Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.02 
    0.016554765 = product of:
  0.099328585 = sum of:
    0.08608252 = weight(_text_:205 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08608252 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.41845644 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
    0.01324607 = product of:
      0.02649214 = sum of:
        0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02649214 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  2. Feitelson, D.G.; Yovel, U.: Predictive ranking of computer scientists using CiteSeer data (2004) 0.01 
    0.014597863 = product of:
  0.08758718 = sum of:
    0.06561986 = weight(_text_:informatik in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06561986 = score(doc=1259,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662844 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.3946243 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
    0.021967318 = weight(_text_:internet in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021967318 = score(doc=1259,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Abstract
    The increasing availability of digital libraries with cross-citation data on the Internet enables new studies in bibliometrics. The paper focuses on the list of 10.000 top-cited authors in computer science available as part of CiteSeer. Using data from several consecutive lists a model of how authors accrue citations with time is constructed. By comparing the rate at which individual authors accrue citations with the average rate, predictions are made of how their ranking in the list will change in the future.
    Field
    Informatik
  3. Garfield, E.: Citation indexing : its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (1979) 0.01 
    0.0066286074 = product of:
  0.079543285 = sum of:
    0.079543285 = weight(_text_:informatik in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079543285 = score(doc=348,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1662844 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.4783569 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    BK
    54.80 Angewandte Informatik
    Classification
    54.80 Angewandte Informatik
  4. Wainer, J.; Valle, E.: What happens to computer science research after it is published? : Tracking CS research lines (2013) 0.01 
    0.005468322 = product of:
  0.06561986 = sum of:
    0.06561986 = weight(_text_:informatik in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06561986 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662844 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.3946243 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Field
    Informatik
  5. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.00 
    0.004782362 = product of:
  0.057388343 = sum of:
    0.057388343 = weight(_text_:205 in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057388343 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.27897096 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
  6. Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996) 0.00 
    0.0036612197 = product of:
  0.043934636 = sum of:
    0.043934636 = weight(_text_:internet in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043934636 = score(doc=3044,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.45665127 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Reports recent experiences with the publishing, via the Internet and WWW of ISI's biweekly newspaper, The Scientist; which was originally mounted on the NSFnet. Compares the use of the Internet for SDI by comparing Web searches via AltaVista with similar searches on CD-ROM. Predicts that future current awareness services and SDI services will be linked to electronic periodicals in electronic libraries. Concludes with a note on cited reference searching, a variation on the theme of hypertext searching, with particular reference to SCI and Web crawlers
    Theme
    Internet
  7. Cronin, B.: Bibliometrics and beyond : some thoughts on web-based citation analysis (2001) 0.00 
    0.0036612197 = product of:
  0.043934636 = sum of:
    0.043934636 = weight(_text_:internet in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043934636 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.45665127 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Theme
    Internet
  8. Barnett, G.A.; Fink, E.L.: Impact of the internet and scholar age distribution on academic citation age (2008) 0.00 
    0.0035086013 = product of:
  0.042103216 = sum of:
    0.042103216 = weight(_text_:internet in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042103216 = score(doc=1376,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.43761572 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    This article examines the impact of the Internet and the age distribution of research scholars on academic citation age with a mathematical model proposed by Barnett, Fink, and Debus (1989) and a revised model that incorporates information about the online environment and scholar age distribution. The modified model fits the data well, accounting for 99.6% of the variance for science citations and 99.8% for social science citations. The Internet's impact on the aging process of academic citations has been very small, accounting for only 0.1% for the social sciences and 0.8% for the sciences. Rather than resulting in the use of more recent citations, the Internet appears to have lengthened the average life of academic citations by 6 to 8 months. The aging of scholars seems to have a greater impact, accounting for 2.8% of the variance for the sciences and 0.9% for the social sciences. However, because the diffusion of the Internet and the aging of the professoriate are correlated over this time period, differentiating their effects is somewhat problematic.
    Theme
    Internet
  9. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.0029435712 = product of:
  0.035322852 = sum of:
    0.035322852 = product of:
      0.070645705 = sum of:
        0.070645705 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070645705 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  10. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.00 
    0.0029435712 = product of:
  0.035322852 = sum of:
    0.035322852 = product of:
      0.070645705 = sum of:
        0.070645705 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070645705 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  11. Rosenberg, V.: ¬An assessment of ISI's new Web of Science : ISI's services brings citiation indexing to new and advanced researchers (1998) 0.00 
    0.002615157 = product of:
  0.031381883 = sum of:
    0.031381883 = weight(_text_:internet in 1885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031381883 = score(doc=1885,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.3261795 = fieldWeight in 1885, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1885)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Theme
    Internet
  12. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00 
    0.002601774 = product of:
  0.031221285 = sum of:
    0.031221285 = product of:
      0.06244257 = sum of:
        0.06244257 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06244257 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  13. Gorraiz, J.: "Web of Science" versus "Scopus" oder das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliotheken (2006) 0.00 
    0.0024851537 = product of:
  0.029821843 = sum of:
    0.029821843 = product of:
      0.059643686 = sum of:
        0.059643686 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059643686 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17123379 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.34831727 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Bei den nachfolgenden Ausführungen handelt es sich um eine Zusammenstellung von Kommentaren, Vorträgen und Rückmeldungen von Kollegen bzw. Benutzern der Bibliothek sowie meine eigenen Erfahrungen als Vortragender im Universitätslehrgang "Master of Science", in dessen Rahmen ich das Fach "Bibliometrie" unterrichte. Schwerpunkt dieses Beitrages ist eine Zusammenfassung der Diskussion "Web of Science versus Scopus", die den aktuellen Stand der Kontroverse (vor allem an der Universität Wien im naturwissenschaftlichen Sektor) widerspiegelt. Hier ist zu bemerken, dass diese Problematik auch fachspezifisch ist und deswegen an jeder Universität bzw. in jedem Fachgebiet anders zu betrachten ist. Startpunkt meiner Betrachtung ist die allgemein akzeptierte Notwendigkeit des "Journal of Citation Reports (JCR)". Nur in diesem bibliometrischen Verzeichnis sind derzeit die "Impact Factors" zu finden, die als Grundlage jeder akademischen Evaluation dienen. Deswegen ist JCR heutzutage an jeder Universität mit naturwissenschaftlichen Fächern unentbehrlich und das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliothekare lautet nicht wirklich "Web of Science versus Scopus", sondern genaugesagt "Fallbeispiel A: Web of Science &JCR" oder "Fallbeispiel B: Scopus &JCR".
  14. Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001) 0.00 
    0.0022190344 = product of:
  0.02662841 = sum of:
    0.02662841 = weight(_text_:internet in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02662841 = score(doc=5768,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.27677247 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    A citation analysis of undergraduate term papers in microeconomics revealed a significant decrease in the frequency of scholarly resources cited between 1996 and 1999. Book citations decreased from 30% to 19%, newspaper citations increased from 7% to 19%, and Web citations increased from 9% to 21%. Web citations checked in 2000 revealed that only 18% of URLs cited in 1996 led to the correct Internet document. For 1999 bibliographies, only 55% of URLs led to the correct document. The authors recommend (1) setting stricter guidelines for acceptable citations in course assignments; (2) creating and maintaining scholarly portals for authoritative Web sites with a commitment to long-term access; and (3) continuing to instruct students how to critically evaluate resources
    Theme
    Internet
  15. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.00 
    0.0020921256 = product of:
  0.025105506 = sum of:
    0.025105506 = weight(_text_:internet in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025105506 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.2609436 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    It has been shown (Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411, 521) that journal articles which have been posted without charge on the internet are more heavily cited than those which have not been. Using data from the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ads.harvard.edu) and from the ArXiv e-print archive at Cornell University (arXiv.org) we examine the causes of this effect.
  16. Thelwall, M.: Extracting macroscopic information from Web links (2001) 0.00 
    0.0018491952 = product of:
  0.022190342 = sum of:
    0.022190342 = weight(_text_:internet in 6851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022190342 = score(doc=6851,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.23064373 = fieldWeight in 6851, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6851)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Much has been written about the potential and pitfalls of macroscopic Web-based link analysis, yet there have been no studies that have provided clear statistical evidence that any of the proposed calculations can produce results over large areas of the Web that correlate with phenomena external to the Internet. This article attempts to provide such evidence through an evaluation of Ingwersen's (1998) proposed external Web Impact Factor (WIF) for the original use of the Web: the interlinking of academic research. In particular, it studies the case of the relationship between academic hyperlinks and research activity for universities in Britain, a country chosen for its variety of institutions and the existence of an official government rating exercise for research. After reviewing the numerous reasons why link counts may be unreliable, it demonstrates that four different WIFs do, in fact, correlate with the conventional academic research measures. The WIF delivering the greatest correlation with research rankings was the ratio of Web pages with links pointing at research-based pages to faculty numbers. The scarcity of links to electronic academic papers in the data set suggests that, in contrast to citation analysis, this WIF is measuring the reputations of universities and their scholars, rather than the quality of their publications
    Theme
    Internet
  17. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.00 
    0.001839732 = product of:
  0.022076784 = sum of:
    0.022076784 = product of:
      0.044153567 = sum of:
        0.044153567 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044153567 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  18. Brody, T.; Harnad, S.; Carr, L.: Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact (2006) 0.00 
    0.0018306099 = product of:
  0.021967318 = sum of:
    0.021967318 = weight(_text_:internet in 165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021967318 = score(doc=165,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 165, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=165)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Theme
    Internet
  19. Prime-Claverie, C.; Beigbeder, M.; Lafouge, T.: Transposition of the cocitation method with a view to classifying Web pages (2004) 0.00 
    0.0015690941 = product of:
  0.01882913 = sum of:
    0.01882913 = weight(_text_:internet in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01882913 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Theme
    Internet
  20. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    0.0015610645 = product of:
  0.018732773 = sum of:
    0.018732773 = product of:
      0.037465546 = sum of:
        0.037465546 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037465546 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 33
  • d 7

Types

  • a 37
  • el 3
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications