Search (144 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Sacherschließung"
  1. Steierwald, U.: Wissen und System : zu Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz' Theorie einer Universalbibliothek (1995) 0.11 
    0.114104256 = product of:
  0.24450912 = sum of:
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
    0.030111264 = weight(_text_:und in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030111264 = score(doc=6041,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
    0.021627497 = weight(_text_:der in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021627497 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
    0.017717376 = product of:
      0.05315213 = sum of:
        0.05315213 = weight(_text_:22 in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05315213 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.46666667 = coord(7/15)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 23(1996) no.4, S.232-233 (W. Totok)
    Series
    Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.22
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  2. Lorenz, B.: Bibliotheksklassifikation als Spiegel der Wissenschaftsentwicklung : Beobachtungen zu einem Spannungsverhältnis (1997) 0.11 
    0.10752994 = product of:
  0.26882485 = sum of:
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
    0.030111264 = weight(_text_:und in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030111264 = score(doc=886,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
    0.04109465 = weight(_text_:zur in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04109465 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.40823817 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
    0.030585902 = weight(_text_:der in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030585902 = score(doc=886,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
  0.4 = coord(6/15)
    Pages
    S.23-34
    Series
    Wolfenbütteler Schriften zur Geschichte des Buchwesens; Bd.27
    Source
    Fachschrifttum, Bibliothek und Naturwissenschaft im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Hrsg.: C. Meinel
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  3. Junger, U.; Scholze, F.: Neue Wege und Qualitäten : die Inhaltserschließungspolitik der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (2021) 0.10 
    0.10406265 = product of:
  0.22299139 = sum of:
    0.039370064 = weight(_text_:23 in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039370064 = score(doc=365,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
    0.039370064 = weight(_text_:23 in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039370064 = score(doc=365,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
    0.03193782 = weight(_text_:und in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03193782 = score(doc=365,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.4407773 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
    0.039370064 = weight(_text_:23 in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039370064 = score(doc=365,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3360056 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
    0.029058306 = weight(_text_:zur in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029058306 = score(doc=365,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.28866798 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=365,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
    0.035865147 = weight(_text_:der in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035865147 = score(doc=365,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.4911232 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
  0.46666667 = coord(7/15)
    Abstract
    Es kommt nicht oft vor, dass ein bibliothekfachliches Thema Gegenstand eines ganzseitigen Artikels im Feuilleton einer der wichtigsten überregionalen Zeitungen in Deutschland wird. Am 31. Juli 2017 war dies der Fall: Die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung veröffentlichte einen Artikel des Generaldirektors der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek, Klaus Ceynowa, in dem dieser sich kritisch mit einem Konzept zur inhaltlichen Erschließung auseinandersetzte, das die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) zuvor für die deutschsprachige bibliothekarische Community veröffentlicht hatte. Hatten bereits zuvor die Bemühungen der DNB, Verfahren zur maschinellen Dokumenterschließung zu entwickeln und einzusetzen, zu kontroversen Reaktionen im Bibliothekswesen geführt, so sorgte dieser Artikel noch einmal in besonderer Weise für Aufmerksamkeit und Diskussionen zu einem Thema, das vielen als eher verstaubt und unattraktiv galt: die Inhaltserschließung. Der folgende Beitrag zeichnet einige Grundlinien der Erschließungspolitik der DNB seit 2010 nach und beschreibt, welche Instrumente und Verfahren bei der Inhaltserschließung zum Einsatz kommen, welche konzeptionellen Entscheidungen ihr zugrunde liegen, wie versucht wird, Qualität zu erfassen und welche Entwicklungs- und Handlungsfelder für die Zukunft gesehen werden.
    Date
    23. 9.2021 16:09:53
    23. 9.2021 19:02:33
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  4. Franke-Maier, M.; Kasprzik, A.; Ledl, A.; Schürmann, H.: Editorial (2021) 0.08 
    0.08422739 = product of:
  0.18048726 = sum of:
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
    0.021512525 = weight(_text_:und in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021512525 = score(doc=360,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
    0.023971878 = weight(_text_:zur in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023971878 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23813893 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
    0.009356594 = weight(_text_:in in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009356594 = score(doc=360,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
    0.028210325 = weight(_text_:der in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028210325 = score(doc=360,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
  0.46666667 = coord(7/15)
    Abstract
    Es ist naheliegend, einen Band zur Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung damit zu beginnen, den Begriff Qualität als solchen zu reflektieren. Wenn wir Qualität gemäß der ISO-Norm 9000:2015-1 definieren als "Grad, in dem ein Satz inhärenter Merkmale eines Objekts Anforderungen erfüllt", was sind dann die Qualitätsanforderungen an die Inhaltserschließung? Auf diese Frage gibt es zweifellos keine eindeutige und allgemeingültige Antwort - zumindest war das das Ergebnis der Diskussion unter den Herausgeber:innen dieses Bandes. Dementsprechend beleuchten wir die Frage im Folgenden aus vier unterschiedlichen Perspektiven: zunächst aus einer eher idealistischen, im Berufsethos verankerten, dann aus einer rein fachlichen und schließlich aus einer praktischen Perspektive. Die vierte, die deskriptive bzw. historische, geht als eigener Aufsatz von Andreas Ledl in den Band ein.
    Date
    23. 9.2021 16:09:53
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  5. Greubel, R.: ¬Die Abteilungsbibliothek Schweinfurt der Fachhochschule Würzburg-Schweinfurt-Aschaffenburg (1995) 0.06 
    0.061481446 = product of:
  0.23055542 = sum of:
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
    0.03568355 = weight(_text_:der in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03568355 = score(doc=3942,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.4886365 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Source
    Bibliotheksforum Bayern. 23(1995) H.?, S.349-360
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  6. Ledl, A.: Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung : ein Überblick aus 50 Jahren (1970-2020) (2021) 0.06 
    0.05735104 = product of:
  0.1433776 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
    0.015055632 = weight(_text_:und in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015055632 = score(doc=362,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
    0.010609381 = weight(_text_:in in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010609381 = score(doc=362,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
    0.03419608 = weight(_text_:der in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03419608 = score(doc=362,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.46826762 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
  0.4 = coord(6/15)
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag sollen Aspekte des Diskurses eines halben Jahrhunderts über die Qualität von Sacherschließung im deutschsprachigen Raum anhand ausgewählter Publikationen skizziert werden. Einschlusskriterium bei der Selektion der Texte war, dass der Begriff Qualität unmittelbar auf Inhalts- bzw. Sacherschließung bezogen ist, also nicht zwischen den Zeilen herausgelesen werden muss. Der subjektive Abriss erhebt keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Als erstes fällt auf, dass das Thema Qualität der Inhaltserschließung in den 1970er Jahren weit weniger häufig diskutiert wird als in den Jahrzehnten danach. Dies ist dem Umstand geschuldet, dass sich seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg in punkto Sacherschließung nur wenig getan hat. Die Bibliotheken kooperieren nicht untereinander und nehmen bei der Inhaltserschließung vor allem ihre eigenen Bestände in den Blick -Qualität ist daher höchstens ein internes Thema. Was qualitätvoll sein muss, ist der universelle Bestand an sich.
    Date
    23. 9.2021 16:09:53
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  7. Hartmann, F.: Paul Otlets Hypermedium : Dokumentation als Gegenidee zur Bibliothek (2015) 0.04 
    0.037576243 = product of:
  0.11272873 = sum of:
    0.024585744 = weight(_text_:und in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024585744 = score(doc=1432,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
    0.038744405 = weight(_text_:zur in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038744405 = score(doc=1432,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.38489062 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
    0.005346625 = weight(_text_:in in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005346625 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
    0.03224037 = weight(_text_:der in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03224037 = score(doc=1432,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.44148692 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
    0.011811584 = product of:
      0.035434753 = sum of:
        0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035434753 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Abstract
    Schon zur Wende ins 20. Jahrhundert zweifelte der belgische Privatgelehrte Paul Otlet an der Zukunft des Buches und der Bibliothek. Statt dessen begann er damit, eine Dokumentation und Neuorganisation des Weltwissens anzulegen, und mittels eines Karteikartensystems (Répertoire Bibliographique Universel) zu vernetzen. Dieses Projekt eines flexiblen, abfrageorientierten Wissensbestandes in einem 'Hypermedium' (Otlet) besetzte jene technologische Leerstelle, die inzwischen eine die bibliothekarische Epoche aufsprengende neue Wissenskultur der digitalen Medialität produziert hat.
    Date
    22. 8.2016 15:58:46
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  8. Vorstius, J.: Kritische Gedanken über den neuesten Beitrag zur Kataloggeschichte und Kataloglehre (1934) 0.04 
    0.035588644 = product of:
  0.1334574 = sum of:
    0.030111264 = weight(_text_:und in 7388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030111264 = score(doc=7388,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 7388, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7388)
    0.04109465 = weight(_text_:zur in 7388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04109465 = score(doc=7388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.40823817 = fieldWeight in 7388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7388)
    0.01389094 = weight(_text_:in in 7388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01389094 = score(doc=7388,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3123684 = fieldWeight in 7388, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7388)
    0.048360553 = weight(_text_:der in 7388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048360553 = score(doc=7388,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.6622304 = fieldWeight in 7388, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7388)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Trebst, H.: Der heutige Erkenntnisstand in der Formal- und in der Sachkatalogisierung in ZfB 51(1934) S.435-450
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
    Geschichte der Kataloge
  9. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.03 
    0.03495718 = product of:
  0.10487154 = sum of:
    0.034615938 = product of:
      0.10384781 = sum of:
        0.10384781 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10384781 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27716497 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.012292872 = weight(_text_:und in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012292872 = score(doc=7394,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.16965526 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
    0.019372202 = weight(_text_:zur in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019372202 = score(doc=7394,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.19244531 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
    0.008866375 = weight(_text_:in in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008866375 = score(doc=7394,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.19937998 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
    0.02972415 = weight(_text_:der in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02972415 = score(doc=7394,freq=34.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.40703082 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
          5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
            34.0 = termFreq=34.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
    Theme
    Geschichte der Kataloge
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  10. Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.03 
    0.03285299 = product of:
  0.08213247 = sum of:
    0.018559227 = weight(_text_:23 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018559227 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
    0.018559227 = weight(_text_:23 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018559227 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
    0.018559227 = weight(_text_:23 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018559227 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
    0.010353696 = weight(_text_:in in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010353696 = score(doc=3624,freq=30.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23282567 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
          5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
            30.0 = termFreq=30.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
    0.0101953 = weight(_text_:der in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0101953 = score(doc=3624,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.13961042 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
    0.005905792 = product of:
      0.017717376 = sum of:
        0.017717376 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017717376 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(6/15)
    Abstract
    Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
    Date
    3. 7.2005 10:23:39
    Footnote
    Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
    Geschichte der Kataloge
  11. Minter, C.: Systematic or mechanical arrangement? : Revisiting a debate in German library science, 1790-1914 (2017) 0.03 
    0.0319242 = product of:
  0.095772594 = sum of:
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
    0.010567197 = weight(_text_:in in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010567197 = score(doc=5066,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
    0.015608302 = weight(_text_:der in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015608302 = score(doc=5066,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.21373394 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Abstract
    This article examines changing views on "systematic" or classified shelf-arrangement in German library science from Kayser's 1790 work Ueber die Manipulation bey der Einrichtung einer Bibliothek to the 1914 Versammlung deutscher Bibliothekare in Leipzig, at which Georg Leyh delivered the seminal paper, "Systematische oder mechanische Aufstellung?" Systematic arrangement was, with few exceptions, held up as an ideal throughout the nineteenth century; but by 1914 it could be agreed to belong to a past era in which, in the words of Leyh, libraries ran as a "Kleinbetrieb" [small business] (Leyh 1913, 100, "Das Dogma von der systematischen Aufstellung II-IV." Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 30:97-135). In particular, this article seeks to explore how changing views on the ideal of systematic shelf-arrangement in German library science during this period reflected evolving conceptions of librarianship. For nineteenth-century writers such as Ebert, Molbech, and Petzholdt, systematic classification and arrangement had meaning against the backdrop of an encyclopedic tradition within which libraries and librarians played an important role in organizing and presenting a rational overview of the universe of knowledge - an overview that was to be both physical and intellectual. The waning of the ideal of systematic arrangement at the turn of the twentieth century was associated with a sense of loss, as an intellectual or "scholarly" tradition of librarianship was seen to give way to more utilitarian and "bureaucratic" expectations. The changing fortunes of the ideal of systematic arrangement in German library science between 1790 and 1914 may be seen to illustrate how progress and loss are often inextricably linked in the history of libraries and librarianship
    Date
    16. 3.2019 14:34:23
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  12. Riplinger, T.: ¬Die Bedeutung der Methode Eppelsheimer für Theorie und Praxis der bibliothekarischen und der dokumentarischen Sacherschließung (2004) 0.03 
    0.028337503 = product of:
  0.10626563 = sum of:
    0.03174006 = weight(_text_:und in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03174006 = score(doc=2521,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.438048 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
    0.027396431 = weight(_text_:zur in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027396431 = score(doc=2521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27215877 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
    0.035317555 = weight(_text_:der in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035317555 = score(doc=2521,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.4836247 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
    0.011811584 = product of:
      0.035434753 = sum of:
        0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035434753 = score(doc=2521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Der Artikel beleuchtet den einzigartigen Beitrag von Hanns Wilhelm Eppelsheimer (1890-1972) zur Theorie und Praxis der facettierten klassifikatorischen Sacherschließung. Hauptpunkt seiner Methode ist die klare Trennung zwischen den klassifikatorisch abgebildeten, disziplin-spezifischen Begriffsbeziehungen einerseits und den durch sog. "Schlüssel" abgebildeten, dokument-spezifischen Behandlungsaspekten andererseits.
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:33:51
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 28(2004) H.2, S.252-262
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  13. Runge, S.: Beiträge zur Sachkatalogisierung (1937) 0.03 
    0.028322397 = product of:
  0.10620898 = sum of:
    0.024585744 = weight(_text_:und in 3328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024585744 = score(doc=3328,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 3328, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3328)
    0.038744405 = weight(_text_:zur in 3328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038744405 = score(doc=3328,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.38489062 = fieldWeight in 3328, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3328)
    0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 3328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00756127 = score(doc=3328,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3328, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3328)
