-
Rohlfien, K.: Sacherschließung der Monographien, Serienwerke und Stücktitel der Entomologischen Bibliothek mit dem Literaturverwaltungssystem VCH-BIBLIO (1994)
0.20
0.2013404 = product of:
0.43144372 = sum of:
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 8970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=8970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 8970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8970)
0.16052344 = weight(_text_:monographien in 8970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16052344 = score(doc=8970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.217941 = queryWeight, product of:
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.73654544 = fieldWeight in 8970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8970)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 8970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=8970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 8970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8970)
0.056846928 = weight(_text_:software in 8970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056846928 = score(doc=8970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 8970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8970)
0.03073218 = weight(_text_:und in 8970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03073218 = score(doc=8970,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 8970, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8970)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 8970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=8970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 8970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8970)
0.044146944 = weight(_text_:der in 8970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044146944 = score(doc=8970,freq=12.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.6045309 = fieldWeight in 8970, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8970)
0.46666667 = coord(7/15)
- Abstract
- Ausgehend von der Situation der Entomologischen Bibliothek werden sowohl die Stellung des Sachkataloges im Literatursystem der Projektgruppe Entomologie als auch die Anforderungen an eine Sacherschließung erörtert und die Anpassung des Literaturverwaltungssystems VCH-BIBLIO sowie die erarbeiteten Ordnungsmittel beschrieben
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaues. 1994, H.50, S.18-23
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Nagelschmidt, M.: Literaturverwaltungsprogramme : das funktionale Minimum (2010)
0.14
0.13876642 = product of:
0.26018703 = sum of:
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.06431496 = weight(_text_:software in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06431496 = score(doc=4208,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.024585744 = weight(_text_:und in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024585744 = score(doc=4208,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.027396431 = weight(_text_:zur in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027396431 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27215877 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00756127 = score(doc=4208,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.024973284 = weight(_text_:der in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024973284 = score(doc=4208,freq=6.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.53333336 = coord(8/15)
- Abstract
- Mit der zunehmenden Verfügbarkeit bibliografischer Daten wird auch die Verwendung von Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen immer interessanter. Viele Bibliotheken bieten in ihren Katalogen mittlerweile entsprechende Schnittstellen an, die einen direkten Import der Bestandsdaten der Bibliothek in die Literaturverwaltung des Nutzers ermöglichen. Dabei muss jedoch streng differenziert werden zwischen solchen Programmen zum Aufbau individueller Literatursammlungen und solchen, zum Aufbau und zur Pflege institutionell betriebener Datenbanken. Im Beitrag werden die Leistungsmerkmale einer idealtypischen Literaturverwaltung im Sinne eines Produktivitätswerkzeuges beschrieben und anschließend von den Merkmalen professioneller bibliografischer Software abgegrenzt.
- Date
- 26. 8.2010 11:23:50
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Bjorner, S.: EndNote Plus und EndLink : Bibliography formatting software for managing search results (1995)
0.10
0.104833 = product of:
0.2620825 = sum of:
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=3381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=3381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
0.09846178 = weight(_text_:software in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09846178 = score(doc=3381,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.75917953 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
0.017743232 = weight(_text_:und in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017743232 = score(doc=3381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=3381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066832816 = score(doc=3381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
0.4 = coord(6/15)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of 2 part article examining the use of bibliography formatting software for managing online search output. Looks at the use of EndNote Plus 2 and its companion program EndLink. Gives examples of the difficulties encountered in importing references from ABI/INFORM and IAC databases
- Date
- 23. 2.1996 19:13:41
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993)
0.08
0.0829132 = product of:
0.20728299 = sum of:
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
0.07876942 = weight(_text_:software in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07876942 = score(doc=561,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.6073436 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
0.005346625 = weight(_text_:in in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005346625 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
0.011811584 = product of:
0.035434753 = sum of:
0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035434753 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(6/15)
- Abstract
- Presents a summary of a more detailed study made of evaluation versions of these 2 US software packages, due to appear in 'C and L applications'. The packages are aimed at individual researchers, students and lecturers rather than libraries. Concludes that the cheaper package, EndNote, appears better suited to the students with occasional need for bibliographies, whereas the more complex (and expensive) Pro-Cite would suit a researcher or writer with a high output of professional papers. Pro-Cite could probably also be used by a small library as a means of creating a database
- Source
- Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998)
0.08
0.07713141 = product of:
0.19282852 = sum of:
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
0.06431496 = weight(_text_:software in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06431496 = score(doc=2878,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
0.005346625 = weight(_text_:in in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005346625 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
0.011811584 = product of:
0.035434753 = sum of:
0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035434753 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(6/15)
- Abstract
- Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
- Source
- Library software review. 17(1998) no.1, S.14-23
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Perera, P.: Micro CDS/ISIS : a critical appraisal of its search interface (1992)
0.07
0.07318869 = product of:
0.27445757 = sum of:
0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 4537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06495729 = score(doc=4537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 4537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4537)
0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 4537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06495729 = score(doc=4537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 4537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4537)
0.0795857 = weight(_text_:software in 4537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0795857 = score(doc=4537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.61363745 = fieldWeight in 4537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4537)
0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 4537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06495729 = score(doc=4537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 4537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4537)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:30:47
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993)
0.07
0.070482306 = product of:
0.17620575 = sum of:
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.045477543 = weight(_text_:software in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045477543 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00756127 = score(doc=7701,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.011811584 = product of:
0.035434753 = sum of:
0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035434753 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(6/15)
- Abstract
- Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:22:09
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996)
0.06
0.05701249 = product of:
0.17103747 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.06892324 = weight(_text_:software in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06892324 = score(doc=6757,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.53142565 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.004678297 = weight(_text_:in in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004678297 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 19:00:23
- Object
- Personal Library Software
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
EndNote X1 (2007)
0.05
0.054556824 = product of:
0.13639206 = sum of:
0.020098427 = weight(_text_:software in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020098427 = score(doc=2928,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.15496688 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
0.019837536 = weight(_text_:und in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019837536 = score(doc=2928,freq=40.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27378 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
0.024215251 = weight(_text_:zur in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024215251 = score(doc=2928,freq=16.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.24055663 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
0.0076566604 = weight(_text_:in in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0076566604 = score(doc=2928,freq=42.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.17217688 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
42.0 = termFreq=42.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
0.028138263 = weight(_text_:der in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028138263 = score(doc=2928,freq=78.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3853143 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
8.83176 = tf(freq=78.0), with freq of:
78.0 = termFreq=78.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
