Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008) 0.06
    0.056839816 = product of:
      0.11367963 = sum of:
        0.11367963 = sum of:
          0.07493546 = weight(_text_:200 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07493546 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.25595167 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.038744178 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038744178 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050551776 = queryNorm
              0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
    Pages
    S.200-201
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.04
    0.040144812 = product of:
      0.080289625 = sum of:
        0.080289625 = product of:
          0.24086887 = sum of:
            0.24086887 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24086887 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42857853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  3. Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Introducing FRSAD and mapping it with SKOS and other models (2009) 0.03
    0.028100798 = product of:
      0.056201596 = sum of:
        0.056201596 = product of:
          0.11240319 = sum of:
            0.11240319 = weight(_text_:200 in 3150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11240319 = score(doc=3150,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.38392752 = fieldWeight in 3150, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3150)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.ifla.org/files/hq/papers/ifla75/200-zeng-en.pdf
  4. Campbell, D.G.: Farradane's relational indexing and its relationship to hyperlinking in Alzheimer's information (2012) 0.03
    0.028100798 = product of:
      0.056201596 = sum of:
        0.056201596 = product of:
          0.11240319 = sum of:
            0.11240319 = weight(_text_:200 in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11240319 = score(doc=847,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.38392752 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.195-200
  5. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.03
    0.026763208 = product of:
      0.053526416 = sum of:
        0.053526416 = product of:
          0.16057925 = sum of:
            0.16057925 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16057925 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42857853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  6. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.03
    0.026763208 = product of:
      0.053526416 = sum of:
        0.053526416 = product of:
          0.16057925 = sum of:
            0.16057925 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16057925 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42857853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  7. Widhalm, R.; Mück, T.: Topic maps : Semantische Suche im Internet (2002) 0.03
    0.026493685 = product of:
      0.05298737 = sum of:
        0.05298737 = product of:
          0.10597474 = sum of:
            0.10597474 = weight(_text_:200 in 4731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10597474 = score(doc=4731,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.36197034 = fieldWeight in 4731, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    ST 200
    RVK
    ST 200
  8. Curras, E.: Ontologies, taxonomy and thesauri in information organisation and retrieval (2010) 0.02
    0.023417331 = product of:
      0.046834663 = sum of:
        0.046834663 = product of:
          0.093669325 = sum of:
            0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.093669325 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    200 S
  9. Aker, A.; Plaza, L.; Lloret, E.; Gaizauskas, R.: Do humans have conceptual models about geographic objects? : a user study (2013) 0.02
    0.023417331 = product of:
      0.046834663 = sum of:
        0.046834663 = product of:
          0.093669325 = sum of:
            0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.093669325 = score(doc=680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=680)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we investigate what sorts of information humans request about geographical objects of the same type. For example, Edinburgh Castle and Bodiam Castle are two objects of the same type: "castle." The question is whether specific information is requested for the object type "castle" and how this information differs for objects of other types (e.g., church, museum, or lake). We aim to answer this question using an online survey. In the survey, we showed 184 participants 200 images pertaining to urban and rural objects and asked them to write questions for which they would like to know the answers when seeing those objects. Our analysis of the 6,169 questions collected in the survey shows that humans have shared ideas of what to ask about geographical objects. When the object types resemble each other (e.g., church and temple), the requested information is similar for the objects of these types. Otherwise, the information is specific to an object type. Our results may be very useful in guiding Natural Language Processing tasks involving automatic generation of templates for image descriptions and their assessment, as well as image indexing and organization.
  10. Jansen, L.: Four rules for classifying social entities (2014) 0.02
    0.023417331 = product of:
      0.046834663 = sum of:
        0.046834663 = product of:
          0.093669325 = sum of:
            0.093669325 = weight(_text_:200 in 3409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.093669325 = score(doc=3409,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2927719 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.31993958 = fieldWeight in 3409, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7915254 = idf(docFreq=366, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3409)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.189-200
  11. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.02
    0.01712267 = product of:
      0.03424534 = sum of:
        0.03424534 = product of:
          0.06849068 = sum of:
            0.06849068 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06849068 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  12. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.01712267 = product of:
      0.03424534 = sum of:
        0.03424534 = product of:
          0.06849068 = sum of:
            0.06849068 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06849068 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  13. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.02
    0.01712267 = product of:
      0.03424534 = sum of:
        0.03424534 = product of:
          0.06849068 = sum of:
            0.06849068 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06849068 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  14. Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002) 0.02
    0.01712267 = product of:
      0.03424534 = sum of:
        0.03424534 = product of:
          0.06849068 = sum of:
            0.06849068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06849068 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 5.2010 16:22:35
  15. Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018) 0.02
    0.01712267 = product of:
      0.03424534 = sum of:
        0.03424534 = product of:
          0.06849068 = sum of:
            0.06849068 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06849068 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
  16. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.01
    0.014529068 = product of:
      0.029058136 = sum of:
        0.029058136 = product of:
          0.058116272 = sum of:
            0.058116272 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058116272 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
  17. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01
    0.0136981355 = product of:
      0.027396271 = sum of:
        0.027396271 = product of:
          0.054792542 = sum of:
            0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054792542 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  18. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01
    0.0136981355 = product of:
      0.027396271 = sum of:
        0.027396271 = product of:
          0.054792542 = sum of:
            0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054792542 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  19. Giunchiglia, F.; Villafiorita, A.; Walsh, T.: Theories of abstraction (1997) 0.01
    0.0136981355 = product of:
      0.027396271 = sum of:
        0.027396271 = product of:
          0.054792542 = sum of:
            0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054792542 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.10.2018 14:13:22
  20. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.01
    0.0136981355 = product of:
      0.027396271 = sum of:
        0.027396271 = product of:
          0.054792542 = sum of:
            0.054792542 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054792542 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17702371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050551776 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 48
  • d 12

Types

  • a 43
  • el 14
  • x 5
  • m 4
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…