Search (434 results, page 1 of 22)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Li, X.; Crane, N.B.: Electronic styles : a guide to citing electronic information (1993) 0.04
    0.041868135 = product of:
      0.2512088 = sum of:
        0.092800505 = weight(_text_:informatik in 4989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092800505 = score(doc=4989,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1662844 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.55808306 = fieldWeight in 4989, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4989)
        0.1584083 = weight(_text_:monographien in 4989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1584083 = score(doc=4989,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21725276 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.72914284 = fieldWeight in 4989, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4989)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Classification
    ST 620 Informatik / Monographien / Einzelne Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung / Datenverarbeitung in Anwendungsgebieten / Technik
    RVK
    ST 620 Informatik / Monographien / Einzelne Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung / Datenverarbeitung in Anwendungsgebieten / Technik
  2. Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993) 0.02
    0.022947986 = product of:
      0.1376879 = sum of:
        0.120026484 = weight(_text_:verteilte in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120026484 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21036641 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.45514 = idf(docFreq=188, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.57055914 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.45514 = idf(docFreq=188, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
        0.017661426 = product of:
          0.035322852 = sum of:
            0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035322852 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:47:22
    Theme
    Verteilte bibliographische Datenbanken
  3. Quinn, A.C.: Cataloging the congressional serial set (2005) 0.02
    0.020399487 = product of:
      0.122396916 = sum of:
        0.1004296 = weight(_text_:205 in 5739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1004296 = score(doc=5739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.48819917 = fieldWeight in 5739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5739)
        0.021967318 = weight(_text_:internet in 5739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021967318 = score(doc=5739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 5739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5739)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Many librarians question the usefulness of the traditional cataloging of difficult historic sets in a time when more and more information moves to either to the Internet or is digitized outright. One of the most challenging sets to catalog is the U.S. Congressional Serial Set, a 14,000 + (and growing) mega serial comprised of five monographic sub-series. The Congressional Serial Set is an anomaly since it is both monographic and serial in nature. This article examines the intricacies in cataloging government publications in an electronic atmosphere using one House document in the Serial Set as a guide and examines the two commercial digitization projects currently underway.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 41(2005) no.1, S.183-205
  4. Weiss, B.: Metadaten für Online-Monographien und Online-Zeitschriften (2001) 0.02
    0.018668598 = product of:
      0.22402316 = sum of:
        0.22402316 = weight(_text_:monographien in 6491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22402316 = score(doc=6491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21725276 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            1.0311637 = fieldWeight in 6491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6491)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
  5. Hamm, S.; Schneider, K.: Automatische Erschließung von Universitätsdissertationen (2015) 0.02
    0.016691115 = product of:
      0.10014668 = sum of:
        0.08248526 = weight(_text_:systeme in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08248526 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17439179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.4729882 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
        0.017661426 = product of:
          0.035322852 = sum of:
            0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035322852 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Seit über 40 Jahren arbeiten Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare an der Automatisierung von Erschließungsprozessen. Von Anfang an war dabei ein zentrales Ziel, die Arbeit der formalen Erschließung zu unterstützen und zu beschleunigen, um eventuell vorhandene Bearbeitungsrückstände schneller abbauen oder eine Vielzahl bislang unzureichend erschlossener Bestandsgruppen überhaupt erst erschließen zu können. Trotz vielfältiger Forschungsansätze und praktischer Versuche sind bis heute nur wenige regelbasierte Systeme im Einsatz, die Bibliotheken bei der Erstellung einfacher Titelaufnahmen erfolgreich unterstützen.
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 27(2015) H.1, S.18-22
  6. Pampel, H.; Fenner, M.: ORCID - Offener Standard zur Vernetzung von Forschenden (2016) 0.02
    0.016605537 = product of:
      0.099633224 = sum of:
        0.039619982 = product of:
          0.079239964 = sum of:
            0.079239964 = weight(_text_:vernetzung in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079239964 = score(doc=2839,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20326729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.38983136 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.060013242 = weight(_text_:verteilte in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060013242 = score(doc=2839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21036641 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.45514 = idf(docFreq=188, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.28527957 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.45514 = idf(docFreq=188, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Das internationale ORCID-Konsortium vernetzt Publizierende mit ihren Aufsätzen und Forschungsdaten über eine eindeutige ID. Weltweit besitzen bereits über 2 Millionen Forschende eine solche Kennung. Um ORCID in Deutschland zu fördern, wurde das Projektvorhaben "ORCID DE - Förderung der Open Researcher and Contributor ID in Deutschland" gebildet. Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) hat die Förderung des auf drei Jahre angelegten Projekts im Februar 2016 bewilligt. Durch die Integration in über 230 digitale Informationsinfrastrukturen erleichtert die Open Researcher and Contributor ID, kurz ORCID, die Pflege der Publikationsliste für Forscherinnen und Forscher. Die Idee dahinter ist folgende: Jede Person, die im wissenschaftlichen Arbeitsprozess einen Beitrag leistet, kann sich über die eindeutige ORCID-Kennung mit ihren Publikationen, Forschungsdaten und anderen Produkten des Forschungsprozesses (zum Beispiel Software) eindeutig vernetzen. Damit werden diese Objekte sichtbar und technisch verlässlich mit ihren Erschafferinnen und Erschaffern verbunden. ORCID bietet das Potenzial, bisher verteilte Informationen standardisiert zusammenzuführen und damit einen Überblick auf die Forschungsleistung von Forschenden zu ermöglichen. Durch die Offenheit des Systems und des großen internationalen Konsortiums ist ORCID auf dem Weg, ein langfristig gültiger Identifikator im wissenschaftlichen Alltag zu werden.
    Ziel des DFG-Projekts ORCID DE ist es, die vielerorts erwogene Implementierung der ORCID an Hochschulen und außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen durch einen übergreifenden Ansatz nachhaltig zu unterstützen. Dabei stehen organisatorische, technische und rechtliche Fragen gleichermaßen im Fokus. Neben der Schaffung einer zentralen Anlaufstelle für Hochschulen und außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen sind die Vernetzung und Verbreitung der ORCID im Bereich von Open-Access-Repositorien und -Publikationdiensten sowie die Verzahnung mit der Gemeinsame Normdatei (GND) wesentliche Aspekte des Projekts. Projektpartner von ORCID DE sind das Helmholtz Open Science Koordinationsbüro am Deutschen GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek und die Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld. Das Projekt wurde durch die Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation (DINI) initiiert.
  7. Gumbrecht, C.: Workshop zur CJK-Katalogisierung am 18. Juni 2009 an der Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin : ein Bericht (2009) 0.02
    0.015758263 = product of:
      0.06303305 = sum of:
        0.040004134 = weight(_text_:monographien in 3042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040004134 = score(doc=3042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21725276 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.18413636 = fieldWeight in 3042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3042)
        0.017509725 = product of:
          0.03501945 = sum of:
            0.03501945 = weight(_text_:vernetzung in 3042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03501945 = score(doc=3042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20326729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.17228276 = fieldWeight in 3042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005519196 = product of:
          0.011038392 = sum of:
            0.011038392 = weight(_text_:22 in 3042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011038392 = score(doc=3042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 3042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Abstract
    Vor nunmehr acht Jahren gab Günter Schucher an dieser Stelle einen Situationsbericht zur Schaffung eines einheitlichen Katalogs für chinesische, japanische und koreanische (CJK-)Literatur in Deutschland, indem er eingangs feststellt: "Schon lange träumen deutsche Ostasienwissenschaftler von einem einheitlichen Katalog, der ihnen die Recherche originalsprachlicher Literatur in deutschen Bibliotheken erleichtern würde. Anders als in den USA blieb dieser Traum jedoch bisher unerfüllt." Schucher, der damalige Geschäftsführer der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Asienkunde e.V., hatte im Jahr 1999 eine vom BMBF finanzierte und vom Institut für Asienkunde betreute Studie durchgeführt, die die Möglichkeiten zur Verbesserung der Literaturversorgung der Ostasienwissenschaftler ausloten sollte. Die Studie dokumentiert die ungünstige Forschungssituation der Ostasienforschung in Deutschland im Hinblick auf die Verstreutheit der von ihr dringend benötigten originalsprachigen Literatur auf eine Vielzahl von Bibliotheken und Archive und die daraus resultierende erschwerte Recherchierbarkeit derselben. Neben den Staats- und Universitätsbibliotheken mit z.T. großen bis sehr großen Beständen solcher Literatur (allen voran die Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin und die Bayerische Staatsbliothek in München), existieren ca. 100 Seminar- und Institutsbibliotheken. Die Studie konstatierte sowohl die mangelnde Kooperation bei Beschaffung und Katalogisierung seitens der Institute, die in der materiellen und personellen Unterausstattung mit Bibliothekaren ihre Ursache habe, als auch die Weigerung der Bibliotheksverbünde, den Ostasienbibliotheken durch Mehrschriftlichkeit ihrer Kataloge die Mitarbeit zu ermöglichen. Auf dem Workshop "Vernetzung von Bibliotheks- und Archivressourcen im Bereich Ostasienwissenschaften", am 20. April 2000, auf dem die Ergebnisse der Studie diskutiert wurden, kam man zu dem Ergebnis, "dass die Förderorganisationen bis zur Ermöglichung von Mehrschriftlichkeit in den Verbünden bereits die Schaffung eines einheitlichen CJK-Katalogs in Deutschland unterstützen könnten, der sich so weit wie möglich auf die Standards der Verbünde zu bewegen sollte, um die Katalogisate der beteiligten Bibliotheken qualitativ zu verbessern und eine spätere Integration zu erleichtern.
