-
Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014)
0.01
0.0071779857 = product of:
0.08613583 = sum of:
0.08613583 = sum of:
0.059643686 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059643686 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17123379 = queryWeight, product of:
5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.34831727 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02649214 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- Sehr viele Informationen sind bereits im Web verfügbar oder können aus isolierten strukturierten Datenspeichern wie Informationssystemen und sozialen Netzwerken gewonnen werden. Datenintegration durch Nachbearbeitung oder durch Suchmechanismen (z. B. D2R) ist deshalb wichtig, um Informationen allgemein verwendbar zu machen. Semantische Technologien ermöglichen die Verwendung definierter Verbindungen (typisierter Links), durch die ihre Beziehungen zueinander festgehalten werden, was Vorteile für jede Anwendung bietet, die das in Daten enthaltene Wissen wieder verwenden kann. Um eine semantische Daten-Landkarte herzustellen, benötigen wir Wissen über die einzelnen Daten und ihre Beziehung zu anderen Daten. Dieser Beitrag stellt unsere Arbeit zur Benutzung von Lexical Linked Data (LLD) durch ein Meta-Modell vor, das alle Ressourcen enthält und zudem die Möglichkeit bietet sie unter unterschiedlichen Gesichtspunkten aufzufinden. Wir verbinden damit bestehende Arbeiten über Wissensgebiete (basierend auf der Information Coding Classification) mit der Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (basierend auf der RDF/OWL-Repräsentation von EuroWordNet und den ähnlichen integrierten lexikalischen Ressourcen MultiWordNet, MEMODATA und die Hamburg Metapher DB).
- Date
- 22. 9.2014 19:00:13
-
Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978)
0.00
0.003679464 = product of:
0.044153567 = sum of:
0.044153567 = product of:
0.088307135 = sum of:
0.088307135 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088307135 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Source
- DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
-
Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975)
0.00
0.003679464 = product of:
0.044153567 = sum of:
0.044153567 = product of:
0.088307135 = sum of:
0.088307135 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088307135 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
-
Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981)
0.00
0.003679464 = product of:
0.044153567 = sum of:
0.044153567 = product of:
0.088307135 = sum of:
0.088307135 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088307135 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Source
- International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
-
Dahlberg, I.: Dokumentenkunde - Dokumentologie : damals - und heute? (2016)
0.00
0.002899346 = product of:
0.03479215 = sum of:
0.03479215 = product of:
0.0695843 = sum of:
0.0695843 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 3235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0695843 = score(doc=3235,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17123379 = queryWeight, product of:
5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.40637016 = fieldWeight in 3235, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3235)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- Nach einer einleitenden Diskussion der Benennungen Dokumentenkunde und Dokumentologie wird der diesbezügliche Objektbereich der Informationswissenschaft begründet. Es wird dazu eine Systematik vorgestellt, die von 1968 bis 1970 vom UDC-Revisions-Komitee 03/04 mit etwa 2000 Begriffen und Codes auf 37 Seiten erarbeitet und von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation nur in wenigen Kopien gedruckt und bislang noch nicht allgemein publik gemacht wurde. Das System wurde auch vom FID Central Classification Committee weder verabschiedet noch publiziert. Die Tabellen werden aus Platzgründen kumuliert wiedergegeben. Abschließend wird ein Vorschlag für eine neue Gliederung unterbreitet und die Verwendung der Systematik im Zusammenhang mit der Information Coding Classification erörtert.
-
Dahlberg, I.: Library catalogs in the Internet : switching for future subject access (1996)
0.00
0.0027177508 = product of:
0.03261301 = sum of:
0.03261301 = weight(_text_:internet in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03261301 = score(doc=5171,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.33897567 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- A multitude of library catalogs are now being entered into the Internet. Their differing classification and subject headings systems used for subject access call for a switching system, a black box to facilitate the location of subject fields and their subjects in these systems. The principles on which such a switching system must be built in order to provide the necessary insight, surveyability, reproducebility and ease of concept combinability (e.g. in cases of interdisciplinary subjects) are outlined and compared with the BSO which hance once been established by the FID in order to serve a switching purpose. The advantages of using the Information Coding Classification (ICC) as a switching system in the Internet are demonstrated, likewise the methodology needed to establish the necessary correlation between library classification systems (and if possible also subject heading systems and thesauri) and the ICC. Finally some organizational implications for creating a switching for 6 universal systems in use are described
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.00
0.0025756247 = product of:
0.030907497 = sum of:
0.030907497 = product of:
0.061814994 = sum of:
0.061814994 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061814994 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Pages
- S.9-22
-
Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974)
0.00
0.001839732 = product of:
0.022076784 = sum of:
0.022076784 = product of:
0.044153567 = sum of:
0.044153567 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044153567 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Footnote
- Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.00
0.0014717856 = product of:
0.017661426 = sum of:
0.017661426 = product of:
0.035322852 = sum of:
0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035322852 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014)
0.00
0.001300887 = product of:
0.015610643 = sum of:
0.015610643 = product of:
0.031221285 = sum of:
0.031221285 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031221285 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 22. 9.2014 19:01:18
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Dahlberg, I.: How to improve ISKO's standing : ten desiderata for knowledge organization (2011)
0.00
6.5378926E-4 = product of:
0.007845471 = sum of:
0.007845471 = weight(_text_:internet in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007845471 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.081544876 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Content
- 6. Establishment of national Knowledge Organization Institutes should be scheduled by national chapters, planned energetically and submitted to corresponding administrative authorities for support. They could be attached to research institutions, e.g., the Max-Planck or Fraunhofer Institutes in Germany or to universities. Their scope and research areas relate to the elaboration of knowledge systems of subject related concepts, according to Desideratum 1, and may be connected to training activities and KOsubject-related research work. 7. ISKO experts should not accept to be impressed by Internet and Computer Science, but should demonstrate their expertise more actively on the public plane. They should tend to take a leading part in the ISKO Secretariats and the KO Institutes, and act as consultants and informants, as well as editors of statistics and other publications. 8. All colleagues trained in the field of classification/indexing and thesauri construction and active in different countries should be identified and approached for membership in ISKO. This would have to be accomplished by the General Secretariat with the collaboration of the experts in the different secretariats of the countries, as soon as they start to work. The more members ISKO will have, the greater will be its reputation and influence. But it will also prove its professionalism by the quality of its products, especially its innovating conceptual order systems to come. 9. ISKO should-especially in view of global expansion-intensify the promotion of knowledge about its own subject area through the publications mentioned here and in further publications as deemed necessary. It should be made clear that, especially in ISKO's own publications, professional subject indexes are a sine qua non. 10. 1) Knowledge Organization, having arisen from librarianship and documentation, the contents of which has many points of contact with numerous application fields, should-although still linked up with its areas of descent-be recognized in the long run as an independent autonomous discipline to be located under the science of science, since only thereby can it fully play its role as an equal partner in all application fields; and, 2) An "at-a-first-glance knowledge order" could be implemented through the Information Coding Classification (ICC), as this system is based on an entirely new approach, namely based on general object areas, thus deviating from discipline-oriented main classes of the current main universal classification systems. It can therefore recoup by simple display on screen the hitherto lost overview of all knowledge areas and fields. On "one look", one perceives 9 object areas subdivided into 9 aspects which break down into 81 subject areas with their 729 subject fields, including further special fields. The synthesis and place of order of all knowledge becomes thus evident at a glance to everybody. Nobody would any longer be irritated by the abundance of singular apparently unrelated knowledge fields or become hesitant in his/her understanding of the world.
