Search (196 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Feitelson, D.G.; Yovel, U.: Predictive ranking of computer scientists using CiteSeer data (2004) 0.01 
    0.014597863 = product of:
  0.08758718 = sum of:
    0.06561986 = weight(_text_:informatik in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06561986 = score(doc=1259,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662844 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.3946243 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
    0.021967318 = weight(_text_:internet in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021967318 = score(doc=1259,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Abstract
    The increasing availability of digital libraries with cross-citation data on the Internet enables new studies in bibliometrics. The paper focuses on the list of 10.000 top-cited authors in computer science available as part of CiteSeer. Using data from several consecutive lists a model of how authors accrue citations with time is constructed. By comparing the rate at which individual authors accrue citations with the average rate, predictions are made of how their ranking in the list will change in the future.
    Field
    Informatik
  2. Campanario, J.M.: Using 'Citation Classics' to study the incidence of serendipity in scientific discovery (1996) 0.01 
    0.009564724 = product of:
  0.114776686 = sum of:
    0.114776686 = weight(_text_:205 in 6693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.114776686 = score(doc=6693,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.5579419 = fieldWeight in 6693, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6693)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Suggests that the literature on the role of chance, error or accident in scientific progress tends to be anecdotal, hagiographic and rarely systematic. In contrast, presents a new approach to this topic, the study of serendipity in scietific discovery. Bases the approach on the study of highly cited papers obtained from the 'Citation Classics' feature of 'Current Contents'. Reports on the analysis of 205 'Citation Classics' commentaries from the 400 most cited papers in the recent history of science, and presents the results of the analysis
  3. Ye, F.Y.: ¬A unification of three models for the h-index (2011) 0.01 
    0.009564724 = product of:
  0.114776686 = sum of:
    0.114776686 = weight(_text_:205 in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.114776686 = score(doc=4142,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.5579419 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.205-207
  4. Raan, A.F.J. van: Scientometrics : state of the art (1997) 0.01 
    0.008369134 = product of:
  0.1004296 = sum of:
    0.1004296 = weight(_text_:205 in 409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1004296 = score(doc=409,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.48819917 = fieldWeight in 409, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=409)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Source
    Scientometrics. 38(1997) no.1, S.205-218
  5. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.01 
    0.0077533713 = product of:
  0.046520226 = sum of:
    0.03106648 = weight(_text_:internet in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03106648 = score(doc=108,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.32290122 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
    0.015453748 = product of:
      0.030907497 = sum of:
        0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030907497 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Abstract
    Citation analysis has long been used by librarians as an important tool of collection development and the advent of Internet technology and especially the WWW adds a new facet to the role played by citation analysis. One of the reasons why librarians create WWW homepages is to provide users with further sources of interest or reference and to do this libraries include links from their own homepages to other information sources. Reports current research on the analysis of WWW pages as an introduction to an examination of the homepages of 25 art libraries to determine what sites are most often included. The types of linked sites are analyzed based on 3 criteria: location, focus and evidence that the link was evaluated before the connection was establisheds
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
    Theme
    Internet
  6. Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.; Costa, F. Di: Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications (2012) 0.01 
    0.0071735433 = product of:
  0.08608252 = sum of:
    0.08608252 = weight(_text_:205 in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08608252 = score(doc=491,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.41845644 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    The growing complexity of challenges involved in scientific progress demands ever more frequent application of competencies and knowledge from different scientific fields. The present work analyzes the degree of collaboration among scientists from different disciplines to identify the most frequent "combinations of knowledge" in research activity. The methodology adopts an innovative bibliometric approach based on the disciplinary affiliation of publication coauthors. The field of observation includes all publications (167,179) indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded for the years 2004-2008, authored by all scientists in the hard sciences (43,223) at Italian universities (68). The analysis examines 205 research fields grouped in 9 disciplines. Identifying the fields with the highest potential of interdisciplinary collaboration is useful to inform research polices at the national and regional levels, as well as management strategies at the institutional level.
