Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Kleiber, K.; Lindpointner, R.: DDC in Europa : Workshop "The use of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) in Europe: recent developments and future perspectives" und "Meeting of the European DDC users' group" (2007) 0.01
    0.01159438 = product of:
      0.06956628 = sum of:
        0.02101167 = product of:
          0.04202334 = sum of:
            0.04202334 = weight(_text_:vernetzung in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04202334 = score(doc=1286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20326729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.2067393 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.048554614 = sum of:
          0.029821843 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029821843 = score(doc=1286,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17123379 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032588977 = queryNorm
              0.17415863 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
          0.018732773 = weight(_text_:22 in 1286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018732773 = score(doc=1286,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032588977 = queryNorm
              0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 1286, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1286)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Content
    Der dann folgende Vortrag von Joan Mitchell mit dem programmatischen Titel "Locality and universality in the DDC" gab zuerst einen Überblick über die laufenden Übersetzungsprojekte, bezogen auf die Ed. 22, nämlich: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch, Griechisch, Arabisch und Chinesisch. Bezogen auf die Abridged Ed. 14 außerdem: Hebräisch und Vietnamesisch. Sie erwähnte auch den Einsatz von Dewey bei internationalen Projekten wie der "World Digital Library". Der zentrale Punkt des Vortrags betraf dann den Spagat zwischen ,Localization and Interoperability', d.h. zwischen Anpassung an regionale Gegebenheiten (wie z.B. Unterschiede in den Bereichen des Rechts- und Erziehungssystems) auf der einen Seite und Festhalten an der Durchgängigkeit der Bedeutung über alle Sprachen und Kulturen hinweg. Wie auch Magda Heiner-Freiling in ihrem Vortrag hinwies, hat sich die amerikanisch geprägte DDC im Zuge der Übersetzungsprojekte zwar schrittweise den Bedürfnissen der Benutzer in anderen Erdteilen geöffnet, dennoch bestehen noch zahlreiche Schwierigkeiten. Das von Heiner-Freiling erwähnte Beispiel der Pädagogik zeigte aber auch, dass Vorsicht bei Alleingängen auf nationaler Ebene geboten ist, da z.B. im Zuge des Bologna-Prozesses auch in Europa amerikanische institutionelle Strukturen und Terminologie im Bildungswesen Einzug halten. Weitere Vorträge befassten sich mit der Arbeit an elektronischen Verfahren zur automatischen Analyse von DDC-Notationen (Ulrike Reiner aus Göttingen), mit der DDC-Übersetzungs-Software, die für die Übersetzung ins Deutsche entwickelt wurde und nun auch in allen anderen Sprachen im Einsatz ist (Peter Werling, Fa. Pansoft) bzw. mit der DDC-Suche in verschiedenen Webportalen (Lars G. Svensson, DNB). Der abschließende Vortrag von Magda Heiner-Freiling (DNB) ging dann wieder ins Programmatische mit dem Vorschlag, eine gemeinsame European DDC Users Group (EDUG) zu gründen, um gemeinsame Anliegen der europäischen Dewey-User, was z.B. die anfangs erwähnten Probleme in einzelnen Bereichen betrifft, gemeinsam gegenüber den amerikanischen Herausgebern zu vertreten, um so mehr Einfluss auf die künftige Entwicklung der DDC zu haben.
    Wer sich näher für einzelne Themen interessiert, hat die Möglichkeit, auf der Homepage der Schweizer Nationalbibliothek die Präsentationsunterlagen der einzelnen Vorträge einzusehen (http://www.nb.admin.ch/slb/slb_professionnel/projektarbeit/00729/01615/01675/index.html?lang=de). Ziel des zweiten Tages war die Gründung einer europäischen DDC-Anwendergruppe zum Zweck der Vernetzung und Planung für die gemeinsame Entwicklungsarbeit. Anwesend waren Vertreterinnen der Nationalbibliotheken von Großbritannien, Deutschland, Frankreich, Schweden, Norwegen, Italien, Schweiz und Österreich sowie eine Vertreterin von OCLC. Eingeladen hatten die Nationalbibliotheken von Deutschland und der Schweiz. Vormittags wurde eine allgemeine Diskussion über die Ziele und Möglichkeiten einer solchen Anwendergruppe sowie allgemein über die Vorteile einer DDC-Anwendung in Europa diskutiert. Ziele von EDUG könnten sein: - Monitoring der europäischen DDC-Anwendungen - Kenntnis der unterschiedlichen Anwendungsregeln in den verschiedenen Ländern - Zugang auch zu den DDC-Übersetzungen in anderen Sprachen samt Expansionen - Zusammenarbeit beim Angebot von "built numbers" Zusammenarbeit mit OCLC als Vertreterin von europäischen Anliegen (die am Vortag ausführlich angesprochen worden waren) - Harmonisierung der Änderungen in den verschiedensprachigen Ausgaben (21./22. Ed., unterschiedliche Erweiterungen, anderer Sprachgebrauch) - Kooperation bei der Realisierung von technischen Plänen wie z.B. die automatische Klassifikation von Online-Dokumenten oder dem Mapping zu anderen Klassifikationssystemen - Weitergabe von Know-how und Erfahrungen an andere Interessierte Spontan wurden drei Arbeitsgruppen ins Leben gerufen, und zwar eine für technische Angelegenheiten und zwei inhaltliche für die kritischen Bereiche Recht und Erziehung. Nachmittags wurden die Satzungen von EDUG diskutiert und überarbeitet. Bei vielen Punkten wurde Übereinkunft erzielt. Einzelne Fragen blieben noch offen und sollen beim nächsten Treffen - wahrscheinlich im April 2008 in Frankfurt - endgültig fixiert werden."
  2. Junger, U.: Basisinformationen zur Universellen Dezimalklassifikation (UDK) (2018) 0.01
    0.009570647 = product of:
      0.114847764 = sum of:
        0.114847764 = sum of:
          0.07952491 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 4337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07952491 = score(doc=4337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17123379 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032588977 = queryNorm
              0.46442303 = fieldWeight in 4337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4337)
          0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 4337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035322852 = score(doc=4337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032588977 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4337)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    Der ursprünglich vorgesehene Beitrag zur UDK wurde kurzfristig zurückgezogen. Da die Klassifikation in diesem Band aber nicht völlig unerwähnt bleiben soll, werden hier die wichtigsten allgemein zugänglichen Informationen zu dieser Klassifikation zusammengestellt.
    Date
    7. 7.2018 17:22:00
  3. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.L.: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) (2009) 0.01
    0.005345867 = product of:
      0.0320752 = sum of:
        0.01882913 = weight(_text_:internet in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01882913 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
        0.01324607 = product of:
          0.02649214 = sum of:
            0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02649214 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Classification (LCC), originally designed for classifying the Library's own collection, is now used in a wide range of libraries, both in the United States and abroad. This entry recounts its history and development from its genesis to the present time, leading up to an explanation of LCC structure, tables, and notation. It then considers the system's potential for wider application in the online age, through speculation on using LCC as a tool for (a) partitioning large files; (b) generating domain-specific taxonomies; and (c) integrating classification and controlled subject terms for improved retrieval in the online public access catalog (OPAC) and the Internet. Finally, analyzing both its strong and relatively weak features, it addresses the question of whether in its current state LCC is in all respects ready for playing such roles
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:42
  4. McIlwaine, I.: Knowledge classifications, bibliographic classifications and the Internet (1998) 0.00
    0.0036236679 = product of:
      0.043484014 = sum of:
        0.043484014 = weight(_text_:internet in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043484014 = score(doc=63,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.45196757 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    The advent of the Internet has intensified problems of classification and nomenclature in a range of disciplines that have been the concern of librarians and scientists for over a century. Biology and Medicine are selected as examples, and the work of specialists both in scientific systematics and taxonomy and in bibliographic classification is examined in order to suggest some solutions to current difficulties in information retrieval
    Theme
    Internet
  5. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Mitchell, J.S.: Dewey 2000 (2001) 0.00
    0.0031381883 = product of:
      0.03765826 = sum of:
        0.03765826 = weight(_text_:internet in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03765826 = score(doc=1033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.3914154 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes: OCLC and the Internet: An Historical Overview of Research Activities, 1990-1999 - Part I
  6. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22: Dewey in the world, the world in Dewey (2004) 0.00
    0.002056883 = product of:
      0.024682594 = sum of:
        0.024682594 = product of:
          0.04936519 = sum of:
            0.04936519 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04936519 = score(doc=2644,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.43256867 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    In 2003, OCLC published Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22), in print and Web versions. The changes and updates in the new edition reflect a modern view of knowledge structures and address the general needs of Dewey users. The content of DDC 22 has been shaped by a number of social, geopolitical, and technical trends. The World Wide Web has provided a vehicle for more frequent distribution of updates to the DDC, and a medium for direct communication with Dewey users around the world. In addition to updating the system itself, other strategies are needed to accommodate the needs of the global Dewey user community. Translation of the system is one approach; another is mapping. Mapping terminology to the DDC is a strategy for supporting effective local implementation of the system while maintaining the internal cohesiveness of the DDC. This paper explores the usefulness of mapping terminology from English-language general subject headings lists produced outside the U.S.