0.036445912 = product of:
0.10933773 = sum of:
0.10933773 = weight(_text_:5d in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10933773 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35973665 = queryWeight, product of:
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.30393827 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(6/15)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 61(2008) H.1, S.110-112 (O. Oberhauser): "In Heft 4/2006 dieser Zeitschrift wurde die zehnte Ausgabe ("X") des bewährten Literaturverwaltungsprogramms EndNote besprochen. 2007 kam die vorliegende, elfte Version auf den Markt, diesmal mit der leicht postmodern anmutenden Zählung "X1", die sich nach der Implementierung eines kürzlich erschienenen Updates als "X1.0.1" liest. Die neue Version ist der vorhergehenden grundsätzlich ähnlich, verfügt aber über einige interessante zusätzliche Features, die im Folgenden kurz behandelt werden sollen. Eine Gruppe dieser Neuerungen betrifft die in der EndNote-Diktion als "library window" bezeichnete Kurztitelliste. In dieser ist es erstens nunmehr möglich, pro EndNote-Bibliothek bis zu 500 individuell definierbare "Gruppen" zu erstellen, denen z.B. einzelne oder mehrere ausgewählte Datensätze, aber auch Ergebnisse einer Suche in der betreffenden Bibliothek oder eine Menge importierter Datensätze zugeordnet werden können. Diese Gruppen bleiben über das Ende einer Sitzung hinweg erhalten, können aber stets leicht wieder verändert (erweitert, reduziert, umbenannt bzw. gelöscht) werden. Ein und derselbe Eintrag kann bei Bedarf auch verschiedenen Gruppen zugeordnet werden. Wenn die Spalte, in der die Gruppen aufgelistet werden (und in der zwischen der Anzeige aller Datensätze und jener einer bestimmten Gruppe hin- und hergewechselt werden kann), gerade nicht benötigt wird, kann sie mit einem in der Werkzeugleiste plazierten Icon weggeklickt werden. Ich selbst habe mit dem Gruppen-Feature bereits gute Erfahrungen gemacht, z.B. zur (temporären) Zusammenfassung von thematisch ähnlichen Einträgen, zur Zusammenführung von Vorträgen einer bestimmten Konferenz sowie zur Markierung von dringend zu beschaffender Originalliteratur. Zur Verbesserung der Kurztitelliste gehört zweitens die Option, in der Autorenspalte alle Verfasser einer Publikation (nicht nur die jeweils ersten) samt ihren Vornamen bzw. Initialen aufscheinen zu lassen. Dies ist nicht nur bei Namensgleichheit von Vorteil, sondern macht auch die Unterschiede in der Sortierung von Ein- und Mehrverfasserpublikationen transparenter und erscheint mir daher als höchst willkommene Änderung. Drittens kann jetzt, mit Hilfe eines per rechter Maustaste aufrufbaren Menüs, direkt aus der Kurztitelliste heraus der zu einem jeweiligen Datensatz gespeicherte Volltext aufgerufen bzw. eine katalogisierte Web-Adresse (URL) geöffnet werden. Während ersteres im Fall meiner Datenbank problemlos funktioniert, scheitert das URL-Öffnen an meiner Gepflogenheit, zu einer Web-Adresse auch das Zugriffsdatum festzuhalten. So wird beim Aufruf aus der Kurzanzeige z. B. der katalogisierte Eintrag
http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper330.html [16.10.2007] im Web-Browser unglücklicherweise in die Adresse http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper330.html%20%5B16.10.2007%5D umgesetzt, während dies im Eingabefenster ("reference window") durchaus nicht der Fall ist. Dort wird der in blauer Schrift dargestellte Link korrekt erkannt und kann, ohne dass das dahinter stehende Datum stört, durch simples Anklicken in einem Browser-Fenster geöffnet werden. Als viertes und auch recht nützliches neues Feature der Kurztitelliste ist anzuführen, dass dort als Alternative zu der mit einem separaten Suchfenster realisierten Recherche in der EndNote-Library nunmehr ein kleines Eingabefenster für eine "Quick Search" zur Verfügung steht, mit der sich ein guter Teil der Abfragen bewältigen lässt. Andere Neuerungen betreffen neben der Kurztitelliste ("library window") auch das Eingabefenster ("reference window") bzw. die dort bei der Datenerfassung und -pflege erscheinenden Felder und ihre Bezeichnungen. So steht nunmehr eine umfassendere Möglichkeit zur Gestaltung von Schriftart und -grösse der Felder und ihrer Inhalte zur Verfügung. Das Feld "Link to PDF" wurde in "File Attachment" umbenannt, zumal dort jetzt pro Datensatz bis zu 45 Dateien beliebiger Formate verlinkt werden können. Das Feld für die Erfassung von Kennungen für digitale Dokumente heisst jetzt "DOI" (Digital Object Identifier), da sich dieser Identifikator insbesondere für Online-Artikel wissenschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften durchgesetzt hat. Eine neue Funktionalität, die zur Erhöhung der Flexibilität bei der Verwendung von EndNote beitragen soll, verbirgt sich hinter den Headings "Sharing Your Reference Type Table" (Manual) bzw. "Exportieren und Importieren von angepassten Datenbankstrukturen" (deutschsprachiger Produktprospekt). Damit wird es bspw. möglich gemacht, die EndNoteDatenbank eines Kollegen, die dieser mit individuellen Modifikationen (Feldbezeichnungen, Standard-Referenztyp, Spaltendefinition der Kurztitelanzeige), versehen hat, in dieser modifizierten Form zu betrachten. Dazu muss allerdings zuerst die eigene Tabelle der dokumententypspezifischen Felddefinitionen ("reference type table") exportiert und an sicherer Stelle verwahrt werden. Diese Prozedur ist für den geschilderten Fall, der nicht allzu oft vorkommen wird, unschwer durchführbar - dies zeigte sich auch bei einem einfachen Test. Wollte man sie hingegen für den alltäglichen, parallelen Betrieb von Datenbanken mit unterschiedlicher Struktur (z.B. Literatur- vs. CD- oder Filmdatenbank) nutzen, so bedürfte sie noch einer weiteren, ein ergonomisches Arbeiten besser unterstützenden Automatisierung.
