Search (188 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.11
    0.111814834 = product of:
      0.27953708 = sum of:
        0.015457011 = weight(_text_:und in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015457011 = score(doc=193,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03123975 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.03123975 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.009614649 = weight(_text_:der in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009614649 = score(doc=193,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21373394 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0045474293 = product of:
          0.013642288 = sum of:
            0.013642288 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013642288 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(8/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Verwendung von Erschließungsinstrumenten zur Beschreibung von Informationsressourcen kann Effizienz und Effektivität thematischer Recherchen wesentlich steigern: standardisierte Begriffe unterstützen Recall und Precision begrifflicher Suchen; Ausweisung von Relationen bietet die Grundlage für explorative Suchprozesse. Eine zusätzliche Steigerung der Funktionalitäten des Retrievals kann mittels einer Ausdifferenzierung und Spezifizierung der in Normdaten enthaltenen semantischen Informationen erreicht werden, die über die in Thesauri und Klassifikationen verbreiteten grundlegenden Relationstypen (äquivalent, hierarchisch, assoziativ) hinausgehen. In modernen Informationsräumen, in denen Daten verschiedener Institutionen über eine Plattform zeit- und ortsunabhängig zugänglich gemacht werden, können einzelne Wissenssysteme indes nur unzureichend das Information Retrieval unterstützen. Zu unterschiedlich sind die für thematische Suchanfragen relevanten Indexierungsdaten. Eine Verbesserung kann mittels Herstellung von Interoperabilität zwischen den verschiedenen Dokumentationssprachen erreicht werden. Im Vortrag wird dargelegt, in welcher Art und Weise die in Wissenssystemen enthaltenen semantischen Informationen zur Unterstützung thematischer Recherchen optimiert werden können und inwiefern Interoperabilität zwischen Systemen geschaffen werden kann, die gleichwertige Funktionalitäten in heterogenen Informationsräumen gewährleisten. In diesem Zusammenhang wird auch auf aktuelle Mappingprojekte wie das DFG-Projekt CrissCross oder das RESEDA-Projekt, welches sich mit den Möglichkeiten der semantischen Anreicherung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen befasst, eingegangen.
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  2. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.04
    0.035469428 = product of:
      0.14187771 = sum of:
        0.036391225 = weight(_text_:software in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036391225 = score(doc=4820,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
        0.036391225 = weight(_text_:software in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036391225 = score(doc=4820,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
        0.036391225 = weight(_text_:software in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036391225 = score(doc=4820,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
        0.027247135 = product of:
          0.05449427 = sum of:
            0.05449427 = weight(_text_:engineering in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05449427 = score(doc=4820,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5036745 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005456915 = product of:
          0.016370745 = sum of:
            0.016370745 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016370745 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    One of the major problems facing systems for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications today is the lack of interoperability among the various systems. When integrating software applications, substantial di culties can arise in translating information from one application to the other. In this paper, we focus on semantic di culties that arise in software integration. Applications may use di erent terminologies to describe the same domain. Even when appli-cations use the same terminology, they often associate di erent semantics with the terms. This obstructs information exchange among applications. To cir-cumvent this obstacle, we need some way of explicitly specifying the semantics for each terminology in an unambiguous fashion. Ontologies can provide such specification. It will be the task of this paper to explain what ontologies are and how they can be used to facilitate interoperability between software systems used in computer aided design, architecture engineering and construction, and geographic information processing.
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  3. Si, L.E.; O'Brien, A.; Probets, S.: Integration of distributed terminology resources to facilitate subject cross-browsing for library portal systems (2009) 0.03
    0.034980807 = product of:
      0.099945165 = sum of:
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
        0.0045474293 = product of:
          0.013642288 = sum of:
            0.013642288 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013642288 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose: To develop a prototype middleware framework between different terminology resources in order to provide a subject cross-browsing service for library portal systems. Design/methodology/approach: Nine terminology experts were interviewed to collect appropriate knowledge to support the development of a theoretical framework for the research. Based on this, a simplified software-based prototype system was constructed incorporating the knowledge acquired. The prototype involved mappings between the computer science schedule of the Dewey Decimal Classification (which acted as a spine) and two controlled vocabularies UKAT and ACM Computing Classification. Subsequently, six further experts in the field were invited to evaluate the prototype system and provide feedback to improve the framework. Findings: The major findings showed that given the large variety of terminology resources distributed on the web, the proposed middleware service is essential to integrate technically and semantically the different terminology resources in order to facilitate subject cross-browsing. A set of recommendations are also made outlining the important approaches and features that support such a cross browsing middleware service.
    Content
    This paper is a pre-print version presented at the ISKO UK 2009 conference, 22-23 June, prior to peer review and editing. For published proceedings see special issue of Aslib Proceedings journal.
  4. Schubert, C.; Kinkeldey, C.; Reich, H.: Handbuch Datenbankanwendung zur Wissensrepräsentation im Verbundprojekt DeCOVER (2006) 0.03
    0.033549864 = product of:
      0.11183288 = sum of:
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=4256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=4256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
        0.0123656085 = weight(_text_:und in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0123656085 = score(doc=4256,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=4256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
        0.019859934 = weight(_text_:der in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019859934 = score(doc=4256,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.44148692 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
        0.011012898 = product of:
          0.022025796 = sum of:
            0.022025796 = weight(_text_:29 in 4256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022025796 = score(doc=4256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Datenbank basierte Objektartenbeschreibung dient zur eigenschaftsbasierten Aufnahme aller Objektarten der Kataloge BNTK, CLC; GMES M 2.1, ATKIS und des DeCOVER Vorschlags. Das Ziel der Datenbankanwendung besteht in der 'manuellen' Beziehungsauswertung und Darstellung der gesamten Objektarten bezogen auf die erstellte Wissensrepräsentation. Anhand einer hierarchisch strukturierten Wissensrepräsentation lassen sich mit Ontologien Überführungen von Objektarten verwirklichen, die im Sinne der semantischen Interoperabilität als Zielstellung in dem Verbundprojekt DeCOVER besteht.
    Date
    29. 1.2011 18:45:23
  5. Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007) 0.03
    0.031284925 = product of:
      0.15642461 = sum of:
        0.048503593 = weight(_text_:23 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048503593 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.6720112 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.048503593 = weight(_text_:23 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048503593 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.6720112 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.048503593 = weight(_text_:23 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048503593 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.6720112 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.01091383 = product of:
          0.03274149 = sum of:
            0.03274149 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03274149 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
    Date
    20. 1.2008 17:42:23
  6. Nentwig, L.: Semantische Interoperabilität : Bd.1: Eine technische Einführung (2010) 0.03
    0.029977527 = product of:
      0.099925086 = sum of:
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 4847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=4847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4847)
        0.018930895 = weight(_text_:und in 4847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018930895 = score(doc=4847,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 4847, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4847)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 4847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=4847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4847)
        0.012412459 = weight(_text_:der in 4847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012412459 = score(doc=4847,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27592933 = fieldWeight in 4847, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4847)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 4847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=4847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4847)
        0.016055528 = product of:
          0.032111056 = sum of:
            0.032111056 = weight(_text_:engineering in 4847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032111056 = score(doc=4847,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.29679304 = fieldWeight in 4847, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4847)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Jede Organisation, sei es in der freien Wirtschaft oder der öffentlichen Verwaltung, nutzt heute Informationssysteme zur effizienten Abwicklung der Geschäftsprozesse. Um Kooperationen zwischen den Organisationen zu ermöglichen, steigt dabei in zunehmendem Maße die Bedeutung organisationsübergreifender und medienbruchfreier Geschäftsprozesse. Grundlage für einen solchen Datenaustausch ist ein Vorgehen, das Fehlinterpretationen und inhaltliche Missverständnisse bei der Verwendung von Begriffen, Datenstrukturen, Schreibkonventionen etc. zu vermeiden hilft und semantische Interoperabilität ermöglicht. Erst die Semantische Interoperabilität gewährleistet einen effizienten organisationsinternen Datenaustausch und eine effiziente Datenintegration mit externen Kooperationsteilnehmern. Die Arbeit an praktikablen Konzepten und Lösungen steht im Zentrum des Arbeitsgebietes »Semantic Interoperability Engineering« (SIE). In diesem Whitepaper werden dafür zentrale Begriffe und Konzepte eingeführt. Sie dienen als Basis für eine weitere Beschäftigung mit dem Thema.
    Content
    Um zwischen Behörden, Wirtschaft und Bürgern durchgängige Prozessketten zu erreichen, wird heute weitgehend auf internetgestützte Kooperation gesetzt. Vielfach sind dabei Insellösungen und autarke IT-Fachanwendungen entstanden, die nicht ohne Weiteres interoperabel sind. Trotz eines syntaktisch korrekten Datenaustausches können die Nutzung unterschiedlicher Begriffe, Datenstrukturen und Schreibkonventionen zu Fehlinterpretationen führen. In der White Paper-Reihe »Semantische Interoperabilität« vermittelt das Fraunhofer ISST in verständlicher Weise Grundlagen und Lösungsansätze des »Semantic Interoperability Engineerings « (SIE). Die Reihe richtet sich an technisch interessierte Personenkreise mit und ohne fachliches Vorwissen (vom Projektleiter bis zum CIO). Vgl.: http://www.isst.fraunhofer.de/geschaeftsfelder/gfegovernment/referenzprojekte/sie/white-paper/index.jsp.
    Imprint
    Berlin : Fraunhofer-Institut für Software- und Systemtechnik ISST
  7. Burstein, M.; McDermott, D.V.: Ontology translation for interoperability among Semantic Web services (2005) 0.03
    0.028619321 = product of:
      0.09539773 = sum of:
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Research on semantic web services promises greater interoperability among software agents and web services by enabling content-based automated service discovery and interaction and by utilizing. Although this is to be based on use of shared ontologies published on the semantic web, services produced and described by different developers may well use different, perhaps partly overlapping, sets of ontologies. Interoperability will depend on ontology mappings and architectures supporting the associated translation processes. The question we ask is, does the traditional approach of introducing mediator agents to translate messages between requestors and services work in such an open environment? This article reviews some of the processing assumptions that were made in the development of the semantic web service modeling ontology OWL-S and argues that, as a practical matter, the translation function cannot always be isolated in mediators. Ontology mappings need to be published on the semantic web just as ontologies themselves are. The translation for service discovery, service process model interpretation, task negotiation, service invocation, and response interpretation may then be distributed to various places in the architecture so that translation can be done in the specific goal-oriented informational contexts of the agents performing these processes. We present arguments for assigning translation responsibility to particular agents in the cases of service invocation, response translation, and match- making.
    Date
    23. 1.2016 19:07:35
  8. Niggemann, E.: Wer suchet, der findet? : Verbesserung der inhaltlichen Suchmöglichkeiten im Informationssystem Der Deutschen Bibliothek (2006) 0.02
    0.024777208 = product of:
      0.09910883 = sum of:
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=5812,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5812, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5812)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=5812,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5812, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5812)
        0.017107777 = weight(_text_:und in 5812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017107777 = score(doc=5812,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 5812, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5812)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=5812,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5812, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5812)
        0.021980919 = weight(_text_:der in 5812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021980919 = score(doc=5812,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4886365 = fieldWeight in 5812, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5812)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Elektronische Bibliothekskataloge und Bibliografien haben ihr Monopol bei der Suche nach Büchern, Aufsätzen, musikalischen Werken u. a. verloren. Globale Suchmaschinen sind starke Konkurrenten, und Bibliotheken müssen heute so planen, dass ihre Dienstleistungen auch morgen noch interessant sind. Die Deutsche Bibliothek (DDB) wird ihre traditionelle Katalogrecherche zu einem globalen, netzbasierten Informationssystem erweitern, das die Vorteile der neutralen, qualitätsbasierten Katalogsuche mit den Vorteilen moderner Suchmaschinen zu verbinden sucht. Dieser Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit der Verbesserung der inhaltlichen Suchmöglichkeiten im Informationssystem Der Deutschen Bibliothek. Weitere Entwicklungsstränge sollen nur kurz im Ausblick angerissen werden.
    Date
    13.10.2006 9:35:23
    Source
    Information und Sprache: Beiträge zu Informationswissenschaft, Computerlinguistik, Bibliothekswesen und verwandten Fächern. Festschrift für Harald H. Zimmermann. Herausgegeben von Ilse Harms, Heinz-Dirk Luckhardt und Hans W. Giessen
  9. Hoffmann, P.; Médini and , L.; Ghodous, P.: Using context to improve semantic interoperability (2006) 0.02
    0.024762774 = product of:
      0.12381387 = sum of:
        0.02829376 = weight(_text_:23 in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02829376 = score(doc=4434,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
        0.02829376 = weight(_text_:23 in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02829376 = score(doc=4434,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
        0.02829376 = weight(_text_:23 in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02829376 = score(doc=4434,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
        0.038932588 = product of:
          0.077865176 = sum of:
            0.077865176 = weight(_text_:engineering in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077865176 = score(doc=4434,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.71968496 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Date
    23. 6.2011 13:23:58
    Source
    Leading the Web in concurrent engineering: next generation concurrent engineering. Proceeding of the 2006 ISPE Conference on Concurrent Engineering. Edited by Parisa Ghodous, Rose Dieng-Kuntz, Geilson Loureiro
  10. Balakrishnan, U.; Peters, S.; Voß, J.: Coli-conc : eine Infrastruktur zur Nutzung und Erstellung von Konkordanzen (2021) 0.02
    0.024759348 = product of:
      0.099037394 = sum of:
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
        0.021639816 = weight(_text_:und in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021639816 = score(doc=368,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
        0.017377444 = weight(_text_:der in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017377444 = score(doc=368,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    coli-conc ist eine Dienstleistung der Verbundzentrale des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes (VZG). Sie stellt webbasierte Dienste für einen effektiveren Austausch von Wissensorganisationssystemen und für die effiziente Erstellung und Wartung von Mappings zur Verfügung. Der Schwerpunkt liegt auf den im deutschsprachigen Raum verbreiteten bibliothekarischen Klassifikationen und Normdateien, vor allem den bedeutenden Universalklassifikationen wie Dewey Dezimalklassifikation (DDC), Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK), Basisklassifikation (BK) und den Sachgruppen der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie (SDNB). Dieser Bericht beschreibt den Hintergrund, die Architektur und die Funktionalitäten von coli-conc sowie das Herzstück der Infrastruktur - das Mapping-Tool Cocoda. Außerdem wird auf Maßnahmen zur Qualitätssicherung eingegangen und ein Einblick in das neue Mapping-Verfahren mit dem Konzept- Hub gewährt.
    Date
    23. 9.2021 16:09:53
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
  11. Nentwig, L.: Semantische Interoperabilität : Bd.2: Semantische Konflikte (2010) 0.02
    0.023403756 = product of:
      0.093615025 = sum of:
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=4848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
        0.021859515 = weight(_text_:und in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021859515 = score(doc=4848,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=4848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
        0.019229298 = weight(_text_:der in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019229298 = score(doc=4848,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.42746788 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=4848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Prozessketten in der freien Wirtschaft oder Verwaltung sind zunehmend geprägt von einem intensiven Austausch von Dokumenten und Daten auch über die Grenzen der beteiligten Organisationen hinweg. Wie in Band 1 der White Paper-Reihe dargelegt, ist die Sicherstellung der semantischen Interoperabilität eine der zentralen Anforderungen für einen semantisch konsistenten und damit erfolgreichen Ablauf der Geschäftsprozesse. Grundlage für semantische Interoperabilität sind die technische und die syntaktische Interoperabilität: Die technische Interoperabilität umfasst die Möglichkeit der technischen Interaktion mit sowie des Transports von Inhalten und erfordert dafür die leitungstechnische Verbindbarkeit und Passbarkeit auf Protokollebene. Die syntaktische Interoperabilität wird durch einen homogenen Einsatz von Sprachen (wie z. B. XML) sichergestellt und gewährleistet den Austausch von Daten auf Basis von vordefinierten und exakt vereinbahrten syntaktischen Strukturen. Semantische Interoperabilität stellt die komplexeste unter den Stufen der Interoperabilität dar. Der wesentliche Grund dafür, dass die Anforderung der semantischen Interoperabilität nicht erfüllt wird, ist das Vorhandensein bzw. die fehlende Auflösung sogenannter semantischer Konflikte. Ein semantischer Konflikt wird hervorgerufen, wenn die am Datenaustausch beteiligten Sender und Empfänger unterschiedliche Datenstrukturen und Dateninhalte verwenden. Eine detaillierte Beschreibung der Konfliktarten und ihrer Behandlung zeigen die nächsten Abschnitte.
    Content
    Um zwischen Behörden, Wirtschaft und Bürgern durchgängige Prozessketten zu erreichen, wird heute weitgehend auf internetgestützte Kooperation gesetzt. Vielfach sind dabei Insellösungen und autarke IT-Fachanwendungen entstanden, die nicht ohne Weiteres interoperabel sind. Trotz eines syntaktisch korrekten Datenaustausches können die Nutzung unterschiedlicher Begriffe, Datenstrukturen und Schreibkonventionen zu Fehlinterpretationen führen. In der White Paper-Reihe »Semantische Interoperabilität« vermittelt das Fraunhofer ISST in verständlicher Weise Grundlagen und Lösungsansätze des »Semantic Interoperability Engineerings « (SIE). Die Reihe richtet sich an technisch interessierte Personenkreise mit und ohne fachliches Vorwissen (vom Projektleiter bis zum CIO). Vgl.: http://www.isst.fraunhofer.de/geschaeftsfelder/gfegovernment/referenzprojekte/sie/white-paper/index.jsp.
    Imprint
    Berlin : Fraunhofer-Institut für Software- und Systemtechnik ISST
  12. Menzel, S.; Schnaitter, H.; Zinck, J.; Petras, V.; Neudecker, C.; Labusch, K.; Leitner, E.; Rehm, G.: Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND : das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten (2021) 0.02
    0.02225325 = product of:
      0.089013 = sum of:
        0.02020983 = weight(_text_:23 in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02020983 = score(doc=373,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
        0.02020983 = weight(_text_:23 in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02020983 = score(doc=373,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
        0.017281463 = weight(_text_:und in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017281463 = score(doc=373,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3871834 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
        0.02020983 = weight(_text_:23 in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02020983 = score(doc=373,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
        0.01110204 = weight(_text_:der in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01110204 = score(doc=373,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Named Entities (benannte Entitäten) - wie Personen, Organisationen, Orte, Ereignisse und Werke - sind wichtige inhaltstragende Komponenten eines Dokuments und sind daher maßgeblich für eine gute inhaltliche Erschließung. Die Erkennung von Named Entities, deren Auszeichnung (Annotation) und Verfügbarmachung für die Suche sind wichtige Instrumente, um Anwendungen wie z. B. die inhaltliche oder semantische Suche in Texten, dokumentübergreifende Kontextualisierung oder das automatische Textzusammenfassen zu verbessern. Inhaltlich präzise und nachhaltig erschlossen werden die erkannten Named Entities eines Dokuments allerdings erst, wenn sie mit einer oder mehreren Quellen verknüpft werden (Grundprinzip von Linked Data, Berners-Lee 2006), die die Entität eindeutig identifizieren und gegenüber gleichlautenden Entitäten disambiguieren (vergleiche z. B. Berlin als Hauptstadt Deutschlands mit dem Komponisten Irving Berlin). Dazu wird die im Dokument erkannte Entität mit dem Entitätseintrag einer Normdatei oder einer anderen zuvor festgelegten Wissensbasis (z. B. Gazetteer für geografische Entitäten) verknüpft, gewöhnlich über den persistenten Identifikator der jeweiligen Wissensbasis oder Normdatei. Durch die Verknüpfung mit einer Normdatei erfolgt nicht nur die Disambiguierung und Identifikation der Entität, sondern es wird dadurch auch Interoperabilität zu anderen Systemen hergestellt, in denen die gleiche Normdatei benutzt wird, z. B. die Suche nach der Hauptstadt Berlin in verschiedenen Datenbanken bzw. Portalen. Die Entitätenverknüpfung (Named Entity Linking, NEL) hat zudem den Vorteil, dass die Normdateien oftmals Relationen zwischen Entitäten enthalten, sodass Dokumente, in denen Named Entities erkannt wurden, zusätzlich auch im Kontext einer größeren Netzwerkstruktur von Entitäten verortet und suchbar gemacht werden können
    Date
    23. 9.2021 16:09:53
    23. 9.2021 19:37:38
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
  13. Balakrishnan, U.; Krausz, A,; Voss, J.: Cocoda - ein Konkordanztool für bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme (2015) 0.02
    0.021134697 = product of:
      0.08453879 = sum of:
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=2030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
        0.014458709 = weight(_text_:und in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014458709 = score(doc=2030,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.32394084 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=2030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
        0.017553868 = weight(_text_:der in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017553868 = score(doc=2030,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.390223 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=2030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Cocoda (Colibri Concordance Database for library classification systems) ist ein semi-automatisches, webbasiertes Tool für die Erstellung und Verwaltung von Konkordanzen zwischen bibliothekarischen Klassifikationssystemen. Das Tool wird im Rahmen des Teilprojektes "coli-conc" (Colibri-Konkordanzerstellung) des VZG-Projektes Colibri/DDC als eine Open-Source-Software an der Verbundzentrale des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes (VZG) entwickelt. Im Fokus des Projektes "coli-conc" steht zunächst die Konkordanzbildung zwischen der Dewey Dezimal Klassifikation (DDC) und der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK). Die inhärenten strukturellen und kulturellen Unterschiede von solch fein gegliederten bibliothekarischen Klassifikationssystemen machen den Konkordanzerstellungsprozess bei rein intellektuellem Ansatz aufwendig und zeitraubend. Um diesen zu vereinfachen und zu beschleunigen, werden die intellektuellen Schritte, die im Teilprojekt "coli-conc" eingesetzt werden, z. T. vom Konkordanztool "Cocoda" automatisch durchgeführt. Die von Cocoda erzeugten Konkordanz-Vorschläge stammen sowohl aus der automatischen Analyse der vergebenen Notationen in den Titeldatensätzen verschiedener Datenbanken als auch aus der vergleichenden Analyse der Begriffswelt der Klassifikationssysteme. Ferner soll "Cocoda" als eine Plattform für die Speicherung, Bereitstellung und Analyse von Konkordanzen dienen, um die Nutzungseffizienz der Konkordanzen zu erhöhen. In dieser Präsentation wird zuerst das Konkordanzprojekt "coli-conc", das die Basis des Konkordanztools "Cocoda" bildet, vorgestellt. Danach werden Algorithmus, Benutzeroberfläche und technische Details des Tools dargelegt. Anhand von Beispielen wird der Konkordanzerstellungsprozess mit Cocoda demonstriert.
  14. Kutz, O.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Lange, C.: Towards a standard for heterogeneous ontology integration and interoperability (2011) 0.02
    0.021065002 = product of:
      0.10532501 = sum of:
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
        0.031788323 = product of:
          0.063576646 = sum of:
            0.063576646 = weight(_text_:engineering in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063576646 = score(doc=114,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.58762026 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    Even though ontologies are widely being used to enable interoperability in information-rich endeavours, there is currently no united framework for ontology interoperability itself. Surprisingly little of the state of the art in modularity and structuring, e.g. in software engineering, has been applied to ontology engineering so far. However, application areas like Ambient Assisted Living (AAL), which require synchronization and orchestration of interoperable services, are in dire need of safe and secure ontology interoperability. OntoIOp (Ontology Integration and Interoperability), a new international standard proposed in ISO/TC 37/SC 3, aims at filling this gap.
  15. Heel, F.: Abbildungen zwischen der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC), der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) und der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) für die Recherche in heterogen erschlossenen Datenbeständen : Möglichkeiten und Problembereiche (2007) 0.02
    0.020218272 = product of:
      0.08087309 = sum of:
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=4434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=4434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
        0.020447703 = weight(_text_:und in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020447703 = score(doc=4434,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.45812157 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=4434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
        0.017553868 = weight(_text_:der in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017553868 = score(doc=4434,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.390223 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Eine einheitliche Sacherschließung in Deutschland wird durch die Vielzahl an vorhandenen und verwendeten Erschließungssystemen, Universal-, Fachklassifikationen und Fachthesauri erschwert. Den Benutzern von Bibliothekskatalogen oder Datenbanken fällt es daher schwer, themenspezifische Recherchen in heterogen erschlossenen Datenbeständen durchzuführen. In diesem Fall müssen die Nutzer derzeit nämlich den Umgang mit mehreren Erschließungsinstrumenten erlernen und verschiedene Suchanfragen anwenden, um das gewünschte Rechercheergebnis datenbankübergreifend zu erreichen. Um dem Benutzer einen einheitlichen Zugang zu heterogen erschlossenen Datenbeständen zu gewährleisten und gleichzeitig auch den Arbeitsaufwand für die Bibliothekare zu reduzieren, ist die Erstellung eines so genannten "Integrierten Retrievals" sinnvoll. Durch die Verknüpfung der unterschiedlichen Sacherschließungssysteme mit Hilfe von Konkordanzen wird es dem Nutzer ermöglicht, mit einem ihm vertrauten Vokabular eine sachliche Recherche in unterschiedlich erschlossenen Datenbeständen durchzuführen, ohne die spezifischen Besonderheiten der verschiedenen Erschließungsinstrumente kennen zu müssen. In dieser Arbeit sind exemplarisch drei Abbildungen für den Fachbereich der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften zwischen den für Deutschland wichtigsten Sacherschließungssystemen Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC), Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) und Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) erstellt worden. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit sollen einen ersten Überblick über spezifische Problemfelder und Möglichkeiten der hier erstellten Konkordanzen DDC - RVK, SWD - DDC und SWD - RVK liefern, um damit die Erstellung eines zukünftigen Recherchetools (und gegebenenfalls einer Klassifizierungshilfe) voranzutreiben. Die erstellten Konkordanzen liegen der Arbeit als Anhang bei.
    Content
    Bachelorarbeit im Studiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement, Fakultät Information und Kommunikation, Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart
    Date
    23.10.2007 19:23:28
    Imprint
    Stuttgart : Hochschule der Medien / Fakultät Information und Kommunikation
  16. Hubrich, J.: Thematische Suche in heterogenen Informationsräumen (2010) 0.02
    0.020056443 = product of:
      0.08022577 = sum of:
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 4377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=4377,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4377, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4377)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 4377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=4377,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4377, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4377)
        0.018124953 = weight(_text_:und in 4377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018124953 = score(doc=4377,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 4377, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4377)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 4377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=4377,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4377, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4377)
        0.019229298 = weight(_text_:der in 4377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019229298 = score(doc=4377,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.42746788 = fieldWeight in 4377, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4377)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Wissensorganisationssysteme unterstützen inhaltsbezogene Recherche- und Explorationsprozesse, indem sie a priori Beziehungen zwischen Begriffen ausweisen und einen standardisierten Zugriff auf Informationen ermöglichen. In heterogen erschlossenen Informationsräumen ist ihre Funktionalität indes eingeschränkt, da sie lediglich die Suche nach den Informationsressourcen, die mit ihnen erschlossen wurden, effizienter gestalten. Dokumente, deren inhaltliche Beschreibung auf der Grundlage von sprachlich, strukturell und typologisch unterschiedlichen Begriffssystemen erfolgte, werden hingegen nicht gefunden. Dies führt zu einem unzureichenden Recall und macht zusätzliche Recherchen notwendig. Mittels der Herstellung von Verbindungen zwischen Begriffen unterschiedlicher Dokumentationssprachen wird der standardisierte Zugriff auf Informationen erweitert und das Potential einzelner Erschließungsinstrumente über Teilmengen hinaus nutzbar. Vor dem Hintergrund, über welche inhaltlichen Qualitäten die erstellten Links verfügen, lassen sich drei Arten semantischer Interoperabilität unterscheiden, die mit jeweils anderen Implikationen für Retrievalszenarien einhergehen: wortbasierte, begriffliche und differenzierte Interoperabilität.
    In dem von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) geförderten und von der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB) in Kooperation mit der Fachhochschule Köln durchgeführten Projekt CrissCross wird eine begriffliche und differenzierte Interoperabilität zwischen der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) und der Dewey- Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) realisiert. In diesem Beitrag wird unter Berücksichtigung der Charakteristika der beiden Begriffssysteme dargelegt, welche Möglichkeiten die SWD-DDC-Mappings sowohl zur Unterstützung von inhaltsbezogenen Such- und Explorationsprozessen als auch zur Strukturierung von Treffermengen bieten.
    Date
    20. 3.2011 13:23:08
    Series
    Schriften der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare (VÖB); Band 7
    Source
    ¬The Ne(x)t generation: das Angebot der Bibliotheken; 30. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag, Graz, 15.-18.9.2009. Hrsg.: Ute Bergner u. Erhard Göbel
  17. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.02
    0.019467173 = product of:
      0.09733586 = sum of:
        0.03731573 = product of:
          0.11194719 = sum of:
            0.11194719 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11194719 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17073247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
    Date
    14. 7.2012 17:23:34
  18. Jahns, Y.: Sacherschließung - zeitgemäß und zukunftsfähig (2010) 0.02
    0.01933456 = product of:
      0.0966728 = sum of:
        0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028581016 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
        0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028581016 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
        0.010929758 = weight(_text_:und in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929758 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
        0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028581016 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Date
    16. 5.2010 17:23:40
  19. Klasing, M.: Crosskonkordanzen als Möglichkeit zur Heterogenitätsbehandlung : dargestellt am Projekt CrissCross (2008) 0.02
    0.019205008 = product of:
      0.07682003 = sum of:
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=2460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=2460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
        0.016394636 = weight(_text_:und in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016394636 = score(doc=2460,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=2460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
        0.017553868 = weight(_text_:der in 2460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017553868 = score(doc=2460,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.390223 = fieldWeight in 2460, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2460)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    In Zeiten, in denen der schnelle und einfache Zugriff auf strukturierte und umfangreiche Datenbestände zunehmend an Bedeutung gewinnt, stellt die Heterogenität eben dieser Bestände ein großes Problem dar. Die meisten Bibliothekskataloge, Datenbanken usw. sind inhaltlich durch unterschiedliche Instrumente erschlossen, was für den Benutzer eine gewisse Einarbeitungszeit in jedes Erschließungsinstrument sowie die Notwendigkeit zur wiederholten und neu formulierten Suche in den unterschiedlich erschlossenen Datenbeständen bedeutet. Als Möglichkeit zur Behandlung der Heterogenitätsproblematik kommen beispielsweise Crosskonkordanzen in Betracht, durch welche semantisch übereinstimmende Schlagwörter, Deskriptoren bzw. Notationen verschiedener Erschließungsinstrumente intellektuell miteinander verbunden werden, so dass mit identischer Suchfrage mehrere unterschiedlich erschlossene Datenbestände durchsucht werden können. In der vorliegenden Arbeit soll die Problematik heterogener Datenbestände sowie die Behandlungsmöglichkeit durch Crosskonkordanzen beschrieben werden. Die konkretisierende Darstellung erfolgt anhand des Projektes CrissCross, einem gemeinschaftlichen Projekt der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und der Fachhochschule Köln, in dem Crosskonkordanzen zwischen den Erschließungsinstrumenten SWD, DDC sowie LCSH und RAMEAU erstellt werden. Besonderheiten des Projektes CrissCross sind neben der Multilingualität und der Verbindung von verbalen und klassifikatorischen Erschließungsinstrumenten auch eine intellektuelle Gewichtung der Beziehungsstärke zweier verknüpfter Terme, die so genannte Determiniertheit. Neben den integrierten Erschließungsinstrumenten wird auch die konkrete Vorgehensweise ihrer Verbindung erläutert. Des Weiteren werden die Problemfelder des Projektes und im Besonderen denkbare Einsatzmöglichkeiten der Projektergebnisse vorgestellt, die wesentlich zur Lösung der Heterogenitätsproblematik und somit zu einer Verbesserung des Retrievals für den Benutzer beitragen können.
    Date
    23. 2.2005 10:27:09
  20. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.02
    0.018967582 = product of:
      0.094837904 = sum of:
        0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028581016 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
        0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028581016 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
        0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028581016 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
        0.009094859 = product of:
          0.027284576 = sum of:
            0.027284576 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027284576 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".

Years

Languages

  • e 110
  • d 73
  • no 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 121
  • el 59
  • m 9
  • x 9
  • r 6
  • s 4
  • n 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…