  7. Colebunders, R.; Kenyon, C.; Rousseau, R.: Increase in numbers and proportions of review articles in Tropical Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and oncology (2014) 0.01 
    0.0071735433 = product of:
  0.08608252 = sum of:
    0.08608252 = weight(_text_:205 in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08608252 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.41845644 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.1, S.201-205
  8. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.01 
    0.0071313586 = product of:
  0.04278815 = sum of:
    0.027177509 = weight(_text_:internet in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027177509 = score(doc=2808,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.28247973 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
    0.015610643 = product of:
      0.031221285 = sum of:
        0.031221285 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031221285 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Abstract
    Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
    Theme
    Internet
  9. Tanaka, M.: Domain analysis of computational science : fifty years of a scientific computing group 0.01 
    0.006249511 = product of:
  0.07499413 = sum of:
    0.07499413 = weight(_text_:informatik in 3538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07499413 = score(doc=3538,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662844 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.4509992 = fieldWeight in 3538, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3538)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Field
    Informatik
  10. Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996) 0.01 
    0.005345867 = product of:
  0.0320752 = sum of:
    0.01882913 = weight(_text_:internet in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01882913 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
    0.01324607 = product of:
      0.02649214 = sum of:
        0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02649214 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
    Theme
    Internet
  11. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01 
    0.005345867 = product of:
  0.0320752 = sum of:
    0.01882913 = weight(_text_:internet in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01882913 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
    0.01324607 = product of:
      0.02649214 = sum of:
        0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02649214 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
    Theme
    Internet
  12. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.00 
    0.004782362 = product of:
  0.057388343 = sum of:
    0.057388343 = weight(_text_:205 in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057388343 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.27897096 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
  13. Franceschet, M.: Collaboration in computer science : a network science approach (2011) 0.00 
    0.0046871332 = product of:
  0.056245595 = sum of:
    0.056245595 = weight(_text_:informatik in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056245595 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662844 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.3382494 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Field
    Informatik
  14. Vrettas, G.; Sanderson, M.: Conferences versus journals in computer science (2015) 0.00 
    0.0046871332 = product of:
  0.056245595 = sum of:
    0.056245595 = weight(_text_:informatik in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056245595 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662844 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.3382494 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Field
    Informatik
  15. Kaminer, N.; Braunstein, Y.M.: Bibliometric analysis of the impact of Internet use on scholarly productivity (1998) 0.00 
    0.0046781353 = product of:
  0.05613762 = sum of:
    0.05613762 = weight(_text_:internet in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05613762 = score(doc=1151,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.58348763 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Variables measuring the nature and level of Internet usage by natural scientists improve the explanatory power of a traditional bibliographic model of scholarly productivity. The data used to construct these variables come from log files generated by the internal accounting modules of the UNIX operating system. The effects of Internet usage on productivity are quntifiable, and it is possible to calculate tradeoffs between Internet usage and the more traditional inputs
    Theme
    Internet
  16. Gu, Y.: ¬An exploratory study of Malaysian publication productivity in computer science and information technology (2002) 0.00 
    0.0039059445 = product of:
  0.046871334 = sum of:
    0.046871334 = weight(_text_:informatik in 976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046871334 = score(doc=976,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662844 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.2818745 = fieldWeight in 976, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=976)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Field
    Informatik
  17. Kim, J.: Author-based analysis of conference versus journal publication in computer science (2019) 0.00 
    0.0039059445 = product of:
  0.046871334 = sum of:
    0.046871334 = weight(_text_:informatik in 4678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046871334 = score(doc=4678,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662844 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.2818745 = fieldWeight in 4678, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4678)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Field
    Informatik
  18. Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: Informetric theories and methods for exploring the Internet : an analytical survey of recent research literature (2002) 0.00 
    0.0038434798 = product of:
  0.046121757 = sum of:
    0.046121757 = weight(_text_:internet in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046121757 = score(doc=813,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.47938398 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    The Internet, and more specifically the World Wide Web, is quickly becoming one of our main information sources. Systematic evaluation and analysis can help us understand how this medium works, grows, and changes, and how it influences our lives and research. New approaches in informetrics can provide an appropriate means towards achieving the above goals, and towards establishing a sound theory. This paper presents a selective review of research based on the Internet, using bibliometric and informetric methods and tools. Some of these studies clearly show the applicability of bibliometric laws to the Internet, while others establish new definitions and methods based on the respective definitions for printed sources. Both informetrics and Internet research can gain from these additional methods.
    Theme
    Internet
  19. Cronin, B.: Bibliometrics and beyond : some thoughts on web-based citation analysis (2001) 0.00 
    0.0036612197 = product of:
  0.043934636 = sum of:
    0.043934636 = weight(_text_:internet in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043934636 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.45665127 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Theme
    Internet
  20. Barnett, G.A.; Fink, E.L.: Impact of the internet and scholar age distribution on academic citation age (2008) 0.00 
    0.0035086013 = product of:
  0.042103216 = sum of:
    0.042103216 = weight(_text_:internet in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042103216 = score(doc=1376,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.43761572 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    This article examines the impact of the Internet and the age distribution of research scholars on academic citation age with a mathematical model proposed by Barnett, Fink, and Debus (1989) and a revised model that incorporates information about the online environment and scholar age distribution. The modified model fits the data well, accounting for 99.6% of the variance for science citations and 99.8% for social science citations. The Internet's impact on the aging process of academic citations has been very small, accounting for only 0.1% for the social sciences and 0.8% for the sciences. Rather than resulting in the use of more recent citations, the Internet appears to have lengthened the average life of academic citations by 6 to 8 months. The aging of scholars seems to have a greater impact, accounting for 2.8% of the variance for the sciences and 0.9% for the social sciences. However, because the diffusion of the Internet and the aging of the professoriate are correlated over this time period, differentiating their effects is somewhat problematic.
    Theme
    Internet

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 191
  • m 4
  • el 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications