Search (138 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Geißelmann, F. (Hrsg.): Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen (1994) 0.06
    0.05589886 = product of:
      0.20496248 = sum of:
        0.016574152 = weight(_text_:und in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016574152 = score(doc=4360,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.36362273 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.016574152 = weight(_text_:und in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016574152 = score(doc=4360,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.36362273 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.08419695 = weight(_text_:schriftenreihen in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08419695 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17793995 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.47317618 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.07584107 = sum of:
          0.061924208 = weight(_text_:sign in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061924208 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15260035 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02056547 = queryNorm
              0.40579337 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
          0.0139168585 = weight(_text_:29 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0139168585 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02056547 = queryNorm
              0.19237353 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.0048803217 = weight(_text_:in in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048803217 = score(doc=4360,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17445749 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.0068958336 = product of:
          0.013791667 = sum of:
            0.013791667 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013791667 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(6/22)
    
    Abstract
    Es werden die Grundprobleme der Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen dargestellt. Ein anschließendes Kapitel behandelt das Verhältnis von verbaler und klassifikatorischer Erschließung. Ein wichtiger Teil der Aussagen betrifft das Gebiet der verbalen Sacherschließung und damit das nationale Regelwerk: Es werden Vorschläge für eine Reform der RSWK im Hinblick auf die Erfordernisse der OPAC unterbreitet. Regelwerk und Normdatei (SWD) bilden dabei eine Einheit und werden zusammen betrachtet. Im vergangenen Jahr wurden die Ergebnisse der Expertengruppe mit dem Schwerpunkt Formalerschließung vorgelegt, nun folgen die Aussagen zur Sacherschließung, welche die Expertengruppe - in veränderter personeller Zusammensetzung unter Leitung von Dr. Friedrich Geißelmann, Regensburg - erarbeitet hat. Die bibliothekarische Öffentlichkeit ist aufgefordert, sich dazu bis zum Jahresende zu äußern. Beide Berichte beziehen sich aufeinander und versuchen, den Zusammenhang zwischen Formal- und Sacherschließung herzustellen. Vom gegenwärtigen Stand der Sacherschließung in deutschen Bibliotheken ausgehend - wozu auch durch die Gruppe im Frühjahr 1993 eine Umfrage in wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken gemacht worden ist, werden die Grundprobleme der Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen dargestellt. Ein anschließendes Kapitel behandelt das Verhältnis von verbaler und klassifikatorischer Erschließung. Ein wichtiger Teil der Aussagen betrifft das Gebiet der verbalen Sacherschließung und damit das nationale Regelwerk: Es werden Vorschläge für ein Reform der RSWK im Hinblick auf die Erfordernisse des OPAC unterbreitet. Regelwerk und Normdatei (SWD) bilden dabei eine Einheit und werden zusammen betrachtet. Es geht um Kettenbildung und Permutationsregeln, Kompositumbildung oder Zerlegung von Begriffen, Pleonasmus, Funktion der SWD, Ansetzung von Schlagwörtern, die Einführung eines Zeit-Codes, Erschließung literarischer Formen und Gattungen, den verwendeten Zeichensatz, den Umgang mit Verweisungen
    Classification
    AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines
    AN 50200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliographien, Sammelschriften / Schriftenreihen (Indiv.-Sign.)
    Date
    15. 7.2018 16:22:16
    Editor
    Kommission des DBI für Erschließung und Katalogmanagement / Expertengruppe Online-Kataloge
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .
    RVK
    AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines
    AN 50200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliographien, Sammelschriften / Schriftenreihen (Indiv.-Sign.)
