Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Wiberley, S.E.; Daugherty, R.A.; Danowski, J.A.: User persistence in displaying online catalog postings : LUIS (1995) 0.05
    0.04636395 = product of:
      0.0927279 = sum of:
        0.0927279 = product of:
          0.1854558 = sum of:
            0.1854558 = weight(_text_:200 in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1854558 = score(doc=3695,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.63344806 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    User persistence in displaying postings is a significant human factor in the design of computer driven information systems, including online catalogs. Expert opinion and a study of users of a first generation online catalogue have suggested that users normally display no more than 30 to 35 postings. A follow up study on a second generation system with a larger database found that a greater proportion of users reported overload, but 100 postings (rather than 15) were considered 'too many'. Partially persistent users typically displayed 28 postings, but overloaded uses did not outnumber totally persistent users until postings retrieved exceeded 200. The findings suggest that, given sufficient resources, designers should still consider 30 to 35 postings typical persistence, but also justify treating 100 or 200 postings as a common threshold of overload
  2. Spink, A.: Multiple search sessions model of end-user behaviour : an exploratory study (1996) 0.04
    0.03746773 = product of:
      0.07493546 = sum of:
        0.07493546 = product of:
          0.14987092 = sum of:
            0.14987092 = weight(_text_:200 in 5805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14987092 = score(doc=5805,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.51190335 = fieldWeight in 5805, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5805)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses a multiple search session model of end users' interaction with information retrieval systems based on results from an exploratory study investigating end users' search sessions over time with OPACs or CD-ROM databases at different stages of their information seeking related to a current research project. Interviews were conducted with 200 academic end users to investigate the occurrence of multiple search sessions
  3. Spink, A.; Beatty, L.: Multiple search sessions by end-users of online catalogs and CD-ROM databases (1995) 0.03
    0.028100798 = product of:
      0.056201596 = sum of:
        0.056201596 = product of:
          0.11240319 = sum of:
            0.11240319 = weight(_text_:200 in 3877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11240319 = score(doc=3877,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.38392752 = fieldWeight in 3877, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3877)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports from a study investigating the extent to which academic end users conduct multiple search sessions, over time woth OPAC or CD-ROM databases at different stages of their information seeking related to a current research project. Interviews were conducted using a questionnaire with 200 academic end users at Rutgers University Alexander Library, NJ and University of North Texas, to investigate the occurrence of multiple search sessions. Results show that at the time of the survey interview, 57% of end users had conducted multiple search sessions during their research project and 86% of end users conducted their 1st search session at the beginning stage of their information seeking process. 49% of end users had conducted between 1 and 6 search sessions and 8% more than 6 search sessions. 70% of multiple search sessionss end users had modified their search terms since their 1st search session. Discusses the implications of the findings for end user training, information retrieval systems design and further research
  4. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.01
    0.0136981355 = product of:
      0.027396271 = sum of:
        0.027396271 = product of:
          0.054792542 = sum of:
            0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054792542 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  5. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01
    0.0136981355 = product of:
      0.027396271 = sum of:
        0.027396271 = product of:
          0.054792542 = sum of:
            0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054792542 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  6. Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.01
    0.011985868 = product of:
      0.023971736 = sum of:
        0.023971736 = product of:
          0.047943473 = sum of:
            0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047943473 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.
  7. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.01
    0.011985868 = product of:
      0.023971736 = sum of:
        0.023971736 = product of:
          0.047943473 = sum of:
            0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047943473 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71
  8. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.011985868 = product of:
      0.023971736 = sum of:
        0.023971736 = product of:
          0.047943473 = sum of:
            0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047943473 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22