-
Trkulja, V.: Weltgrößte Abstracts- und Zitationsdatenbank aus dem wissenschaftlichen Web (2005)
0.06
0.063948795 = product of:
0.18271086 = sum of:
0.070481904 = weight(_text_:230 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070481904 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13547163 = queryWeight, product of:
6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.5202706 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
0.01874063 = weight(_text_:und in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01874063 = score(doc=3437,freq=12.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
0.0109904595 = weight(_text_:der in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0109904595 = score(doc=3437,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
0.022477739 = product of:
0.044955477 = sum of:
0.044955477 = weight(_text_:engineering in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044955477 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.41551027 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- Scopus ist ein Such- und Navigationssystem für interdisziplinäre, wissenschaftliche Literatur. Die zur Zeit weltgrößte Abstract- & Zitationsdatenbank deckt 14.000 WTM-Titel von 4.000 Verlagen ab und liefert Ergebnisse aus dem wissenschaftlichen Web, inklusive Patentinformationen. Darüber hinaus unterstützt Scopus ein Volltext-Linking sowie eine erweiterte Bibliotheksintegration mit personalisierten Konfigurationsmöglichkeiten. Das neue Angebot ist überzeugend.
- Content
- Datenbestand Scopus beinhaltet - 12.650 akademische Zeitschriften (davon 1.100 Medline-Zeitschriften und 465 Open Access-Zeitschriften), - 750 Conference Proceedings, - 600 Trade Publications, - 27 Millionen Kurzfassungen der letzten zwanzig Jahre, - 230 Millionen Referenzen zu allen Kurzfassungen ab 1996 und - 180 Millionen wissenschaftliche Webseiten via Scirus. Der Inhalt wird täglich aktualisiert. Auf die Fachbereiche teilen sich die Quellen wie folgt auf: - 4.500 Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics and Engineering, - 5.900 Life and Health Sciences (100 Medline-Abdeckung), - 2.700 Social Sciences, Psychology and Economics und - 2.500 Biological, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences.
- Date
- 23. 5.2005 11:38:28
-
Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001)
0.05
0.04629555 = product of:
0.1851822 = sum of:
0.04632376 = weight(_text_:software in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04632376 = score(doc=5767,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.5798329 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.04632376 = weight(_text_:software in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04632376 = score(doc=5767,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.5798329 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.0068830615 = product of:
0.013766123 = sum of:
0.013766123 = weight(_text_:29 in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013766123 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04632376 = weight(_text_:software in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04632376 = score(doc=5767,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.5798329 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.03932785 = product of:
0.0786557 = sum of:
0.0786557 = weight(_text_:engineering in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0786557 = score(doc=5767,freq=12.0), product of:
0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.72699153 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Abstract
- We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 14:01:01
-
Trivison, D.: Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity (1987)
0.02
0.020578332 = product of:
0.13718888 = sum of:
0.045729626 = weight(_text_:23 in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045729626 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
0.045729626 = weight(_text_:23 in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045729626 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
0.045729626 = weight(_text_:23 in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045729626 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 23(1987), S.183-194
-
Zitatenanalyse und verwandte Verfahren : Vorträge einer öffentlichen Sitzung während der 32. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation, Oktober 1979 (1980)
0.02
0.018393895 = product of:
0.122625954 = sum of:
0.010929758 = weight(_text_:und in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010929758 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
0.08450186 = weight(_text_:methoden in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08450186 = score(doc=417,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.8097148 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
0.027194334 = weight(_text_:der in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027194334 = score(doc=417,freq=12.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.6045309 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: NACKE, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne; GERDEL, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse; EISENHARDT, O.-H.: Ergebnisse der Referenzanalyse; KRUG, G.: List-Analyse; LANGE, H.: Requestanalyse; HENZLER, R.G.: Bibliometrische Methoden der Termanalyse; NACKE, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse
-
Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003)
0.02
0.015921468 = product of:
0.07960734 = sum of:
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
0.011012898 = product of:
0.022025796 = sum of:
0.022025796 = weight(_text_:29 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022025796 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:52:23
-
Marx, W.: Wie mißt man Forschungsqualität? : der Science Citation Index - ein Maßstab für die Bewertung (1996)
0.02
0.015219952 = product of:
0.10146634 = sum of:
0.008743806 = weight(_text_:und in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008743806 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
0.06760149 = weight(_text_:methoden in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06760149 = score(doc=5036,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.64777184 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
0.02512105 = weight(_text_:der in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02512105 = score(doc=5036,freq=16.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.5584417 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- Ein überfordertes Gutachter-System, knapper fließende Forschungsgelder sowie die starke Faszination von Ranglisten bewirken zunehmend den Einsatz bibliometrischer Methoden zur Messung von Forschungsqualität. Grundlage der meisten Bewertungen ist der Science Citation Index, der nun auch in der Version als Online-Datenbank für umfangreiche Analysen genutzt werden kann. Erweiterungen der Retrievalsprache beim Host STN International ermöglichen statistische Analysen, die bisher nur dem SCI-Hersteller und wenigen Spezialisten vorbehalten waren. Voraussetzung für eine sinnvolle Anwendung sind vor allem die Wahl geeigneter Selektionskriterien sowie die sorgfältige Interpretation der Ergebnisse im Rahmen der Grenzen dieser Methoden
-
Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996)
0.01
0.013558313 = product of:
0.067791566 = sum of:
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
0.0077714287 = weight(_text_:der in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0077714287 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Series
- Veröffentlichungen der Universitätsbibliothek Essen; 21
- Source
- Towards a worldwide library: a ten year forecast. Proceedings of the 19th International Essen Symposium, 23-26 Sept 1996. Ed.: A.H. Helal u. J.W. Weiss
-
Stock, W.G.: Publikation und Zitat : Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung (2001)
0.01
0.013350158 = product of:
0.06675079 = sum of:
0.016394636 = weight(_text_:und in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016394636 = score(doc=5787,freq=18.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.02987592 = weight(_text_:methoden in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02987592 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2862774 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.013597167 = weight(_text_:der in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013597167 = score(doc=5787,freq=12.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.30226544 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.0068830615 = product of:
0.013766123 = sum of:
0.013766123 = weight(_text_:29 in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013766123 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- Die empirische Wissenschaftsforschung arbeitet bei den Indikatoren wissenschaftlicher Leistung und wissenschaftlicher Wirkung mit Publikations- und Zitationsraten. Die vorliegende Arbeit befaßt sich mit dabei auftretenden methodischen Problemen. Was ist überhaupt eine Publikation? Was heißt Zitation? Zentral ist auch die Zählbasis, d.h. die Einheitenbildung: Was ist 1 Publikation? und: Was ist 1 Zitation? Bei Printpublikationen gibt es eine Reihe von beachtenswerten Faktoren (u.a. Mehrautorenwerke, Gewichtungsfaktoren wie den Impact Factor, Dokumenttypen). Bei elektronischen Publikationen im Internet mit ihrem dynamischen Charakter ist die Einheitenbildung noch weitaus problematischer. Zitationen, verstanden als zitierte Publikationen, werfen alle methodischen Probleme der Publikationseinheiten auf, hinzu kommen weitere, spezifische Probleme. Lösungsmöglichkeiten im syntaktischen Bereich (Relativierung auf Textseiten oder Zeichen) ändern am grundlegenden Problem nur wenig, Lösungsversuche im semantischen Bereich (etwa im Rahmen der semantischen Informationstheorie) sind im Rahmen der Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen nicht durchführbar und verweisen sowohl auf themenanalytische Methoden als auch auf die Wissenschaftstheorie. Mit diesem Working Paper wollen wir vor allem auf offene Probleme hinweisen; "endgültige" Lösungen wird der Leser nicht finden, wohl aber Lösungsvorschläge, die meist durchaus noch diskussionswürdig sind. In der Informationswissenschaft wie in der Wissenschaftsforschung sind wir bisher viel zu sicher davon ausgegangen, daß wir wissen, was Publikationen und Zitationen sind
- Imprint
- Köln : FH Köln, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
- Series
- Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.29
-
Small, H.: Visualizing science by citation mapping (1999)
0.01
0.011030504 = product of:
0.07353669 = sum of:
0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02451223 = score(doc=3920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02451223 = score(doc=3920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02451223 = score(doc=3920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- Science mapping is discussed in the general context of information visualization. Attempts to construct maps of science using citation data are reviewed, focusing on the use of co-citation clusters. New work is reported on a dataset of about 36.000 documents using simplified methods for ordination, and nesting maps hierarchically. an overall map of the dataset shows the multidisciplinary breadth of the document sample, and submaps allow drilling down the document level. An effort to visualize these data using advanced virtual reality software is described, and the creation of document pathways through the map is seen as a realization of Bush's associative trails
-
Gorraiz, J.: "Web of Science" versus "Scopus" oder das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliotheken (2006)
0.01
0.010872628 = product of:
0.054363135 = sum of:
0.011358538 = weight(_text_:und in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011358538 = score(doc=5021,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.018428326 = product of:
0.03685665 = sum of:
0.03685665 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03685665 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10581345 = queryWeight, product of:
5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.34831727 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0163166 = weight(_text_:der in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0163166 = score(doc=5021,freq=12.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.36271852 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.008259674 = product of:
0.016519347 = sum of:
0.016519347 = weight(_text_:29 in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016519347 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- Bei den nachfolgenden Ausführungen handelt es sich um eine Zusammenstellung von Kommentaren, Vorträgen und Rückmeldungen von Kollegen bzw. Benutzern der Bibliothek sowie meine eigenen Erfahrungen als Vortragender im Universitätslehrgang "Master of Science", in dessen Rahmen ich das Fach "Bibliometrie" unterrichte. Schwerpunkt dieses Beitrages ist eine Zusammenfassung der Diskussion "Web of Science versus Scopus", die den aktuellen Stand der Kontroverse (vor allem an der Universität Wien im naturwissenschaftlichen Sektor) widerspiegelt. Hier ist zu bemerken, dass diese Problematik auch fachspezifisch ist und deswegen an jeder Universität bzw. in jedem Fachgebiet anders zu betrachten ist. Startpunkt meiner Betrachtung ist die allgemein akzeptierte Notwendigkeit des "Journal of Citation Reports (JCR)". Nur in diesem bibliometrischen Verzeichnis sind derzeit die "Impact Factors" zu finden, die als Grundlage jeder akademischen Evaluation dienen. Deswegen ist JCR heutzutage an jeder Universität mit naturwissenschaftlichen Fächern unentbehrlich und das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliothekare lautet nicht wirklich "Web of Science versus Scopus", sondern genaugesagt "Fallbeispiel A: Web of Science &JCR" oder "Fallbeispiel B: Scopus &JCR".
- Date
- 4. 6.2006 17:36:29
-
Sen, B.K.; Pandalai, T.A.; Karanjai, A.: Ranking of scientists - a new approach (1998)
0.01
0.010289166 = product of:
0.06859444 = sum of:
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=5113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=5113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=5113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 6. 9.2000 14:23:30
-
Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002)
0.01
0.010289166 = product of:
0.06859444 = sum of:
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:15:23
-
Vanclay, J.K.: On the robustness of the h-index (2007)
0.01
0.010289166 = product of:
0.06859444 = sum of:
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 1.11.2007 19:16:23
-
Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.; Bollaker, K.: Digital libraries and Autonomous Citation Indexing (1999)
0.01
0.009454718 = product of:
0.06303145 = sum of:
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- Autonomous Citation Indexing (ACI) automates the construction of citation indexes - Lower cost, wider availability: ACI is completely autonomous - no manual effort is required. This should result in lower cost and wider availability. Broader coverage: Because no manual effort is required, there are few barriers to indexing a broader range of literature, compared to indexes like the Science Citation Index that require manual effort. More timely feedback: Conference papers, technical reports, and preprints can be indexed, providing far more timely feedback in many cases (often such publications appear far in advance of corresponding journal publications). Citation context: ACI groups together the context of citations to a given article, allowing researchers to easily see what is being said and why the article was cited. Benefits for both literature search and evaluation. Freely available: Our implementation of ACI is available at no cost for non-commercial use. Several orgnizations have requested the software and expressed interest in providing an index within their domain, or in using ACI within their own digital libraries.
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Clusters and maps of science journals based on bi-connected graphs in Journal Citation Reports (2004)
0.01
0.009454718 = product of:
0.06303145 = sum of:
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- The aggregated journal-journal citation matrix derived from Journal Citation Reports 2001 can be decomposed into a unique subject classification using the graph-analytical algorithm of bi-connected components. This technique was recently incorporated in software tools for social network analysis. The matrix can be assessed in terms of its decomposability using articulation points which indicate overlap between the components. The articulation points of this set did not exhibit a next-order network of "general science" journals. However, the clusters differ in size and in terms of the internal density of their relations. A full classification of the journals is provided in the Appendix. The clusters can also be extracted and mapped for the visualization.
-
Stock, W.G.: Forschung im internationalen Vergleich - Wissenschaftsindikatoren auf Zitationsbasis : ISI Essential Science Indicators (2002)
0.01
0.0085173575 = product of:
0.05678238 = sum of:
0.01221984 = weight(_text_:und in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01221984 = score(doc=474,freq=10.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27378 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
0.02987592 = weight(_text_:methoden in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02987592 = score(doc=474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2862774 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
0.01468662 = weight(_text_:der in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01468662 = score(doc=474,freq=14.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.326484 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschungsergebnisse aus einer elektronischen Datenbank heraus? Rangordnungen der wichtigsten Institutionen, Wissenschaftler, Zeitschriften und sogar Länder in Fachdisziplinen nach Einfluss? Markierung "heißer", hochaktueller Artikel? Auflisten der hochzitierten Forschungsfronten in den einzelnen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen? Und das alles auf Knopfdruck und nicht mittels umständlicher szientometrischer Verfahren? Geht so etwas überhaupt? Es geht. Mit den "Essential Science Indicators" (ESI) legt das ISl ein webbasiertes Informationssystem zur Wissenschaftsevaluation vor, das einzigartige Ergebnisse präsentiert und in der Tat ausgesprochen einfach zu bedienen ist. Aber es geht, verglichen mit ausgeklügelten Methoden der empirischen Wissenschaftsforschung, nicht alles. Wo liegen die Grenzen des Systems? Wir werden die Arbeitsweise der ESI, seine Datenbasis, die eingesetzten informetrischen Algorithmen - und deren methodischen Probleme, die Suchoberfläche sowie die Ergebnisdarstellung skizzieren. Als Beispiel dienen uns Aspekte deutscher Forschung. Etwa: In welcher Disziplin haben Deutschlands Forscher den größten internationalen Einfluss? Welches deutsche Institut der Neurowissenschaften kann aufglobaler Ebene mitmischen? Oder: Welcher in Deutschland tätige Wissenschaftler führt eine disziplinspezifische Rangordnung an?Letztlich: Wer braucht die "Essential Science Indicators"? - Wir testeten die Essential Science Indicators Mitte Februar 2002 anhand der Version vom 1. Januar 2002, die das Zehn-Jahres-Intervall 1991 bis 2000 sowie die ersten zehn Monate aus 2001 berücksichtigt.
-
Frohlich, C.; Resler, L.: Analysis of publications and citations from a geophysics research institute (2001)
0.01
0.007960734 = product of:
0.03980367 = sum of:
0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0114324065 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0114324065 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0114324065 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
0.005506449 = product of:
0.011012898 = sum of:
0.011012898 = weight(_text_:29 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011012898 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- We here perform an analysis of all 1128 publications produced by scientists during their employment at the University of Texas Institute for Geophysics, a geophysical research laboratory founded in 1972 that currently employs 23 Ph.D.-level scientists. We thus assess research performance using as bibliometric indicators such statistics as publications per year, citations per paper, and cited half-lives. To characterize the research style of individual scientists and to obtain insight into the origin of certain publication-counting discrepancies, we classified the 1128 publications into four categories that differed significantly with respect to statistics such as lifetime citation rates, fraction of papers never-cited after 10 years, and cited half-life. The categories were: mainstream (prestige journal) publications -32.6 lifetime cit/pap, 2.4% never cited, and 6.9 year half-life; archival (other refereed)-12.0 lifetime cit/pap. 21.5% never cited, and 9.5 years half-life; articles published as proceedings of conferences-5.4 lifetime cit/pap, 26.6% never cited, and 5.4 years half-life; and "other" publications (news articles, book reviews, etc.)-4.2 lifetime cit/pap, 57.1% never cited, and 1.9 years half-life. Because determining cited half-lives is highly similar to a well-studied phenomenon in earthquake seismology, which was familiar to us, we thoroughly evaluate five different methods for determining the cited half-life and discuss the robustness and limitations of the various methods. Unfortunately, even when data are numerous the various methods often obtain very different values for the half-life. Our preferred method determines halflife from the ratio of citations appearing in back-to-back 5-year periods. We also evaluate the reliability of the citation count data used for these kinds of analysis and conclude that citation count data are often imprecise. All observations suggest that reported differences in cited half-lives must be quite large to be significant
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 14:01:26
-
White, H.D.: Citation analysis : history (2009)
0.01
0.007878931 = product of:
0.052526206 = sum of:
0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 3763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017508736 = score(doc=3763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 3763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3763)
0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 3763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017508736 = score(doc=3763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 3763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3763)
0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 3763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017508736 = score(doc=3763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 3763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3763)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- References from publications are at the same time citations to other publications. This entry introduces some of the practical uses of citation data in science and scholarship. At the individual level citations identify and permit the retrieval of specific editions of works, while also suggesting their subject matter, authority, and age. Through citation indexes, retrievals may include not only the earlier items referred to by a given work, but also the later items that cite that given work in turn. Some technical notes on retrieval are included here. Counts of citations received over time, and measures derived from them, reveal the varying impacts of works, authors, journals, organizations, and countries. This has obvious implications for the evaluation of, e.g., library collections, academics, research teams, and science policies. When treated as linkages between pairs of publications, references and citations reveal intellectual ties. Several kinds of links have been defined, such as cocitation, bibliographic coupling, and intercitation. In the aggregate, these links form networks that compactly suggest the intellectual histories of research specialties and disciplines, especially when the networks are visualized through mapping software. Citation analysis is of course not without critics, who have long pointed out imperfections in the data or in analytical techniques. However, the criticisms have generally been met by strong counterarguments from proponents.
-
MacCain, K.W.: Descriptor and citation retrieval in the medical behavioral sciences literature : retrieval overlaps and novelty distribution (1989)
0.01
0.007716874 = product of:
0.051445827 = sum of:
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- Search results for nine topics in the medical behavioral sciences are reanalyzed to compare the overall perfor-mance of descriptor and citation search strategies in identifying relevant and novel documents. Overlap per- centages between an aggregate "descriptor-based" database (MEDLINE, EXERPTA MEDICA, PSYCINFO) and an aggregate "citation-based" database (SCISEARCH, SOCIAL SCISEARCH) ranged from 1% to 26%, with a median overlap of 8% relevant retrievals found using both search strategies. For seven topics in which both descriptor and citation strategies produced reasonably substantial retrievals, two patterns of search performance and novelty distribution were observed: (1) where descriptor and citation retrieval showed little overlap, novelty retrieval percentages differed by 17-23% between the two strategies; (2) topics with a relatively high percentage retrieval overlap shoed little difference (1-4%) in descriptor and citation novelty retrieval percentages. These results reflect the varying partial congruence of two literature networks and represent two different types of subject relevance
-
Moed, H.F.; Bruin, R.E.D.; Leeuwen, T.N.V.: New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance : database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)
0.01
0.007716874 = product of:
0.051445827 = sum of:
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 23. 2.1996 18:31:20
