Search (73 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Winograd, T.: Software für Sprachverarbeitung (1984) 0.03 
    0.03454656 = product of:
  0.13818625 = sum of:
    0.03501747 = weight(_text_:software in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03501747 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
    0.010929758 = weight(_text_:und in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010929758 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
    0.03501747 = weight(_text_:software in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03501747 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
    0.02220408 = weight(_text_:der in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02220408 = score(doc=1687,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.4935974 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
    0.03501747 = weight(_text_:software in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03501747 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    Der Computer kann mit sprachlichen Zeichen sicher und schnell umgehen. Dies zeigen Programme zur Textverarbeitung. Versuche allerdings, ihn auch mit Bedeutungen operieren zu lassen, sind gescheitert. Wird der Rechner das größte Problem der Sprachverarbeitung - die Mehrdeutigkeit natürlicher Sprachen - jemals bewältigen?
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1984, H.11, S.88-102
  2. Bhattacharyya, G.: ¬A general theory of subject headings (1974) 0.03 
    0.031842936 = product of:
  0.15921468 = sum of:
    0.045729626 = weight(_text_:23 in 1592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045729626 = score(doc=1592,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 1592, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1592)
    0.045729626 = weight(_text_:23 in 1592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045729626 = score(doc=1592,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 1592, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1592)
    0.045729626 = weight(_text_:23 in 1592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045729626 = score(doc=1592,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 1592, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1592)
    0.022025796 = product of:
      0.04405159 = sum of:
        0.04405159 = weight(_text_:29 in 1592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04405159 = score(doc=1592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1592)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation. 11(1974), S.23-29
  3. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.02 
    0.023575904 = product of:
  0.094303615 = sum of:
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
    0.01874063 = weight(_text_:und in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01874063 = score(doc=2461,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
    0.015542857 = weight(_text_:der in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015542857 = score(doc=2461,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
    Date
    23. 2.2005 10:27:09
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.02 
    0.021222297 = product of:
  0.08488919 = sum of:
    0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017148608 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
    0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017148608 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
    0.018548414 = weight(_text_:und in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018548414 = score(doc=1837,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
    0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017148608 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
    0.01489495 = weight(_text_:der in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01489495 = score(doc=1837,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
    Date
    23. 2.2005 10:27:09
    Footnote
    Überarb. Version der Diplomarbeit im Studiengang Bibliothekswesen
    Imprint
    Köln : Fachhochschule, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Institut für Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd. 54
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Formalizing terminology-based knowledge for an ontology independently of a particular language (2008) 0.02 
    0.021121062 = product of:
  0.08448425 = sum of:
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
    0.0065578544 = weight(_text_:und in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065578544 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
    0.01489495 = weight(_text_:der in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01489495 = score(doc=1680,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 1680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=1680,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 1680, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1680)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    Last word ontological thought and practice is exemplified on an axiomatic framework [a model for an Integrative Cross-Language Ontology (ICLO), cf. Poli, R., Schmitz-Esser, W., forthcoming 2007] that is highly general, based on natural language, multilingual, can be implemented as topic maps and may be openly enhanced by software available for particular languages. Basics of ontological modelling, conditions for construction and maintenance, and the most salient points in application are addressed, such as cross-language text mining and knowledge generation. The rationale is to open the eyes for the tremendous potential of terminology-based ontologies for principled Knowledge Organization and the interchange and reuse of formalized knowledge.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.10
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  6. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.02 
    0.015949633 = product of:
  0.07974816 = sum of:
    0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024761094 = score(doc=6050,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
    0.005464879 = weight(_text_:und in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005464879 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
    0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024761094 = score(doc=6050,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
    0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024761094 = score(doc=6050,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  7. Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Zoeken met woorden : hergebruik van onderwerpsontsluiting (1998) 0.01 
    0.012861458 = product of:
  0.08574305 = sum of:
    0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028581016 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
    0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028581016 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
    0.028581016 = weight(_text_:23 in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028581016 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Date
    28. 2.1999 20:23:07
  8. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01 
    0.011060918 = product of:
  0.055304587 = sum of:
    0.01874063 = weight(_text_:und in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01874063 = score(doc=4792,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
    0.020561269 = weight(_text_:der in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020561269 = score(doc=4792,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.4570776 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
    0.009636286 = product of:
      0.019272571 = sum of:
        0.019272571 = weight(_text_:29 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019272571 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.006366401 = product of:
      0.019099202 = sum of:
        0.019099202 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019099202 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
    Date
    2. 3.2013 12:29:05
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.11
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  9. Vickery, B.C.: Structure and function in retrieval languages (1997) 0.01 
    0.010289166 = product of:
  0.06859444 = sum of:
    0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022864813 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
    0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022864813 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
    0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022864813 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Pages
    S.23-34
  10. Lopes, M.I.: Principles underlying subject heading languages : an international approach (1996) 0.01 
    0.009003021 = product of:
  0.060020134 = sum of:
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=5608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=5608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=5608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Date
    10. 2.2001 10:52:23
  11. Krömmelbein, U.: linguistische und fachwissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkte. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Regeln für die Schlagwortvergabe der Deutschen Bibliothek, RSWK, Voll-PRECIS und Kurz-PRECIS : Schlagwort-Syntax (1983) 0.01 
    0.0077889473 = product of:
  0.051926315 = sum of:
    0.018930895 = weight(_text_:und in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018930895 = score(doc=2566,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
    0.019229298 = weight(_text_:der in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019229298 = score(doc=2566,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.42746788 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
    0.013766123 = product of:
      0.027532246 = sum of:
        0.027532246 = weight(_text_:29 in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027532246 = score(doc=2566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Date
    6. 1.1999 9:29:10
    Footnote
    Examensarbeit Höherer Dienst an der FHBD in Köln. - Auch veröffentlicht in: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 8(1984) S.159-203
  12. Rolling, L.: ¬The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies (1985) 0.01 
    0.007275539 = product of:
  0.048503593 = sum of:
    0.016167864 = weight(_text_:23 in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016167864 = score(doc=3646,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.22400373 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
    0.016167864 = weight(_text_:23 in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016167864 = score(doc=3646,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.22400373 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
    0.016167864 = weight(_text_:23 in 3646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016167864 = score(doc=3646,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.22400373 = fieldWeight in 3646, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3646)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Date
    3. 7.2005 18:23:23
  13. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.01 
    0.0067670965 = product of:
  0.03383548 = sum of:
    0.010003355 = weight(_text_:23 in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010003355 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.13859524 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.010003355 = weight(_text_:23 in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010003355 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.13859524 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.0038254152 = weight(_text_:und in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0038254152 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.010003355 = weight(_text_:23 in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010003355 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.13859524 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Date
    5. 4.2008 11:25:23
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  14. Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and index language in the field of information supply : an overview of their specific capabilities and limitations (2002) 0.01 
    0.005722728 = product of:
  0.05722728 = sum of:
    0.050344218 = weight(_text_:230 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050344218 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13547163 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.37162185 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
    0.0068830615 = product of:
      0.013766123 = sum of:
        0.013766123 = weight(_text_:29 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013766123 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1 = coord(2/20)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.217-230
  15. Fugmann, R.: ¬The complementarity of natural and controlled languages in indexing (1995) 0.01 
    0.005034422 = product of:
  0.100688435 = sum of:
    0.100688435 = weight(_text_:230 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.100688435 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13547163 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.7432437 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
    Pages
    S.215-230
  16. Sechser, O.: Beziehungen im Sprachsystem und in Texten (1992) 0.00 
    0.0045193313 = product of:
  0.04519331 = sum of:
    0.018548414 = weight(_text_:und in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018548414 = score(doc=1369,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
    0.026644897 = weight(_text_:der in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026644897 = score(doc=1369,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.59231687 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
  0.1 = coord(2/20)
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.2
    Source
    Kognitive Ansätze zum Ordnen und Darstellen von Wissen. 2. Tagung der Deutschen ISKO Sektion einschl. der Vorträge des Workshops "Thesauri als Werkzeuge der Sprachtechnologie", Weilburg, 15.-18.10.1991
  17. Neet, H.: Assoziationsrelationen in Dokumentationslexika für die verbale Sacherschließung (1984) 0.00 
    0.00408972 = product of:
  0.040897198 = sum of:
    0.023133935 = weight(_text_:und in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023133935 = score(doc=1254,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.51830536 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
    0.017763264 = weight(_text_:der in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017763264 = score(doc=1254,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
  0.1 = coord(2/20)
    Abstract
    Thesauri und Dokumentationslexika können als Varianten von onomasiologischen Wörterbüchern aufgefaßt werden, deren besonderes Interesse für die Linguistik darin besteht, daß Äquivalenz-, Hierarchie- und Assoziationsrelationen angegegeben werden. Regelwerke und Beiträge werden besprochen, die sich mit der Ausweisung von "verwandten" Begriffen in der bibliothekarischen und dokumentarischen Praxis befassen. Belege zu Musterbeispielen von "siehe auch"- und "related term"-Verweisungen werden anhand von drei deutschsprachigen Schlagwortregistern aufgelistet. Die Assoziationsrelationen werden in paradigmatische und syntagmatische Beziehungen eingeteilt. Auch Gruppierungen nach Begriffsfeldern und Assoziationsfeldern sind möglich. Untersuchungen von Assoziationsrelationen im Sachbereich "Buchwesen" bestätigen die Vermutung, daß die Mehrzahl der Verweisungen das gemeinsame Vorkommen bestimmter Begriffe in typischen Kontexten der außersprachlichen Wirklichkeit betrifft.
  18. Krömmelbein, U.: Linguistische und fachwissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkte der Schlagwortsyntax : Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Regeln für die Schlagwortvergabe der Deutschen Bibliothek, der RSWK und der Indexierungsverfahren Voll-PRECIS und Kurz-PRECIS (1984) 0.00 
    0.0038532086 = product of:
  0.038532086 = sum of:
    0.018548414 = weight(_text_:und in 984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018548414 = score(doc=984,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 984, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=984)
    0.019983673 = weight(_text_:der in 984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019983673 = score(doc=984,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.44423765 = fieldWeight in 984, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=984)
  0.1 = coord(2/20)
    Abstract
    Die deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt bietet seit einigen Jahren zentrale Dienste im Bereich der verbalen Sacherschließung an, Um deren Akzeptanz zu verbessern, will die Deutsche Bibliothek ab 1986 von der augenblicklichen gleichordnenden Indexierung zu einem syntaktischen Verfahren übergehen. Als Alternativen standen die RSWK und eine verkürzte Version des britischen Indexierungsverfahrens PRECIS zur Diskussion. Die Anforderungen einer Fachwissenschaft an die Schlagwort-Syntax einer adäquaten Dokumentationssprache werden exemplarisch entwickelt, die vier Alternativen - augenblickliche verbale Sacherschließunf der DB, RSWK, PRECIS (britische Version) und Kurz-PRECIS (DB-Version) - an ihnen gemessen. Die Kriterien basiern auf Grammatiktheorien der modernen Linguistik und gehen von einer Analogie zwischen Dokumentationssprachen und natürlicher Sprache aus.
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 8(1984), S.159-202
  19. Engerer, V.: Thesauri, Terminologien, Lexika, Fachsprachen : Kontrolle, physische Verortung und das Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung von Vokabularen (2014) 0.00 
    0.0038532086 = product of:
  0.038532086 = sum of:
    0.018548414 = weight(_text_:und in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018548414 = score(doc=3644,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
    0.019983673 = weight(_text_:der in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019983673 = score(doc=3644,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.44423765 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
  0.1 = coord(2/20)
    Abstract
    Ich unternehme in diesem Beitrag den Versuch, die Informationswissenschaft - hier gedeutet als 'Information Retrieval'- Disziplin - einer synchronen Querschnittsanalyse zu unterziehen, welche die aktuelle Position dieser Disziplin im Feld anderer zeichen- und wortschatzorientierter Disziplinen (neben der Linguistik die Terminologielehre und die Fachsprachenforschung) näher bestimmen soll. Im Rahmen der Analyse wird von einem Information Retrieval-Kern der Informationswissenschaft ausgegangen, welcher den Informationssuchkontext sowie die Konzepte des Informationsbedarfs und der Relevanz als für diese Disziplin zentrale Komponenten ansieht. Synchron wird das Verhältnis der Informationswissenschaft zu benachbarten Disziplinen durch eine Reihe disziplinspezifischer Zeichenanforderungen erklärt, wodurch ein systemischer Zusammenhang entsteht, der die Informationswissenschaft mit den drei anderen zeichenbezogenen und vokabularorientierten Disziplinen in Beziehung setzt. Das Verhältnis zwischen diesen Disziplinen wird anhand der Dimensionen Kontrolle/Verbindlichkeit sowie Verortung des Vokabulars ("im Kopf" vs. in externen Dokumenten) aufgezeigt, und es wird ein übergeordnetes Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung, welches die beiden Dimensionen vereint, vorgeschlagen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.2, S.99-108
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  20. Dietze, J.: ¬Die semantische Struktur der Thesauruslexik (1988) 0.00 
    0.003728258 = product of:
  0.03728258 = sum of:
    0.015301661 = weight(_text_:und in 6051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015301661 = score(doc=6051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 6051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6051)
    0.021980919 = weight(_text_:der in 6051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021980919 = score(doc=6051,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.4886365 = fieldWeight in 6051, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6051)
  0.1 = coord(2/20)
    Source
    Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg: Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe. 37(1988) H.6, S.120-123

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 43
  • d 26
  • f 3
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 55
  • m 6
  • s 5
  • x 4
  • el 3
  • r 3
  • n 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications