Search (90 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × author_ss:"Gödert, W."
  1. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.11
    0.111814834 = product of:
      0.27953708 = sum of:
        0.015457011 = weight(_text_:und in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015457011 = score(doc=193,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03123975 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.03123975 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.009614649 = weight(_text_:der in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009614649 = score(doc=193,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21373394 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0045474293 = product of:
          0.013642288 = sum of:
            0.013642288 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013642288 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(8/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Verwendung von Erschließungsinstrumenten zur Beschreibung von Informationsressourcen kann Effizienz und Effektivität thematischer Recherchen wesentlich steigern: standardisierte Begriffe unterstützen Recall und Precision begrifflicher Suchen; Ausweisung von Relationen bietet die Grundlage für explorative Suchprozesse. Eine zusätzliche Steigerung der Funktionalitäten des Retrievals kann mittels einer Ausdifferenzierung und Spezifizierung der in Normdaten enthaltenen semantischen Informationen erreicht werden, die über die in Thesauri und Klassifikationen verbreiteten grundlegenden Relationstypen (äquivalent, hierarchisch, assoziativ) hinausgehen. In modernen Informationsräumen, in denen Daten verschiedener Institutionen über eine Plattform zeit- und ortsunabhängig zugänglich gemacht werden, können einzelne Wissenssysteme indes nur unzureichend das Information Retrieval unterstützen. Zu unterschiedlich sind die für thematische Suchanfragen relevanten Indexierungsdaten. Eine Verbesserung kann mittels Herstellung von Interoperabilität zwischen den verschiedenen Dokumentationssprachen erreicht werden. Im Vortrag wird dargelegt, in welcher Art und Weise die in Wissenssystemen enthaltenen semantischen Informationen zur Unterstützung thematischer Recherchen optimiert werden können und inwiefern Interoperabilität zwischen Systemen geschaffen werden kann, die gleichwertige Funktionalitäten in heterogenen Informationsräumen gewährleisten. In diesem Zusammenhang wird auch auf aktuelle Mappingprojekte wie das DFG-Projekt CrissCross oder das RESEDA-Projekt, welches sich mit den Möglichkeiten der semantischen Anreicherung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen befasst, eingegangen.
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  2. Schöneberg, U.; Gödert, W.: Erschließung mathematischer Publikationen mittels linguistischer Verfahren (2012) 0.05
    0.05403028 = product of:
      0.15437223 = sum of:
        0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021010485 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
        0.016063396 = weight(_text_:und in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016063396 = score(doc=1055,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
        0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021010485 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
        0.050701115 = weight(_text_:methoden in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050701115 = score(doc=1055,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.48582888 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
        0.0163166 = weight(_text_:der in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0163166 = score(doc=1055,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.36271852 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
        0.008259674 = product of:
          0.016519347 = sum of:
            0.016519347 = weight(_text_:29 in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016519347 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021010485 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Zahl der mathematik-relevanten Publikationn steigt von Jahr zu Jahr an. Referatedienste wie da Zentralblatt MATH und Mathematical Reviews erfassen die bibliographischen Daten, erschließen die Arbeiten inhaltlich und machen sie - heute über Datenbanken, früher in gedruckter Form - für den Nutzer suchbar. Keywords sind ein wesentlicher Bestandteil der inhaltlichen Erschließung der Publikationen. Keywords sind meist keine einzelnen Wörter, sondern Mehrwortphrasen. Das legt die Anwendung linguistischer Methoden und Verfahren nahe. Die an der FH Köln entwickelte Software 'Lingo' wurde für die speziellen Anforderungen mathematischer Texte angepasst und sowohl zum Aufbau eines kontrollierten Vokabulars als auch zur Extraction von Keywords aus mathematischen Publikationen genutzt. Es ist geplant, über eine Verknüpfung von kontrolliertem Vokabular und der Mathematical Subject Classification Methoden für die automatische Klassifikation für den Referatedienst Zentralblatt MATH zu entwickeln und zu erproben.
    Date
    12. 9.2013 12:29:05
    Footnote
    Vortrag anlässlich der DMV-Tagung in Saarbrücken, 17.-20.09.2012.
  3. Gödert, W.: ¬Die Literatur der Mathematik und ihre Fachbibliographische Verzeichnung : ein Bericht für die Jahre 1979-1985 (1985) 0.04
    0.041031715 = product of:
      0.13677238 = sum of:
        0.049440887 = weight(_text_:monographien in 4579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049440887 = score(doc=4579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13425075 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.36827272 = fieldWeight in 4579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4579)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 4579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=4579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4579)
        0.016394636 = weight(_text_:und in 4579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016394636 = score(doc=4579,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 4579, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4579)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 4579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=4579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4579)
        0.018410651 = weight(_text_:der in 4579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018410651 = score(doc=4579,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.40926933 = fieldWeight in 4579, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4579)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 4579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=4579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4579)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Situation der mathematischen Literatur ist geprägt durch Preissteigerungen, die nun - wie vorher schon andere naturwissenschaftliche Fächer - auch die Mathematik erreicht haben. Diese Situation macht es vielen Bibliotheken immer schwerer, die Zahl der Zeitschriftenabonnements aufrecht zu erhalten und eine ausreichende Anzahl relevanter Monographien zu kaufen. Die Situation ist aber auch geprägt durch eine Zunahme der Vielfalt in der Erscheinungsform mathematischer Literatur und der Nachweisinstrumente. Dies bringt manche Änderung mit sich; manchmal mehr Komfort, hin und wieder auch heue Probleme. In diesem Beitrag soll die vor einiger Zeit an anderer Stelle begonnene Berichterstattung über die fachbibliographische Situation auf dem Gebiet der Mathematik fortgesetzt und ein Überblick bis zum Jahre 1985 gegeben werden. Leider hat sich an dem schon damals beklagten Zustand der mangelnden Berichterstattung über die fachbibliographische Situation in den Naturwissenschaften bis heute nichts geändert. So gibt es zwar die vorzügliche Rubrik von Klaus Schreiber in der Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, die Naturwissenschaften sind dort aber nicht überrepräsentiert, und auch an anderer Stelle ist kein Ersatz in Sicht; ein angesichts rascher Änderungen auf manchem Gebiet bedauerlicher Zustand. Neben den Neuerungen bei den bekannten Referateorganen sollen die seit einiger Zeit nunmehr auch für die Mathematik online zu recherchierenden Datenbanken erwähnt werden. Berücksichtigen wollen wir diesmal auch die Didaktik der Mathematik und die Statistik. Nicht berücksichtigt werden soll hingegen die Informatik; dieses in den letzten Jahren stark expandierende Gebiet mit einer Reihe von Besonderheiten in der fachlich relevanten Literatur (Produkt-Literatur, Firmenschriften, Software-Bibliotheken u.a.) verdient eine eigene Darstellung. Darüberhinaus wollen wir versuchen, einige weitere nützliche Hinweise für den Umgang mit mathematischer Literatur zu geben.
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 9(1985) H.2, S.205-214
  4. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.04
    0.039589554 = product of:
      0.11311301 = sum of:
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.017281463 = weight(_text_:und in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017281463 = score(doc=5801,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3871834 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.02987592 = weight(_text_:methoden in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02987592 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.2862774 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.01665306 = weight(_text_:der in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01665306 = score(doc=5801,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.37019804 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.0064310357 = product of:
          0.019293107 = sum of:
            0.019293107 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019293107 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    Der Umfang und die Heterogenität des Informationsangebotes erfordert immer differenzierte Methoden und Hilfsmittel für das gezielte und möglichst ballastfreie Auffinden von Informationsquellen im Kontext eines bestimmten Fachgebietes oder einer wissenschaftlichen Disziplin. Um dieses Ziel zu erreichen, wurden in der letzten Zeit eine Reihe sog. Subject Gateways entwickelt. Bislang liegen weder viele Untersuchungen zur Qualität derartiger Hilfsmittel vor noch ist eine differenzierte Methodik für solche Bewertungen entwickelt worden. Das Projekt Evaluation von Subject Gateways des Internet (EJECT) verfolgte daher die Ziele: durch Analyse bereits realisierter Subject Gateways die Verwendungsvielfalt des Begriffes aufzuzeigen und zu einer Präzisierung der Begriffsbildung beizutragen; einen methodischen Weg zur qualitativen Bewertung von Subject Gateways aufzuzeigen; diesen Weg anhand einer Evaluation des Subject Gateways EULER zu testen, das im Rahmen eines EU-Projektes für das Fachgebiet Mathematik entwickelt wurde. Die Resultate der Evaluation werden hier in verkürzter Form vorgestellt und es wird aufgezeigt, inwieweit eine Übertragung auf die Bewertung anderer Gateways möglich ist
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22
    Series
    Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis; 4
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  5. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.03
    0.03477816 = product of:
      0.11592719 = sum of:
        0.03731573 = product of:
          0.11194719 = sum of:
            0.11194719 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11194719 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17073247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.010819908 = weight(_text_:und in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010819908 = score(doc=5955,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.0077714287 = weight(_text_:der in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0077714287 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Diskussionen um Datennetze und Informationstechnik drehen sich häufig um kompetentes Handeln. In der Publikation werden Voraussetzungen eines autonomen informationellen Handelns gezeigt: Abstrahieren, Analogien bilden, Plausibilitäten beachten, Schlussfolgern und kreativ sein. Informationelle Kompetenz ist gelebte Informationelle Autonomie. Es lassen sich Konsequenzen für ein zukünftiges Menschenbild in informationstechnischen Umgebungen ziehen.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  6. Gödert, W.; Oßwald, A.; Rösch, H.; Sleegers, P.: Evit@: Evaluation elektronischer Informationsmittel (2000) 0.03
    0.028943997 = product of:
      0.11577599 = sum of:
        0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028581016 = score(doc=1881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
        0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028581016 = score(doc=1881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
        0.018930895 = weight(_text_:und in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018930895 = score(doc=1881,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
        0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028581016 = score(doc=1881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
        0.01110204 = weight(_text_:der in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01110204 = score(doc=1881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Evit@ stellt ein Bewertungsinstrument bereit, mit dessen Hilfe qualitative Aussagen über elektronische Informationsmittel möglich werden. Eine Stärke des Verfahrens liegt auf der vergleichenden Produktanalyse und auf einem weitgehend entindividualisierten Ansatz
    Imprint
    Köln : FH Köln, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.23
  7. Gödert, W.: Wissensdarstellung in Informationssystemen, Fragetypen und Anforderungen an Retrievalkomponenten (2000) 0.03
    0.025645657 = product of:
      0.12822828 = sum of:
        0.018930895 = weight(_text_:und in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018930895 = score(doc=4194,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
        0.08450186 = weight(_text_:methoden in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08450186 = score(doc=4194,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.8097148 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
        0.015700657 = weight(_text_:der in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015700657 = score(doc=4194,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
        0.009094859 = product of:
          0.027284576 = sum of:
            0.027284576 = weight(_text_:22 in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027284576 = score(doc=4194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Content
    Vortrag, gehalten anläßlich der Tagung 'Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung - Methoden und Anwendungen' im Ernst Schröder Zentrum für Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung an der TH Darmstadt, 22.-25.2.1995
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen, mit Beiträgen zahlreicher Fachwissenschaftler. Hrsg.: G. Stumme u. R. Wille
  8. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.02
    0.022065293 = product of:
      0.08826117 = sum of:
        0.015457011 = weight(_text_:und in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015457011 = score(doc=2411,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
        0.030713879 = product of:
          0.061427757 = sum of:
            0.061427757 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061427757 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10581345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5805288 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.019229298 = weight(_text_:der in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019229298 = score(doc=2411,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.42746788 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
        0.013766123 = product of:
          0.027532246 = sum of:
            0.027532246 = weight(_text_:29 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027532246 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009094859 = product of:
          0.027284576 = sum of:
            0.027284576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027284576 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Diskussion des Zusammenhangs zwischen Formal- und Inhaltserschließung hinsichtlich der Bestimmung der bibliografischen Identität, die für die Bildung eines Datensatzes ausschlaggebend ist und über die Auffindbarkeit eines Objektes entscheidet.
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  9. Gödert, W.: Einführung in Probleme und Methoden der inhaltlichen Dokumenterschließung : eine Text- und Materialsammlung (1996) 0.02
    0.021548346 = product of:
      0.14365563 = sum of:
        0.030289432 = weight(_text_:und in 4220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030289432 = score(doc=4220,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.67862105 = fieldWeight in 4220, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4220)
        0.09560294 = weight(_text_:methoden in 4220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09560294 = score(doc=4220,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.9160877 = fieldWeight in 4220, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4220)
        0.017763264 = weight(_text_:der in 4220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017763264 = score(doc=4220,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 4220, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4220)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Imprint
    Köln : Fachhochschule, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
  10. Gödert, W.: Einführung in Probleme und Methoden der inhaltlichen Dokumenterschließung : eine Text- und Materialsammlung (1997) 0.02
    0.021548346 = product of:
      0.14365563 = sum of:
        0.030289432 = weight(_text_:und in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030289432 = score(doc=391,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.67862105 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
        0.09560294 = weight(_text_:methoden in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09560294 = score(doc=391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.9160877 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
        0.017763264 = weight(_text_:der in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017763264 = score(doc=391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Imprint
    Köln : Fachhochschule, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
  11. Gödert, W.: Methoden und Verfahren der verbalen Inhaltserschließung und ihre Anwendung in Bibliotheken (1989) 0.02
    0.020714615 = product of:
      0.13809742 = sum of:
        0.024731217 = weight(_text_:und in 173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024731217 = score(doc=173,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 173, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=173)
        0.09560294 = weight(_text_:methoden in 173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09560294 = score(doc=173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.9160877 = fieldWeight in 173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=173)
        0.017763264 = weight(_text_:der in 173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017763264 = score(doc=173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=173)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
  12. Gödert, W.: Einführung in Probleme und Methoden der inhaltlichen Dokumenterschließung : eine Text- und Materialsammlung (1998) 0.02
    0.018854804 = product of:
      0.12569869 = sum of:
        0.026503252 = weight(_text_:und in 7503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026503252 = score(doc=7503,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.5937934 = fieldWeight in 7503, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7503)
        0.08365257 = weight(_text_:methoden in 7503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08365257 = score(doc=7503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.80157673 = fieldWeight in 7503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7503)
        0.015542857 = weight(_text_:der in 7503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015542857 = score(doc=7503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 7503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7503)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Imprint
    Köln : Fachhochschule, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
  13. Gödert, W.: Literatur zur Inhaltserschließung : ein Projekt an der FHBD in Köln (1994) 0.02
    0.018584713 = product of:
      0.09292357 = sum of:
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
        0.008881632 = weight(_text_:der in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008881632 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    Cologne Library School ran a project to construct a database for literature on content cataloguing and fringe disciplines. Software was the BISMAS 1.0 programme and is now the 1.5 version. The category scheme, indexes and retrieval possibilities are described. Retrieval is mainly free text, using the whole document description and all descriptive categories. BISMAS does not permit standard data file administration so a further database was provided ...
  14. Gödert, W.: Subject headings for mathematical literature (1980) 0.01
    0.014551078 = product of:
      0.097007185 = sum of:
        0.03233573 = weight(_text_:23 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03233573 = score(doc=4660,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.44800746 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
        0.03233573 = weight(_text_:23 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03233573 = score(doc=4660,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.44800746 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
        0.03233573 = weight(_text_:23 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03233573 = score(doc=4660,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.44800746 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Date
    23. 3.2019 16:57:50
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 36(1980) no.1, S.11-23
  15. Gödert, W.: Detecting multiword phrases in mathematical text corpora (2012) 0.01
    0.012606291 = product of:
      0.08404194 = sum of:
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    We present an approach for detecting multiword phrases in mathematical text corpora. The method used is based on characteristic features of mathematical terminology. It makes use of a software tool named Lingo which allows to identify words by means of previously defined dictionaries for specific word classes as adjectives, personal names or nouns. The detection of multiword groups is done algorithmically. Possible advantages of the method for indexing and information retrieval and conclusions for applying dictionary-based methods of automatic indexing instead of stemming procedures are discussed.
  16. Gödert, W.: Wissensorganisation und Information Retrieval im Wandel : Konzepte für die Ausbildung in Deutschland (2001) 0.01
    0.012347132 = product of:
      0.08231421 = sum of:
        0.025398463 = weight(_text_:und in 4833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025398463 = score(doc=4833,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.5690411 = fieldWeight in 4833, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4833)
        0.035851102 = weight(_text_:methoden in 4833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035851102 = score(doc=4833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3435329 = fieldWeight in 4833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4833)
        0.021064643 = weight(_text_:der in 4833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021064643 = score(doc=4833,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.46826762 = fieldWeight in 4833, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4833)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    Es wird ein Überblick gegeben, wie sich die Veränderungen sich im Bereich der Informationsverarbeitung und -technik auf die Gestaltung von Studienkonzepten im Bereich Wissensorganisation und Information Retrieval in deutschen bibliothekarischen Ausbildungseinrichtungen ausgewirkt haben. Dabei wird unterschieden in Bereiche der Veränderungen und in Bereiche der Stabilität. Die Bereiche der Veränderungen lassen sich den Verfahren und Anwendungen in der Praxis zuordnen. Sie sind zum einen geprägt durch eine integrative Sicht auf Indexierung und Information Retrieval und lassen sich zum anderen durch folgende Trends charakterisieren: - Von Katalogen zu OPACs und WebOPACs - Von der Katalogisierung zum intelligenten Information Retrieval und Suchmaschinen mit benutzerfreundlichen Interaktionsschnittstellen - Vom lokalen Katalog zum kooperativen Erschließen und Retrieval in heterogenen Netzen - Von intellektueller zu automatischer Indexierung - Von Regelwerken zu strukturierten Beschreibungsebenen (z.B. Metadaten) - Von Beschreibung und Bewertung zu Entwicklungen und Produktdesign Die Bereiche der Stabilität lassen sich der Theorie und den Methoden zuordnen und sind durch folgende Themen beschreibbar: - Grundlagen der Wissensorganisation und Informationserschließung (z.B. in Philosophie, Linguistik, Informatik, Kognitionspsychologie) - Grundlagen der Gestaltung von Dokumentationssprachen - Grundlagen des Information Retrieval
  17. Gödert, W.: ¬Ein Ontologie basiertes Modell für Indexierung und Retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.012100878 = product of:
      0.08067252 = sum of:
        0.017487612 = weight(_text_:und in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017487612 = score(doc=1266,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
        0.04780147 = weight(_text_:methoden in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04780147 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.45804384 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
        0.015383439 = weight(_text_:der in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015383439 = score(doc=1266,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag wird ausgehend von einem ungelösten Problem der Informationserschließung ein Modell vorgestellt, das die Methoden und Erfahrungen zur inhaltlichen Dokumenterschließung mittels kognitiv zu interpretierender Dokumentationssprachen mit den Möglichkeiten formaler Wissensrepräsentation verbindet. Die Kernkomponente des Modells besteht aus der Nutzung von Inferenzen entlang der Pfade typisierter Relationen zwischen den in Facetten geordneten Entitäten innerhalb einer Wissensrepräsentation zur Bestimmung von Treffermengen im Rahmen von Retrievalprozessen. Es werden die möglichen Konsequenzen für das Indexieren und Retrieval diskutiert.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.2, S.83-98
  18. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.011380549 = product of:
      0.056902744 = sum of:
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
        0.005456915 = product of:
          0.016370745 = sum of:
            0.016370745 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016370745 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Date
    23. 7.2017 13:49:22
  19. Gödert, W.; Liebig, M.: Maschinelle Indexierung auf dem Prüfstand : Ergebnisse eines Retrievaltests zum MILOS II Projekt (1997) 0.01
    0.011030504 = product of:
      0.07353669 = sum of:
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    The test ran between Nov 95-Aug 96 in Cologne Fachhochschule fur Bibliothekswesen (College of Librarianship).The test basis was a database of 190,000 book titles published between 1990-95. MILOS II mechanized indexing methods proved helpful in avoiding or reducing numbers of unsatisfied/no result retrieval searches. Retrieval from mechanised indexing is 3 times more successful than from title keyword data. MILOS II also used a standardized semantic vocabulary. Mechanised indexing demands high quality software and output data
  20. Gödert, W.: Semantische Wissensrepräsentation und Interoperabilität : Teil 1: Interoperabilität als Weg zur Wissensexploration (2010) 0.01
    0.010488678 = product of:
      0.06992452 = sum of:
        0.017107777 = weight(_text_:und in 3348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017107777 = score(doc=3348,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 3348, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3348)
        0.041826285 = weight(_text_:methoden in 3348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041826285 = score(doc=3348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.40078837 = fieldWeight in 3348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3348)
        0.0109904595 = weight(_text_:der in 3348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0109904595 = score(doc=3348,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 3348, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3348)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser aus zwei Teilen bestehende Beitrag setzt Methoden der semantischen Wissensrepräsentation in Verbindung zur Gestaltung von Retrievalszenarios für begriffliche Recherchen und insbesondere für die Wissensexploration. Ausgehend von heterogenen Erschließungssituationen werden Konzepte vorgestellt, wie durch Maßnahmen zur Herstellung von Interoperabilität ein Beitrag zur Lösung der Heterogenitätssituation geleistet werden soll. Basierend auf einem, im zweiten Teil vorgestellten, formalen Modell zum besseren Verständnis von semantischer Interoperabilität, wird ein Vorschlag für ein Gesamtsystem entwickelt, das aus einer Kernontologie und lokalisierten semantischen Netzen mit erweitertem Relationenumfang besteht. Die Möglichkeiten zur Recherche und Exploration in einem solchen Gesamtrahmen werden skizziert.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.1, S.5-18

Years

Languages

  • d 84
  • e 6
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 68
  • el 10
  • u 8
  • m 4
  • r 4
  • p 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications