Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"f"
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Gaschignard, J.-P.: UNIMARC et UNIMARC : attention aux contrefacons (1997) 0.03 
    0.02597323 = product of:
  0.12986615 = sum of:
    0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03961775 = score(doc=921,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
    0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03961775 = score(doc=921,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
    0.011012898 = product of:
      0.022025796 = sum of:
        0.022025796 = weight(_text_:29 in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022025796 = score(doc=921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03961775 = score(doc=921,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    UNIMARC is widely used in French libraries for internal cataloguing, but in versions that differ significantly from the official IFLA form, while the BNF uses its own version for exporting bibliographic information. This situation has in part been created by software suppliers who produce modified versions for small libraries but without precisely detailing the variations. Problems will inevitably arise when such libraries change software or join cataloguing networks
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  2. Bourdon, F.: Qu'est-ce qu'un format d'autorité? (1997) 0.02 
    0.016634597 = product of:
  0.08317298 = sum of:
    0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02451223 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
    0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02451223 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
    0.009636286 = product of:
      0.019272571 = sum of:
        0.019272571 = weight(_text_:29 in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019272571 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02451223 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    Authority records complement bibliographic records, providing cataloguers with essential subject heading and related information. At present there is no international format standard comparable to ISBD for bibliographic records, though IFLA and the International Archives Council have set up working groups. The essential data form comprises of subject heading, structure, homonyms, with supplementary supporting information. In France MARC formats are most widely used, e.g. UNIMARC(A) for authority records and (B) for bibliographic. The National Library (BNF) is introducing new cataloguing software based on the reorganisation of its authotity files, using integrated INTERMARC. As an experiments, readers will for the first time have access to authority files, thus enriching, completing and clarifying the bibliographic records
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  3. Recommandation 995 (1995) 0.01 
    0.012606291 = product of:
  0.08404194 = sum of:
    0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028013978 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
    0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028013978 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
    0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028013978 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Abstract
    Text of a document produced by the French Librarians Association, Federation of Library Software Users and the Association of Directors of Departmental Lending Libraries, setting out standards for local data included in bibliographic notices in UNIMARC format. These are specifically intended for loan copies sent from central to branch libraries, for integration into the local catalogue. The subfields (MARC field 995) are: origin of document; bar code; classification code and loan details; details of contents, support etc; and notes on physical features
  4. Desrichard, Y.: ¬Les formats et normes de catalogage : evolutions et perspectives (1998) 0.00 
    9.214163E-4 = product of:
  0.018428326 = sum of:
    0.018428326 = product of:
      0.03685665 = sum of:
        0.03685665 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03685665 = score(doc=2535,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10581345 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34831727 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  5. Lahary, D.: Recommandations pour l'exchange de donnees d'exemplaires en format UNIMARC : un document de reference (1998) 0.00 
    5.506449E-4 = product of:
  0.011012898 = sum of:
    0.011012898 = product of:
      0.022025796 = sum of:
        0.022025796 = weight(_text_:29 in 4620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022025796 = score(doc=4620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  6. Duclos-Faure, D.: Format d'echange des donnees locales : ou en sommes-nous? (1997) 0.00 
    4.818143E-4 = product of:
  0.009636286 = sum of:
    0.009636286 = product of:
      0.019272571 = sum of:
        0.019272571 = weight(_text_:29 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019272571 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  7. Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997) 0.00 
    4.818143E-4 = product of:
  0.009636286 = sum of:
    0.009636286 = product of:
      0.019272571 = sum of:
        0.019272571 = weight(_text_:29 in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019272571 = score(doc=892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  8. Passin-Aguirre, N.; Leresche, F.: ¬Le format INTERMARC integre : futur format de travail de la BNF (1997) 0.00 
    4.818143E-4 = product of:
  0.009636286 = sum of:
    0.009636286 = product of:
      0.019272571 = sum of:
        0.019272571 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019272571 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  9. Provansal, A.: Neuf mois après (1997) 0.00 
    4.818143E-4 = product of:
  0.009636286 = sum of:
    0.009636286 = product of:
      0.019272571 = sum of:
        0.019272571 = weight(_text_:29 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019272571 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  10. Witt, M.: Evolution du format UNIMARC (1997) 0.00 
    4.818143E-4 = product of:
  0.009636286 = sum of:
    0.009636286 = product of:
      0.019272571 = sum of:
        0.019272571 = weight(_text_:29 in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019272571 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  11. SiBiL: Système intégré pour les bibliothèques universitaires de Lausanne : 9 années d'automatisation à la Bibliothèque cantonale et universitaire (1980) 0.00 
    3.8254153E-4 = product of:
  0.0076508303 = sum of:
    0.0076508303 = weight(_text_:und in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0076508303 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Abstract
    In Grenoble wurde um 1971 das Format MONOCLE als französische Adaption des USMARCII aufgestellt. Dieses wurde vom SiBiL-Verbund übernommen. MONOCLE wurde danach auch die Basis für das weiterentwickelte INTERMARC, das seinerseits ein Vorläufer von UNIMARC wurde. Die Ähnlichkeit mit USMARC ist recht stark, es gibt aber eine Reihe von abweichenden Feldern, vor allem sind die Indikatoren sehr unterschiedlich definiert. Immerhin hat die französische Orientierung auf USMARC dann um 1988 dazu geführt, daß die französischen Universitäten und die Bibliothèque Nationale sich zu einem Anschluß an OCLC entschließen konnten

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 10
  • m 1

Themes