Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
rvk_ss%3a%21st 230 %5BInformatik %23 monographien %23 software und -entwicklung %23 software allgemein%2c %28Einf%c3%bahnung%2c lehre%c3%bücher%2c methoden der programmierung%29 software engineering%2c programmentwicklungssysteme%2c softwarewerkzeuge%5d%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%21st 230 %5BInformatik %23 monographien %23 software und -entwicklung %23 software allgemein%2c %28Einf%c3%bahnung%2c lehre%c3%bucher%2c methoden der programmierung%29 software engineering%2c programmentwicklungssysteme%2c softwarewerkzeuge%5d%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%21st 230 %5BInformatik %23 monographien %23 software und -entwicklung %23 software allgemein%2c %28Einf%c3%bahnung%2c lehre%c3%bücher%2c methoden der programmierung%29 software engineering%2c programmentwicklungssysteme%2c softwarewerkzeugen%5d%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%21st 230 %5BInformatik %23 monographien %23 software und -entwicklung %23 software allgemein%2c %28Einf%c3%bahnung%2c lehrt%c3%bücher%2c methoden der programmierung%29 software engineering%2c programmentwicklungssysteme%2c softwarewerkzeuge%5d%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%21st 230 %5BInformatik %23 monographien %23 software und -entwicklung %23 software allgemein%2c %28Einf%c3%buchung%2c lehre%c3%bücher%2c methoden der programmierung%29 software engineering%2c programmentwicklungssysteme%2c softwarewerkzeuge%5d%22 1

Gomez, J.; Allen, K.; Matney, M.; Awopetu, T.; Shafer, S.: Experimenting with a machine generated annotations pipeline (2020) 0.02

0.01782799 = product of:
  0.118853256 = sum of:
    0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03961775 = score(doc=657,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
    0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03961775 = score(doc=657,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
    0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03961775 = score(doc=657,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)

Abstract: The UCLA Library reorganized its software developers into focused subteams with one, the Labs Team, dedicated to conducting experiments. In this article we describe our first attempt at conducting a software development experiment, in which we attempted to improve our digital library's search results with metadata from cloud-based image tagging services. We explore the findings and discuss the lessons learned from our first attempt at running an experiment.