Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Hobohm, H.-C.: Persönliche Literaturverwaltung im Umbruch vom Bibliographie-Management zum Social Bookmarking : Anmerkungen zu EndNote, Reference Manager, RefWorks und Connotea (2005) 0.05 
    0.047996026 = product of:
  0.07199404 = sum of:
    0.06517021 = weight(_text_:120 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06517021 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26851514 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04278204 = queryNorm
        0.24270593 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.2763524 = idf(docFreq=225, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
    0.006823823 = product of:
      0.020471469 = sum of:
        0.020471469 = weight(_text_:29 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020471469 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Im Sommer 2005 ist die neueste Version des weit verbreiteten persönlichen Literaturverwaltungssystems EndNote erschienen. Noch im Jahre 2000 musste diese Gattung von Software genauer beschrieben und für deutsche Wissenschaftler erklärt werden. Mittlerweile hat sich deren Gebrauch sogar institutionell verbreitet. So bietet der GBV EndNote und Reference Manager Connection Files, der edoc-Server der HU Berlin schreibt die Benutzung eigener Formate zur Ablieferung von Dissertationsliteraturlisten vor und die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft nutzt EndNote und Reference Manager offiziell für ihre Jahres-Berichte um nur einige Beispiele zu nennen. Obwohl viele (Natur-)Wissenschaftler eher von BiB-TeX oder "freien" Bibliographiemanagementsystemen kommen, scheinen sich diese beiden doch immer mehr durchzusetzen. Es erstaunt etwas, dass Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftler sich dieser Systeme offenbar weniger bedienen, obwohl bekannt ist, dass deren Forschungsfront gerade eher auf bibliographische Vollständigkeit angewiesen ist als die der Naturwissenschaftler. Der Wettlauf zwischen EndNote und dem Konkurrenzprodukt aus dem Hause ISI ist jedoch nicht beendet wie ich noch vor Jahren spekulierte. ISI bzw. Thomson als dem Produzenten von Reference Manager hatte die beiden Konkurrenten EndNote und ProCite aufgekauft und man konnte erwarten, dass sich die Systeme angleichen und dem Nutzer der Übergang zu einem zentral gepflegten ISI Angebot erleichtert wird. In gewissen Teilen hat tatsächlich eine Angleichung stattgefunden. Die als herausragend empfundene Eigenschaft von Profite in höherem Maße inhaltliche Erschließung zu unterstützen ist mittlerweile auch bei den beiden anderen implementiert. Die einzigen verbleibenden Unterschiede (marketingtechnisch gesprochen: USPs - unique selling propositions) sind die Fähigkeit ProCites, Webseiten "on-the-fly" zu katalogisieren-sofern diese Metadaten aufweisen, die Web Publisher Funktion und erhöhte Netzwerkfähigkeit von Reference Manager sowie die Palm Version und die leicht größeren technischen Kapazitäten von Endnote und dessen Fähigkeit Abbildungen und Objekte direkt einzufügen. Zumindest ist zwischen EndNote und Reference Manager die Entscheidung nicht gefallen, da beide auf eigene Weise weiterentwickelt werden, während Profite seit sechs Jahren kein Update mehr erfahren hat. EndNote ist in den fünf Jahren seit der letzten Besprechung um 5 Versionsnummern auf Nummer 9 gewachsen. Reference Manager hat es auf elf (von 9.5) geschafft. In anderthalb Jahren wird EndNote also Reference Manager überholt haben. Man fragt sich, was die Unterschiede ausmacht, die solche Sprünge in den Versionsbezeichnungen rechtfertigen. Meist handelt es sich um die Einbindung neuer connection files und Importfilter, die Vorgabe neuer Medienformen und neuer bibliographischer Stile (Formatvorlagen): also neben der Anpassung an weiterentwickelte Betriebssysteme eher um quantitative Verbesserungen. Vielleicht ist der Vergleich gewagt, aber mir drängt sich die Parallele zu Virusprogrammen auf: Was wäre wenn diese bei jedem update des virus defintion files eine neue Versionsnummer erhielten? Andere Neuerungen wie die Unterstützung von XML, WSDL, openURL und teilweise auch Unicode werden von den Kunden sicher als selbstverständlich vorausgesetzt oder aber gar nicht bemerkt. Der Abstand der aktuellen Versionsnummer zur eigenen Version erhöht oft nur den psychologischen Druck, endlich auf die neue Fassung umzusteigen. Die meist um die 200 EUR (120 EUR für das update) dafür sind nicht immer gerechtfertigt.
    Date
    4.11.2005 13:29:37
  2. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.03 
    0.025878593 = product of:
  0.07763578 = sum of:
    0.07763578 = product of:
      0.11645367 = sum of:
        0.05848991 = weight(_text_:29 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05848991 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
        0.05796376 = weight(_text_:22 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05796376 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Source
    Library technology reports. 29(1993), no.2
  3. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.03 
    0.025878593 = product of:
  0.07763578 = sum of:
    0.07763578 = product of:
      0.11645367 = sum of:
        0.05848991 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05848991 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
        0.05796376 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05796376 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Source
    Library technology reports. 29(1993), no.3
  4. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.01 
    0.010304669 = product of:
  0.030914005 = sum of:
    0.030914005 = product of:
      0.09274201 = sum of:
        0.09274201 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09274201 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  5. Sühnhold, K.H.: Anwendung von DV-Systemen in Bibliotheken : Ergebnisse der DBI-Umfrage 1994 (1995) 0.01 
    0.009098431 = product of:
  0.027295291 = sum of:
    0.027295291 = product of:
      0.081885874 = sum of:
        0.081885874 = weight(_text_:29 in 552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081885874 = score(doc=552,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 552, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=552)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.2, S.328-337
  6. Biggs, D.R.: ProCite in libraries : applications in bibliographic database management (1995) 0.01 
    0.0077986545 = product of:
  0.023395963 = sum of:
    0.023395963 = product of:
      0.07018789 = sum of:
        0.07018789 = weight(_text_:29 in 5694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07018789 = score(doc=5694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5694)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    11.11.1996 19:29:56
  7. EndNote X7 : bibliographies made easy [= Version 17] (2013) 0.01 
    0.007728501 = product of:
  0.023185503 = sum of:
    0.023185503 = product of:
      0.069556504 = sum of:
        0.069556504 = weight(_text_:22 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069556504 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    17. 9.2018 18:19:22
  8. Chowdhury, S.; Chowdhury, G.G.: Text retrieval system : an overview (1992) 0.01 
    0.0064988798 = product of:
  0.019496638 = sum of:
    0.019496638 = product of:
      0.05848991 = sum of:
        0.05848991 = weight(_text_:29 in 6508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05848991 = score(doc=6508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 6508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6508)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th National IASLIC Conference, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, India, 26-29 December 1992. Ed. by A. Chatterjee et al
  9. Ravindran, S.: Bibliographic databases : software issues (1997) 0.01 
    0.0064988798 = product of:
  0.019496638 = sum of:
    0.019496638 = product of:
      0.05848991 = sum of:
        0.05848991 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05848991 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    12. 8.1998 8:29:25
  10. Freese, E.; Göbel, E.: Literaturdokumentation mit LIDOS und Archivierung am Beispiel des Spezialarchives Arbeit und Gesundheit : Handlungsanleitung (1998) 0.01 
    0.006440418 = product of:
  0.019321254 = sum of:
    0.019321254 = product of:
      0.05796376 = sum of:
        0.05796376 = weight(_text_:22 in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05796376 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    17. 7.2002 15:38:22
  11. Delozier, E.P.: Bibliography management with Library Master version 2.0 (1994) 0.01 
    0.005199103 = product of:
  0.015597309 = sum of:
    0.015597309 = product of:
      0.046791926 = sum of:
        0.046791926 = weight(_text_:29 in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046791926 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Medical reference services quarterly. 13(1994) no.2, S.29-44
  12. Dell'Orso, F.: Preparare la bibliografia di un dattiloscritto (1997) 0.01 
    0.005199103 = product of:
  0.015597309 = sum of:
    0.015597309 = product of:
      0.046791926 = sum of:
        0.046791926 = weight(_text_:29 in 1756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046791926 = score(doc=1756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1756)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
  13. Buxton, A.; Hopkinson, A.: ¬The CDS/ISIS handbook (1994) 0.01 
    0.005199103 = product of:
  0.015597309 = sum of:
    0.015597309 = product of:
      0.046791926 = sum of:
        0.046791926 = weight(_text_:29 in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046791926 = score(doc=4482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Program 29(1995) no.3, S.356-357 (A. Radwanski)
  14. Kim, T.C.-w.K.; Zumstein, P.: Semiautomatische Katalogisierung und Normdatenverknüpfung mit Zotero im Index Theologicus (2016) 0.01 
    0.005199103 = product of:
  0.015597309 = sum of:
    0.015597309 = product of:
      0.046791926 = sum of:
        0.046791926 = weight(_text_:29 in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046791926 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15049383 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.29, 2016 [urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-100238157]
  15. Wurangian, N.: Using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer to produce a bibliography list (1993) 0.01 
    0.0051523345 = product of:
  0.015457002 = sum of:
    0.015457002 = product of:
      0.046371005 = sum of:
        0.046371005 = weight(_text_:22 in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046371005 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.1, S.22-24
  16. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01 
    0.0051523345 = product of:
  0.015457002 = sum of:
    0.015457002 = product of:
      0.046371005 = sum of:
        0.046371005 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046371005 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  17. Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.01 
    0.0051523345 = product of:
  0.015457002 = sum of:
    0.015457002 = product of:
      0.046371005 = sum of:
        0.046371005 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046371005 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
  18. Knauth, M.: Bibliographies made easy : a look at PRO-CITE (1989) 0.01 
    0.0051523345 = product of:
  0.015457002 = sum of:
    0.015457002 = product of:
      0.046371005 = sum of:
        0.046371005 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046371005 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24
  19. Brandt, D.S.: Ovid searching software (1996) 0.01 
    0.0051523345 = product of:
  0.015457002 = sum of:
    0.015457002 = product of:
      0.046371005 = sum of:
        0.046371005 = weight(_text_:22 in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046371005 = score(doc=6754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  20. Boeder, R.: Database applications for libraries : an introduction (1996) 0.01 
    0.0051523345 = product of:
  0.015457002 = sum of:
    0.015457002 = product of:
      0.046371005 = sum of:
        0.046371005 = weight(_text_:22 in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046371005 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14981541 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04278204 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.25-28

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 27
  • d 6

Types

  • a 27
  • m 4
  • s 3
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects