-
Chen, X.: Indexing consistency between online catalogues (2008)
0.01
0.011548201 = product of:
0.1385784 = sum of:
0.1385784 = weight(_text_:monographien in 2209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1385784 = score(doc=2209,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21725276 = queryWeight, product of:
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.63786715 = fieldWeight in 2209, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2209)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- In der globalen Online-Umgebung stellen viele bibliographische Dienstleistungen integrierten Zugang zu unterschiedlichen internetbasierten OPACs zur Verfügung. In solch einer Umgebung erwarten Benutzer mehr Übereinstimmungen innerhalb und zwischen den Systemen zu sehen. Zweck dieser Studie ist, die Indexierungskonsistenz zwischen Systemen zu untersuchen. Währenddessen werden einige Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen können, untersucht. Wichtigstes Ziel dieser Studie ist, die Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen herauszufinden, damit sinnvolle Vorschläge gemacht werden können, um die Indexierungskonsistenz zu verbessern. Eine Auswahl von 3307 Monographien wurde aus zwei chinesischen bibliographischen Katalogen gewählt. Nach Hooper's Formel war die durchschnittliche Indexierungskonsistenz für Indexterme 64,2% und für Klassennummern 61,6%. Nach Rolling's Formel war sie für Indexterme 70,7% und für Klassennummern 63,4%. Mehrere Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen, wurden untersucht: (1) Indexierungsbereite; (2) Indexierungsspezifizität; (3) Länge der Monographien; (4) Kategorie der Indexierungssprache; (5) Sachgebiet der Monographien; (6) Entwicklung von Disziplinen; (7) Struktur des Thesaurus oder der Klassifikation; (8) Erscheinungsjahr. Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen wurden ebenfalls analysiert. Die Analyse ergab: (1) den Indexieren mangelt es an Fachwissen, Vertrautheit mit den Indexierungssprachen und den Indexierungsregeln, so dass viele Inkonsistenzen verursacht wurden; (2) der Mangel an vereinheitlichten oder präzisen Regeln brachte ebenfalls Inkonsistenzen hervor; (3) verzögerte Überarbeitungen der Indexierungssprachen, Mangel an terminologischer Kontrolle, zu wenige Erläuterungen und "siehe auch" Referenzen, sowie die hohe semantische Freiheit bei der Auswahl von Deskriptoren oder Klassen, verursachten Inkonsistenzen.
-
Kautto, V.: Classing and indexing : a comparative time study (1992)
0.01
0.0071735433 = product of:
0.08608252 = sum of:
0.08608252 = weight(_text_:205 in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08608252 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2057144 = queryWeight, product of:
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.41845644 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Source
- International classification. 19(1992) no.4, S.205-209
-
Gil-Leiva, I.; Alonso-Arroyo, A.: Keywords given by authors of scientific articles in database descriptors (2007)
0.00
0.0039059445 = product of:
0.046871334 = sum of:
0.046871334 = weight(_text_:informatik in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046871334 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1662844 = queryWeight, product of:
5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.2818745 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Field
- Informatik
-
Connell, T.H.: Use of the LCSH system : realities (1996)
0.00
0.0025888733 = product of:
0.03106648 = sum of:
0.03106648 = weight(_text_:internet in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03106648 = score(doc=6941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.32290122 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- Explores the question of whether academic libraries keep up with the changes in the LCSH system. Analysis of the handling of 15 subject headings in 50 academic library catalogues available via the Internet found that libraries are not consistently maintaining subject authority control, or making syndetic references and scope notes in their catalogues. Discusses the results from the perspective of the libraries' performance, performance on the headings overall, performance on references, performance on the type of change made to the headings,a nd performance within 3 widely used onlien catalogue systems (DRA, INNOPAC and NOTIS). Discusses the implications of the findings in relationship to expressions of dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of subject cataloguing expressed by discussion groups on the Internet
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.00
0.0022076783 = product of:
0.02649214 = sum of:
0.02649214 = product of:
0.05298428 = sum of:
0.05298428 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05298428 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.00
0.0014717856 = product of:
0.017661426 = sum of:
0.017661426 = product of:
0.035322852 = sum of:
0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035322852 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.00
0.0012878124 = product of:
0.015453748 = sum of:
0.015453748 = product of:
0.030907497 = sum of:
0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030907497 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.00
0.0012878124 = product of:
0.015453748 = sum of:
0.015453748 = product of:
0.030907497 = sum of:
0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030907497 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.00
0.0011038391 = product of:
0.01324607 = sum of:
0.01324607 = product of:
0.02649214 = sum of:
0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02649214 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000)
0.00
0.0011038391 = product of:
0.01324607 = sum of:
0.01324607 = product of:
0.02649214 = sum of:
0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02649214 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006)
0.00
9.19866E-4 = product of:
0.011038392 = sum of:
0.011038392 = product of:
0.022076784 = sum of:
0.022076784 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076784 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014)
0.00
9.19866E-4 = product of:
0.011038392 = sum of:
0.011038392 = product of:
0.022076784 = sum of:
0.022076784 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022076784 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.00
3.679464E-4 = product of:
0.0044153566 = sum of:
0.0044153566 = product of:
0.008830713 = sum of:
0.008830713 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008830713 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032588977 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