    0.035317555 = weight(_text_:der in 3328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035317555 = score(doc=3328,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.4836247 = fieldWeight in 3328, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3328)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: RUNGE, S.: Wege und Möglichkeiten gemeinschaftlicher Sachkatalogisierung; FRAUENDORFER, S. von: Wo liegen die Grenzen für die Aufstellung und Verwendung bibliographischer Einheitssysteme?; RUNGE, S.: Die Deweysche Dezimalklassifikation [DDC] im Vergleich zur Brüsseler Dezimalklassifikation [UDC]; KLEMM, F.: Die Cuttersche Expansive Classification; MOGK, H.: Das System der Kongreßbibliothek in Washington [LCC]; FAASS, B.: Die neuen Fachkataloge des sächsischen Landesbibliothek; NISSEN, C.: Der Mainzer Sachkatalog in Theorie und Praxis; SCHMITZ, W.: Der Katalog "Technik" der Preußischen Staatsbibliothek; RUNGE, S.: Die Bezeichnung im systematischen Katalog
    Theme
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  14. Heinrich, G.: Klassifikatorische Sacherschließung in deutschen Bibliotheken (1978) 0.03 
    0.0283041 = product of:
  0.10614037 = sum of:
    0.032860924 = weight(_text_:und in 1511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032860924 = score(doc=1511,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 1511, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1511)
    0.023971878 = weight(_text_:zur in 1511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023971878 = score(doc=1511,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23813893 = fieldWeight in 1511, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1511)
    0.011459442 = weight(_text_:in in 1511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011459442 = score(doc=1511,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 1511, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1511)
    0.037848122 = weight(_text_:der in 1511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037848122 = score(doc=1511,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.5182773 = fieldWeight in 1511, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1511)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Darstellung der Benutzung von universalen Klassifikationssystemen in den 50 wissenschaftlichen Universalbibliotheken und den 362 Öffentlichen Bibliotheken aufgrund der Ergebnisse zweier Umfragen aus dem Jahr 1977 in tabellarischer Form und Diskussion. Eine Übernahmebereitschaft von Klassifikationssystemen scheint trotz gegenwärtig noch stark unterschiedlicher Praxis vorhanden zu sein. Möglichkeiten und Voraussetzungen für eine Kooperation und zentrale Klassifizierung werden genannt. Des weiteren wird ein Überblick über die Benutzung von Sachkatalogen (Systematischen und Schlagwortkatalogen) in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken der BRD sowie eine Übersicht über hauptsächlich vorkommende Arten zweigleisiger Sacherschließung in bestimmten Bibliotheken gegeben. Die Voraussetzungen für Angleichungsprozesse unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Funktionsbestimmung und Erschließungstiefe werden diskutiert. Auch wird abschließend auf die Möglichkeiten von Revisions- und Reklassifizierungsverfahren, auch mit Computerhilfe, hingewiesen
    Series
    Studien zur Klassifikation; Bd.3
    Source
    Kooperation in der Klassifikation II. Proc. der Sekt.4-6 der 2. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Frankfurt-Höchst, 6.-7.4.1978
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  15. Rang, B.: Zur Frage der Systematik und der Neuordnung der systematischen Kataloge (1939) 0.03 
    0.028171076 = product of:
  0.14085537 = sum of:
    0.02838917 = weight(_text_:und in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02838917 = score(doc=3951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
    0.054792862 = weight(_text_:zur in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054792862 = score(doc=3951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.54431754 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
    0.057673328 = weight(_text_:der in 3951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057673328 = score(doc=3951,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.7897558 = fieldWeight in 3951, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3951)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  16. Seeger, T.: ¬Ein Blick voraus in die Vergangenheit : Von Visionen und Konzepten der frühen Dokumentationsbewegung (2004) 0.03 
    0.027130887 = product of:
  0.10174082 = sum of:
    0.017743232 = weight(_text_:und in 4678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017743232 = score(doc=4678,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 4678, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4678)
    0.03424554 = weight(_text_:zur in 4678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03424554 = score(doc=4678,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.34019846 = fieldWeight in 4678, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4678)
    0.009451588 = weight(_text_:in in 4678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009451588 = score(doc=4678,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4678, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4678)
    0.040300462 = weight(_text_:der in 4678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040300462 = score(doc=4678,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55185866 = fieldWeight in 4678, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4678)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Series
    Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.41
    Source
    Wissen in Aktion: Der Primat der Pragmatik als Motto der Konstanzer Informationswissenschaft. Festschrift für Rainer Kuhlen. Hrsg. R. Hammwöhner, u.a
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  17. Vom Buch zur Datenbank : Paul Otlets Utopie der Wissensvisualisierung (2012) 0.03 
    0.026018258 = product of:
