., from the ground up). A special code for computer manipulation is used with each line of the string. This translates the string format into one that, with specially derived algorithms, can be used by the computer, to produce the actual index headings with all parts rotated by following the algorithm. The PRECIS system has been translated and utilized for languages other than English, notably French, German, and Danish. Modifications needed for idiosyncracies of each language have been made. Some, such as those modifications needed for German, have turned out to have usefulness with English as weIl. All in all, the system has such advanced indexing concepts that it provides a kind of indexing not possible before the computer came into common usage. Austin, who joined the staff of the British National Bibliography in 1963, is currently a member of the British Library staff. His early work included a NATO-sponsored research assignment for the Classification Research Group (q.v.). This, in turn, led to the development of PRECIS.
    Footnote
    Original in: Library resources and technical services 21(1977) no.1, S.13-30.
  18. Förschner, F.: ¬Eine Theorie zum Schlagwortkatalog (1987) 0.00 
    0.0036173777 = product of:
  0.026527436 = sum of:
    0.011161615 = weight(_text_:und in 1383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011161615 = score(doc=1383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 1383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1383)
    0.011161615 = weight(_text_:und in 1383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011161615 = score(doc=1383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 1383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1383)
    0.0042042066 = weight(_text_:in in 1383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0042042066 = score(doc=1383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1383)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungsblatt. Verband der Bibliotheken des Landes NW N.F. 38(1988) S.67-68 (G. Hartwieg); Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 102(1988) S.470-473 (H. Beck); International classification 15(1988) S.164 (W. Bies); Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie 36(1989) S.340-342 (M. Kunz)
  19. Subject indexing : principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal (1995) 0.00 
    0.003434427 = product of:
  0.025185797 = sum of:
    0.007892453 = weight(_text_:und in 6042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007892453 = score(doc=6042,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 6042, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6042)
    0.007892453 = weight(_text_:und in 6042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007892453 = score(doc=6042,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 6042, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6042)
    0.009400892 = weight(_text_:in in 6042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009400892 = score(doc=6042,freq=40.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.3360549 = fieldWeight in 6042, product of:
          6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
            40.0 = termFreq=40.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6042)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Dieser Band enthält die gesammelten Vorträge der IFLA-Arbeitsgruppe für verbale Sacherschließung. Berichte über länder- und damit sprachspezifische Historien der Schlagwortkataloge und den heute gültigen Regeln der Klassifikation. Neben diesem internationalen Überblick bietet der Band weitere aktuell diskutierte Ansätze, die vor allem im Zusammenhang mit dem Aufbau zahlreicher Nationalbibliotheken in den osteuropäischen Ländern von Bedeutung sind
    Content
    Enthält folgende Beiträge: McGARRY, D.: Introduction; HOLLEY, R.P.: Editor's comments; DECOURT, E. u. S.M.G. PACHECO: Subject analysis in the Brazilian Library Network BIBLIODATA CALCO; PARENT, I.: Subject access to library materials in Canada: overview; SCHWEITZER, A.: Subject access to library materials in Canada: a balancing act between conformity and divergence; WILLER, M.: Subject access systems in use in Croatia; MASTROVIC, M.: Cataloguing graphics in the prints collection: National and University Library, Zagreb, Croatia; JOUGUELET, S.: Evolution of subject indexing practice in France; HEINER-FREILING, M.: Subject indexing in the nineties: the situation in Germany; SOLTANI, P.: Subject access in Iran; SADOWSKA, J.: Subject catalogues in Poland; LOPES, M.I.: Subject indexing in Portuguese libraries: a new approach with SIPORbase; CASTELLOTE, P.B.: Subject indexing at the National Library of Spain; McILWAINE, I.C.: Subject control: the British viewpoint; CHAN, L.M.: Subject access systems in the USA; FUGMANN, R.: The complementary of natural and controlled languages in indexing; SVENONIUS, E.: Precoordination or not?; REY, J.: International tendencies in terminology and indexing; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Standards and standardization in subject analysis systems: current status and future directions: BEALL, J.: Summary
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 23(1996) no.4, S.233-236 (M. Micacic, M. Willer)
  20. Bloomfield, M.: ¬A look at subject headings : a plea for standardization (1993) 0.00 
    0.003266084 = product of:
  0.035926923 = sum of:
    0.0058858884 = weight(_text_:in in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0058858884 = score(doc=2475,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
    0.030041033 = weight(_text_:computer in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030041033 = score(doc=2475,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.39971197 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Abstract
    In the preparation of a book on how to do a literature search, many inconsistencies were found in the assignment of subject terms. The Library of Congress Subject Headings is cited for not bringing computer languages into a consistent pattern. BASIC and FORTRAN are treated differently in their see also references and are without references to the words "computers" or "computer." Also index terms for the literature search on the "search for extraterrestrial life" showed inconsistent patterns in indexing. Catalogers and indexers need to review the work they are currently publishing and try to decide how to bring some standardization to the construction of subject terms. There is a need to provide a single thesaurus for all English index terms.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 87
  • m 29
  • el 4
  • i 4
  • s 4
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications