-
Colebunders, R.; Kenyon, C.; Rousseau, R.: Increase in numbers and proportions of review articles in Tropical Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and oncology (2014)
0.08
0.08310222 = product of:
0.124653324 = sum of:
0.1129602 = weight(_text_:205 in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1129602 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26994494 = queryWeight, product of:
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.41845644 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
0.011693127 = product of:
0.035079382 = sum of:
0.035079382 = weight(_text_:29 in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035079382 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15043138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 15:56:36
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.1, S.201-205
-
Bannister, A.; Hulek, K.; Teschke, O.: ¬Das Zitationsverhalten in mathematischen Arbeiten : einige Anmerkungen (2017)
0.06
0.06275567 = product of:
0.188267 = sum of:
0.188267 = weight(_text_:205 in 4499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.188267 = score(doc=4499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26994494 = queryWeight, product of:
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.6974274 = fieldWeight in 4499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4499)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl. auch den Beitrag auf S.204-205: Vier bibliometrische Kennzahlen auf Grundlage von zbMATH-Daten. Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1515/dmvm-2017-0064.
-
Campanario, J.M.: Using 'Citation Classics' to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery (1996)
0.05
0.05020453 = product of:
0.15061359 = sum of:
0.15061359 = weight(_text_:205 in 6693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15061359 = score(doc=6693,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26994494 = queryWeight, product of:
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.5579419 = fieldWeight in 6693, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6693)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Suggests that the literature on the role of chance, error or accident in scientific progress tends to be anecdotal, hagiographic and rarely systematic. In contrast, presents a new approach to this topic, the study of serendipity in scietific discovery. Bases the approach on the study of highly cited papers obtained from the 'Citation Classics' feature of 'Current Contents'. Reports on the analysis of 205 'Citation Classics' commentaries from the 400 most cited papers in the recent history of science, and presents the results of the analysis
-
Ye, F.Y.: ¬A unification of three models for the h-index (2011)
0.05
0.05020453 = product of:
0.15061359 = sum of:
0.15061359 = weight(_text_:205 in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15061359 = score(doc=4142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26994494 = queryWeight, product of:
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.5579419 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.205-207
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Scientometrics : state of the art (1997)
0.04
0.043928966 = product of:
0.1317869 = sum of:
0.1317869 = weight(_text_:205 in 409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1317869 = score(doc=409,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26994494 = queryWeight, product of:
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.48819917 = fieldWeight in 409, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=409)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Scientometrics. 38(1997) no.1, S.205-218
-
Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.; Costa, F. Di: Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications (2012)
0.04
0.0376534 = product of:
0.1129602 = sum of:
0.1129602 = weight(_text_:205 in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1129602 = score(doc=491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26994494 = queryWeight, product of:
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.41845644 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The growing complexity of challenges involved in scientific progress demands ever more frequent application of competencies and knowledge from different scientific fields. The present work analyzes the degree of collaboration among scientists from different disciplines to identify the most frequent "combinations of knowledge" in research activity. The methodology adopts an innovative bibliometric approach based on the disciplinary affiliation of publication coauthors. The field of observation includes all publications (167,179) indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded for the years 2004-2008, authored by all scientists in the hard sciences (43,223) at Italian universities (68). The analysis examines 205 research fields grouped in 9 disciplines. Identifying the fields with the highest potential of interdisciplinary collaboration is useful to inform research polices at the national and regional levels, as well as management strategies at the institutional level.
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.04
0.036214996 = product of:
0.108644985 = sum of:
0.108644985 = product of:
0.16296747 = sum of:
0.08185189 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08185189 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15043138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.08111558 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08111558 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14975324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
-
Vier bibliometrische Kennzahlen auf Grundlage von zbMATH-Daten (2017)
0.03
0.031377833 = product of:
0.0941335 = sum of:
0.0941335 = weight(_text_:205 in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0941335 = score(doc=4315,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26994494 = queryWeight, product of:
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.3487137 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2017, H.4, S.204-205
-
Hassler, M.: Web analytics : Metriken auswerten, Besucherverhalten verstehen, Website optimieren ; [Metriken analysieren und interpretieren ; Besucherverhalten verstehen und auswerten ; Website-Ziele definieren, Webauftritt optimieren und den Erfolg steigern] (2009)
0.03
0.031062469 = product of:
0.09318741 = sum of:
0.09318741 = weight(_text_:205 in 3586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09318741 = score(doc=3586,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26994494 = queryWeight, product of:
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.34520894 = fieldWeight in 3586, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3586)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Classification
- ST 205
- RVK
- ST 205
-
De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008)
0.03
0.025102265 = product of:
0.075306796 = sum of:
0.075306796 = weight(_text_:205 in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075306796 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26994494 = queryWeight, product of:
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.27897096 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.02
0.020694284 = product of:
0.06208285 = sum of:
0.06208285 = product of:
0.09312427 = sum of:
0.04677251 = weight(_text_:29 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04677251 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15043138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.046351764 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046351764 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14975324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998)
0.02
0.018107498 = product of:
0.054322492 = sum of:
0.054322492 = product of:
0.08148374 = sum of:
0.040925946 = weight(_text_:29 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040925946 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15043138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.04055779 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04055779 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14975324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 1.1999 16:22:37
- Source
- Art documentation. 17(1998) no.1, S.29-33
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.02
0.018107498 = product of:
0.054322492 = sum of:
0.054322492 = product of:
0.08148374 = sum of:
0.040925946 = weight(_text_:29 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040925946 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15043138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.04055779 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04055779 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14975324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004)
0.02
0.015520712 = product of:
0.046562135 = sum of:
0.046562135 = product of:
0.0698432 = sum of:
0.035079382 = weight(_text_:29 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035079382 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15043138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.03476382 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03476382 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14975324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
17.12.2006 19:44:29
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.02
0.015520712 = product of:
0.046562135 = sum of:
0.046562135 = product of:
0.0698432 = sum of:
0.035079382 = weight(_text_:29 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035079382 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15043138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.03476382 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03476382 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14975324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020)
0.01
0.012933928 = product of:
0.03880178 = sum of:
0.03880178 = product of:
0.058202673 = sum of:
0.02923282 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02923282 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15043138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.028969852 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028969852 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14975324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.01
0.010300392 = product of:
0.030901177 = sum of:
0.030901177 = product of:
0.09270353 = sum of:
0.09270353 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09270353 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14975324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.010300392 = product of:
0.030901177 = sum of:
0.030901177 = product of:
0.09270353 = sum of:
0.09270353 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09270353 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14975324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.01
0.010300392 = product of:
0.030901177 = sum of:
0.030901177 = product of:
0.09270353 = sum of:
0.09270353 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09270353 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14975324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.01
0.009104347 = product of:
0.027313039 = sum of:
0.027313039 = product of:
0.081939116 = sum of:
0.081939116 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081939116 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14975324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042764284 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
