-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.03
0.025225831 = product of:
0.12612915 = sum of:
0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03961775 = score(doc=7247,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03961775 = score(doc=7247,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03961775 = score(doc=7247,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.007275887 = product of:
0.02182766 = sum of:
0.02182766 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02182766 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- Describes an experiment comparing the performance of automatic full-text indexing software for personal computers with the human intellectual assignment of indexing terms in each document in a collection. Considers the times required to index the document, to retrieve documents satisfying 5 typical foreseen information needs, and the recall and precision ratios of searching. The software used is QuickFinder facility in WordPerfect 6.1 for Windows
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Ladewig, C.; Rieger, M.: Ähnlichkeitsmessung mit und ohne aspektische Indexierung (1998)
0.02
0.018185327 = product of:
0.09092663 = sum of:
0.019551745 = weight(_text_:und in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019551745 = score(doc=2526,freq=10.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.438048 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.04780147 = weight(_text_:methoden in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04780147 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.45804384 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.012560525 = weight(_text_:der in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012560525 = score(doc=2526,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.011012898 = product of:
0.022025796 = sum of:
0.022025796 = weight(_text_:29 in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022025796 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- Für eine fiktive Dokumentmenge wird eine Dokument-Wort-Matrix erstellt und mittels zweier Suchanfragen, ebenfalls als Matrix dargestellt, die Retrievalergebnisse ermittelt. Den Wörtern der Dokumentmenge werden in einem zweiten Schritt Aspekte zugeordnet und die Untersuchung erneut durchgeführt. Ein Vergleich bestätigt die schon früher gefundenen Vorteile des aspektischen Indexierung gegenüber anderen Methoden der Retrievalverbesserung, wie Trunkierung und Controlled Terms
- Date
- 4. 1.1999 19:31:29
- Source
- nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.8, S.459-462
-
Huffman, G.D.; Vital, D.A.; Bivins, R.G.: Generating indices with lexical association methods : term uniqueness (1990)
0.02
0.01623327 = product of:
0.08116634 = sum of:
0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024761094 = score(doc=4152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024761094 = score(doc=4152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.0068830615 = product of:
0.013766123 = sum of:
0.013766123 = weight(_text_:29 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013766123 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024761094 = score(doc=4152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- A software system has been developed which orders citations retrieved from an online database in terms of relevancy. The system resulted from an effort generated by NASA's Technology Utilization Program to create new advanced software tools to largely automate the process of determining relevancy of database citations retrieved to support large technology transfer studies. The ranking is based on the generation of an enriched vocabulary using lexical association methods, a user assessment of the vocabulary and a combination of the user assessment and the lexical metric. One of the key elements in relevancy ranking is the enriched vocabulary -the terms mst be both unique and descriptive. This paper examines term uniqueness. Six lexical association methods were employed to generate characteristic word indices. A limited subset of the terms - the highest 20,40,60 and 7,5% of the uniquess words - we compared and uniquess factors developed. Computational times were also measured. It was found that methods based on occurrences and signal produced virtually the same terms. The limited subset of terms producedby the exact and centroid discrimination value were also nearly identical. Unique terms sets were produced by teh occurrence, variance and discrimination value (centroid), An end-user evaluation showed that the generated terms were largely distinct and had values of word precision which were consistent with values of the search precision.
- Date
- 23.11.1995 11:29:46
-
Gregor, D.; Mandel, C.: Cataloging must change! (1991)
0.02
0.015433748 = product of:
0.102891654 = sum of:
0.034297217 = weight(_text_:23 in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034297217 = score(doc=1999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
0.034297217 = weight(_text_:23 in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034297217 = score(doc=1999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
0.034297217 = weight(_text_:23 in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034297217 = score(doc=1999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch die Erwiderung von T. Mann in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 23(1997) nos.3/4, S.3-45
-
Pimenov, E.N.: O faktorah, vliyayushchikh na indeksirivanie : indeksirovanie i predmetnaya oblast' (2000)
0.02
0.015433748 = product of:
0.102891654 = sum of:
0.034297217 = weight(_text_:23 in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034297217 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
0.034297217 = weight(_text_:23 in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034297217 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
0.034297217 = weight(_text_:23 in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034297217 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Source
- Nauchno- Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya; Series 1. 2000, no.2, S.15-23
-
Harter, S.P.; Cheng, Y.-R.: Colinked descriptors : improving vocabulary selection for end-user searching (1996)
0.01
0.013917861 = product of:
0.0695893 = sum of:
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.0065578544 = weight(_text_:und in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065578544 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021010485 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- This article introduces a new concept and technique for information retrieval called 'colinked descriptors'. Borrowed from an analogous idea in bibliometrics - cocited references - colinked descriptors provide a theory and method for identifying search terms that, by hypothesis, will be superior to those entered initially by a searcher. The theory suggests a means of moving automatically from 2 or more initial search terms, to other terms that should be superior in retrieval performance to the 2 original terms. A research project designed to test this colinked descriptor hypothesis is reported. The results suggest that the approach is effective, although methodological problems in testing the idea are reported. Algorithms to generate colinked descriptors can be incorporated easily into system interfaces, front-end or pre-search systems, or help software, in any database that employs a thesaurus. The potential use of colinked descriptors is a strong argument for building richer and more complex thesauri that reflect as many legitimate links among descriptors as possible
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Wilson, P.: ¬The end of specifity (1979)
0.01
0.010289166 = product of:
0.06859444 = sum of:
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 23(1979), S.116-122
-
Haanen, E.: Specificiteit en consistentie : een kwantitatief oderzoek naar trefwoordtoekenning door UBA en UBN (1991)
0.01
0.010289166 = product of:
0.06859444 = sum of:
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 4778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=4778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4778)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 4778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=4778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4778)
0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 4778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864813 = score(doc=4778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4778)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Source
- Open. 23(1991) no.2, S.45-49
-
Connell, T.H.: Use of the LCSH system : realities (1996)
0.01
0.009003021 = product of:
0.060020134 = sum of:
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 23(1996) no.1, S.73-98
-
Tseng, Y.-H.: Keyword extraction techniques and relevance feedback (1997)
0.01
0.009003021 = product of:
0.060020134 = sum of:
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02000671 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Date
- 13. 5.1996 21:43:23
-
Mann, T.: 'Cataloging must change!' and indexer consistency studies : misreading the evidence at our peril (1997)
0.01
0.007716874 = product of:
0.051445827 = sum of:
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017148608 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 23(1997) nos.3/4, S.3-45
-
Saracevic, T.: Measuring the degree of agreement between searchers (1984)
0.01
0.006041306 = product of:
0.12082612 = sum of:
0.12082612 = weight(_text_:230 in 2410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12082612 = score(doc=2410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13547163 = queryWeight, product of:
6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.89189243 = fieldWeight in 2410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2410)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Pages
- S.227-230
-
Hersh, W.R.; Hickam, D.H.: ¬A comparison of two methods for indexing and retrieval from a full-text medical database (1992)
0.00
0.0035240953 = product of:
0.070481904 = sum of:
0.070481904 = weight(_text_:230 in 4526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070481904 = score(doc=4526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13547163 = queryWeight, product of:
6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.5202706 = fieldWeight in 4526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4526)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Pages
- S.221-230
-
Gretz, M.; Thomas, M.: Indexierungen in biomedizinischen Literaturdatenbanken : eine vergleichende Analyse (1991)
0.00
0.0030568286 = product of:
0.030568287 = sum of:
0.017107777 = weight(_text_:und in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017107777 = score(doc=5104,freq=10.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.0134605095 = weight(_text_:der in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0134605095 = score(doc=5104,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- Auf der Grundlage von vier Originaldokumenten, d.h. dokumentarischen Bezugseinheiten (DBEs), wird die Indexierung in vier biomedizinischen Online-Datenbanken (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS PREVIEWS, SCISEARCH) analysiert. Anhand von Beispielen werden inahltliche Erschließung, Indexierungstiefe, Indexierungsbreite, Indexierungskonsistenz, Präzision (durch syntaktisches Indexieren, Gewichtung, Proximity Operatoren) und Wiederauffindbarkeit (Recall) der in den Datenbanken gespeicherten Dokumentationseinheien (DBEs) untersucht. Die zeitaufwendigere intellektuelle Indexierung bei MEDLINE und EMBASE erweist sich als wesentlich präziser als die schneller verfügbare maschinelle Zuteilung von Deskriptoren in BIOSIS PREVIEWS und SCISEARCH. In Teil 1 der Untersuchung werden die Indexierungen in MEDLINE und EMBASE, in Teil 2 die Deskriptorenzuteilungen in BIOSIS PREVIEWS und SCISEARCH verglichen
-
White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014)
0.00
0.0020602958 = product of:
0.020602956 = sum of:
0.016055528 = product of:
0.032111056 = sum of:
0.032111056 = weight(_text_:engineering in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032111056 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.29679304 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0045474293 = product of:
0.013642288 = sum of:
0.013642288 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013642288 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
-
Gil-Leiva, I.; Alonso-Arroyo, A.: Keywords given by authors of scientific articles in database descriptors (2007)
0.00
8.027764E-4 = product of:
0.016055528 = sum of:
0.016055528 = product of:
0.032111056 = sum of:
0.032111056 = weight(_text_:engineering in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032111056 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.29679304 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- In this article, the authors analyze the keywords given by authors of scientific articles and the descriptors assigned to the articles to ascertain the presence of the keywords in the descriptors. Six-hundred forty INSPEC (Information Service for Physics, Engineering, and Computing), CAB (Current Agriculture Bibliography) abstracts, ISTA (Information Science and Technology Abstracts), and LISA (Library and Information Science Abstracts) database records were consulted. After detailed comparisons, it was found that keywords provided by authors have an important presence in the database descriptors studied; nearly 25% of all the keywords appeared in exactly the same form as descriptors, with another 21% though normalized, still detected in the descriptors. This means that almost 46% of keywords appear in the descriptors, either as such or after normalization. Elsewhere, three distinct indexing policies appear, one represented by INSPEC and LISA (indexers seem to have freedom to assign the descriptors they deem necessary); another is represented by CAB (no record has fewer than four descriptors and, in general, a large number of descriptors is employed). In contrast, in ISTA, a certain institutional code exists towards economy in indexing because 84% of records contain only four descriptors.
-
Tinker, F.F.: Imprecision in meaning measured by inconsistency of indexing (1966-68)
0.00
5.464879E-4 = product of:
0.010929758 = sum of:
0.010929758 = weight(_text_:und in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010929758 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Content
- Ergebnisse: (1) Wenn SW frei gewählt, Recherche um so schwieriger, je mehr SW; (2) 'ältere' SW häufiger und weniger genau verwendet als 'jüngere'; (3) viele Wörter mit ungenauer Bedeutung
-
Chan, L.M.: Inter-indexer consistency in subject cataloging (1989)
0.00
4.371903E-4 = product of:
0.008743806 = sum of:
0.008743806 = weight(_text_:und in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008743806 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Content
- Die Studie enthält Konsistenzzahlen bezogen auf die LCSH. Diese Zahlen sind kategorienbezogen und können teilweise auf die RSWK übertragen werden
-
Iivonen, M.; Kivimäki, K.: Common entities and missing properties : similarities and differences in the indexing of concepts (1998)
0.00
4.1298367E-4 = product of:
0.008259674 = sum of:
0.008259674 = product of:
0.016519347 = sum of:
0.016519347 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016519347 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Date
- 24. 2.1999 21:29:51
-
Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004)
0.00
4.1298367E-4 = product of:
0.008259674 = sum of:
0.008259674 = product of:
0.016519347 = sum of:
0.016519347 = weight(_text_:29 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016519347 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02013827 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 16:17:19
