Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"O'Neill, E.T."
  1. O'Neill, E.T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Quality control in online databases (1989) 0.06 
    0.062241066 = product of:
  0.23340398 = sum of:
    0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07423691 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
    0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07423691 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
    0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07423691 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
    0.01069325 = weight(_text_:in in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01069325 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 23(1988), S.125-156
  2. Lavoie, B.F.; O'Neill, E.T.: How "World Wide" Is the Web? : Trends in the Internationalization of Web Sites (2001) 0.05 
    0.053547315 = product of:
  0.16064194 = sum of:
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
    0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066832816 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
    0.01476448 = product of:
      0.04429344 = sum of:
        0.04429344 = weight(_text_:22 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04429344 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Date
    11. 2.1997 20:11:23
    7.10.2002 9:22:14
  3. O'Neill, E.T.; McClain, P.D.; Lavoie, B.F.: ¬A Methodology for Sampling the World Wide Web (2001) 0.04 
    0.039370067 = product of:
  0.19685033 = sum of:
    0.06561678 = weight(_text_:23 in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06561678 = score(doc=1052,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.56000936 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
    0.06561678 = weight(_text_:23 in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06561678 = score(doc=1052,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.56000936 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
    0.06561678 = weight(_text_:23 in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06561678 = score(doc=1052,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.56000936 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    11. 2.1997 20:11:23
    6.10.2002 14:32:23
  4. O'Neill, E.T.; Lavoie, B.F.: Bibliographic control for the Web (2000) 0.04 
    0.038974375 = product of:
  0.19487187 = sum of:
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 7088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=7088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 7088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7088)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 7088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=7088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 7088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7088)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 7088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=7088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 7088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7088)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    6. 2.1997 18:23:32
  5. O'Neill, E.T.; McClain, P.: Copy Cataloging Practices : Use of the Call Number by Dewey Libraries (2001) 0.03 
    0.02783884 = product of:
  0.13919419 = sum of:
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    11. 2.1997 20:11:23
  6. Prabha, C.C.; O'Neill, E.T.: Interlibrary Borrowing Initiated by Patrons : Some Characteristics of Books Requested via OhioLink (2001) 0.03 
    0.02783884 = product of:
  0.13919419 = sum of:
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1059,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1059, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1059)
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1059,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1059, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1059)
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1059,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1059, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1059)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    11. 2.1997 20:11:23
  7. O'Neill, E.T.; Lavoie, B.F.; McClain, P.D.: Web Characterization Project : An Analysis of Metadata Usage on the Web (2001) 0.03 
    0.02783884 = product of:
  0.13919419 = sum of:
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    11. 2.1997 20:11:23
  8. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.01 
    0.011646207 = product of:
  0.058231037 = sum of:
    0.03979285 = weight(_text_:software in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03979285 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008103048 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
    0.010335136 = product of:
      0.031005409 = sum of:
        0.031005409 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031005409 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. O'Neill, E.T.: OCLC's experience identifying and using works (2004) 0.01 
    0.010847394 = product of:
  0.05423697 = sum of:
    0.024585744 = weight(_text_:und in 2459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024585744 = score(doc=2459,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 2459, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2459)
    0.009260627 = weight(_text_:in in 2459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009260627 = score(doc=2459,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 2459, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2459)
    0.0203906 = weight(_text_:der in 2459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0203906 = score(doc=2459,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 2459, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2459)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Content
    Beitrag anlässlich des FRBR-Workshops für Expertengruppenmitglieder am 8. und 9. Juli 2004 in Der Deutschen Bibliothek mit der Zielsetzung: Die Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) haben seit ihrer Veröffentlichung 1998 durch die IFLA die bibliothekarische Diskussion befruchtet. Was verbirgt sich hinter den FRBR? Welche Auswirkungen hat dieses Modell, das Beziehungen zwischen Entitäten darstellt, auf Regelwerke, Normdateien, Formate, Online-Kataloge und andere Bereiche? Welche Erfahrungen sind international bereits mit den FRBR gesammelt worden? Können wir die FRBR in Deutschland und Österreich nutzbringend in die Standardisierungsarbeit einbringen?