Auch für die gemeinsame Verwendung von EndNote mit der Textverarbeitung wurden einige Verbesserungen eingebaut (von mir noch nicht ausprobiert). So gibt es etwa eine neue Word 2007 für Windows Multifunktionsleiste mit "Cite While You Write"-Befehlen, Konflikte mit anderen in Word eingebundenen Programmen wurden beseitigt, und auch OpenOffice-Dokumente (ODT) werden jetzt bei der Erstellung formatierter Zitate und Literaturverzeichnisse unterstützt. Schließlich sei noch erwähnt, dass EndNote nunmehr auch auf Pocket PCs mit dem Betriebssystem Windows Mobile lauffähig ist. Von den vier in meiner früheren Rezension zu Version X angeführten Desiderata wurden durch die neue Version zwei erfüllt. Die Sortierung der Kurztitelliste ist jetzt, wie oben dargestellt, transparenter und das Programm startet auch wieder schneller. Die anderen beiden früher aufgelisteten Punkte - fehlende Beziehungen zwischen Datensätzen (Stichwort "Sammelwerke") und verbesserbare Dublettenerkennung - sind noch offen. Eine damals nicht erwähnte Kleinigkeit, die aber bei der alltäglichen Dateneingabe und -pflege durchaus "nervt", ist das Fehlen der bisher nicht in das Programm integrierten Sonderzeichentabelle. Um ein Sonderzeichen - und sei dies auch nur ein simpler Gedankenstrich - einzugeben, muss dieses von irgendwoher kopiert werden (am besten aus der Windows-eigenen Zeichentabelle, die dann stets neben EndNote geöffnet sein muss). In Summe kann festgehalten werden, dass EndNote mit der vorliegenden Version X1 wieder ein Stück besser geworden ist. Dass die Software ja insgesamt nicht viele Wünsche offen lässt, wurde bereits in der letzten Besprechung vermerkt. Es ist aber erfreulich, dass dem Hersteller daran liegt, auch einem so etablierten Produkt immer wieder ein wenig "Modellpflege" angedeihen zu lassen."
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
White, F.: EndNote Plus: a bibliography maker for the researcher (1993)
0.05
0.053949453 = product of:
0.20231044 = sum of:
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=6949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=6949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
0.090955086 = weight(_text_:software in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.090955086 = score(doc=6949,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.70129997 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=6949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Reviews the EndNote Plus software package, one of a growing range of bibliography makers, designed to facilitate the creation of bibliographies by means of word processing software. EndNote Plus can be used to create large, fully formatted bibliographies that can be incorporated automatically into research papers. Alternatively, EndNote Plus bibliographies can be created as independent documents with facilities that provide users with basic search and retrieval tools. EndNote Plus also supports the importing of downloaded data from online databases and other external sources
- Source
- Library software review. 12(1993) no.3, S.12-23
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Scholz, M.W.: Anwendungsmöglichkeiten der Bibliothekssoftware Bismas bei der Erstellung und Verwaltung von Informations- und Literaturdatenbanken (1994)
0.05
0.052891415 = product of:
0.1983428 = sum of:
0.0795857 = weight(_text_:software in 7477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0795857 = score(doc=7477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.61363745 = fieldWeight in 7477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7477)
0.035129808 = weight(_text_:und in 7477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035129808 = score(doc=7477,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 7477, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7477)
0.047943756 = weight(_text_:zur in 7477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047943756 = score(doc=7477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.47627786 = fieldWeight in 7477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7477)
0.03568355 = weight(_text_:der in 7477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03568355 = score(doc=7477,freq=4.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.4886365 = fieldWeight in 7477, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7477)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Footnote
- [Diplomarbeit zur Prüfung für den Studiengang Öffentliches Bibliothekswesen]
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Buxton, A.; Hopkinson, A.: ¬The CDS/ISIS for Windows handbook (2001)
0.05
0.05227764 = product of:
0.19604114 = sum of:
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.056846928 = weight(_text_:software in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056846928 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Date
- 22.12.2002 12:23:03
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Stephan, A.: Datenbanksysteme zur Verarbeitung bibliographischer Daten : Anforderung und Wertung (1994)
0.05
0.05169211 = product of:
0.15507632 = sum of:
0.056846928 = weight(_text_:software in 6546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056846928 = score(doc=6546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 6546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6546)
0.02509272 = weight(_text_:und in 6546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02509272 = score(doc=6546,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 6546, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6546)
0.048430502 = weight(_text_:zur in 6546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048430502 = score(doc=6546,freq=4.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.48111326 = fieldWeight in 6546, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6546)
0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 6546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066832816 = score(doc=6546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 6546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6546)
0.018022915 = weight(_text_:der in 6546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018022915 = score(doc=6546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 6546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6546)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Bibliotheksverwaltungssysteme basieren auf Datenbanksystemen. Zur Bewertung ihrer Leistungsfähigkeit bedarf es eines Grundverständnisses für die internen Strukturen und Arbeitsabläufe solcher Systeme. Dieses Grundverständnis soll im folgenden anhand des Beispiels der Verarbeitung bibliographischer Daten vermittelt werden
- Source
- Personalcomputer. T.2: Anwendung von PCs in Bibliotheken. Vollständige Neufassung
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Sawallisch, U.: ¬Das Retrievalsystem FREITEXT im Einsatz in einer kleinen Dokumentationsstelle (1993)
0.05
0.051332057 = product of:
0.15399617 = sum of:
0.056846928 = weight(_text_:software in 8588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056846928 = score(doc=8588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.43831247 = fieldWeight in 8588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8588)
0.03073218 = weight(_text_:und in 8588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03073218 = score(doc=8588,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 8588, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8588)
0.03424554 = weight(_text_:zur in 8588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03424554 = score(doc=8588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.34019846 = fieldWeight in 8588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8588)
0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 8588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066832816 = score(doc=8588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 8588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8588)
0.02548825 = weight(_text_:der in 8588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02548825 = score(doc=8588,freq=4.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 8588, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8588)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Seit 2 Jahren arbeitet die Dokumentationsstelle Obstbau, Berlin, mit dem Datenbanksystem FREITEXT. Das System verwaltet alle Literaturdaten der Dokumentationsstelle seit 1984. Die Daten konnten aus verschiedenen Quellen zusammengeführt werden und stehen dem Benutzer als lokale Datenbank zur Verfügung. FREITEXT hat sich als preiswertes, komfortables und zuverlässiges Retrievalsystem erwiesen
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaues. 1993, H.49, S.43-49
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Bjorner, S.: Moving online search results into EndNote (1995)
0.05
0.050699946 = product of:
0.19012478 = sum of:
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 4083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=4083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4083)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 4083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=4083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4083)
0.07876942 = weight(_text_:software in 4083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07876942 = score(doc=4083,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.6073436 = fieldWeight in 4083, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4083)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 4083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=4083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4083)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Part 2 of 2 part article examining the use of bibliography formatting software for managing online search output. EndNote Plus is a bibliography management software and EndLink is an add-on utility programme that permits easy importing from online and CD-ROM databases. Offers advice on moving online search results from a business search into EndNote. The example given is importing records from ABI/INFORM and Trade and Industry databases on Dialog
- Date
- 23. 2.1996 19:13:41
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
The, K.H.; Wong, S.F.: Developing a CDS/ISIS-based online cataloguing and information retrieval interface for use in small libraries (1996)
0.05
0.048935782 = product of:
0.14680734 = sum of:
0.03280839 = weight(_text_:23 in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03280839 = score(doc=2736,freq=4.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
0.03280839 = weight(_text_:23 in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03280839 = score(doc=2736,freq=4.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
0.040196855 = weight(_text_:software in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040196855 = score(doc=2736,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
0.03280839 = weight(_text_:23 in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03280839 = score(doc=2736,freq=4.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.28000468 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
0.008185315 = weight(_text_:in in 2736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008185315 = score(doc=2736,freq=12.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 2736, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2736)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Describes the development, by the Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Malaya University, of ONLIS (Online Library Information System), a customized user interface for coputerized MARC cataloguing and information retrieval, targeted for use in small libraries and information centres. Micro CDS/ISIS ver. 3.07 software package and its built in PAscal language were used for the design process and development. Design philosophy centres on the development of a very user friendly and simple interface, capable of mimicking the salient features of a contemporary commercial library package, yet easy to implement and maintain in a small library environment requiring little or no technical expertise. The system incorporates many new features and comprises 2 main components: data entry and file maintenace; and information retrieval. A security system is incorporated into the former environment to ensure data integrity and regulate important file maintenance tasks. While the system is ready for immediate implementation in libraries, modifications and enhancements are currently being undertaken to make it a truly reliable product. Concludes that some degree of user training in MARC and cataloguing using AACR2 is necessary to get the maximum benefits from the systems
- Date
- 23. 2.1997 18:34:57
23. 1.1999 19:39:36
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Albrecht, R.; Nicol, N.: Literaturverwaltung in Studium und Beruf (1994)
0.05
0.04838262 = product of:
0.14514786 = sum of:
0.05627559 = weight(_text_:software in 734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05627559 = score(doc=734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.43390724 = fieldWeight in 734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=734)
0.027772553 = weight(_text_:und in 734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027772553 = score(doc=734,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 734, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=734)
0.033901356 = weight(_text_:zur in 734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033901356 = score(doc=734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3367793 = fieldWeight in 734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=734)
0.009356594 = weight(_text_:in in 734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009356594 = score(doc=734,freq=8.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 734, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=734)
0.017841775 = weight(_text_:der in 734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017841775 = score(doc=734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=734)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Eine komplette Datenbankanwendung zur Literaturverwaltung auf CD-ROM und Diskette sowie viele Hinweise zum sinnvollen Umgang mit Literaturstellen, beispielsweise Recherchen, Abfrageorganisation und Zitierregeln, finden Sie in diesem Buch. Die Software unterstützt Sie bei der Verwaltung der Luiteraturhinweise. Sie können dort die entsprechenden Daten per Hand oder über die integrierten Schenittstellen zu Recherchesystemen einlesen. Durch Vorschläge zur Stichwortvergabe vereinfacht das Programm die Erfassung. Die Auswertungskriterien (nach Autoren, Stichworten, Signaturen und Fachgebieten) lassen sich am Bildschirm definieren. Die Ausgabe kann am Bildschirm, auf dem Drucker, in ASCII-Dateien oder direkt in Microsoft Word für Windows erfolgen. So wird das Anfertigen eines Literaturverzeichnisses, z.B. für Diplom- und Doktorarbeiten, zum Kinderspiel
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Jucquois-Delpierre, M.: Is information retrieval with microcomputers mini-information-retrieval? (1992)
0.05
0.04730236 = product of:
0.14190708 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.03979285 = weight(_text_:software in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03979285 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.004678297 = weight(_text_:in in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004678297 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Are microcomputers able to support good IRSs? How do they cope with them? What types of IRS are currently available? After explaining the differences between IRSs using micros and IRSs using mainframes, this paper will describe various functions of 'microretrieval' (by which I mean IR on microcomputers) functions, possible criteria for selection, and essential differences between database systems. It will give a short market overview and compare some IRSs currently available (such as LARS, BRS, LIDOS, HYPERCARD, HEUREKA, CICADE, ALLEGRO, etc.) It will also explain how microretrieval could be the kernel of economic, scientific or technical integration and assist in the cooperation between countries with different levels of development
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 17(1992) no.1, S.18-23
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Kim, T.C.-w.K.; Zumstein, P.: Semiautomatische Katalogisierung und Normdatenverknüpfung mit Zotero im Index Theologicus (2016)
0.05
0.04657915 = product of:
0.13973744 = sum of:
0.06431496 = weight(_text_:software in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06431496 = score(doc=3064,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
0.020074176 = weight(_text_:und in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020074176 = score(doc=3064,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
0.027396431 = weight(_text_:zur in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027396431 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27215877 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00756127 = score(doc=3064,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
0.0203906 = weight(_text_:der in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0203906 = score(doc=3064,freq=4.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Im Folgenden soll aufgezeigt werden, wie derzeit das Literaturverwaltungsprogramm Zotero innerhalb des Index Theologicus genutzt wird, um unselbstständige Literatur in einem bibliothekarischen Katalogisierungssystem zu erfassen. Die modulare und flexible Architektur der Open Source Software erlaubt es, die bereits kollaborativ zusammengetragene Programmierarbeit zur Datenextraktion mitzunutzen. Das vorgestellte semiautomatische Verfahren bringt auch bei der Verknüpfung von Normdaten erhebliche Vorteile für die Medienbearbeitung.
- Content
- Beitrag in einer dem Thema "Bibliographie" gewidmeten Ausgabe. Vgl.: http://libreas.eu/ausgabe29/04pohl/.
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Goedeken, E.: Library Master, Version 3.0 (1996)
0.05
0.045807898 = product of:
0.1374237 = sum of:
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=893,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=893,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
0.04823622 = weight(_text_:software in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04823622 = score(doc=893,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=893,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
0.005670953 = weight(_text_:in in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005670953 = score(doc=893,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Reviews Library Master, Verison 3.0, a sophisticated but easy-to-use database management software which, in addition to creating basic bibliographies can also be used for organizing other types of materials such as research notes, museum and archive records, and mailing lists. Library Master's main focus is on creating bibliographies to support research papers or other types of scholarly activity and it contains over two dozen templates covering many types of record. Lists of records can be searched in an number of ways, including by author, title, subject, record number, or by Boolean operators. Library Master will accept up to 65.000 individual records for each database and supports a number of citation styles. It can also extract pre-coded citations from the text of a research paper and create the bibliography from those references and is able to import data from a variety of online services
- Date
- 25.10.1996 14:23:18
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