    Object
    DDC-22
  7. Heiner-Freiling, M.: DDC Deutsch 22 : formale, terminologische und inhaltliche Aspekte einer deutschen DDC-Ausgabe (2001) 0.00
    0.0018212418 = product of:
      0.021854902 = sum of:
        0.021854902 = product of:
          0.043709803 = sum of:
            0.043709803 = weight(_text_:22 in 6993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043709803 = score(doc=6993,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 6993, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6993)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    Es werden die Überlegungen im Zusammenhang mit der Einführung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation im deutschen Sprachraum dargestellt, wobei die künftige deutsche DDC-Ausgabe auf der Basis der 22. Auflage der Original-DDC im Mittelpunkt steht. Dringlich für eine deutsche Ausgabe sind neben Korrekturen und Expansionen für deutsche Sachverhalte, etwa im Bereich der geografischen Hilfstafel, die Schaffung eines deutschen Begriffsinventars für das Instrumentarium der DDC selbst und eine Integration der Terminologie der Schlagwortnormdatei, soweit das mit der Struktur einer Klassifikation vereinbar ist. Daneben kommt der über eine reine Übersetzung hinausgehenden Anpassung der Beispiele und Registereinträge der DDC an die Suchgewohnheiten deutschsprachiger Benutzer eine erhebliche Bedeutung zu.
  8. McIlwaine, I.C.: Classification schemes : consultation with users and cooperation between editors (1997) 0.00
    0.0015690941 = product of:
      0.01882913 = sum of:
        0.01882913 = weight(_text_:internet in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01882913 = score(doc=5610,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    Recent developments in the improvement of communication between those responsible for editing the general schemes of classification and their users are outlined. Increased participation in conferences, the publication of guides and manuals for aiding the implementation of general classifications, and the use of the Internet as a means of communicating are all ways in which users hear more about these schemes and can make their views known to those responsible for maintaining them. Increased communication at editorial level, including coordination of current developments and future revisions, is discussed. The Dewey Decimal Classification, the Library of Congress Classification, the Universal Decimal Classification, and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2) are reviewed and the ways in which each communicates with its users and participates in joint enterprises are noted.
  9. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.00
    0.0014717856 = product of:
      0.017661426 = sum of:
        0.017661426 = product of:
          0.035322852 = sum of:
            0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035322852 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  10. Gödert, W.: ¬"Die Welt ist groß - Wir bringen Ordnung in diese Welt" : Das DFG-Projekt DDC Deutsch (2002) 0.00
    0.0014717856 = product of:
      0.017661426 = sum of:
        0.017661426 = product of:
          0.035322852 = sum of:
            0.035322852 = weight(_text_:22 in 1095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035322852 = score(doc=1095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag wird die Zielsetzung und die geplante Durchführung des Projektes DDC Deutsch zur Herstellung einer deutschen Version der 22. Ausgabe der Dewey Decimal Classification näher beschrieben. Es werden Gründe für die Durchführung des Vorhabens diskutiert und der erwartete spätere Nutzen beschrieben.
