Search (5171 results, page 1 of 259)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.11
    0.111814834 = product of:
      0.27953708 = sum of:
        0.015457011 = weight(_text_:und in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015457011 = score(doc=193,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03123975 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.03123975 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.009614649 = weight(_text_:der in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009614649 = score(doc=193,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21373394 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0045474293 = product of:
          0.013642288 = sum of:
            0.013642288 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013642288 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(8/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die Verwendung von Erschließungsinstrumenten zur Beschreibung von Informationsressourcen kann Effizienz und Effektivität thematischer Recherchen wesentlich steigern: standardisierte Begriffe unterstützen Recall und Precision begrifflicher Suchen; Ausweisung von Relationen bietet die Grundlage für explorative Suchprozesse. Eine zusätzliche Steigerung der Funktionalitäten des Retrievals kann mittels einer Ausdifferenzierung und Spezifizierung der in Normdaten enthaltenen semantischen Informationen erreicht werden, die über die in Thesauri und Klassifikationen verbreiteten grundlegenden Relationstypen (äquivalent, hierarchisch, assoziativ) hinausgehen. In modernen Informationsräumen, in denen Daten verschiedener Institutionen über eine Plattform zeit- und ortsunabhängig zugänglich gemacht werden, können einzelne Wissenssysteme indes nur unzureichend das Information Retrieval unterstützen. Zu unterschiedlich sind die für thematische Suchanfragen relevanten Indexierungsdaten. Eine Verbesserung kann mittels Herstellung von Interoperabilität zwischen den verschiedenen Dokumentationssprachen erreicht werden. Im Vortrag wird dargelegt, in welcher Art und Weise die in Wissenssystemen enthaltenen semantischen Informationen zur Unterstützung thematischer Recherchen optimiert werden können und inwiefern Interoperabilität zwischen Systemen geschaffen werden kann, die gleichwertige Funktionalitäten in heterogenen Informationsräumen gewährleisten. In diesem Zusammenhang wird auch auf aktuelle Mappingprojekte wie das DFG-Projekt CrissCross oder das RESEDA-Projekt, welches sich mit den Möglichkeiten der semantischen Anreicherung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen befasst, eingegangen.
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  2. Lindig, C.; Snelting, G.: Formale Begriffsnalyse im Software Engineering (2000) 0.09
    0.08729493 = product of:
      0.29098308 = sum of:
        0.04902446 = weight(_text_:software in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04902446 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.61363745 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.015301661 = weight(_text_:und in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015301661 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.04902446 = weight(_text_:software in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04902446 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.61363745 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.08365257 = weight(_text_:methoden in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08365257 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.80157673 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.04902446 = weight(_text_:software in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04902446 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.61363745 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.044955477 = product of:
          0.089910954 = sum of:
            0.089910954 = weight(_text_:engineering in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089910954 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.83102053 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen, mit Beiträgen zahlreicher Fachwissenschaftler. Hrsg.: G. Stumme u. R. Wille
  3. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.08
    0.082971625 = product of:
      0.27657208 = sum of:
        0.026654093 = product of:
          0.079962276 = sum of:
            0.079962276 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079962276 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17073247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03123975 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.03123975 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0624795 = product of:
          0.124959 = sum of:
            0.124959 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124959 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21343093 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  4. Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus dem Jahr 2004. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2003 (2005) 0.07
    0.06998846 = product of:
      0.17497115 = sum of:
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
        0.06921725 = weight(_text_:monographien in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06921725 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13425075 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.51558185 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
        0.01874063 = weight(_text_:und in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01874063 = score(doc=1759,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
        0.0109904595 = weight(_text_:der in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0109904595 = score(doc=1759,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
        0.009636286 = product of:
          0.019272571 = sum of:
            0.019272571 = weight(_text_:29 in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019272571 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006366401 = product of:
          0.019099202 = sum of:
            0.019099202 = weight(_text_:22 in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019099202 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(8/20)
    
    Abstract
    Die von Wilbert Ubbens und Dr. Willi Höfig im Jahr 1982 begründete und bis zum Jahr 2002 jeweils in Heft 3 dieser Zeitschrift veröffentlichte Bibliographie wird mit der vorliegenden Übersicht fortgesetzt. Die Gliederung nach Schlagwörtern und die Zitierweise wurden weitgehend beibehalten, um sowohl die Orientierung zu erleichtern als auch spätere Hinweise auf diese Bibliographie zu vereinfachen. Wo nötig, wurden wieder erläuternde Hinweise in englischer Sprache hinzugefügt. Für diese Übersicht wurden auch Nachweise aus den verwandten Bereichen der Archive, Dokumentationsstellen und Museen aufgenommen, um die für Zeitungen wünschenswerte spartenübergreifende Zusammenarbeit zu fördern.
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:23:55
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 29(2005) H.3, S.382-385
  5. Weiss, B.: Metadaten für Online-Monographien und Online-Zeitschriften (2001) 0.07
    0.0684441 = product of:
      0.2737764 = sum of:
        0.04001342 = weight(_text_:23 in 6491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04001342 = score(doc=6491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6491)
        0.1384345 = weight(_text_:monographien in 6491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1384345 = score(doc=6491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13425075 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            1.0311637 = fieldWeight in 6491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6491)
        0.04001342 = weight(_text_:23 in 6491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04001342 = score(doc=6491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6491)
        0.015301661 = weight(_text_:und in 6491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015301661 = score(doc=6491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 6491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6491)
        0.04001342 = weight(_text_:23 in 6491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04001342 = score(doc=6491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6491)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2001 8:43:23
  6. Thiel, M.: Bedingt wahrscheinliche Syntaxbäume (2006) 0.06
    0.064822845 = product of:
      0.14405078 = sum of:
        0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0114324065 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
        0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0114324065 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
        0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014006989 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
        0.018548414 = weight(_text_:und in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018548414 = score(doc=6069,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
        0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0114324065 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
        0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014006989 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
        0.033800744 = weight(_text_:methoden in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033800744 = score(doc=6069,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.32388592 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
        0.015383439 = weight(_text_:der in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015383439 = score(doc=6069,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
        0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014006989 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
      0.45 = coord(9/20)
    
    Abstract
    Es wird argumentiert, dass die Ansätze der probabilistischen kontextfreien Grammatiken und anderer Modelle nicht ausreichend sind für die Lösung der im Parsing auftretenden Probleme. Zu deren Lösung wird folgende Hypothese aufgestellt: Die Wahrscheinlichkeiten einzelner Lesarten und verschiedener Knoten in einem Syntaxbaum sind voneinander abhängig. Vereindeutigt man eine Lesart bzw. einen Knoten, hat dies Auswirkungen auf die Wahrscheinlichkeit anderer Lesarten bzw. Knoten. Daher werden alle Lesarten und Syntaxbäume in einen Graphen integriert. Wenn die Wahrscheinlichkeiten also voneinander abhängig sind, wird angenommen, dass die Theorie der bedingten Wahrscheinlichkeiten von Bayes als Basis eine Lösung produzieren sollte. An einem Beispiel wird dies nachvollzogen und die Hypothese konnte bestätigt werden.
    Die Tendenz ist eindeutig: wo immer es sinnvoll ist, werden hart' programmierte Lösungen durch Ansätze des Softcomputing ersetzt. Vor allem technische und kommerzielle Bereiche profitieren davon. So finden wir Kransteuerungen und viele andere Anwendungen mit Fuzzy Expertensystemen sowie Bilderkennungssysteme und Entscheidungen über die Kreditvergabe mit Neuronalen Netzen oder auch Methoden des Maschinellen Lernens (vgl. Jafar-Shaghaghi 1994). Ein Prinzip dieser Ansätze ist, dass die Software sich automatisch an die spezielle Situation und Datengrundlage der Anwendung anpasst. Flexibilität der Anpassung und die Fähigkeit zur Verallgemeinerung auf bislang ungesehene Fälle sind implizit in den Methoden vorhanden. Gerade dies ist auch ein typisches Problem, das bei der Beschreibung und vor allem beim Parsen natürlicher Sprache auftritt. Bei der Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache kommt das leidige Problem der Ambiguität auf verschiedenen Ebenen hinzu. Alternative Regeln schließen sich in ihrer Anwendung in einem Satz meistens gegenseitig aus und sind nicht alle an der aktuellen Stelle gleich wahrscheinlich. Auf diese Problematik wurde schon früh hingewiesen (Thiel 1987, 137 ff.), wo versucht wurde, mit Gewichtungen die Wahrscheinlichkeit von Regeln, Syntaxbäumen, Kategorien und Wortsemantik in den Griff zu bekommen. Das Gewicht eines Syntaxbaumes kann z.B. einfach zugewiesen werden oder berechnet werden als Funktion des Baumes, aus dem er abgeleitet wird, und der angewandten Regel. Ein solches Verfahren wird (Thiel 1987, 152) am Beispiel einer Heuristik für die Inferenzmaschine eines Expertensystems gezeigt. Aber auch bereits in einer sehr frühen Veröffentlichung zur Analyse natürlicher Sprache, an der Zimmermann maßgeblich beteiligt war, wurde auf Vorkommenswahrscheinlichkeiten hingewiesen: "Statistische Auswertung von Typen des Satzbaus, Bau nominaler und verbaler Gruppen ..." (Eggers et al. 1969, 18). Derzeit konzentrieren sich die Ansätze von Vagheit in der Verarbeitung von natürlicher Sprache vor allem auf die Filterung von Texten z.B. in Spam-Filtern und auf probabilistische kontextfreie Grammatiken.
    Date
    13.10.2006 9:35:23
    Source
    Information und Sprache: Beiträge zu Informationswissenschaft, Computerlinguistik, Bibliothekswesen und verwandten Fächern. Festschrift für Harald H. Zimmermann. Herausgegeben von Ilse Harms, Heinz-Dirk Luckhardt und Hans W. Giessen
  7. Münch, V.: "Wenn man mit dem Organisieren fertig ist, ist mehr neue Information da, als man bewältigen kann" (2009) 0.06
    0.06410759 = product of:
      0.16026896 = sum of:
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
        0.013251626 = weight(_text_:und in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013251626 = score(doc=2655,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
        0.0134605095 = weight(_text_:der in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0134605095 = score(doc=2655,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
      0.4 = coord(8/20)
    
    Abstract
    Auf der Konferenzmesse Online Information 2008, 2. bis 4. Dezember, waren Prozessorganisation und internationale Vernetzung der Branchenteilnehmer erstmals wichtiger als technische Neuentwicklungen
    Content
    Bericht über die Themenfelder: Semantische Technologien und Social Web Organisieren ohne Organisationen Jedes Stück Information ist eine latente Community Semantische Tools als Sahnehäubchen für die Suche Google Beta 1: Benutzerdefinierte Suche Google Beta 2: Plattform zum Teilen von Wissen (Knol) Weitkämper's HitEngine: Das spannendste Produkt der Messe Web of Science speist Thomson Collexis Dashboards Elseviers Illumin8 - Technologiewissen aus allen Quellen gleichzeitig Deutsche Stunde thematisiert das Potential von PS I Europaweite Studie zum Sektor öffentliche Daten OCLC baut an einer weltweiten Bibliotheken-G enossenschaft OCLC plant SaaS-Software für Bibliotheken Goportis wird aktiv
    Date
    23. 3.2009 14:49:12
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.2, S.97-103
  8. Trkulja, V.: Weltgrößte Abstracts- und Zitationsdatenbank aus dem wissenschaftlichen Web (2005) 0.06
    0.063948795 = product of:
      0.18271086 = sum of:
        0.070481904 = weight(_text_:230 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070481904 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13547163 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.5202706 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
        0.01874063 = weight(_text_:und in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01874063 = score(doc=3437,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
        0.0109904595 = weight(_text_:der in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0109904595 = score(doc=3437,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
        0.022477739 = product of:
          0.044955477 = sum of:
            0.044955477 = weight(_text_:engineering in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044955477 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.41551027 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    Scopus ist ein Such- und Navigationssystem für interdisziplinäre, wissenschaftliche Literatur. Die zur Zeit weltgrößte Abstract- & Zitationsdatenbank deckt 14.000 WTM-Titel von 4.000 Verlagen ab und liefert Ergebnisse aus dem wissenschaftlichen Web, inklusive Patentinformationen. Darüber hinaus unterstützt Scopus ein Volltext-Linking sowie eine erweiterte Bibliotheksintegration mit personalisierten Konfigurationsmöglichkeiten. Das neue Angebot ist überzeugend.
    Content
    Datenbestand Scopus beinhaltet - 12.650 akademische Zeitschriften (davon 1.100 Medline-Zeitschriften und 465 Open Access-Zeitschriften), - 750 Conference Proceedings, - 600 Trade Publications, - 27 Millionen Kurzfassungen der letzten zwanzig Jahre, - 230 Millionen Referenzen zu allen Kurzfassungen ab 1996 und - 180 Millionen wissenschaftliche Webseiten via Scirus. Der Inhalt wird täglich aktualisiert. Auf die Fachbereiche teilen sich die Quellen wie folgt auf: - 4.500 Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics and Engineering, - 5.900 Life and Health Sciences (100 Medline-Abdeckung), - 2.700 Social Sciences, Psychology and Economics und - 2.500 Biological, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences.
    Date
    23. 5.2005 11:38:28
  9. Garfield, E.; Paris, S.W.; Stock, W.G.: HistCite(TM) : a software tool for informetric analysis of citation linkage (2006) 0.06
    0.06008364 = product of:
      0.17166755 = sum of:
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
        0.034665532 = weight(_text_:software in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034665532 = score(doc=79,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
        0.0076508303 = weight(_text_:und in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076508303 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
        0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02000671 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
        0.034665532 = weight(_text_:software in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034665532 = score(doc=79,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
        0.034665532 = weight(_text_:software in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034665532 = score(doc=79,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    HistCite(TM) is a software tool for analyzing and visualizing direct citation linkages between scientific papers. Its inputs are bibliographic records (with cited references) from "Web of Knowledge" or other sources. Its outputs are various tables and graphs with informetric indicators about the knowledge domain under study. As an example we analyze informetrically the literature about Alexius Meinong, an Austrian philosopher and psychologist. The article shortly discusses the informetric functionality of "Web of Knowledge" and shows broadly the possibilities that HistCite offers to its users (e.g. scientists, scientometricans and science journalists).
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:09:23
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.391-400
  10. Voss, J.: LibraryThing : Web 2.0 für Literaturfreunde und Bibliotheken (2007) 0.06
    0.059648834 = product of:
      0.11929767 = sum of:
        0.007145254 = weight(_text_:23 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007145254 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.0989966 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
        0.007145254 = weight(_text_:23 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007145254 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.0989966 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
        0.019575363 = weight(_text_:software in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019575363 = score(doc=1847,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24502413 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
        0.01616533 = weight(_text_:und in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01616533 = score(doc=1847,freq=70.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3621769 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              8.3666 = tf(freq=70.0), with freq of:
                70.0 = termFreq=70.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
        0.007145254 = weight(_text_:23 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007145254 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.0989966 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
        0.019575363 = weight(_text_:software in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019575363 = score(doc=1847,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24502413 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
        0.0076784696 = product of:
          0.015356939 = sum of:
            0.015356939 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015356939 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10581345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.1451322 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013018297 = weight(_text_:der in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013018297 = score(doc=1847,freq=44.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.28939712 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
                44.0 = termFreq=44.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
        0.019575363 = weight(_text_:software in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019575363 = score(doc=1847,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24502413 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
        0.0022737146 = product of:
          0.006821144 = sum of:
            0.006821144 = weight(_text_:22 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006821144 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(10/20)
    
    Abstract
    LibraryThing ist eine zur Klasse der Sozialen Software gehörende Webanwendung, in der Benutzer gemeinsam Bücher verwalten und miteinander in Kontakt treten können. Die Webseite wurde Ende August 2005 veröffentlicht und verzeichnet inzwischen (Juli 2007) über 235.000 Benutzer und 16 Millionen verschiedene Bücher. Jeder Nutzer verfügt über eine eigene Sammlung, die in LibraryThing als "Bibliotheken" oder "Katalog" bezeichnet wird. Die Katalogisierung geschieht in eine gemeinsame Datenbank, die von allen Nutzern direkt bearbeitet werden kann. Da es sich um eine reine Webanwendung handelt, muss zur Nutzung keine weitere Software installiert werden. Die Nutzung ist für bis zu 200 Medien kostenlos, eine jährliche Mitgliedschaft kostet 10 $ und eine lebenslange Mitgliedschaft 25 $. Bibliotheken und andere nichtkommerzielle Einrichtungen zahlen 15 $ pro Jahr. Dieses Preismodell hat sich auch nicht geändert, nachdem 40% des Unternehmens im Mai 2006 vom Gebrauchtbuchhändler AbeBooks übernommen wurden. Die Mehrheit hält weiterhin der Gründer Tim Spalding, der die ursprünglich als privates Projekt begonnene Seite mit inzwischen zwei weiteren Entwicklern und einer Bibliothekarin kontinuierlich weiterentwickelt.
    Content
    "Vom Nutzer zur Community Wie bei anderen Formen Sozialer Software beruht die Popularität von LibraryThing zu einem großen Teil auf den Interaktionsmöglichkeiten, durch die Nutzer miteinander in Kontakt treten und zusammenarbeiten. Neben einem allgemeinen Forum und Diskussionen zu konkreten Büchern, können sich Nutzer zu Gruppen zusammenschließen, beispielsweise die Comic-Liebhaber in der Gruppe Comics' und die deutschsprachigen LibraryThing-Nutzer in der Gruppe German Library Thingers. Per RSS können Nachrichten zu neuen Teilnehmern, Gruppen und Büchern aus Sammlungen von Gruppenmitgliedern abonniert werden. Jeder Benutzer verfügt über eine Profilseite, auf der er sich anderen Nutzern vorstellen kann und wo diese ihm Nachrichten hinterlassen können. Zu den Einträgen einzelner Nutzer, Werke, Bücher und Autoren wird jeweils angezeigt, welche Nutzer über die gleichen Bücher in ihrer Sammlung verfügen - so bringt LibraryThing Menschen zusammen, die sich für die gleichen Bücher interessieren. Jeder Nutzer kann zudem Bücher auf einer Skala von null bis fünf Sternen bewerten und Rezensionen einstellen. Erschließung leichtgemacht Nutzer können in LibraryThing bereits vorhandene Bücher mit einem Klick in ihre eigene Sammlung aufnehmen oder wieder entfernen. Das so kopierte Katalogisat können sie dann beliebig bearbeiten. Die Bearbeitung erfolgt nach dem Wiki-Prinzip direkt im Webbrowser. Bei der Anzeige einzelner Bücher und Werke werden die verschiedenen Metadaten dann zusammengefasst angezeigt. Andere Inhalte, wie die Autorenseiten (vergleichbar mit Personen-Normdatensätzen), können von allen Nutzern verändert werden. Eine wesentliche Rolle bei der Erschließung spielen freie Schlagwörter (Tags), aber auch DDC-Nummern lassen sich eintragen und werden beim Import aus Bibliothekskatalogen übernommen. Mit knapp 15 Feldern (Tags, Rezension, Bewertung, Titel, Autor, Weitere Autoren, Datum, ISBN, LoC-Signatur, DDC-Nummern, bibliographische Daten, Zusammenfassung, Kommentar und bis zu drei Sprachen) ist die Erschließung noch überschaubar und wird vor allem den Bedürfnissen der Nutzer gerecht.
    Zusammenarbeit mit Bibliotheken Bereits früh setzte sich Tim Spalding für eine Zusammenarbeit mit Bibliotheken ein. Zum Eintragen von neuen Büchern in LibraryThing können zahlreiche Bibliothekskataloge ausgewählt werden, die via Z39.50 eingebunden werden - seit Oktober 2006 ist auch der GBV dabei. Im April 2007 veröffentlichte Tim Spalding mit LibraryThing for Libraries ein Reihe von Webservices, die Bibliotheken in ihre OPACs einbinden können.4 Ein Webservice ist eine Funktion, die von anderen Programmen über das Web aufgerufen werden kann und Daten zurückliefert. Bereits seit Juni 2006 können über verschiedene offene LibraryThing-Webservices unter Anderem zu einer gegebenen ISBN die Sprache und eine Liste von ISBNs anderer Auflagen und Übersetzungen ermittelt werden, die zum gleichen Werk gehören (thinglSBN). Damit setzt LibraryThing praktisch einen Teil der Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) um, die in bibliothekswissenschaftlichen Fachkreisen bereits seit Anfang der 1990er diskutiert werden, aber bislang nicht so Recht ihre Umsetzung in Katalogen gefunden haben. Die Information darüber, welche Bücher zum gleichen Werk gehören, wird von der LibraryThing-Community bereitgestellt; jeder Benutzer kann einzelne Ausgaben mit einem Klick zusammenführen oder wieder trennen. Vergleiche mit dem ähnlichen Dienst xISBN von OCLC zeigen, dass sich thinglSBN und xISBN gut ergänzen, allerdings bietet LibraryThing seinen Webservice im Gegensatz zu OCLC kostenlos an. Neben Empfehlungen von verwandten Büchern ist es im Rahmen von LibraryThing for Libraries auch möglich, die von den Nutzern vergebenen Tags in den eigenen Katalog einzubinden. Ein Nachteil dabei ist allerdings die bisherige Übermacht der englischen Sprache und dass nur selbständige Titel mit ISBN berücksichtigt werden. Die VZG prüft derzeit, in welcher Form LibraryThing for Libraries am besten in GBV-Bibliotheken umgesetzt werden kann. Es spricht allerdings für jede einzelne Bibliothek nichts dagegen, schon jetzt damit zu experimentieren, wie der eigene OPAC mit zusätzlichen Links und Tags von LibraryThing aussehen könnte. Darüber hinaus können sich auch Bibliotheken mit einem eigenen Zugang als Nutzer in LibraryThing beteiligen. So stellt beispielsweise die Stadtbücherei Nordenham bereits seit Ende 2005 ihre Neuzugänge im Erwachsenenbestand in einer Sammlung bei LibraryThing ein.
    Beispiel für die Anwendung von LibraryThing for Libraries im Katalog des Waterford Institute of Technology (): Zu einer ISBN werden auf Basis der in LibraryThing gesammelten Daten andere Auflagen und Übersetzungen, ähnliche Bücher und Tags eingeblendet. Soziale Software lebt vom Mitmachen Vieles spricht dafür, dass LibraryThing auf dem besten Weg ist, sich zu einem der wichtigsten Web 2.0-Dienste für die Zusammenarbeit mit Bibliotheken zu entwickeln. Wie schon bei Wikipedia gibt es allerdings noch viel zu oft Berührungsängste und die Vorstellung, dass sich diese Dienste erst durch Hilfe von Außen in der eigenen Einrichtung einführen ließen. Soziale Software lebt jedoch von der Zusammenarbeit und dem freien Austausch von Gedanken und Informationen. Deshalb hilft nur eins: Ausprobieren und Mitmachen. Ebenso wie Wikipedia schwer zu beurteilen ist, ohne selbst mit anderen Wikipedianern einen Artikel erstellt und diskutiert zu haben, erschließt sich LibraryThing erst vollständig durch eine eigene dort angelegte Büchersammlung. Zum Kennenlernen reicht der kostenlose Zugang und mit 15 $ Jahresgebühr können auch Bibliotheken problemlos bis zu 5.000 Medieneinheiten pro Sammlung einstellen. Wenn Sie erstmal mehr mit Library-Thing vertraut sind, werden Ihnen sicherlich weitere Einsatzmöglichkeiten für Ihre Einrichtung und deren Nutzer einfallen. LibraryThing entwickelt sich beständig weiter und dürfte noch für einige Überraschungen gut sein.
    Date
    22. 9.2007 10:36:23
    Source
    Mitteilungsblatt der Bibliotheken in Niedersachsen und Sachsen-Anhalt. 2007, H.137, S.12-13
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  11. Schumacher, M.: Content is King : Content Management in Fachverlagen per Online-Software (2007) 0.06
    0.059543394 = product of:
      0.17012398 = sum of:
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=1749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=1749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=1749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
        0.017487612 = weight(_text_:und in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017487612 = score(doc=1749,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=1749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=1749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=1749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftliche Fachverlage benötigen in einem wandlungs- und wettbewerbsintensiven Marktumfeld effiziente Content Management-Strategien. Tausende von jährlich weltweit neu erscheinenden Fachbüchern und derzeit rund 24.000 nach wissenschaftlichen Kriterien publizierte Zeitschriften mit rund 2,5 Millionen Fachbeiträgen unterstreichen den Bedarf an verlagsweiten Verwaltungslösungen. Online genutzte Manuskriptverwaltungslösungen wie Editorial Manager von Aries sind Teil dieser Content-Management-Strategien. Zunehmend gibt es in diesem Verlagssegment auch Bestrebungen, die Internet-basierte Softwareunterstützung über den nachgelagerten Herstellungs- und Verwertungsprozess auszudehnen.
    Date
    23. 6.2007 19:01:33
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.4, S.222-224
  12. Montesi, M.; Mackenzie Owen, J.: From conference to journal publication : how conference papers in software engineering are extended for publication in journals (2008) 0.06
    0.058741514 = product of:
      0.1678329 = sum of:
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.029713312 = weight(_text_:software in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029713312 = score(doc=1615,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017148608 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.029713312 = weight(_text_:software in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029713312 = score(doc=1615,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.029713312 = weight(_text_:software in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029713312 = score(doc=1615,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
        0.027247135 = product of:
          0.05449427 = sum of:
            0.05449427 = weight(_text_:engineering in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05449427 = score(doc=1615,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.5036745 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    In software engineering (SE) and in the computing disciplines, papers presented at conferences are considered as formal papers and counted when evaluating research productivity of academic staff. In spite of this, conference papers may still be extended for publication in academic journals. In this research, we have studied the process of extension from conference to journal publication, and tried to explain the different purposes these two forms of publication serve in the field. Twenty-two editors in chief and associate editors in chief of major publications in SE and related fields were interviewed, and 122 authors of extended versions of conference papers answered a Web questionnaire regarding the extension of their papers. As a result, the process of extending conference papers for journal publication in SE is recorded. In the conclusion, we comment on the following: (a) the role of the conference in the development of the research work; (b) the review process at the conference and at the journal stage; and (c) the different purposes conference and journal publication fulfill in SE.
    Date
    6. 3.2008 18:43:23
  13. Petersen, A.; Münch, V.: STN® AnaVist(TM) holt verborgenes Wissen aus Recherche-Ergebnissen : Neue Software analysiert und visualisiert Marktaufteilung, Forschung und Patentaktivitäten (2005) 0.06
    0.058722533 = product of:
      0.14680633 = sum of:
        0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0114324065 = score(doc=3984,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
        0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0114324065 = score(doc=3984,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=3984,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
        0.015144716 = weight(_text_:und in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015144716 = score(doc=3984,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
        0.0114324065 = weight(_text_:23 in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0114324065 = score(doc=3984,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=3984,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
        0.013322448 = weight(_text_:der in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013322448 = score(doc=3984,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
        0.028013978 = weight(_text_:software in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028013978 = score(doc=3984,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
      0.4 = coord(8/20)
    
    Abstract
    "Im 21. Jahrhundert ist die entscheidende Herausforderung an Informationsdienstleister nicht, Informationen zugänglich, sondern sie optimal nutzbar zu machen", sagt Sabine Brünger-Weilandt, Geschäftsführerin von FIZ Karlsruhe, das den Online-Dienst STN International in internationaler Kooperation betreibt. Informationsprofis, so Brünger-Weilandt weiter, bräuchten hockentwickelte Software für strategisches Informationsmanagement. Als "Antwort auf diesen Bedarf" hat STN International eine neue Software zur Analyse und Visualisierung (A&V) von Rechercheergebnissen aus STN-Datenbanken entwickelt. STN® AnaVistT(TM) wurde auf der DGI Online-Tagung Ende Mai in Frankfurt am Main und auf Benutzertreffen in Frankfurt am Main, München und Essen vorgestellt. Seit 18. Juli 2005 ist das neue A&V-Werkzeug für die öffentliche Nutzung freigegeben (www.stn-international.de).
    Die wichtigsten Funktionen von STN AnaVist sind: - Inhalte aus mehreren Datenbanken sind gleichzeitig auswertbar - Nutzer können Daten aus unterschiedlichen Ouellen suchen, analysieren und visualisieren, u.a. aus der Chemiedatenbank CAplusSM, der Patentdatenbank PCTFULL, und US-amerikanischen Volltextdatenbanken. - Einzigartige Beziehungen zwischen Datenelementen-nur STN AnaVist bietet die Möglichkeit, Beziehungen zwischen sieben unterschiedlichen Feldern aus Datenbankdokumenten - z.B., Firmen, Erfindern, Veröffentlichungsjahren und Konzepten-darzustellen. - Gruppierung und Bereinigung von Daten - vor der Analyse werden Firmen und ihre unterschiedlichen Namensvarianten von einem "Company Name Thesaurus" zusammengefasst. - Konzept-Standardisierung - Durch das CAS-Vokabular werden Fachbegriffe datenbankübergreifend standardisiert, so dass weniger Streuung auftritt. - Interaktive Präsentation der Beziehungen zwischen Daten und Diagrammenwährend der Auswertung können Daten zum besseren Erkennen der Beziehungen farblich hervorgehoben werden. - Flexible Erstellung der auszuwertenden Rechercheergebnisse - Rechercheergebnisse, die als Ausgangsdatensatz für die Analyse verwendet werden sollen, können auf zwei Arten gewonnen werden: zum einen über die in STN® AnaVist(TM) integrierte Konzept-Suchfunktion, zum anderen durch problemlose Übernahme von Suchergebnissen aus der bewährten Software STN Express® with Discover! TM Analysis Edition, Version 8.0
    Date
    16. 9.2005 15:10:23
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.5/6, S.319-322
  14. Gentzen, C.: Zentralkatalog und Retrokonversion der Buchbestände des Stadtmuseums Berlin (2002) 0.06
    0.05816527 = product of:
      0.19388422 = sum of:
        0.04001342 = weight(_text_:23 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04001342 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
        0.04001342 = weight(_text_:23 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04001342 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
        0.015301661 = weight(_text_:und in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015301661 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
        0.04001342 = weight(_text_:23 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04001342 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
        0.042999428 = product of:
          0.085998856 = sum of:
            0.085998856 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085998856 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10581345 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.8127403 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015542857 = weight(_text_:der in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015542857 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Date
    23. 6.2002 11:03:56
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  15. MacFarlane, A.: On open source IR (2003) 0.06
    0.056234308 = product of:
      0.18744768 = sum of:
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
        0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03961775 = score(doc=2010,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
        0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03961775 = score(doc=2010,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
        0.03961775 = weight(_text_:software in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03961775 = score(doc=2010,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Open source software development is becoming increasingly popular as a way of producing software, due to a number of factors. It is argued in this paper that these factors may have a significant impact on the future of information retrieval (IR) systems, and that it is desirable that these systems are made open to all. Some problems are outlined that may prevent the uptake of open source IR systems and a number of open source IR systems are described.
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:43:23
  16. Kaps, G.; Nohr, H.: Erfolgsmessung im Wissensmanagement mit Balanced Scorecards : Teil 1 (2001) 0.06
    0.055654187 = product of:
      0.15901196 = sum of:
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
        0.015301661 = weight(_text_:und in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015301661 = score(doc=5675,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
        0.041826285 = weight(_text_:methoden in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041826285 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.40078837 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
        0.021980919 = weight(_text_:der in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021980919 = score(doc=5675,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4886365 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
        0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02451223 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
        0.006366401 = product of:
          0.019099202 = sum of:
            0.019099202 = weight(_text_:22 in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019099202 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit der Erfolgsmessung im Wissensmanagement unter Anwendung der Balanced Scorecard. In Teil 1 werden verschiedene Methoden der Erfolgsmessung im Wissensmanagement verglichen, insbesondere wird gezeigt, wie sich die Balanced Scorecard einsetzen und gestalten lässt. In diesem Zusammenhang wird die Darstellung durch die klassischen Perspektiven erläutert und dann ein Ausblick auf Wissensperspektiven gegeben. In Teil 2 wird der Erarbeitungsprozess einer Scorecard erläutert und es werden Messgrößen entwickelt. Außerdem wird der Einfluss der Scorecard auf das organisationale Lernverhalten geschildert. Am Schluss wird Software vorgestellt, die das Konzept der Balanced Scorecard unterstützt
    Date
    22. 3.2001 13:20:44
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.2, S.89-97
  17. bs: 23 Bände auf einer Scheibe (2001) 0.06
    0.05527098 = product of:
      0.1842366 = sum of:
        0.049503773 = weight(_text_:23 in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049503773 = score(doc=5665,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.68586856 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
        0.049503773 = weight(_text_:23 in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049503773 = score(doc=5665,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.68586856 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
        0.010929758 = weight(_text_:und in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010929758 = score(doc=5665,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
        0.049503773 = weight(_text_:23 in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049503773 = score(doc=5665,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.68586856 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
        0.015700657 = weight(_text_:der in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015700657 = score(doc=5665,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
        0.009094859 = product of:
          0.027284576 = sum of:
            0.027284576 = weight(_text_:22 in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027284576 = score(doc=5665,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02013827 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Gute Nachrichten für Literatur-Interessierte: alle 23 Bände des Kindler Literatur-Lexikons sind jetzt auf einer einzigen CD-ROM erschienen. Und bei gleichem Inhalt beträgt der Preis nur ein Zehntel der Buchausgabe
    Source
    CD-Info. 2001, H.4, S.22-23
  18. Montesi, M.; Navarrete, T.: Classifying web genres in context : A case study documenting the web genres used by a software engineer (2008) 0.05
    0.05457872 = product of:
      0.18192907 = sum of:
        0.024251796 = weight(_text_:23 in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024251796 = score(doc=2100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
        0.024251796 = weight(_text_:23 in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024251796 = score(doc=2100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
        0.036391225 = weight(_text_:software in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036391225 = score(doc=2100,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
        0.024251796 = weight(_text_:23 in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024251796 = score(doc=2100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
        0.036391225 = weight(_text_:software in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036391225 = score(doc=2100,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
        0.036391225 = weight(_text_:software in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036391225 = score(doc=2100,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.4555077 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    This case study analyzes the Internet-based resources that a software engineer uses in his daily work. Methodologically, we studied the web browser history of the participant, classifying all the web pages he had seen over a period of 12 days into web genres. We interviewed him before and after the analysis of the web browser history. In the first interview, he spoke about his general information behavior; in the second, he commented on each web genre, explaining why and how he used them. As a result, three approaches allow us to describe the set of 23 web genres obtained: (a) the purposes they serve for the participant; (b) the role they play in the various work and search phases; (c) and the way they are used in combination with each other. Further observations concern the way the participant assesses quality of web-based resources, and his information behavior as a software engineer.
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:17:23
  19. Herget, J.: Strategischer Wert von Information Services : Methoden und Instrumente zur Erarbeitung und Darstellung des Nutzenbeitrags (2001) 0.05
    0.053607125 = product of:
      0.1786904 = sum of:
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 5883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=5883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5883)
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 5883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=5883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5883)
        0.024731217 = weight(_text_:und in 5883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024731217 = score(doc=5883,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 5883, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5883)
        0.022864813 = weight(_text_:23 in 5883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022864813 = score(doc=5883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5883)
        0.06760149 = weight(_text_:methoden in 5883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06760149 = score(doc=5883,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.64777184 = fieldWeight in 5883, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5883)
        0.017763264 = weight(_text_:der in 5883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017763264 = score(doc=5883,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 5883, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5883)
      0.3 = coord(6/20)
    
    Abstract
    Das Problem des Legitimationsnachweises in Information und Dokumentation wird seit Jahrzehnten diskutiert - nach wie vor jedoch ohne überzeugende Konzepte in der Praxis zu implementieren. In diesem Beitrag werden Methoden und Instrumente vorgestellt, die einen Beitrag zur Lösung dieses Dilemmas liefern können
    Series
    Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis; 4
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  20. Semar, W.: Kollaborative Leistungsevaluation beim Einsatz von Wissensmanagementsystemen in der Ausbildung (2006) 0.05
    0.053095717 = product of:
      0.13273929 = sum of:
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 5877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=5877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5877)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 5877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=5877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5877)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 5877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=5877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 5877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5877)
        0.018930895 = weight(_text_:und in 5877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018930895 = score(doc=5877,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 5877, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5877)
        0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 5877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014290508 = score(doc=5877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5877)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 5877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=5877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 5877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5877)
        0.018410651 = weight(_text_:der in 5877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018410651 = score(doc=5877,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.40926933 = fieldWeight in 5877, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5877)
        0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 5877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017508736 = score(doc=5877,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 5877, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5877)
      0.4 = coord(8/20)
    
    Abstract
    Neue Formen der Aus- und Weiterbildung prägen derzeit die öffentliche und universitäre Diskussion. Im Kontext von Lehren und Lernen mit neuen Medien stellt die Förderung des kollaborativen, selbstgesteuerten Lernens ein zentrales Forschungsgebiet dar [Arnold 2003, S. 16; Mandl 2000, S. 3; Semar 2004a, S. 255]. Dabei hat sich gezeigt, dass eine aktive Förderung und Unterstützung der Systemteilnehmer notwendig ist, in der Regel geschieht dies, indem die einzelnen Akteure dazu aufgefordert werden, meist persönlich durch den Dozenten oder durch ein anderes Gruppenmitglied, bestimmte Tätigkeiten auszuführen. Zwar kann dadurch ein bestimmtes Verhalten in Lernumgebungen "erzwungen" werden, aber besser und erfolgreicher ist es, wenn die Akteure dazu motiviert werden können. Diese Motivation kann mittels entsprechender Anreizsysteme geschehen. Die Problematik liegt jedoch in der Ausgestaltung solcher Anreizsysteme [Schanz 1991, S. 23]. Wir wollen ein "Anreizsystem" darstellen, das aufgrund bestimmter Kennzahlen und deren Visualisierung den einzelnen Akteur so beeinflusst, dass seine intrinsische Motivation gefördert wird und daraus eine eigenständige, aktive Teilnahme am kollaborativen Wissenserarbeitungsprozess resultiert. Ein dem kollaborativen Ansatz angemessenes Anreizsystem mit starker reputativer Ausrichtung soll den gesamten Wissenserarbeitungsprozess unterstützen. Den Akteuren wird eine Aufgabe gestellt, die sie eigenständig als Gruppe lösen sollen. Individuelle Anreize animieren die Akteure bestimmte Leistungen zu erbringen, die dann mit Hilfe des Bewertungssystems bewertet werden. Das Ergebnis wirkt auf die Motivation der Akteure und veranlasst sie weiterhin mitzuarbeiten, bis die gestellte Aufgabe (zufriedenstellend) gelöst wurde. Dieses Anreizsystems ist seit dem Sommersemester 2005 Teil des Software-Systems K3, das in der studentischen Hochschulausbildung kollaboratives und verteiltes Erarbeiten von konzeptuellem Wissen über heterogene Ressourcen und moderierte elektronische Kommunikationsforen ermöglicht.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.9
    Source
    Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung: Gesellschaftliche, ökonomische und technische Aspekte. Proceedings der 9. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Duisburg, 5.-7. November 2004. Hrsg. von H.P. Ohly u.a

Languages

Types

Themes