Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"James, J.E."
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. James, J.E.: Free-to-publish, free-to-read, or both? : Cost, equality of access, and integrity in science publishing (2017) 0.00 
    0.0015690941 = product of:
  0.01882913 = sum of:
    0.01882913 = weight(_text_:internet in 3652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01882913 = score(doc=3652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 3652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3652)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    The Internet has triggered transformational change in the dissemination of science in the form of a global transition to open access (OA) publishing. Heavy investment favoring Gold over Green OA has been associated with increased total publication costs, inequality of opportunity to publish, and concerns about integrity in science reporting. Notwithstanding current fluidity because of ongoing competition for market share between supporters of the major alternative publishing strategies, emerging trends indicate the need for material and human resources to be redirected away from Gold and toward Green OA. Doing so will reduce total publication costs, increase equality of access for authors and readers, and remove the financial incentives that have encouraged poor and corrupt publishing practices.
  2. James, J.E.: Pirate open access as electronic civil disobedience : is it ethical to breach the paywalls of monetized academic publishing? (2020) 0.00 
    0.0015690941 = product of:
  0.01882913 = sum of:
    0.01882913 = weight(_text_:internet in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01882913 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Open access has long been an ideal of academic publishing. Yet, contrary to initial expectations, cost of access to published scientific knowledge increased following the advent of the Internet and electronic processing. An analysis of the ethicality of current arrangements in academic publishing shows that monetization and the sequestering of scientific knowledge behind paywalls breach the principle of fairness and damage public interest. Following decades of failed effort to redress the situation, there are ethical grounds for consumers of scientific knowledge to invoke the right of collective civil disobedience, including support for pirate open access. Could this be the best option available to consumers of scientific knowledge for removing paywalls to knowledge that rightly belongs in the public domain?

Years