-
Olson, H.A.: Hegel's epistemograph, classification, and Spivak's postcolonial reason (2010)
0.05
0.04564796 = product of:
0.13694388 = sum of:
0.039370064 = weight(_text_:23 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039370064 = score(doc=3510,freq=4.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.039370064 = weight(_text_:23 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039370064 = score(doc=3510,freq=4.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.039370064 = weight(_text_:23 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039370064 = score(doc=3510,freq=4.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008019937 = score(doc=3510,freq=8.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.010813748 = weight(_text_:der in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010813748 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- A major characteristic of classification is teleology interpreted as a linear progression toward knowledge. G.W.F. Hegel's three stages of knowledge development: Being (Sein), Essence (Wesen), and Idea (Begriff), explicated in his Science of logic form such a progression. Feminist postcolonial critic Gayatri Spivak calls this kind of progression as an "epistemograph". Classification is a manifestation of Western logic and the sequence of main classes is illustrative of the progression that reflects Hegel's epistemograph. DDC and UDC between them represent library classification globally and use a sequence of main classes derived from Hegel and indirectly from Bacon. The lingering consequences of this heritage still create dilemmas in our organization of knowledge.
- Pages
- S.23-30
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12
- Source
- Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Olson, H.A.; Given, L.M.: Indexing and the 'organized' researcher (2003)
0.04
0.044542145 = product of:
0.22271073 = sum of:
0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07423691 = score(doc=464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07423691 = score(doc=464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07423691 = score(doc=464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Source
- Indexer. 23(2003) no.3, S.120-133
-
Olson, H.A.: Cultural discourse of classification : indigeous alternatives to the tradition of Aristotle, Durkheim, and Foucault (2001)
0.04
0.03938501 = product of:
0.118155025 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008103048 = score(doc=1594,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.01261604 = weight(_text_:der in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01261604 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- The paper explores the cultural construction of classification by identifying fundamental characteristics of classification and examining how these fit with other cultures. Foucault's method of discourse analysis is applied to selected texts an classification in two areas. The first area is classification originated in the dominant Western culture. The second area is classifications from indigenous cultures. It is concluded that classification research needs to have an increasing awareness of the cultural construction of classification schemes and to work with alternatives to approaches of fundamental universal principles of classification.
- Date
- 11. 5.2003 18:28:23
- Source
- Advances in classification research, vol.10: proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. Ed.: Albrechtsen, H. u. J.E. Mai
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Milani, S.O.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Olson, H.A.: Bias in subject representation : convergences and divergences in the international literature (2014)
0.04
0.035018615 = product of:
0.10505584 = sum of:
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
0.012680635 = weight(_text_:in in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012680635 = score(doc=1443,freq=20.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.28515202 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
0.008858688 = product of:
0.026576065 = sum of:
0.026576065 = weight(_text_:22 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026576065 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Terms chosen to represent document subjects, the classification notations assigned to them, the abstracts and indices contain biases in two contexts. In a negative context, document surrogates are constructed with bias when they leave out diverse features, disenfranchise groups and topics outside an accepted norm (Olson, 2002). In this way, these document surrogates would convey inclinations, or prejudices. In a positive context, slanting or tendency (Hjørland, 2008a, McIlwaine, 2003) conveyed by the document surrogates to ensure specificity to particular discursive communities or knowledge domains can be observed. Considering that topics related to biases are scarce in the Information Organization literature, this paper proposes a discussion on the characteristics and occurrences of bias in subject representation. This study is exploratory and bibliographic, and adopts an inductive method.
- Date
- 2.10.2017 19:18:23
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (2001)
0.03
0.028143732 = product of:
0.10553899 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008103048 = score(doc=6113,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Date
- 23. 6.2002 12:56:57
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.4, S.206-208 (C. Arsenault):"Overall, this is an excellent work, on an ever increasingly pertinent topic. This long-awaited second edition provides a thorough and comprehensive update of an already important text. I very highly recommend it to professionals and academics alike ; both neophytes and veterans will find it valuable. It is a fundamental work that cannot be ignored in the field of subject analysis and retrieval for all bibliographic systems, including online catalogs."
-
Olson, H.A.: Dewey thinks therefore he is : the epistemic stance of Dewey and DDC (1996)
0.03
0.027230462 = product of:
0.10211423 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=5186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5186)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=5186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5186)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=5186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5186)
0.004678297 = weight(_text_:in in 5186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004678297 = score(doc=5186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 5186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5186)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Date
- 23. 7.1996 19:14:52
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.5
-
Lee, H.-L.; Olson, H.A.: Hierarchical navigation : an exploration of Yahoo! directories (2005)
0.02
0.024662156 = product of:
0.09248308 = sum of:
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=3991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=3991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=3991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
0.008966564 = weight(_text_:in in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008966564 = score(doc=3991,freq=10.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Although researchers have theorized the critical importance of classification in the organization of information, the classification approach seems to have given way to the alphabetical subject approach in retrieval tools widely used in libraries, and research an how users utilize classification or classification-like arrangements in information seeking has been scant. To better understand whether searchers consider classificatory structures a viable alternative to information retrieval, this article reports an a study of how 24 library and information science students used Yahoo! directories, a popular search service resembling classification, in completing an assigned simple task. Several issues emerged from the students' reporting of their search process and a comparison between hierarchical navigation and keyword searching: citation order of facets, precision vs. recall, and other factors influencing searchers' successes and preferences. The latter included search expertise, knowledge of the discipline, and time required to complete the search. Without a definitive conclusion, we suggest a number of directoons for further research.
