-
Kwok, K.L.: ¬The use of titles and cited titles as document representations for automatic classification (1975)
0.08
0.08074833 = product of:
0.16149665 = sum of:
0.16149665 = product of:
0.3229933 = sum of:
0.3229933 = weight(_text_:201 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3229933 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32321984 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4604454 = idf(docFreq=187, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.99929917 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4604454 = idf(docFreq=187, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 11(1975), S.201-206
-
Garfield, E.; Sher, I.H.: New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature literature through citation indexing (1963)
0.08
0.08074833 = product of:
0.16149665 = sum of:
0.16149665 = product of:
0.3229933 = sum of:
0.3229933 = weight(_text_:201 in 8242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3229933 = score(doc=8242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32321984 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4604454 = idf(docFreq=187, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.99929917 = fieldWeight in 8242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4604454 = idf(docFreq=187, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- American documentation. 14(1963) no.3, S.195-201
-
Száva-Kováts, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) in the elite journal literature of physics : I: a literature science study on the journal level (2001)
0.04
0.040374164 = product of:
0.08074833 = sum of:
0.08074833 = product of:
0.16149665 = sum of:
0.16149665 = weight(_text_:201 in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16149665 = score(doc=5180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32321984 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4604454 = idf(docFreq=187, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.49964958 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4604454 = idf(docFreq=187, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.3, S.201-211
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.027113812 = product of:
0.054227624 = sum of:
0.054227624 = product of:
0.10845525 = sum of:
0.10845525 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10845525 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.027113812 = product of:
0.054227624 = sum of:
0.054227624 = product of:
0.10845525 = sum of:
0.10845525 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10845525 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.02396545 = product of:
0.0479309 = sum of:
0.0479309 = product of:
0.0958618 = sum of:
0.0958618 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0958618 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Száva-Kováts, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) in the elite journal literature of physics : II: a literature science study on the level of communications (2002)
0.02
0.023070952 = product of:
0.046141904 = sum of:
0.046141904 = product of:
0.09228381 = sum of:
0.09228381 = weight(_text_:201 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09228381 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32321984 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4604454 = idf(docFreq=187, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.28551406 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4604454 = idf(docFreq=187, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the author's three previous articles dealing with the ICR phenomenon (JASIS, 49, 1998, 477-481; 50, 1999, 1284-1294; JASIST, 52, 2001, 201-211) the nature, life course, and importance of this phenomenon of scientific literature was demonstrated. It was shown that the quantity of nonindexed indirect-collective references in The Physical Review now alone exceeds many times over the quantity of formal references listed in the Science Citation Index as "citations." It was shown that the ICR phenomenon is present in all the 44 elite physics journals of a representative sample of this literature. The bibliometrically very heterogeneous sample is very homogeneous regarding the presence and frequency of the ICR phenomenon. However, no real connection could be found between the simple degree of documentedness and the presence and frequency of the ICR phenomenon on the journal level of the sample. The present article reports the findings of the latest ICR investigation carried out on the level of communications of the representative sample. Correlation calculations were carried out in the stock of all 458 communications containing the ICR phenomenon as a statistical population, and within this population also in the groups of communications of the "normal" and the "letter" journals, and the "short communications." The correlation analysis did not find notable statistical correlation between the simple and specific degree of documentedness of a communication and the number of works cited in it by ICR act(s) either in the total population or in the selected groups. There is no correlation either statistical or real (i.e., cause-and-effect) between the documentedness of scientific communications made by their authors and the presence and intensity of the ICR method used by their authors. However, in reality there exists a very strong connection between these two statistically independent variables: both depend on the referencing author, on his/her subjectivity and barely limited subjective free will. This subjective free will shapes the stock of the formal-direct references of scientific communications, thereby placing the achievements cited in this way and their creators into the (indexed) showcase of present Big Science. The same free will decides on the use or nonuse of the ICR method, and in the case of use also on the intensity with which the method is used
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.02
0.016946133 = product of:
0.033892266 = sum of:
0.033892266 = product of:
0.06778453 = sum of:
0.06778453 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06778453 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.014379271 = product of:
0.028758543 = sum of:
0.028758543 = product of:
0.057517085 = sum of:
0.057517085 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057517085 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.013556906 = product of:
0.027113812 = sum of:
0.027113812 = product of:
0.054227624 = sum of:
0.054227624 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054227624 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.011862293 = product of:
0.023724586 = sum of:
0.023724586 = product of:
0.04744917 = sum of:
0.04744917 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04744917 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.011862293 = product of:
0.023724586 = sum of:
0.023724586 = product of:
0.04744917 = sum of:
0.04744917 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04744917 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.011862293 = product of:
0.023724586 = sum of:
0.023724586 = product of:
0.04744917 = sum of:
0.04744917 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04744917 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.010167679 = product of:
0.020335358 = sum of:
0.020335358 = product of:
0.040670715 = sum of:
0.040670715 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040670715 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.010167679 = product of:
0.020335358 = sum of:
0.020335358 = product of:
0.040670715 = sum of:
0.040670715 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040670715 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.010167679 = product of:
0.020335358 = sum of:
0.020335358 = product of:
0.040670715 = sum of:
0.040670715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040670715 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.010167679 = product of:
0.020335358 = sum of:
0.020335358 = product of:
0.040670715 = sum of:
0.040670715 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040670715 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.010167679 = product of:
0.020335358 = sum of:
0.020335358 = product of:
0.040670715 = sum of:
0.040670715 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040670715 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.010167679 = product of:
0.020335358 = sum of:
0.020335358 = product of:
0.040670715 = sum of:
0.040670715 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040670715 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.010167679 = product of:
0.020335358 = sum of:
0.020335358 = product of:
0.040670715 = sum of:
0.040670715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040670715 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17519857 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05003058 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