  11. Comaroni, J.P.: Use of the Dewey Decimal Classification in the United States and Canada (1978) 0.00
    0.0012878124 = product of:
      0.015453748 = sum of:
        0.015453748 = product of:
          0.030907497 = sum of:
            0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030907497 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 22(1978), S.402-408
  12. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995) 0.00
    0.0012878124 = product of:
      0.015453748 = sum of:
        0.015453748 = product of:
          0.030907497 = sum of:
            0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030907497 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69
  13. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Beall, J.: Using literary warrant to define a version of the DDC for automated classification services (2004) 0.00
    0.0012878124 = product of:
      0.015453748 = sum of:
        0.015453748 = product of:
          0.030907497 = sum of:
            0.030907497 = weight(_text_:22 in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030907497 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Object
    DDC-22
  14. Heiner-Freiling, M.: DDC German - the project, the aims, the methods : new ideas for a well-established traditional classification system (2006) 0.00
    0.0011038391 = product of:
      0.01324607 = sum of:
        0.01324607 = product of:
          0.02649214 = sum of:
            0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02649214 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    The paper will give a short outline of the project DDC German. The project is not limited to a mere translation of DDC 22, but aims at the implementation of Dewey in the library networks of the German-language countries. Use of DDC mainly for retrieval purposes, not for shelving, leads to certain new aspects in classifying with Dewey which are described in detail and presented together with the German web service Melvil. Based an the German experience of cooperation and data exchange in the field of verbal indexing the paper develops some ideas an future Dewey cooperation between European and American libraries.
  15. Svanberg, M.: Mapping two classification schemes : DDC and SAB (2008) 0.00
    0.0011038391 = product of:
      0.01324607 = sum of:
        0.01324607 = product of:
          0.02649214 = sum of:
            0.02649214 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02649214 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2008 11:22:44
  16. Hajdu Barat, A.: Knowledge organization of the Universal Decimal Classification : new solutions, user friendly methods from Hungary (2004) 0.00
    0.0010460628 = product of:
      0.012552753 = sum of:
        0.012552753 = weight(_text_:internet in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012552753 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    This paper aims at exploring the changes in the role and representation of information retrieval languages, particularly the UDC system in the digital, online environment and the Internet. The Totalzoom Technology takes a different approach, with the help of which even a lay user can easily navigate in the "informational space". This system follows the free associative nature of human thinking. Technically, it works with the wide degree of freedom afforded by a logical-associative network, coupled with a hierarchical search tree as an inner auxiliary structure.
  17. Williamson, N.: Knowledge integration and classification schemes (2003) 0.00
    0.0010460628 = product of:
      0.012552753 = sum of:
        0.012552753 = weight(_text_:internet in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012552753 = score(doc=2736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    A work in progress. An analysis of the handling of the domain "environmental science" in three universal classification schemes. Attention is given to problems of primary location, interdisciplinarity, degree of scatter, tenninology and structure of the domain. 1. Introduction Many traditional tools for organizing and providing access to recorded knowledge have become increasingly inadequate in responding to the changing requirements for effective organization and retrieval. The universal classification systems have been primary targets for criticism. In varying degrees they have been proven too rigid and somewhat limited as tools of modern knowledge organization. These inadequacies can be attributed to several significant factors - the changing nature of knowledge itself, the emergence of new domains, the realignment of old ones, and the development of very large databases. Also, more and more, as new technologies become available, there is increasing emphasis an the retrieval of facts as opposed to the retrieval of whole documents. In particular, the Internet encourages information seeking at a macro-level while the major universal systems were designed to organize information at a macro level. Moreover, there is a growing body of research and practical application aimed at improving the situation. This papers examines three of the best known universal classification systems the Dewey Decimal (DDC), Universal Decimal (UDC) and Library of Congress (LCC) classification systems in the light of their ability to respond to the changing nature of information itself. Recent research is briefly examined for its applicability to them. Environmental science, a recently emerging domain, is used as a basis for the analysis.
  18. Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012) 0.00
    9.19866E-4 = product of:
      0.011038392 = sum of:
        0.011038392 = product of:
          0.022076784 = sum of:
            0.022076784 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022076784 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11412105 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    3. 3.2016 18:59:22