    In der Einführung sprachen zunächst Matthias Kaun und Silke Horny (BSZ) über Problemstellung und Ziel des Workshops aus Sicht der Sondersammelgebiet-Bibliothek (SSG Ost- und Südostasien) bzw. der Verbünde. Matthias Kaun stellte fest, dass bei den Ostasienbibliothekaren in Deutschland bzw. Europa nach wie vor für die Katalogisierung von originalsprachiger Literatur Diskussions- und Handlungsbedarf im Hinblick auf Regelungen, Praxis und technische Lösungen bestehe. Er erwähnte Lösungsansätze, die für Zeitschriften in der Zeitschriftendatenbank existieren, vermisste jedoch eine übergreifende Praxis für den Bereich der Formalerschließung von Monographien, im Bereich der Namensansetzungen sowie der Normdaten. Während die Nutzung von Fremddaten an der SBB seit 1990 Praxis war, fehlt es auch heute noch an Kooperation bzw. Datenaustausch in Deutschland. Matthias Kaun formulierte die Notwendigkeit einer Professionalisierung im Bereich der CJK-Katalogisierung und damit verbunden der Erarbeitung einer gemeinsamen Praxis im Bereich der Titel und Verfasser in Originalschrift und / oder auch Transkriptionen sowie im Bereich der Normdaten (PND / GKD) wie auch die Notwendigkeit der Definition eines Zeichenvorrats. Erklärtes Ziel des Workshops war somit zunächst eine stärkere Sensibilisierung für die bestehenden Probleme und dann die Bildung von Arbeitsgruppen, die sich den Fragen einer gemeinsamen Praxis annehmen sollen, um auf deren Grundlage Lösungsansätze kooperativ verbundübergreifend erarbeiten, testen und umsetzen zu können.
    Date
    22. 8.2009 10:44:16
  8. Seymour, C.: Cataloging Internet resources (1996) 0.02
    0.015374801 = product of:
      0.092248805 = sum of:
        0.07017202 = weight(_text_:internet in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07017202 = score(doc=4679,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.7293595 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
        0.022076784 = product of:
          0.044153567 = sum of:
            0.044153567 = weight(_text_:22 in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044153567 = score(doc=4679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the OCLC project for cataloguing Internet resources, a project aimed at developing rules for electronic material, and as a possible solution for the difficulty of locating materials on the Internet. No attempts is made to catalogue all the resources on the Internet and choice of materials is left to participating libraries
    Source
    Information and librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-35
    Theme
    Internet
  9. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.01
    0.0143559715 = product of:
      0.17227165 = sum of:
        0.17227165 = sum of:
          0.11928737 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11928737 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17123379 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032588977 = queryNorm
              0.69663453 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
          0.05298428 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05298428 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032588977 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  10. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.01
    0.0143559715 = product of:
      0.17227165 = sum of:
        0.17227165 = sum of:
          0.11928737 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11928737 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17123379 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032588977 = queryNorm
              0.69663453 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.05298428 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05298428 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032588977 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  11. Nafzger-Glöser, J.: Formalerschließung zwischen PI und AUTOCAT (1988) 0.01
    0.014347087 = product of:
      0.17216504 = sum of:
        0.17216504 = weight(_text_:205 in 7781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17216504 = score(doc=7781,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.8369129 = fieldWeight in 7781, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7781)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Pages
    S.200-205
  12. Ferguson, B.: MARC/AACR2/authority control tagging : a blitz cataloging workbook (2005) 0.01
    0.014347087 = product of:
      0.17216504 = sum of:
        0.17216504 = weight(_text_:205 in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17216504 = score(doc=4602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.8369129 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Isbn
    1-59158-205-9
  13. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.01
    0.012299841 = product of:
      0.073799044 = sum of:
        0.05613762 = weight(_text_:internet in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05613762 = score(doc=2170,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.58348763 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
        0.017661426 = product of:
          0.035322852 = sum of:
            0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035322852 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
    Theme
    Internet
  14. Moir, S.; Wells, A.: Descriptive cataloguing and the Internet : recent research (1996) 0.01
    0.012299841 = product of:
      0.073799044 = sum of:
        0.05613762 = weight(_text_:internet in 7230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05613762 = score(doc=7230,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.58348763 = fieldWeight in 7230, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7230)
        0.017661426 = product of:
          0.035322852 = sum of:
            0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 7230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035322852 = score(doc=7230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the Coalition for Networked Information's (CNI) analysis of the networked electronic environment where the chief problem for the users appears to be finding resources on the Internet. Presents the CNI's arguments for surrogates and describes one approach to the identification and description of resources on the Internet: the OCLC Internet Cataloguing Project
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.8-16
    Theme
    Internet
  15. Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996) 0.01
    0.012262302 = product of:
      0.07357381 = sum of:
        0.058120064 = weight(_text_:internet in 6737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058120064 = score(doc=6737,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.6040929 = fieldWeight in 6737, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6737)
        0.015453748 = product of:
          0.030907497 = sum of:
            0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 6737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030907497 = score(doc=6737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews issues related to the cataloguing of Internet resources and considers short term and long term directions for cataloguing and the gereal provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. Discusses the strengths and weaknesses of using a library catalogue model to improve access to Internet resources. Based on experience gained through 2 OCLC Internet cataloguing projects, recommends continued application of library cataloguing standard and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogues, cataloguing and libraries in general will continue to evolve. Points to problems inherent in the MARC field 856
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
    Theme
    Internet
  16. Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996) 0.01
    0.011543743 = product of:
      0.06926246 = sum of:
        0.053808715 = weight(_text_:internet in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053808715 = score(doc=602,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.5592813 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
        0.015453748 = product of:
          0.030907497 = sum of:
            0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030907497 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238
  17. Cremer, M.: WebCAT: Erfahrungen bei der Katalogisierung von Internet-Dokumenten an der SUB Göttingen im Rahmen des WebDOC-Projektes (1996) 0.01
    0.0110762445 = product of:
      0.066457465 = sum of:
        0.044380683 = weight(_text_:internet in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044380683 = score(doc=5218,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.46128747 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
        0.022076784 = product of:
          0.044153567 = sum of:
            0.044153567 = weight(_text_:22 in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044153567 = score(doc=5218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Date
    21. 9.1996 16:03:22
    Theme
    Internet
  18. Gradmann, S.: Katalogisierung mit dem PC : Microrechnergestützte Datenbanksysteme für die Verarbeitung bibliothekarischer Daten: Allegro-C, LIDOS, TINman im Vergleich (1989) 0.01
    0.010310657 = product of:
      0.12372789 = sum of:
        0.12372789 = weight(_text_:systeme in 5975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12372789 = score(doc=5975,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17439179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.7094823 = fieldWeight in 5975, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5975)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Footnote
    Beschreibung der untersuchten Systeme erfolgt zwangsläufig nicht aufgrund der aktuellsten Version
  19. Gradmann, S.: Katalogisierung mit dem PC : datenbankgestützte Systeme für die Verarbeitung bibliographischer Daten: allegro-C, BIS-LOK, IBAS IV/Biblio (1992) 0.01
    0.010310657 = product of:
      0.12372789 = sum of:
        0.12372789 = weight(_text_:systeme in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12372789 = score(doc=5976,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17439179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.7094823 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
  20. Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997) 0.01
    0.010190907 = product of:
      0.06114544 = sum of:
        0.043484014 = weight(_text_:internet in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043484014 = score(doc=903,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.45196757 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
        0.017661426 = product of:
          0.035322852 = sum of:
            0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035322852 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Recently the view has developed that electronic resources require the same level of cataloguing as the physical resources found in libraries, with the effect that a number of guidelines for cataloguing Internet resources have appeared. Describes one such standard for resource description, the Dublin Core metadata set, the ongoing refinement of the metadata elements and the application of the Dublin Core metadata set
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
    Theme
    Internet

Languages

Types

  • a 392
  • el 25
  • m 20
  • b 16
  • s 8
  • r 4
  • x 3
  • ? 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…