  10. Lavoie, B.F.; Connaway, L.S.; O'Neill, E.T.: Mapping WorldCat's digital landscape (2007) 0.00 
    0.002490809 = product of:
  0.018681066 = sum of:
    0.009822378 = weight(_text_:in in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009822378 = score(doc=2292,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
    0.008858688 = product of:
      0.026576065 = sum of:
        0.026576065 = weight(_text_:22 in 2292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026576065 = score(doc=2292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2292)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Digital materials are reshaping library collections and, by extension, traditional library practice for collecting, organizing, and preserving information. This paper uses OCLC's WorldCat bibliographic database as a data source for examining questions relating to digital materials in library collections, including criteria for identifying digital materials algorithmically in MARC21 records; the quantity, types, characteristics, and holdings patterns of digital materials cataloged in WorldCat; and trends in WorldCat cataloging activity for digital materials over time. Issues pertaining to cataloging practice for digital materials and perspectives on digital holdings at the work level also are discussed. Analysis of the aggregate collection represented by the combined digital holdings in WorldCat affords a high-level perspective on historical patterns, suggests future trends, and supplies useful intelligence with which to inform decision making in a variety of areas.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001) 0.00 
    0.0022504835 = product of:
  0.016878625 = sum of:
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=2205,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
    0.008858688 = product of:
      0.026576065 = sum of:
        0.026576065 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026576065 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Form subdivisions have always been an important part of the Library of Congress Subject Headings. However, when the MARC format was developed, no separate subfield code to identify form subdivisions was defined. Form and topical subdivisions were both included within a general subdivision category. In 1995, the USMARC Advisory Group approved a proposal defining subfield v for form subdivisions, and in 1999 the Library of Congress (LC) began identifying form subdivisions with the new code. However, there are millions of older bibliographic records lacking the explicit form subdivision coding. Identifying form subdivisions retrospectively is not a simple task. An algorithmic method was developed to identify form subdivisions coded as general subdivisions. The algorithm was used to identify 2,563 unique form subdivisions or combinations of form subdivisions in OCLC's WorldCat. The algorithm proved to be highly accurate with an error rate estimated to be less than 0.1%. The observed usage of the form subdivisions was highly skewed with the 100 most used form subdivisions or combinations of subdivisions accounting for 90% of the assignments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2014) 0.00 
    0.0019732467 = product of:
  0.01479935 = sum of:
    0.0057878923 = weight(_text_:in in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057878923 = score(doc=1970,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
    0.009011458 = weight(_text_:der in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009011458 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve searching by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users' searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST prototype complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
  13. O'Neill, E.T.: FRBR: Functional requirements for bibliographic records application of the entity-relationship model to Humphry Clinker (2002) 0.00 
    0.0014298509 = product of:
  0.010723881 = sum of:
    0.0033416408 = weight(_text_:in in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033416408 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
    0.00738224 = product of:
      0.02214672 = sum of:
        0.02214672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02214672 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    The report from the IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) recommended a new approach to cataloging based on an entity-relationship model. This study examined a single work, The Expedition of Humphry Clinker, to determine benefits and drawbacks associated with creating such an entity-relationship model. Humphry Clinker was selected for several reasons - it has been previously studied, it is widely held, and it is a work of mid-level complexity. In addition to analyzing the bibliographic records, many books were examined to ensure the accuracy of the resulting FRBR model. While it was possible to identify works and manifestations, identifying expressions was problematic. Reliable identification of expressions frequently necessitated the examination of the books themselves. Enhanced manifestation records where the roles of editors, illustrators, translators, and other contributors are explicitly identified may be a viable alternative to expressions. For Humphry Clinker, the enhanced record approach avoids the problem of identifying expressions while providing similar functionality. With the enhanced manifestation record, the three remaining entity-relationship structures - works, manifestations, and items - the FRBR model provides a powerful means to improve bibliographic organization and navigation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. O'Neill, E.T.; Connaway, L.S.; Dickey, T.J.: Estimating the audience level for library resources (2008) 0.00 
    7.87439E-4 = product of:
  0.011811584 = sum of:
    0.011811584 = product of:
      0.035434753 = sum of:
        0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 6654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035434753 = score(doc=6654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6654)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Date
    8.11.2008 19:22:53
  15. O'Neill, E.T.; Aluri, R.: Library of Congress Subject Heading patterns in OCLC monographic records (1981) 0.00 
    7.1288337E-4 = product of:
  0.01069325 = sum of:
    0.01069325 = weight(_text_:in in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01069325 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
  16. Patton, G.; Hengel-Dittrich, C.; O'Neill, E.T.; Tillett, B.B.: VIAF (Virtual International Authority File) : Linking Die Deutsche Bibliothek and Library of Congress Name Authority Files (2006) 0.00 
    6.007639E-4 = product of:
  0.009011458 = sum of:
    0.009011458 = weight(_text_:der in 6105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009011458 = score(doc=6105,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 6105, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6105)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich der 72ND IFLA General Conference and Council, 20-24 August 2006, Seoul, Korea
  17. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.: FAST - a new approach to controlled subject access (2008) 0.00 
    5.9777097E-4 = product of:
  0.008966564 = sum of:
    0.008966564 = weight(_text_:in in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008966564 = score(doc=2181,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid proliferation of digital resources, are forcing changes in bibliographic control to make it easier to use, understand, and apply subject data. Subject headings are no exception. The enormous volume and rapid growth of digital libraries and repositories and the emergence of numerous metadata schemes have spurred a reexamination of the way subject data are to be provided for such resources efficiently and effectively. To address this need, OCLC in cooperation with the Library of Congress, has taken a new approach, called FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology). FAST headings are based on the existing vocabulary in Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), but are applied with a simpler syntax than required by Library of Congress application policies. Adapting the LCSH vocabulary in a simplified faceted syntax retains the rich vocabulary of LCSH while making it easier to understand, control, apply, and use.
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  18. Zumer, M.; O'Neill, E.T.: Modeling aggregates in FRBR (2012) 0.00 
    5.9777097E-4 = product of:
  0.008966564 = sum of:
    0.008966564 = weight(_text_:in in 1913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008966564 = score(doc=1913,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 1913, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1913)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    In the bibliographic environment, the term aggregate is used to describe a bibliographic entity formed by combining distinct bibliographic units together. Aggregates are a large and growing class of information resources-up to twenty percent of the bibliographic records in OCLC's WorldCat may represent aggregates. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report only briefly references aggregates. Difficulties and inconsistencies in the application of the FRBR model to aggregates have been identified as a significant impediment to FRBR implementation. To address the issue, the FRBR Review Group established a Working Group on Aggregates which completed its charge and submitted its final report in 2011. The Working Group proposed that an aggregate be defined as a "manifestation embodying multiple distinct expressions". This paper examines the proposed definition and explores how aggregates can be modeled.
  19. O'Neill, E.T.: ¬The FRBRization of Humphry Clinker : a case study in the application of IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (2002) 0.00 
    4.6303135E-4 = product of:
  0.00694547 = sum of:
    0.00694547 = weight(_text_:in in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00694547 = score(doc=2433,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    The goal of OCLC's FRBR projects is to examine issues associated with the conversion of a set of bibliographic records to conform to FRBR requirements (a process referred to as "FRBRization"). The goals of this FRBR project were to: - examine issues associated with creating an entity-relationship model for (i.e., "FRBRizing") a non-trivial work - better understand the relationship between the bibliographic records and the bibliographic objects they represent - determine if the information available in the bibliographic record is sufficient to reliably identify the FRBR entities - to develop a data set that could be used to evaluate FRBRization algorithms. Using an exemplary work as a case study, lead scientist Ed O'Neill sought to: - better understand the relationship between bibliographic records and the bibliographic objects they represent - determine if the information available in the bibliographic records is sufficient to reliably identify FRBR entities.
  20. O'Neill, E.T.; Kammerer, K.A.; Bennett, R.: ¬The aboutness of words (2017) 0.00 
    4.6303135E-4 = product of:
  0.00694547 = sum of:
    0.00694547 = weight(_text_:in in 3835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00694547 = score(doc=3835,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 3835, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3835)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    Word aboutness is defined as the relationship between words and subjects associated with them. An aboutness coefficient is developed to estimate the strength of the aboutness relationship. Words that are randomly distributed across subjects are assumed to lack aboutness and the degree to which their usage deviates from a random pattern indicates the strength of the aboutness. To estimate aboutness, title words and their associated subjects are extracted from the titles of non-fiction English language books in the OCLC WorldCat database. The usage patterns of the title words are analyzed and used to compute aboutness coefficients for each of the common title words. Words with low aboutness coefficients (An and In) are commonly found in stop word lists, whereas words with high aboutness coefficients (Carbonate, Autism) are unambiguous and have a strong subject association. The aboutness coefficient potentially can enhance indexing, advance authority control, and improve retrieval.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 26
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

Themes