- Date
- 18. 9.2005 12:30:23
-
Olson, H.A.: Thinking professionals : teaching critical cataloguing (1997)
0.02
0.019487187 = product of:
0.09743594 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 25.10.1996 14:23:18
-
Wolfram, D.; Olson, H.A.; Bloom, R.: Measuring consistency for multiple taggers using vector space modeling (2009)
0.01
0.007357559 = product of:
0.05518169 = sum of:
0.04823622 = weight(_text_:software in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04823622 = score(doc=3113,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
0.00694547 = weight(_text_:in in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00694547 = score(doc=3113,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Abstract
- A longstanding area of study in indexing is the identification of factors affecting vocabulary usage and consistency. This topic has seen a recent resurgence with a focus on social tagging. Tagging data for scholarly articles made available by the social bookmarking Website CiteULike (www.citeulike.org) were used to test the use of inter-indexer/tagger consistency density values, based on a method developed by the authors by comparing calculations for highly tagged documents representing three subject areas (Science, Social Science, Social Software). The analysis revealed that the developed method is viable for a large dataset. The findings also indicated that there were no significant differences in tagging consistency among the three topic areas, demonstrating that vocabulary usage in a relatively new subject area like social software is no more inconsistent than the more established subject areas investigated. The implications of the method used and the findings are discussed.
-
Olson, H.A.: Exclusivity, teleology and hierarchy : our aristotelean legacy (1999)
0.00
0.0027625454 = product of:
0.020719089 = sum of:
0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008103048 = score(doc=4466,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
0.01261604 = weight(_text_:der in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01261604 = score(doc=4466,freq=2.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Abstract
- This paper examines Parmenides's 'Fragments', Plato's 'The sophist', and Aristotle's 'Prior analytics, parts of animals', and 'Generation of animals' to identify 3 underlying presumptions of classical logic using the method of Foucauldian discourse analysis. These 3 presumptions are the notion of mutually exclusive categories, teleology in the sense of linear progression toward a goal, and hierarchy both through logical division and through the dominance of some classes over others. These 3 presumptions are linked to classificatory thought in the western tradition. The purpose of making the connections is to investigate the cultural specifity to western culture of widespread classificatory practice. It is a step in a larger study to examine classification as a cultural construction that may be systematically incompatible with other cultures and with marginalized elements of western culture
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Olson, H.A.: ¬The ubiquitous hierarchy : an army to overcome the threat of a mob (2004)
0.00
0.0026353276 = product of:
0.019764956 = sum of:
0.005346625 = weight(_text_:in in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005346625 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
0.014418332 = weight(_text_:der in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014418332 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Olson, H.A.: Earthly order and the oneness of mysticism : Hugh of Saint Victor and medieval classification of wisdom (2010)
0.00
0.0025111581 = product of:
0.018833686 = sum of:
0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 3479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008019937 = score(doc=3479,freq=8.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3479, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3479)
0.010813748 = weight(_text_:der in 3479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010813748 = score(doc=3479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 3479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3479)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Abstract
- Hugh of St. Victor's Didascalicon is a twelfth-century classification of knowledge, or as Hugh would put it, of Wisdom, written in the context of medieval, Christian mysticism. This study reads the text through its cultural and intellectual context, including medieval themes of the problem of universals and the importance of numerology. The study addresses the question of whether or not Hugh's classification is part of the Aristotelian tradition of classificatory structure characterized by mutually exclusive categories, teleological progress toward a goal, and hierarchy, which is still with us today. It also examines the role of the liberal arts in Hugh's pedagogy and philosophy as exhibited in the Didascalicon.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Special issue: A Festschrift for Clare Beghtol
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001)
0.00
0.0024584248 = product of:
0.018438185 = sum of:
0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008103048 = score(doc=166,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.010335136 = product of:
0.031005409 = sum of:
0.031005409 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031005409 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Abstract
- The idea of sameness is used to gather material in classifications. However, it is also used to separate what is different. Sameness and difference as guiding principles of classification seem obvious but are actually fundamental characteristics specifically related to Western culture. Sameness is not a singular factor, but has the potential to represent multiple characteristics or facets. This article explores the ramifications of which characteristics are used to define classifications and in what order. It explains the primacy of division by discipline, its origins in Western philosophy, and the cultural specificity that results. The Dewey Decimal Classification is used as an example throughout.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.00
0.002320955 = product of:
0.017407162 = sum of:
0.010024922 = weight(_text_:in in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010024922 = score(doc=5588,freq=18.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.00738224 = product of:
0.02214672 = sum of:
0.02214672 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02214672 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Abstract
- To organize information, librarians create structures. These structures grow from a logic that goes back at least as far as Aristotle. It is the basis of classification as we practice it, and thesauri and subject headings have developed from it. Feminist critiques of logic suggest that logic is gendered in nature. This article will explore how these critiques play out in contemporary standards for the organization of information. Our widely used classification schemes embody principles such as hierarchical force that conform to traditional/Aristotelian logic. Our subject heading strings follow a linear path of subdivision. Our thesauri break down subjects into discrete concepts. In thesauri and subject heading lists we privilege hierarchical relationships, reflected in the syndetic structure of broader and narrower terms, over all other relationships. Are our classificatory and syndetic structures gendered? Are there other options? Carol Gilligan's In a Different Voice (1982), Women's Ways of Knowing (Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recent related research suggest a different type of structure for women's knowledge grounded in "connected knowing." This article explores current and potential elements of connected knowing in subject access with a focus on the relationships, both paradigmatic and syntagmatic, between concepts.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'Gender Issues in Information Needs and Services'.
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
-
Olson, H.A.: ¬The power to name : representation in library catalogs (2001)
0.00
8.821482E-4 = product of:
0.013232223 = sum of:
0.013232223 = weight(_text_:in in 6212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013232223 = score(doc=6212,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 6212, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6212)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Source
- Signs: Journal of women in culture and society. 26(2001) no.3, S.639-668
-
Olson, H.A.; Ward, D.B.: Charting a journey across knowledge domains : feminism in the Dewey Decimal Classification (1998)
0.00
7.639628E-4 = product of:
0.011459442 = sum of:
0.011459442 = weight(_text_:in in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011459442 = score(doc=70,freq=12.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Abstract
- This paper addresses problems of representing marginalized knowledge domains in general and feminist or women's studies in particular in the Dewey Decimal Classification. The authors develop and apply a theoretical framework that makes the classification's limits permeable. A variety of approaches are proposed to create paradoxical spaces, places that accommodate the margins and the mainstream simultaneously. The resulting changes, expansions and options proposed for DDC are accessible through a user interface designed for the purpose
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.; Olson, H.A.: ¬The use of BISAC in libraries as new cases of Reader-Interest Classifications (2014)
0.00
7.639628E-4 = product of:
0.011459442 = sum of:
0.011459442 = weight(_text_:in in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011459442 = score(doc=1973,freq=12.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Abstract
- In the recent years, several libraries in the United States have been experimenting with Book Industry Standards and Communications (BISAC), the classification system of the book industry, as an alternative to the Dewey Decimal Classification. Although rarely discussed, these cases of implementation of BISAC arguably resemble other past cases of replacement of traditional classifications that received the name of reader-interest classifications. In this article, a comparison of the BISAC cases to the previous cases of reader-interest classifications is taken in order to determine if the current application of BISAC to libraries is susceptible to the same problems, dangers, and ends as occurred in the past.
-
Olson, H.A.: Diversity in knowledge organization : Editorial (2001)
0.00
7.1288337E-4 = product of:
0.01069325 = sum of:
0.01069325 = weight(_text_:in in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01069325 = score(doc=621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; Olson, H.A.; Kipp, M.E.I.: New roles and gobal agents in information organization in Spanish libraries (2012)
0.00
6.6832814E-4 = product of:
0.010024922 = sum of:
0.010024922 = weight(_text_:in in 85) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010024922 = score(doc=85,freq=18.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 85, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=85)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Abstract
- In a new globalized scenario, the traditional activities of information organization agents in libraries have tended to converge with those from the book industry under the presumption that most traditional library practices are not adequate for the new globalized situation. This article analyzes the nature and consequences for libraries of the links between agents from the book industry and the organizations in charge of the main library information organization systems, both at an international level and in Spain. Some of the agents whose discourses were analyzed include OCLC, the UDC Consortium, BISG, BIC, EDItEUR, DILVE, Google and Amazon. We conclude that there is evidence of an incursion of book industry practices into the information organization practices of OCLC and that collaboration between both sectors will result in an increase in universality and homogenization in library information organization practices without consideration for the nature and specific characteristics of the library and how it differs from the bookstore.
-
Olson, H.A.: Transgressive deconstructions : feminist/postcolonial methodology for research in knowledge organization (2003)
0.00
6.301059E-4 = product of:
0.009451588 = sum of:
0.009451588 = weight(_text_:in in 3551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009451588 = score(doc=3551,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 3551, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3551)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Source
- Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