  0.07805477 = sum of:
    0.02509272 = weight(_text_:und in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02509272 = score(doc=3074,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
    0.024215251 = weight(_text_:zur in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024215251 = score(doc=3074,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.24055663 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
    0.0033416408 = weight(_text_:in in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033416408 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
    0.018022915 = weight(_text_:der in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018022915 = score(doc=3074,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
    0.00738224 = product of:
      0.02214672 = sum of:
        0.02214672 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02214672 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Abstract
    Gegen Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts geriet das Dokumentationswesen in eine Krise: wie lässt sich das kulturelle Wissen nachhaltiger organisieren? Paul Otlet (1868-1944), ein belgischer Industriellenerbe und studierter Rechtsanwalt, entwickelte zusammen mit Henri La Fontaine ab 1895 ein Ordnungs- und Klassifikationssystem, das das millionenfach publizierte "Weltwissen" dokumentieren sollte. Otlets Anspruch war die Schaffung eines "Instrument d'ubiquité", das zur "Hyper-Intelligence" führen sollte. Jahrzehnte vor Web und Wikis weisen diese Ideen auf eine globale Vernetzung des Wissens hin. Der vorliegende Titel erinnert an den Pionier Paul Otlet mit einer ausführlichen Einleitung von Frank Hartmann (Bauhaus-Universität Weimar), Beiträgen von W. Boyd Rayward (University of Illinois), Charles van den Heuvel (Königlich Niederländische Akademie der Wissenschaften) und Wouter Van Acker (Universität Gent).
    BK
    06.01 Geschichte des Informations- und Dokumentationswesens
    Classification
    06.01 Geschichte des Informations- und Dokumentationswesens
    Date
    22. 8.2016 16:06:54
    RSWK
    Otlet, Paul / Wissensorganisation / Klassifikation / Information und Dokumentation / Geschichte 1895-1944 / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Otlet, Paul / Wissensorganisation / Klassifikation / Information und Dokumentation / Geschichte 1895-1944 / Aufsatzsammlung
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  18. Klauß, H.: Aspekte der Diskussion über die klassifikatorische Inhaltserschließung in ihrem Verhältnis zur verbalen Inhaltserschließung in deutschen wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.02 
    0.024947638 = product of:
  0.12473819 = sum of:
    0.06780271 = weight(_text_:zur in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780271 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.6735586 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
    0.013232223 = weight(_text_:in in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013232223 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
    0.04370325 = weight(_text_:der in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04370325 = score(doc=4360,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.5984551 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Footnote
    Hausarbeit zur Prüfung für den höheren Bibliotheksdienst
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
    Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
  19. Gebhardt, W.: Zur Geschichte der Sachkatalogisierung an der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen 1817 bis 1961 (1982) 0.02 
    0.023297507 = product of:
  0.11648753 = sum of:
    0.024840524 = weight(_text_:und in 6181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024840524 = score(doc=6181,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 6181, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6181)
    0.047943756 = weight(_text_:zur in 6181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047943756 = score(doc=6181,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47627786 = fieldWeight in 6181, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6181)
    0.04370325 = weight(_text_:der in 6181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04370325 = score(doc=6181,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.5984551 = fieldWeight in 6181, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6181)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 6(1982) H.6, S.74-88
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung
  20. Steierwald, U.: Wissen und System : zu Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz' Theorie einer Universalbibliothek (1994) 0.02 
    0.022403741 = product of:
  0.112018704 = sum of:
    0.02838917 = weight(_text_:und in 8794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02838917 = score(doc=8794,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 8794, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8794)
    0.054792862 = weight(_text_:zur in 8794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054792862 = score(doc=8794,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.54431754 = fieldWeight in 8794, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8794)
    0.028836664 = weight(_text_:der in 8794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028836664 = score(doc=8794,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 8794, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8794)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Footnote
    [Hausarbeit zur Prüfung für den Höheren Bibliotheksdienst]
    Theme
    Geschichte der Sacherschließung

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 73
  • e 66
  • f 2
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 113
  • m 21
  • s 6
  • x 5
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications