Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Ontische Strukturen und Wissensmuster in der Wissensorganisation (2004) 0.08
    0.083239175 = product of:
      0.17836966 = sum of:
        0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02783884 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
        0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02783884 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
        0.033665415 = weight(_text_:und in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033665415 = score(doc=3155,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
        0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02783884 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
        0.020547325 = weight(_text_:zur in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020547325 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.20411909 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
        0.012029907 = weight(_text_:in in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012029907 = score(doc=3155,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27051896 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
        0.028610492 = weight(_text_:der in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028610492 = score(doc=3155,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3917808 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
      0.46666667 = coord(7/15)
    
    Abstract
    Ein jeder Mensch ist mit seinem Dasein eingebettet in kosmische Gesetzmäßigkeiten und findet sich individualisiert und begrenzt durch die Bedingungen von Raum und Zeit; seine jeweilige "Mitgift" in vorgefundener Umgebung verlangt nach menschlicher Sinn Erfüllung. Diese ontischen Gegebenheiten können als Strukturvorgabe angesehen werden, die sich durch die kategorialen und logischen Strukturen menschlichen Denkens und Sprechens - z.B. in artikulierten Sätzen menschlichen Wissens - ergänzen lässt. Dabei bilden sich Wissensmuster, die sich in einem ontologisch fundierten Gesamtschema aller Wissensgebiete zur Darstellung bringen lassen können. Der Vortrag erläutert die hier angedeuteten kategorialen und systemtheoretischen Grundlagen mit Bezug auf die Konstruktion eines neuen, universalen Ordnungssystems aller Wissensgebiete, das vor 30 Jahren konzipiert wurde und sich bereits in vielfacher Hinsicht bewährt hat. Seine Rasterdarstellung ermöglicht eine übersichtliche, fokussierbare und unkomplizierte Handhabung in elektronischen Medien.
    Date
    23. 1.2005 21:21:25
    Footnote
    Mit einer Übersicht der Information Coding Classification
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.8
    Source
    Wissensorganisation in kooperativen Lern- und Arbeitsumgebungen: Proceedings der 8. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Regensburg, 9.-11. Oktober 2002. Hrsg.: G. Budin u. H.P. Ohly
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Gutachten zur Frage einer Einheitsklassifikation (1972) 0.07
    0.07400096 = product of:
      0.27750358 = sum of:
        0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07423691 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
        0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07423691 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
        0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07423691 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
        0.054792862 = weight(_text_:zur in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054792862 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.54431754 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 23(1972), S.175-176
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Was ist Wissensorganisation? (2017) 0.07
    0.06966387 = product of:
      0.17415966 = sum of:
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
        0.024840524 = weight(_text_:und in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024840524 = score(doc=3473,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
        0.004678297 = weight(_text_:in in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004678297 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
        0.047204897 = weight(_text_:der in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047204897 = score(doc=3473,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.6464053 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
      0.4 = coord(6/15)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2017 11:04:23
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.13
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Zur Position der Klassifikation in der Gegenwart (1986) 0.04
    0.038854156 = product of:
      0.14570308 = sum of:
        0.024840524 = weight(_text_:und in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024840524 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
        0.06780271 = weight(_text_:zur in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06780271 = score(doc=665,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.6735586 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
        0.009356594 = weight(_text_:in in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009356594 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
        0.04370325 = weight(_text_:der in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04370325 = score(doc=665,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.5984551 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Series
    Studien zur Klassifikation; Bd.16
    Source
    Klassifikation als Werkzeug der Lehre und Forschung. Hrsg.: I. Dahlberg
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffs- und Definitionstheorie in ihrem Zusammenhang (1985) 0.03
    0.033238046 = product of:
      0.12464267 = sum of:
        0.036878616 = weight(_text_:und in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036878616 = score(doc=1233,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
        0.05811661 = weight(_text_:zur in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05811661 = score(doc=1233,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.57733595 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
        0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008019937 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
        0.021627497 = weight(_text_:der in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021627497 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Series
    Studium Sprachwissenschaft; Beih.5 / Arbeiten zur Klassifikation; 5
    Source
    Studien zur Klassifikation, Systematik und Terminologie: Theorie und Praxis. Akten der 6. Arbeitstagung des Münsteraner Arbeitskreises für Semiotik, Münster, 25.-26.9.1984
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Zur Systematik der Sachgebiete in der neuen internationalen Enzyklopädie der Sozialwissenschaften (1985) 0.03
    0.031939276 = product of:
      0.11977227 = sum of:
        0.017743232 = weight(_text_:und in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017743232 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
        0.048430502 = weight(_text_:zur in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048430502 = score(doc=123,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.48111326 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
        0.009451588 = weight(_text_:in in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009451588 = score(doc=123,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
        0.044146944 = weight(_text_:der in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044146944 = score(doc=123,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.6045309 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Für die Systematisierung der einzelnen Sachgebiete und ihrer Begriffshierarchieen wird auf den 'Systematifikator' zurückgegriffen
    Series
    Studien zur Klassifikation, Bd. 14
    Source
    Anwendungen in der Klassifikation. I. Proc. 8. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Hofgeismar, 10.-13.4.1984. Hrsg.: R.G. Henzler
  7. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.03
    0.031649772 = product of:
      0.11868664 = sum of:
        0.024840524 = weight(_text_:und in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024840524 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
        0.047943756 = weight(_text_:zur in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047943756 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47627786 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
        0.02523208 = weight(_text_:der in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02523208 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
        0.020670272 = product of:
          0.062010817 = sum of:
            0.062010817 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062010817 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
    Source
    Beiträge zur Begriffsanalyse: Vorträge der Arbeitsgruppe Begriffsanalyse, Darmstadt 1986. Hrsg. von B. Ganter, R. Wille u. K.E. Wolff
  8. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Pilotstudie "DB-Thesaurus" : Allgemeiner Thesaurus für Bibliotheken (1982) 0.03
    0.030340748 = product of:
      0.1137778 = sum of:
        0.027772553 = weight(_text_:und in 1527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027772553 = score(doc=1527,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 1527, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1527)
        0.033901356 = weight(_text_:zur in 1527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033901356 = score(doc=1527,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3367793 = fieldWeight in 1527, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1527)
        0.0066161114 = weight(_text_:in in 1527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066161114 = score(doc=1527,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 1527, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1527)
        0.04548778 = weight(_text_:der in 1527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04548778 = score(doc=1527,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.6228917 = fieldWeight in 1527, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1527)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Im Jahre 1978/79 wurde bei der Deutschen Bibliothek eine Pilotstudie durchgeführt, in der die zur Indexierung der in der Reihe A der Deutschen Bibliographie ("Wöchentliches Verzeichnis") verwendeten Schlagwörter auf ihre Brauchbarkeit als Deskriptoren eines Allgemeinen Thesaurus für Bibliotheken untersucht werden. Es sollten die Grundprinzipien eines solchen Thesaurus darsgestellt, und seine Struktur (Fachgebiete, Anzahl der Hauptgruppen, Erschließungstiefe), die Möglichkeiten der Wortschatzbegrenzung, die Behandlung der Eigennamen und die Möglichkeiten der Terminologiekontrolle untersucht werden. Es zeigte sich, daß sich die Schlagwörter der DB sehr wohl als Thesauruselemente eignen, daß sie aber um viele Begriffe ergänzt werden müssen, um den Zusammenhang der Hierarchieebenen herzustellen
    Series
    Studien zur Klassifikation; Bd.10
    Source
    Numerische und nicht-numerische Klassifikation zwischen Theorie und Praxis. Proc. der 5. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Hofgeismar, 7.-10.4.1981. Hrsg.: Peter Ihm u.a
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  9. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Pilotstudie DB-Thesaurus (1980) 0.03
    0.028722914 = product of:
      0.10771092 = sum of:
        0.03193782 = weight(_text_:und in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03193782 = score(doc=3155,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.4407773 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
        0.020547325 = weight(_text_:zur in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020547325 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.20411909 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
        0.005670953 = weight(_text_:in in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005670953 = score(doc=3155,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
        0.04955482 = weight(_text_:der in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04955482 = score(doc=3155,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.6785842 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Bei der Pilotstudie DB-Thesaurus ging es um die Untersuchung der Art und Form der von der Deutschen Bibliothek für ihre Inhaltserschließung verwendeten Schlagwörter und ihre Eignung als Elemente eines allgemeinen Thesaurus für Bibliotheken. Der Abschlußbericht (Arbeits- und Ergebnisbericht) beantwortet die in der Ausschreibung ausgesprochenen Fragen bezgl. der Möglichkeiten und Grundprinzipien eines solchen Thesaurus der DB-Schlagwörter, insbesondere auch seiner Struktur (Umfassung der Fachgebeiete, Anzahl der Hauptgruppen, Erschließungstiefe), seiner Relationsarten (begriffliche und terminologische), der Möglichkeiten der Wortschatzbegrenzung, der Behandlung von Eigennamen und der Möglichkeiten der Terminologiekontrolle. Die Untersuchung ergab, daß sich die SW der DB als Thesauruselemente eignen, daß diese aber um viele Begriffe ergänzt werden müssen, die teilweise aus dem Schatz der DB-Verweisungen gewonnen werden könnten, wenn man einen systematisch angelegten, allgemeinen Thesaurus auf dieser Basis erstellen will. Unter den Anlagen befindet sich als Beispiel dafür, daß DB-Schlag- und Verweisungswörter zur Thesauruserstellung herangezogen werden können, ein sog. Sportthesaurus, der nur durch einige fehlende Oberbegriffe ergänzt wurde. Der gesamte systematische Teil ist im alphabetischen Teil enthalten. Auf die Unterscheidung der Abstraktionsrelation von der Bestandsrelation wurde auch im alphabetischen Teil besonderer Wert gelegt
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Dahlberg, I. in: Numerische und nicht-numerische Klassifikation ... S.184-191.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  10. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The future of classification in libraries and networks : a theoretical point of view (1995) 0.03
    0.028239282 = product of:
      0.1058973 = sum of:
        0.03280839 = weight(_text_:23 in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03280839 = score(doc=5563,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
        0.03280839 = weight(_text_:23 in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03280839 = score(doc=5563,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
        0.03280839 = weight(_text_:23 in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03280839 = score(doc=5563,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
        0.007472136 = weight(_text_:in in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007472136 = score(doc=5563,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Some time ago, some people said classification is dead, we don't need it any more. They probably thought that subject headings could do the job of the necessary subject analysis and shelving of books. However, all of a sudden in 1984 the attitude changed, when an OCLC study of Karen Markey started to show what could be done even with an "outdated system" such as the Dewey Decimal Classification in the computer, once it was visible on a screen to show the helpfulness of a classified library catalogue called an OPAC; classification was brought back into the minds of doubtful librarians and of all those who thought they would not need it any longer. But the problem once phrased: "We are stuck with the two old systems, LCC and DDC" would not find a solution and is still with us today. We know that our systems are outdated but we seem still to be unable to replace them with better ones. What then should one do and advise, knowing that we need something better? Perhaps a new universal ordering system which more adequately represents and mediates the world of our present day knowledge? If we were to develop it from scratch, how would we create it and implement it in such a way that it would be acceptable to the majority of the present intellectual world population?
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 36th Allerton Institute, 23-25 Oct 94, Allerton Park, Monticello, IL: "New Roles for Classification in Libraries and Information Networks: Presentation and Reports"
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.23-35
  11. Dahlberg, I.: Information Coding Classification : Geschichtliches, Prinzipien, Inhaltliches (2010) 0.03
    0.027608404 = product of:
      0.10353151 = sum of:
        0.02838917 = weight(_text_:und in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02838917 = score(doc=4057,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
        0.038744405 = weight(_text_:zur in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038744405 = score(doc=4057,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.38489062 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
        0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00756127 = score(doc=4057,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
        0.028836664 = weight(_text_:der in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028836664 = score(doc=4057,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag umfasst eine Einführung in das Verständnis der Information Coding Classification (ICC), einer Universalklassifikation von Wissensgebieten. Er enthält (1) Entstehungsgeschichte (1970 bis 1977), (2) ihre Prinzipien: Begriffe, Begriffsbeziehungen, Notation, Hauptklassen als Objektbereiche in Integrationsstufen, Systemstellenplan als Systematifikator mit neun Aspekten zur Untergliederung, Verbindungsmöglichkeiten mit anderen Systemen, Systemstellen zur Darstellung von Inter- und Transdisziplinarität. Verwendungsmöglichkeiten. (3) Erläuterung ihres Inhalts und kurze Erörterung der Probleme bei der Konzeption und Erarbeitung.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.8, S.449-454
  12. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.03
    0.026074355 = product of:
      0.078223065 = sum of:
        0.026077118 = weight(_text_:und in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026077118 = score(doc=1736,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
        0.020547325 = weight(_text_:zur in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020547325 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.20411909 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
        0.0040099686 = weight(_text_:in in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0040099686 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
        0.018729964 = weight(_text_:der in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018729964 = score(doc=1736,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.25648075 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
        0.008858688 = product of:
          0.026576065 = sum of:
            0.026576065 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026576065 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    
    Abstract
    Sehr viele Informationen sind bereits im Web verfügbar oder können aus isolierten strukturierten Datenspeichern wie Informationssystemen und sozialen Netzwerken gewonnen werden. Datenintegration durch Nachbearbeitung oder durch Suchmechanismen (z. B. D2R) ist deshalb wichtig, um Informationen allgemein verwendbar zu machen. Semantische Technologien ermöglichen die Verwendung definierter Verbindungen (typisierter Links), durch die ihre Beziehungen zueinander festgehalten werden, was Vorteile für jede Anwendung bietet, die das in Daten enthaltene Wissen wieder verwenden kann. Um ­eine semantische Daten-Landkarte herzustellen, benötigen wir Wissen über die einzelnen Daten und ihre Beziehung zu anderen Daten. Dieser Beitrag stellt unsere Arbeit zur Benutzung von Lexical Linked Data (LLD) durch ein Meta-Modell vor, das alle Ressourcen enthält und zudem die Möglichkeit bietet sie unter unterschiedlichen Gesichtspunkten aufzufinden. Wir verbinden damit bestehende Arbeiten über Wissensgebiete (basierend auf der Information Coding Classification) mit der Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (basierend auf der RDF/OWL-Repräsentation von EuroWordNet und den ähnlichen integrierten lexikalischen Ressourcen MultiWordNet, MEMODATA und die Hamburg Metapher DB).
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.4/5, S.279-287
  13. Dahlberg, I.: Library catalogs in the Internet : switching for future subject access (1996) 0.03
    0.025295582 = product of:
      0.09485842 = sum of:
        0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02783884 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
        0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02783884 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
        0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02783884 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
        0.011341906 = weight(_text_:in in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011341906 = score(doc=5171,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    A multitude of library catalogs are now being entered into the Internet. Their differing classification and subject headings systems used for subject access call for a switching system, a black box to facilitate the location of subject fields and their subjects in these systems. The principles on which such a switching system must be built in order to provide the necessary insight, surveyability, reproducebility and ease of concept combinability (e.g. in cases of interdisciplinary subjects) are outlined and compared with the BSO which hance once been established by the FID in order to serve a switching purpose. The advantages of using the Information Coding Classification (ICC) as a switching system in the Internet are demonstrated, likewise the methodology needed to establish the necessary correlation between library classification systems (and if possible also subject heading systems and thesauri) and the ICC. Finally some organizational implications for creating a switching for 6 universal systems in use are described
    Date
    23. 7.1996 19:14:52
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.5
  14. Dahlberg, I.: Zur Begriffskultur in den Sozialwissenschaften : Evaluation einer Herausforderung (2006) 0.02
    0.023457773 = product of:
      0.08796664 = sum of:
        0.027487697 = weight(_text_:und in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027487697 = score(doc=3128,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3793607 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
        0.019372202 = weight(_text_:zur in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019372202 = score(doc=3128,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.19244531 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
        0.008866375 = weight(_text_:in in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008866375 = score(doc=3128,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.19937998 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
        0.03224037 = weight(_text_:der in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03224037 = score(doc=3128,freq=40.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.44148692 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
              6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                40.0 = termFreq=40.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Aufgrund eines Vortrags über Begriffs- und Definitionstheorie, den ich bei der Tagung über Begriffsanalyse in Darmstadt 1986 gehalten hatte (Dahlberg 1987), wandte sich der damalige Mitherausgeber der Zeitschrift Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften, Dr. Rainer Greshoff, 1990 an mich mit der Bitte, einen ähnlichen Beitrag als Hauptartikel für seine Zeitschrift zu schreiben. Ich sagte zu mit der Absicht im Hinterkopf, dabei auch meine Erfahrungen mit der sozial-wissenschaftlichen Terminologie, die ich bei COCTA, dem Committee for Conceptual and Terminological Analysis (Vorsitz Prof. Dr. Fred Riggs, Hawaii) (Riggs 1982) gemacht hatte, einzubringen. Hinzu kam, dass mir gerade zu diesem Zeitpunkt das Werk von Stefan Andreski in die Hände gefallen war, betitelt: "Die Hexenmeister der Sozialwissenschaften. Missbrauch, Mode und Manipulation einer Wissenschaft", (Andreski 1974) der sozusagen "kein Blatt vor den Mund nimmt" und überaus mutig und an vielen Beispielen die Misere der sozialwissenschaftlichen Terminologie offenbar macht. Ich hoffte daher, in einem entsprechenden Beitrag mehr Bewusstsein für eine begriffsorientierte, systematische Terminologie der Sozialwissenschaften zu wecken. In gewisser Weise war für mich dabei die Lösung von Prof. Riggs mit seiner "Onomantik" (Riggs 1985) vorbildlich. Er ging nämlich davon aus, dass der sog. semasiologische Ansatz, bei dem nach der Bedeutung eines Wortes gefragt wird, unbrauchbar für sein Verständnis sei (und das nicht nur in den Sozialwissenschaften), man müsse vielmehr umgekehrt onomasiologisch vorgehen und sich zunächst über einen Begriff klar werden, der mit einem Wort (oder einem Wort in einem Kontext) verbunden ist und seine mögliche Definition finden und dann erst dafür eine Benennung suchen. Aus Zeitmangel entstand mein Beitrag erst 1995. Herr Dr. Greshoff konnte - entsprechend der Methode seiner Zeitschrift - zu meinem Beitrag eine größere Anzahl von Kritikern finden und diese dann auch noch durch eine Replik der Autorin erwidern lassen und mit einer Metakritik eines Nichtinvolvierten das Ganze beenden. In meinem Fall waren es 27 Persönlichkeiten aus 10 verschiedenen Disziplinen und Herr Prof. Dr. Endruweit als Metakritiker. Der Beitrag umfasste die Seiten 3-91 (DIN A4 Format) in Heft 1-1996 unter dem Titel "Zur Begriffskultur in den Sozialwissenschaften. Lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?" (Dahlberg 1996). Ich war überzeugt, dass sich ihre Probleme mit meiner vorgeschlagenen Methode lösen lassen. Doch meine Kritiker waren es leider nicht. Und über das Warum - davon wird mein Vortrag heute handeln.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.9
    Source
    Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung: Gesellschaftliche, ökonomische und technische Aspekte. Proceedings der 9. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Duisburg, 5.-7. November 2004. Hrsg. von H.P. Ohly u.a
  15. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die "doppelt notierte Einheitsklassifikation" : die Lösung? (1975) 0.02
    0.022364946 = product of:
      0.08386854 = sum of:
        0.020074176 = weight(_text_:und in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020074176 = score(doc=1620,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
        0.027396431 = weight(_text_:zur in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027396431 = score(doc=1620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27215877 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
        0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00756127 = score(doc=1620,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
        0.028836664 = weight(_text_:der in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028836664 = score(doc=1620,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Im Oktober 1974 haben maßgebliche deutsche Bibliothekare der Erarbeitung einer Einheitsklassifikation für die Bibliotheken der BRD entsprechend den Vorschlägen einer AfB-Projektgruppe zugestimmt. Danach kann nun eine "doppelt notierte" Klassifikation in Angriff genommen werden, die auf den Klassaten des systematischen Kataloges der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek (BSB) aufbaut und für vorliegende Titelmengen pro Klassat neue Klassen in einer dreigliedrigen Notation für Aufstellungszwecke festlegt. Die BSB-Systematik wird erläutert und kritisch zur Sachproblematik der vorgeschlagenen Lösung Stellung genommen. Auf organisatorische Schwierigkeiten wird hingewiesen; abschließend werden andere Lösungsmöglichkeiten diskutiert
  16. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.02
    0.02222939 = product of:
      0.08336021 = sum of:
        0.020074176 = weight(_text_:und in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020074176 = score(doc=3726,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
        0.01069325 = weight(_text_:in in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01069325 = score(doc=3726,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
        0.0407812 = weight(_text_:der in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0407812 = score(doc=3726,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.5584417 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
        0.011811584 = product of:
          0.035434753 = sum of:
            0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035434753 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von der Notwendigkeit, das Wissen der Wissensorganisation in ihren Wissenseinheiten (Begriffen) zu erfassen, wird auf Vorgängerarbeiten (E.Wüster, F.Riggs) hingewiesen. Für die notwendigen Arbeiten wird der noematische Wissensbegriff herangezogen und es wird gezeigt, wie begriffsanalytisch (merkmalsbezogen und durch Merkmale auch systembildend) an eine mögliche Begriffsarbeit herangegangen werden sollte. Die sieben notwendigen Schritte hierzu werden erläutert.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.11
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  17. Dahlberg, I.: Wissensmuster und Musterwissen im Erfassen klassifikatorischer Ganzheiten (1980) 0.02
    0.021101627 = product of:
      0.0791311 = sum of:
        0.03073218 = weight(_text_:und in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03073218 = score(doc=124,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
        0.01712277 = weight(_text_:zur in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01712277 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.17009923 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
        0.0057878923 = weight(_text_:in in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057878923 = score(doc=124,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
        0.02548825 = weight(_text_:der in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02548825 = score(doc=124,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Als 'klassifikatorische Ganzheiten' gelten hier Wissensgebiete, bzw. ihre Begriffe. Die Muster, die sich aufgrund der Begriffsrelationen von Wissensgebieten gewinnen lassen, werden sowohl durch formkategoriale als auch durch seinskategoriale Bezüge dieser Begriffe geprägt. Logische und linguistische Untersuchungen haben gezeigt, daß sich Wissensbereiche und Wissensgebiete formkategorial jeweils zu Triaden zusammenordnen lassen und als solche entsprechende Wissensmuster bilden. Ein universales System von 3**3 Triaden von Wissensgebieten wird vorgestellt und erläutert. Es wird dabei gezeigt, wie sich auch in der Interaktion von Wissensgebieten miteinander, z.B. in der Verwendung der Methoden und Verfahren eines Gebietes in einem anderen Gebiet oder der Fundierung eines Gebiets durch ein anderes gewisse Muster abzeichnen, die die Systemstellen eines solchen Systems apriori und auch aposteriori "systematisch" besetzen, ohne die innere Ordnung des Systems und seiner Triaden zu beeinträchtigen. Auf diese Weisen wird durch den Aspekt des internalen Bezugs von Wissensmustern (gegenüber dem o.g. elementalen und totalen) ein Musterwissen gewonnen, das insbesondere auch bei der Benutzung eines solchen Systems von großem Nutzen sein kann, da es das Gedächtnis stützt, die Mustererkennung ermöglicht und dementsprechend die Handhabung bei Einspeicherung und Retrieval von zu ordenbarem Wissen erleichtert.
    Series
    Studien zur Klassifikation; Bd.9
    Source
    Wissensstrukturen und Ordnungsmuster. Proc. der 4. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Salzburg, 16.-19.4.1980. Red.: W. Dahlberg
  18. Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften : lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen? (1996) 0.02
    0.021019911 = product of:
      0.07882466 = sum of:
        0.026077118 = weight(_text_:und in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026077118 = score(doc=3941,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
        0.020547325 = weight(_text_:zur in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020547325 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.20411909 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
        0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008019937 = score(doc=3941,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
        0.024180276 = weight(_text_:der in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024180276 = score(doc=3941,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Einführend Kurzdarstellung der gegenstandsbezogenen, analytischen Begriffstheorie und ihrer Implikationen beim Aufbau von Begriffs- und Definitionssystemen. Daraus ableitend folgen einige wissenschaftstheoretische Überlegungen zum Gegenstand der Sozialwissenschaften, ihrer Ausprägungen in einzelnen Wissensgebieten und deren Zusammenhang mit anderen Wissensgebieten sowie auch ihre entsprechenden Abgrenzungen. Anschließende Darstellung eines Versuchs, die Probleme der sozialwissenschaftlichen Sprachschöpfungen oder sprachlichen Übernahmen und deren Begriffe durch eine entsprechend vorgegebene Methodik zu bewältigen mit einem Hinweis auf die Möglichkeit, wie Begriffskultur in den Sozialwissenschaften zu verstehen und zu verwirklichen ist. Abschließend wird auf die Rolle, die in diesem Zusammenhang der ethische Aspekt einer Begriffskultur spielt, eingegangen
    Footnote
    Dazu im selben Heft Erwiderungen von: J. Becker u. A. Reiss, W.L. Bühl, V. Dreier, R. Dürr, T. Eckes, W. Friedlmeier, W. Gödert, A. Hahn, H. Kerber, R. Kleinknecht, J. Klüver, J. Krause, S. Lamnek, M.-T. Liske, C. Lütge, R. Meyers, K. Manhart, H.P. Ohly, M. Patzak, R. Popp, F.J. Radermacher, A. Ros, P. Schimany, T.B. Seiler, A. Suchanek, E. Walther-Klaus, H. Weiss; eine Erwiderung von I. Dahlberg u. eine Metakritik von G. Endruweit. - Replik der Verfasserin auf die Erwiderungen: S.67-85
    Source
    Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.3-13
  19. Dahlberg, I.: Zur Terminologie der Klassifikation (1973) 0.02
    0.016506488 = product of:
      0.082532436 = sum of:
        0.047943756 = weight(_text_:zur in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047943756 = score(doc=1930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47627786 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
        0.009356594 = weight(_text_:in in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009356594 = score(doc=1930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
        0.02523208 = weight(_text_:der in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02523208 = score(doc=1930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Beling, G. u. P.-T. Hagen in Nachrichten für Dokumentation 24(1973) S.117-126
  20. Dahlberg, I.: Wissen und Bildung in einer informatisierten Welt (1999) 0.02
    0.016428176 = product of:
      0.08214088 = sum of:
        0.024840524 = weight(_text_:und in 4120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024840524 = score(doc=4120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4120)
        0.047943756 = weight(_text_:zur in 4120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047943756 = score(doc=4120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47627786 = fieldWeight in 4120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4120)
        0.009356594 = weight(_text_:in in 4120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009356594 = score(doc=4120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4120)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Footnote
    Bericht zur Tagung