-
Maricic, S.: Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories (1998)
0.03
0.032784265 = product of:
0.06556853 = sum of:
0.06556853 = product of:
0.13113706 = sum of:
0.13113706 = weight(_text_:200 in 3003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13113706 = score(doc=3003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.44791543 = fieldWeight in 3003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3003)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Analyzes 200 papers produced by a multidisciplinary natural sciences institute in a 10 years period for the context of the citation they received during the 21 year period since their publication. They were grouped in 28 research topics from physics, chemistry, to biology, and there were some half a dozen papers per topic on the average. 11% of all the citing papers comprised the sample of the context analysis: 1 citing per each cited paper. Sets of citing papers of each research topic were taken as units in the analysis
-
Wainer, J.; Valle, E.: What happens to computer science research after it is published? : Tracking CS research lines (2013)
0.03
0.032784265 = product of:
0.06556853 = sum of:
0.06556853 = product of:
0.13113706 = sum of:
0.13113706 = weight(_text_:200 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13113706 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.44791543 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Are computer science papers extended after they are published? We have surveyed 200 computer science publications, 100 journal articles, and 100 conference papers, using self-citations to identify potential and actual continuations. We are interested in determining the proportion of papers that do indeed continue, how and when the continuation takes place, and whether any distinctions are found between the journal and conference populations. Despite the implicit assumption of a research line behind each paper, manifest in the ubiquitous "future research" notes that close many of them, we find that more than 70% of the papers are never continued.
-
Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002)
0.03
0.028100798 = product of:
0.056201596 = sum of:
0.056201596 = product of:
0.11240319 = sum of:
0.11240319 = weight(_text_:200 in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11240319 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.38392752 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It has been shown in the physical sciences that a paper's length is related to its number of references in a linear manner. Abt and Garfield here look at the life and social sciences with the thought that if the relation holds the citation counts will provide a measure of relative importance across these disciplines. In the life sciences 200 research papers from 1999-2000 were scanned in each of 10 journals to produce counts of 1000 word normalized pages. In the social sciences an average of 70 research papers in nine journals were scanned for the two-year period. Papers of average length in the various sciences have the same average number of references within plus or minus 17%. A look at the 30 to 60 papers over the two years in 18 review journals indicates twice the references of research papers of the same length.
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.027396271 = product of:
0.054792542 = sum of:
0.054792542 = product of:
0.109585084 = sum of:
0.109585084 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109585084 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.027396271 = product of:
0.054792542 = sum of:
0.054792542 = product of:
0.109585084 = sum of:
0.109585084 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109585084 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024215112 = product of:
0.048430223 = sum of:
0.048430223 = product of:
0.096860446 = sum of:
0.096860446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096860446 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Brown, C.: ¬The evolution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers (2001)
0.02
0.023417331 = product of:
0.046834663 = sum of:
0.046834663 = product of:
0.093669325 = sum of:
0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093669325 = score(doc=5184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.3, S.187-200
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.02
0.01712267 = product of:
0.03424534 = sum of:
0.03424534 = product of:
0.06849068 = sum of:
0.06849068 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06849068 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.014529068 = product of:
0.029058136 = sum of:
0.029058136 = product of:
0.058116272 = sum of:
0.058116272 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058116272 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.0136981355 = product of:
0.027396271 = sum of:
0.027396271 = product of:
0.054792542 = sum of:
0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054792542 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.011985868 = product of:
0.023971736 = sum of:
0.023971736 = product of:
0.047943473 = sum of:
0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047943473 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.011985868 = product of:
0.023971736 = sum of:
0.023971736 = product of:
0.047943473 = sum of:
0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047943473 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.011985868 = product of:
0.023971736 = sum of:
0.023971736 = product of:
0.047943473 = sum of:
0.047943473 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047943473 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.010273602 = product of:
0.020547204 = sum of:
0.020547204 = product of:
0.041094407 = sum of:
0.041094407 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041094407 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050551776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