  2. Blair, D.C.: Language and representation in information retrieval (1991) 0.02
    0.017781472 = product of:
      0.097798094 = sum of:
        0.057961665 = weight(_text_:informatik in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057961665 = score(doc=1545,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.104934774 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.552359 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
        0.017858583 = weight(_text_:und in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017858583 = score(doc=1545,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
        0.017858583 = weight(_text_:und in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017858583 = score(doc=1545,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
        0.0041192644 = weight(_text_:in in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041192644 = score(doc=1545,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.14725187 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
      0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    
    Abstract
    Information or Document Retrieval is the subject of this book. It is not an introductory book, although it is self-contained in the sense that it is not necessary to have a background in the theory or practice of Information Retrieval in order to understand its arguments. The book presents, as clearly as possible, one particular perspective on Information Retrieval, and attempts to say that certain aspects of the theory or practice of the management of documents are more important than others. The majority of Information Retrieval research has been aimed at the more experimentally tractable small-scale systems, and although much of that work has added greatly to our understanding of Information Retrieval it is becoming increasingly apparent that retrieval systems with large data bases of documents are a fundamentally different genre of systems than small-scale systems. If this is so, which is the thesis of this book, then we must now study large information retrieval systems with the same rigor and intensity that we once studied small-scale systems. Hegel observed that the quantitative growth of any system caused qualitative changes to take place in its structure and processes.
    Classification
    ES 930 Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Indogermanistik. Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen / Spezialbereiche der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft / Datenverarbeitung und Sprachwissenschaft. Computerlinguistik / Informationsbehandlung
    ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
    AN 95000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Bibliographische Erfassung, Suchpraxis
    ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
    ST 304 Informatik / Monographien / Künstliche Intelligenz / Automatisches Programmieren, Deduction and theorem proving, Wissensrepräsentation
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library quarterly ( ), S.221-223 (S.P. Harter)
    RVK
    ES 930 Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Indogermanistik. Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen / Spezialbereiche der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft / Datenverarbeitung und Sprachwissenschaft. Computerlinguistik / Informationsbehandlung
    ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
    AN 95000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Bibliographische Erfassung, Suchpraxis
    ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
    ST 304 Informatik / Monographien / Künstliche Intelligenz / Automatisches Programmieren, Deduction and theorem proving, Wissensrepräsentation
  3. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.01
    0.013218671 = product of:
      0.05816215 = sum of:
        0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013393938 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013393938 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.016869778 = product of:
          0.033739556 = sum of:
            0.033739556 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033739556 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0050450475 = weight(_text_:in in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050450475 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.009459447 = product of:
          0.018918894 = sum of:
            0.018918894 = weight(_text_:science in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018918894 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.22727273 = coord(5/22)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2002 17:29:00
    Source
    Journal of information science. 28(2002) no.2, S.111-122
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  4. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.01
    0.008290866 = product of:
      0.045599766 = sum of:
        0.016742421 = weight(_text_:und in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016742421 = score(doc=374,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.016742421 = weight(_text_:und in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016742421 = score(doc=374,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.00514908 = weight(_text_:in in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00514908 = score(doc=374,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.0069658435 = product of:
          0.013931687 = sum of:
            0.013931687 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013931687 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    
    Abstract
    Beschäftigt man sich mit Inhaltserschließung, so sind zunächst zwei Dimensionen zu unterscheiden - die Wissensorganisationssysteme selbst (z. B. Normdateien, Thesauri, Schlagwortsprachen, Klassifikationen und Ontologien) und die Metadaten für Dokumente, die mit diesen Wissensorganisationssystemen erschlossen sind. Beides steht in einer Wechselwirkung zueinander: Die Wissensorganisationssysteme sind die Werkzeuge für die Erschließungsarbeit und bilden die Grundlage für die Erstellung konkreter Erschließungsmetadaten. Die praktische Anwendung der Wissensorganisationssysteme in der Erschließung wiederum ist die Basis für deren Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Zugleich haben Wissensorganisationssysteme auch einen Eigenwert unabhängig von den Erschließungsmetadaten für einzelne Dokumente, indem sie bestimmte Bereiche von Welt- oder Fachwissen modellartig abbilden. Will man nun Aussagen über die Qualität von inhaltlicher Erschließung treffen, so genügt es nicht, den Input - also die Wissensorganisationssysteme und die damit generierten Metadaten - zu betrachten. Man muss auch den Output betrachten, also das, was die Recherchewerkzeuge daraus machen und was folglich bei den Nutzer:innen konkret ankommt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Überlegungen zur Qualität von Recherchewerkzeugen in diesem Bereich angestellt - gewissermaßen als Fortsetzung und Vertiefung der dazu im Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) gegebenen Hinweise. Im Zentrum steht die verbale Erschließung nach den Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung (RSWK), wie sie sich in Bibliothekskatalogen manifestiert - gleich, ob es sich dabei um herkömmliche Kataloge oder um Resource-Discovery-Systeme (RDS) handelt.
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
  5. Leissing, U.; Rädler, K.; Hauer, M.: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri : Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at (2010) 0.01
    0.007415895 = product of:
      0.04078742 = sum of:
        0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013393938 = score(doc=3728,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
        0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013393938 = score(doc=3728,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
        0.005640535 = weight(_text_:in in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005640535 = score(doc=3728,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
        0.008359012 = product of:
          0.016718024 = sum of:
            0.016718024 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016718024 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    
    Abstract
    Die Kombination von gleichzeitig mehreren oder vielen intellektuell konstruierten Thesauri und maschineller Indexierung der Texte führt zu einer umfassenderen und spezifischeren Beschreibung von Dokumenten als die intellektuelle Klassifizierung oder die Indexierung allein. Durch die Expansion der Suchfrage um Thesauruseinträge wird der recall deutlich erhöht. Zugleich kann die intellektuelle Klassifizierung in überschaubaren Domänen dazu genutzt werden, baumartig in Dokumentenkollektionen zu navigieren oder die Suche erst in Teilbereichen der Klassifikation zu beginnen, um die precision zu erhöhen. Der Einsatz von Thesauruskollektionen wird an den Beispielen dandelon.com, Landtagsinformationssystem Vorarlberg und der Landeshomepage vorarlberg.at dargestellt.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.11
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  6. Cochrane, P.A.: Improving LCSH for use in online catalogs revisited : What progress has been made? What issues still remain? (2000) 0.01
    0.007366521 = product of:
      0.05402115 = sum of:
        0.008434889 = product of:
          0.016869778 = sum of:
            0.016869778 = weight(_text_:29 in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016869778 = score(doc=5609,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.038912293 = weight(_text_:notes in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038912293 = score(doc=5609,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.35416222 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
        0.006673971 = weight(_text_:in in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006673971 = score(doc=5609,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Abstract
    In 1986 Libraries Unlimited published Cochrane's book, Improving LCSH for Use in Online Catalogs; Exercises for Self-Help with a Selection of Background Readings. This was preceded in 1981 by an ERIC publication (ED 208 900) by Cochrane, with Monika Kirtland Bibliographic and Bibliometric Essay which documented critical views of LCSH and an analysis of vocabulary control in LCSH (parts of which were published in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly' 1(2/3) (1982), 71-94). Three features of LCSH will be re-examined to check on progress since the time of these earlier publications: notes, structure of relationships between headings in the list, and links between Library of Congress classification numbers and LCSH or other vocabularies
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  7. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.01
    0.0073537407 = product of:
      0.040445574 = sum of:
        0.0055808076 = weight(_text_:und in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055808076 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.0055808076 = weight(_text_:und in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055808076 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.0042042066 = weight(_text_:in in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042042066 = score(doc=2337,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.025079753 = sum of:
          0.011148066 = weight(_text_:science in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011148066 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02056547 = queryNorm
              0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.013931687 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.013931687 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02056547 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    
    Abstract
    Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Lepsky, K.: RSWK - und was noch? : Stellungnahme zum Bericht 'Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen' der Expertengruppe Online-Kataloge (1995) 0.01
    0.0072452957 = product of:
      0.039849125 = sum of:
        0.013532738 = weight(_text_:und in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013532738 = score(doc=772,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
        0.013532738 = weight(_text_:und in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013532738 = score(doc=772,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
        0.009840704 = product of:
          0.019681407 = sum of:
            0.019681407 = weight(_text_:29 in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019681407 = score(doc=772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0029429442 = weight(_text_:in in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0029429442 = score(doc=772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
      0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    
    Abstract
    "So haben wir inzwischen einen Stand der Diskussion erreicht, bei dem zwschen den Anforderungen an das, was Bibliotheken leisten sollten und dem, worüber Bibliothekare reden, eine immense Lücke klafft. Der Bericht der Expertengruppe Online-Kataloge ist dafür nur ein weiteres, leider trauriges Beispiel. Er ist aber auch - dies ist besonders zu bedauern - eine verpaßte Chance, denn hier hätte sich die ideale Gelegenheit geboten, für die neue Katalogform OPAC auch neue Möglichkeiten der Sacherschließung zu diskutieren. Da dies nicht geschehen ist, bleibt nur zu hoffen, daß unter dem sicher stärker werdenden Druck der Benutzer auf die Bibliotheken und deren Informationsangebot auch begonnen wird, offen über die bislang 'heilige Kuh' RSWK zu rden"
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519
  9. Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung (2021) 0.01
    0.007121384 = product of:
      0.05222348 = sum of:
        0.02319898 = weight(_text_:und in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02319898 = score(doc=753,freq=54.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
                54.0 = termFreq=54.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.02319898 = weight(_text_:und in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02319898 = score(doc=753,freq=54.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
                54.0 = termFreq=54.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.0058255196 = weight(_text_:in in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058255196 = score(doc=753,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Abstract
    Der 70. Band der BIPRA-Reihe beschäftigt sich mit der Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung im Kontext etablierter Verfahren und technologischer Innovationen. Treffen heterogene Erzeugnisse unterschiedlicher Methoden und Systeme aufeinander, müssen minimale Anforderungen an die Qualität der Inhaltserschließung festgelegt werden. Die Qualitätsfrage wird zurzeit in verschiedenen Zusammenhängen intensiv diskutiert und im vorliegenden Band aufgegriffen. In diesem Themenfeld aktive Autor:innen beschreiben aus ihrem jeweiligen Blickwinkel unterschiedliche Aspekte zu Metadaten, Normdaten, Formaten, Erschließungsverfahren und Erschließungspolitik. Der Band versteht sich als Handreichung und Anregung für die Diskussion um die Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung.
    Content
    Inhalt: Editorial - Michael Franke-Maier, Anna Kasprzik, Andreas Ledl und Hans Schürmann Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung - Ein Überblick aus 50 Jahren (1970-2020) - Andreas Ledl Fit for Purpose - Standardisierung von inhaltserschließenden Informationen durch Richtlinien für Metadaten - Joachim Laczny Neue Wege und Qualitäten - Die Inhaltserschließungspolitik der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek - Ulrike Junger und Frank Scholze Wissensbasen für die automatische Erschließung und ihre Qualität am Beispiel von Wikidata - Lydia Pintscher, Peter Bourgonje, Julián Moreno Schneider, Malte Ostendorff und Georg Rehm Qualitätssicherung in der GND - Esther Scheven Qualitätskriterien und Qualitätssicherung in der inhaltlichen Erschließung - Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) Coli-conc - Eine Infrastruktur zur Nutzung und Erstellung von Konkordanzen - Uma Balakrishnan, Stefan Peters und Jakob Voß Methoden und Metriken zur Messung von OCR-Qualität für die Kuratierung von Daten und Metadaten - Clemens Neudecker, Karolina Zaczynska, Konstantin Baierer, Georg Rehm, Mike Gerber und Julián Moreno Schneider Datenqualität als Grundlage qualitativer Inhaltserschließung - Jakob Voß Bemerkungen zu der Qualitätsbewertung von MARC-21-Datensätzen - Rudolf Ungváry und Péter Király Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND - Das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten - Sina Menzel, Hannes Schnaitter, Josefine Zinck, Vivien Petras, Clemens Neudecker, Kai Labusch, Elena Leitner und Georg Rehm Ein Protokoll für den Datenabgleich im Web am Beispiel von OpenRefine und der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) - Fabian Steeg und Adrian Pohl Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen - Überlegungen zur Qualität - Heidrun Wiesenmüller Inhaltserschließung für Discovery-Systeme gestalten - Jan Frederik Maas Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext des Information Retrievals - Christian Wartena und Koraljka Golub Die Qualität der Fremddatenanreicherung FRED - Cyrus Beck Quantität als Qualität - Was die Verbünde zur Verbesserung der Inhaltserschließung beitragen können - Rita Albrecht, Barbara Block, Mathias Kratzer und Peter Thiessen Hybride Künstliche Intelligenz in der automatisierten Inhaltserschließung - Harald Sack
    Footnote
    Vgl.: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110691597/html. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110691597. Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 73(2022) H.2-3, S.131-132 (B. Lorenz u. V. Steyer). Weitere Rezension in: o-bib 9(20229 Nr.3. (Martin Völkl) [https://www.o-bib.de/bib/article/view/5843/8714].
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
  10. Bisig, U.: OPAC und verbale Sacherschließung : ein Beitrag zur RSWK-Diskussion (1994) 0.01
    0.0063626915 = product of:
      0.046659738 = sum of:
        0.019966504 = weight(_text_:und in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019966504 = score(doc=4322,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
        0.019966504 = weight(_text_:und in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019966504 = score(doc=4322,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
        0.00672673 = weight(_text_:in in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00672673 = score(doc=4322,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Abstract
    In der vorliegenden Form können die RSWK nicht befriedigen. Die geforderte hochdifferenzierte Erschließung ist in einem OPAC wegen der vielfältigen Abfragemöglichkeiten gar nicht nötig, ja eine einheitliche Indexierung und effiziente Suche is aufgrund der komplexen Regeln sogar erschwert. Aufgaben und Probleme der verbalen Sacherschließung in OPACs werden in dieser Arbeit aufgezeigt und Ansätze zu einer Alternative diskutiert. Der traditionelle Indexkatalog hat als Ergänzung des modernen Information Retrieval nur eine Zukunft, wenn die Möglichkeiten der EDV und der Faktor Mensch bei der Regelwerkentwicklung besser berücksichtigt werden
  11. Jüngling, H.: Bibliothekarische und dokumentarische Sachererschließung auf gemeinsamen Weg in die Zukunft? : Aus bibliothekarischer Sicht (1991) 0.01
    0.0063575534 = product of:
      0.046622057 = sum of:
        0.018941889 = weight(_text_:und in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018941889 = score(doc=144,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
        0.018941889 = weight(_text_:und in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018941889 = score(doc=144,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
        0.008738279 = weight(_text_:in in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008738279 = score(doc=144,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.3123684 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Series
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie: Sonderh.53
    Source
    Bibliotheken in Europa. 80. deutscher Bibliothekartag in Saarbrücken, 1990
  12. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.01
    0.005884963 = product of:
      0.032367297 = sum of:
        0.008929292 = weight(_text_:und in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008929292 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
        0.008929292 = weight(_text_:und in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008929292 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
        0.003363365 = weight(_text_:in in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003363365 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
        0.01114535 = product of:
          0.0222907 = sum of:
            0.0222907 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0222907 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    
    Abstract
    Most indexed databases now include their thesauri and/or coding in their bibliographic files, searchable at the databases' online connect rates. Assesses the searchability of these on the different hosts. Thesauri and classifications are also available as diskette or CD-ROM products. Describes a number of these, highlighting the diskette thesaurus from IFI/Plenum Data for its flexible databases, the CLAIMS Uniterm and Comprehensive indexes to US chemical patents
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  13. Trinkhaus, M.: Möglichkeiten und Aspekte des sachlichen Zugriffs in Online-Katalogen (1990) 0.01
    0.005853931 = product of:
      0.042928826 = sum of:
        0.018941889 = weight(_text_:und in 1301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018941889 = score(doc=1301,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1301, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1301)
        0.018941889 = weight(_text_:und in 1301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018941889 = score(doc=1301,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1301, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1301)
        0.0050450475 = weight(_text_:in in 1301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050450475 = score(doc=1301,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1301, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1301)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek. Forschung und Praxis. 14(1990), S.193-225
  14. Gilchrist, A.: ¬The thesaurus in retrieval (1971) 0.01
    0.0058457963 = product of:
      0.042869173 = sum of:
        0.019332483 = weight(_text_:und in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019332483 = score(doc=4593,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
        0.019332483 = weight(_text_:und in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019332483 = score(doc=4593,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
        0.0042042066 = weight(_text_:in in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042042066 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Classification
    AN 94200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Thesauruskunde
    RVK
    AN 94200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Thesauruskunde
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  15. Gödert, W.: Aufbereitung und Recherche von nach RSWK gebildeten Daten in der CD-ROM-Ausgabe der Deutschen Bibliographie (1990) 0.01
    0.005115744 = product of:
      0.037515458 = sum of:
        0.015784906 = weight(_text_:und in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015784906 = score(doc=168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.015784906 = weight(_text_:und in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015784906 = score(doc=168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.0059456457 = weight(_text_:in in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059456457 = score(doc=168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Source
    Die Schlagwortnormdatei. Entwicklungsstand und Nutzungsmöglichkeiten, Vorträge eines Kolloquiums zur Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) in Frankfurt a. M. am 5. u. 6.10.1989. Zusammengestellt u. hrsg. von Werner Stephan
  16. Geisselmann, F.; Zerbst, H.-J.: Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen : Stand der Diskussion (1996) 0.01
    0.005115744 = product of:
      0.037515458 = sum of:
        0.015784906 = weight(_text_:und in 3416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015784906 = score(doc=3416,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 3416, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3416)
        0.015784906 = weight(_text_:und in 3416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015784906 = score(doc=3416,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 3416, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3416)
        0.0059456457 = weight(_text_:in in 3416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059456457 = score(doc=3416,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 3416, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3416)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Series
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie: Sonderh.63
    Source
    85. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Göttingen 1995: Die Herausforderung der Bibliotheken durch elektronische Medien und neue Organisationsformen. Hrsg.: S. Wefers
  17. Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI): Qualitätskriterien und Qualitätssicherung in der inhaltlichen Erschließung : Thesenpapier (2021) 0.01
    0.0050123855 = product of:
      0.03675749 = sum of:
        0.015465987 = weight(_text_:und in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015465987 = score(doc=364,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.015465987 = weight(_text_:und in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015465987 = score(doc=364,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.0058255196 = weight(_text_:in in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058255196 = score(doc=364,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Abstract
    In der Folge eines Arbeitsauftrags des Standardisierungsausschusses wurde im Herbst 2017 das Expertenteam RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) eingerichtet. Dieses ist der Fachgruppe Erschließung zugeordnet und beschäftigt sich seither mit der Weiterentwicklung der verbalen Inhaltserschließung.
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
  18. Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007) 0.00
    0.004885704 = product of:
      0.035828494 = sum of:
        0.012510579 = product of:
          0.025021158 = sum of:
            0.025021158 = weight(_text_:sign in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025021158 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15260035 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02056547 = queryNorm
                0.16396527 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.018343432 = weight(_text_:notes in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018343432 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.16695367 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
        0.004974484 = weight(_text_:in in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004974484 = score(doc=664,freq=70.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17782353 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              8.3666 = tf(freq=70.0), with freq of:
                70.0 = termFreq=70.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 34(2007) no.1, S.58-60 (P. Buizza): "This Nuovo soggettario is the first sign of subject indexing renewal in Italy. Italian subject indexing has been based until now on Soggettario per i cataloghi delle biblioteche italiane (Firenze, 1956), a list of preferred terms and see references, with suitable hierarchical subdivisions and cross references, derived from the subject catalogue of the National Library in Florence (BNCF). New headings later used in Bibliografia nazionale italiana (BNI) were added without references, nor indeed with any real maintenance. Systematic instructions on how to combine the terms are lacking: the indexer using this instrument is obliged to infer the order of terms absent from the lists by consulting analogous entries. Italian libraries are suffering from the limits of this subject catalogue: vocabulary is inadequate, obsolete and inconsistent, the syndetic structure incomplete and inaccurate, and the syntax ill-defined, poorly explained and unable to reflect complex subjects. In the nineties, the Subject Indexing Research Group (Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto, GRIS) of the AIB (Italian Library Association) developed the indexing theory and some principles of PRECIS and drew up guidelines based on consistent principles for vocabulary, semantic relationships and subject string construction, the latter according to role syntax (Guida 1997). In overhauling the Soggettario, the National Library in Florence aimed at a comprehensive indexing system. (A report on the method and evolution of the work has been published in Knowledge Organization (Lucarelli 2005), while the feasibility study is available in Italian (Per un nuovo Soggettario 2002). Any usable terms from the old Soggettario will be transferred to the new system, while taking into consideration international norms and interlinguistic compatibility, as well as applications outside the immediate library context. The terms will be accessible via a suitable OPAC operating on the most advanced software.
    The guide Nuovo soggettario was presented on February 8' 2007 at a one-day seminar in the Palazzo Vecchio, Florence, in front of some 500 spellbound people. The Nuovo soggettario comes in two parts: the guide in book-form and an accompanying CD-ROM, by way of which a prototype of the thesaurus may be accessed on the Internet. In the former, rules are stated; the latter contains a pdf version of the guide and the first installment of the controlled vocabulary, which is to be further enriched and refined. Syntactic instructions (general application guidelines, as well as special annotations of particular terms) and the compiled subject strings file have yet to be added. The essentials of the new system are: 1) an analytic-synthetic approach, 2) use of terms (units of controlled vocabulary) and subject strings (which represent subjects by combining terms in linear order to form syntactic relationships), instead of main headings and subdivisions, 3) specificity of terms and strings, with a view to the co-extension of subject string and subject matter and 4) a clear distinction between semantic and syntactic relationships, with full control of them both. Basic features of the vocabulary include the uniformity and univocality of terms and thesaural management of a priori (semantic) relationships. Starting from its definition, each term can be categorially analyzed: four macro-categories are represented (agents, action, things, time), for which there are subcategories called facets (e.g., for actions: activities, disciplines, processes), which in turn have sub-facets. Morphological instructions conform to national and international standards, including BS 8723, ANSI/ NISO Z39.19 and the IFLA draft of Guidelines for multilingual thesauri, even for syntactic factorization. Different kinds of semantic relationships are represented thoroughly, and particular attention is paid to poly-hierarchies, which are used only in moderation: both top terms must actually be relevant. Node labels are used to specify the principle of division applied. Instance relationships are also used.
    An entry is structured so as to present all the essential elements of the indexing system. For each term are given: category, facet, related terms, Dewey interdisciplinary class number and, if necessary; definition or scope notes. Sources used are referenced (an appendix in the book lists those used in the current work). Historical notes indicate whenever a change of term has occurred, thus smoothing the transition from the old lists. In chapter 5, the longest one, detailed instructions with practical examples show how to create entries and how to relate terms; upper relationships must always be complete, right up to the top term, whereas hierarchies of related terms not yet fully developed may remain unfinished. Subject string construction consists in a double operation: analysis and synthesis. The former is the analysis of logical functions performed by single concepts in the definition of the subject (e.g., transitive actions, object, agent, etc.) or in syntactic relationships (transitive relationships and belonging relationship), so that each term for those concepts is assigned its role (e.g., key concept, transitive element, agent, instrument, etc.) in the subject string, where the core is distinct from the complementary roles (e.g., place, time, form, etc.). Synthesis is based on a scheme of nuclear and complementary roles, and citation order follows agreed-upon principles of one-to-one relationships and logical dependence. There is no standard citation order based on facets, in a categorial logic, but a flexible one, although thorough. For example, it is possible for a time term (subdivision) to precede an action term, when the former is related to the latter as the object of action: "Arazzi - Sec. 16.-17. - Restauro" [Tapestry - 16th-17th century - Restoration] (p. 126). So, even with more complex subjects, it is possible to produce perfectly readable strings covering the whole of the subject matter without splitting it into two incomplete and complementary headings. To this end, some unusual connectives are adopted, giving the strings a more discursive style.
    Thesaurus software is based on AgroVoc (http:// www.fao.org/aims/ag_intro.htm) provided by the FAO, but in modified form. Many searching options and contextualization within the full hierarchies are possible, so that the choice of morphology and syntax of terms and strings is made easier by the complete overview of semantic relationships. New controlled terms will be available soon, thanks to the work in progress - there are now 13,000 terms, of which 40 percent are non-preferred. In three months, free Internet access by CD-ROM will cease and a subscription will be needed. The digital version of old Soggettario and the corresponding unstructured lists of headings adopted in 1956-1985 are accessible together with the thesaurus, so that the whole vocabulary, old and new, will be at the fingertips of the indexer, who is forced to work with both tools during this transition period. In the future, it will be possible to integrate the thesaurus into library OPACs. The two parts form a very consistent and detailed resource. The guide is filled with examples; the accurate, clearly-expressed and consistent instructions are further enhanced by good use of fonts and type size, facilitating reading. The thesaurus is simple and quick to use, very rich, albeit only a prototype; see, for instance, a list of DDC numbers and related terms with their category and facet, and then entries, hierarchies and so on, and the capacity of the structure to show organized knowledge. The excellent outcome of a demanding experimentation, the intended guide welcomes in a new era of subject indexing in Italy and is highly recommended. The new method has been designed to be easily teachable to new and experimented indexers.
    Now BNI is beginning to use the new language, pointing the way for the adoption of Nuovo soggettario in Italian libraries: a difficult challenge whose success is not assured. To name only one issue: including all fields of study requires particular care in treating terms with different specialized meanings; cooperation of other libraries and institutions is foreseen. At the same time, efforts are being made to assure the system's interoperability outside the library world. It is clear that a great commitment is required. "Too complex a system!" say the naysayers. "Only at the beginning," the proponents reply. The new system goes against the mainstream, compared with the imitation of the easy way offered by search engines - but we know that they must enrich their devices to improve quality, just repeating the work on semantic and syntactic relationships that leads formal expressions to the meanings they are intended to communicate - and also compared with research to create automated devices supporting human work, for the need to simplify cataloguing. Here AI is not involved, but automation is widely used to facilitate and to support the conscious work of indexers guided by rules as clear as possible. The advantage of Nuovo soggettario is its combination of a thesaurus (a much-appreciated tool used across the world) with the equally widespread technique of subject-string construction, which is to say: the rational and predictable combination of the terms used. The appearance of this original, unparalleled working model may well be a great occasion in the international development of indexing, as, on one hand, the Nuovo soggettario uses a recognized tool (the thesaurus) and, on the other, by permitting both pre-coordination and post-coordination, it attempts to overcome the fragmentation of increasingly complex and specialized subjects into isolated, single-term descriptors. This is a serious proposition that merits consideration from both theoretical and practical points of view - and outside Italy, too."
  19. Connell, T.H.: Use of the LCSH system : realities (1996) 0.00
    0.004662142 = product of:
      0.05128356 = sum of:
        0.045397673 = weight(_text_:notes in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045397673 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.41318923 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
        0.0058858884 = weight(_text_:in in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058858884 = score(doc=6941,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
      0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the question of whether academic libraries keep up with the changes in the LCSH system. Analysis of the handling of 15 subject headings in 50 academic library catalogues available via the Internet found that libraries are not consistently maintaining subject authority control, or making syndetic references and scope notes in their catalogues. Discusses the results from the perspective of the libraries' performance, performance on the headings overall, performance on references, performance on the type of change made to the headings,a nd performance within 3 widely used onlien catalogue systems (DRA, INNOPAC and NOTIS). Discusses the implications of the findings in relationship to expressions of dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of subject cataloguing expressed by discussion groups on the Internet
  20. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.00
    0.004562979 = product of:
      0.033461846 = sum of:
        0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013393938 = score(doc=1643,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
        0.013393938 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013393938 = score(doc=1643,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
        0.006673971 = weight(_text_:in in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006673971 = score(doc=1643,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
      0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    
    Abstract
    Die Diskussion um Vor- und Nachteile von Präkoordination oder Postkoordination wird unter den in der verbalen Sacherschließung Engagierten in Deutschland seit Jahren geführt. Mit zunehmender Verbreitung der RSWK gewinnen die Überlegungen, die sich angesichts der Ausbreitung des OPAC für das 'Zerschlagen' der Schlagwortketten aussprechen, an Bedeutung. In diesem Zusammenhang trägt eine Berücksichtigung der internationalen Debatte um Prä- und Postkoordination zur Erweiterung des nationalen Horizontes bei. Der Beitrag ist eine leicht gekürzte Übersetzung eines Referates, das die Autorin beim IFLA Satellite Meeting zum Thema 'Subject indexing in the 90's - principles and practices' im August 1993 in Lissabon gehalten hat
    Footnote
    Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 41(1994) H.3, S.279-294

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 111
  • d 22
  • nl 2
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 111
  • m 13
  • el 10
  • s 7
  • d 2
  • i 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications