Search (134 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.12
    0.11788355 = product of:
      0.22103164 = sum of:
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
        0.04014835 = weight(_text_:und in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04014835 = score(doc=6063,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
        0.027396431 = weight(_text_:zur in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027396431 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27215877 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
        0.005346625 = weight(_text_:in in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005346625 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
        0.024973284 = weight(_text_:der in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024973284 = score(doc=6063,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
        0.011811584 = product of:
          0.035434753 = sum of:
            0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035434753 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.53333336 = coord(8/15)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag werden verschiedene Aspekte einer Begründung einer Informationsethik betrachtet. Zunächst wird eine sinnvolle Abgrenzung zu konkurrierenden Ethiken - Netz- und Medienethik - gesucht. Aus Sicht der Generierung, Distribution und Bewahrung von Information wird die Informationsethik als umfassender und allgemeiner als die anderen angesehen. Weiterhin wird die Option einer diskursethischen und damit absoluten Begründung der Informationsethik diskutiert und zugunsten einer pragmatistischen Sichtweise zurückgewiesen.
    Date
    13.10.2006 9:35:23
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
    Source
    Information und Sprache: Beiträge zu Informationswissenschaft, Computerlinguistik, Bibliothekswesen und verwandten Fächern. Festschrift für Harald H. Zimmermann. Herausgegeben von Ilse Harms, Heinz-Dirk Luckhardt und Hans W. Giessen
  2. Capurro, R.: Informationsethos und Informationsethik : Gedanken zum verantwortungsvollen Handeln im Bereich der Fachinformation (1988) 0.09
    0.091864064 = product of:
      0.22966015 = sum of:
        0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046398066 = score(doc=843,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 843, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=843)
        0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046398066 = score(doc=843,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 843, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=843)
        0.03073218 = weight(_text_:und in 843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03073218 = score(doc=843,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 843, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=843)
        0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046398066 = score(doc=843,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 843, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=843)
        0.03424554 = weight(_text_:zur in 843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03424554 = score(doc=843,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34019846 = fieldWeight in 843, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=843)
        0.02548825 = weight(_text_:der in 843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02548825 = score(doc=843,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 843, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=843)
      0.4 = coord(6/15)
    
    Source
    Von der Information zum Wissen - vom Wissen zur Information: traditionelle und moderne Informationssysteme für Wissenschaft und Praxis, Deutscher Dokumentartag 1987, Bad Dürkheim, vom 23.-25.9.1987. Hrsg.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  3. Metzinger, T.: Philosophische Stichworte zu einer Ethik der Neurowissenschaften und der Informatik (1996) 0.08
    0.075261615 = product of:
      0.22578484 = sum of:
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 2447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=2447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 2447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2447)
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 2447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=2447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 2447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2447)
        0.021291878 = weight(_text_:und in 2447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021291878 = score(doc=2447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2447)
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 2447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=2447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 2447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2447)
        0.03745993 = weight(_text_:der in 2447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03745993 = score(doc=2447,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.5129615 = fieldWeight in 2447, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2447)
      0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    
    Date
    7. 3.1997 15:23:33
    Source
    Die Technik auf dem Weg zu Seele: Forschungen an der Schnittstelle Gehirn / Computer. Hrsg.: C. Maar, u.a
  4. Rötzer, F.; Metzinger, T.; Linke, D.B.; Emrich, H.: Entwurf für eine Ethik der Neurotechnologie (1996) 0.05
    0.052698385 = product of:
      0.19761893 = sum of:
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 2065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=2065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 2065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2065)
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 2065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=2065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 2065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2065)
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 2065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=2065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 2065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2065)
        0.030585902 = weight(_text_:der in 2065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030585902 = score(doc=2065,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 2065, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2065)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Date
    7. 3.1997 15:23:33
    Source
    Die Technik auf dem Weg zu Seele: Forschungen an der Schnittstelle Gehirn / Computer. Hrsg.: C. Maar, u.a
  5. Rötzer, F.: Grundlagen einer neurotechnologischen Ethik (1996) 0.05
    0.05030948 = product of:
      0.18866053 = sum of:
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
        0.021627497 = weight(_text_:der in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021627497 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Date
    7. 3.1997 15:23:33
    Source
    Die Technik auf dem Weg zu Seele: Forschungen an der Schnittstelle Gehirn / Computer. Hrsg.: C. Maar, u.a
  6. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.04
    0.043576073 = product of:
      0.13072821 = sum of:
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
        0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00756127 = score(doc=248,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
        0.011811584 = product of:
          0.035434753 = sum of:
            0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035434753 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    
    Abstract
    Having reached the US Supreme Court in 1997, the Communications Decency Act (1996) has strong implications for Internet service providers. How to protect children while not denying adult rights of access is an issue which has impacted successively upon motion pictures, reading materials, radio, television and cable. The case for freedom of electronic speech appears compelling. The problems of obscenity, encryption (cryptography) and provocative 'cyberspeech' on the Internet offers a field day for litigation
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
    Source
    Journal of information ethics. 7(1998) no.1, S.15-23
  7. Buchanan, E.A.: Ethical transformations in a global information age (1996) 0.04
    0.0389062 = product of:
      0.14589825 = sum of:
        0.045931738 = weight(_text_:23 in 2449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045931738 = score(doc=2449,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 2449, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2449)
        0.045931738 = weight(_text_:23 in 2449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045931738 = score(doc=2449,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 2449, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2449)
        0.045931738 = weight(_text_:23 in 2449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045931738 = score(doc=2449,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 2449, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2449)
        0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 2449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008103048 = score(doc=2449,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 2449, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2449)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses various ethical issues which are germane to the global information age. Argues that such profuse and rapid technological change demands a reexamination of how society is defined and understood in this increasingly global environment where technology bridges temporal and spatial boundaries. Alongside the comes the necessity for a reevaluation of societal and informational values. Discusses cross-cultural problems associated with the information age; philosophical aspects of technology; and problems of social equity arising from the concept of information rich versus the information poor. Considers the ethical role of libraries in the information age concluding that libraries can dissolve the lines that have been drawn between the have and the have-nots. Librarians must understand and adhere to their traditional ethical guidelines while also moving forward and readjusting wit - not to - technology
    Date
    25.10.1996 14:23:18
    Source
    Technical services quarterly. 13(1996) nos.3/4, S.23-38
  8. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.03
    0.03444875 = product of:
      0.10334625 = sum of:
        0.039764244 = weight(_text_:und in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039764244 = score(doc=459,freq=82.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.54879063 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              9.055386 = tf(freq=82.0), with freq of:
                82.0 = termFreq=82.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
        0.023971878 = weight(_text_:zur in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023971878 = score(doc=459,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23813893 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
        0.00843392 = weight(_text_:in in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00843392 = score(doc=459,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.18965527 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
        0.026008632 = weight(_text_:der in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026008632 = score(doc=459,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.35615197 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
        0.005167568 = product of:
          0.015502704 = sum of:
            0.015502704 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015502704 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Content
    "Ethik und Information - Ethische Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe (Stand: 15.3.2007) Bibliothek und Information Deutschland (BID e.V.) ist die Dachorganisation der Bibliotheks- und Informationsverbände in Deutschland. Die in den Mitgliedsverbänden der BID organisierten Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen richten ihre professionellen Aktivitäten nach ethischen Grundsätzen aus, die Verhaltensstandards bewirken, die Bestandteil des beruflichen Selbstverständnisses werden sollen. Die Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen engagieren sich nicht beruflich in Organisationen, deren Tätigkeit oder Ziele diesen ethischen Grundsätzen entgegenstehen. Die BID und ihre Mitgliedsverbände und Mitgliedsorganisationen setzen sich im beruflichen Umfeld für das Arbeiten nach diesen ethischen Grundsätzen ein. Das geschieht unter anderem durch laufende Information, durch berufliche Aus- und Fortbildung, durch Kooperation mit verwandten Organisationen und durch die Reaktion in der Öffentlichkeit auf bekannt werdende Verstöße gegen diese Grundsätze. Die Mitglieder der BID machen diese ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe im Berufsstand und in der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit bekannt.
    1. Ethische Grundsätze im Umgang mit Kundinnen und Kunden - Wir begegnen unseren Kundinnen und Kunden im Rahmen unseres Auftrags und unserer rechtlichen Grundlagen ohne Unterschied. Wir stellen für alle Kundinnen und Kunden Dienstleistungen in hoher Qualität bereit. - Wir ermöglichen unseren Kundinnen und Kunden den Zugang zu unseren Beständen und zu den öffentlich verfügbaren Informationsquellen. - Wir informieren und beraten unsere Kundinnen und Kunden sachlich, unparteiisch und höflich und unterstützen sie dabei, ihren Informationsbedarf zu decken. - Wir behandeln unsere Kundinnen und Kunden gleich, unabhängig von ihrer Herkunft, ihrer Hautfarbe, ihrem Alter, ihrer sozialen Stellung, ihrer Religion, ihrem Geschlecht oder ihrer sexuellen Orientierung. - Wir beachten die Prinzipien der Barrierefreiheit. - Wir setzen uns auf der Grundlage des Jugendschutzgesetzes und weiterer gesetzlicher Regelungen für den Schutz von Kindern und Jugendlichen vor Inhalten ein, die nicht für sie geeignet sind. - Wir respektieren die Privatsphäre unserer Kundinnen und Kunden. Wir speichern personenbezogene Daten nur zur Erbringung unserer Dienstleistung und nur im gesetzlichen Rahmen. Anderen Behörden stellen wir Benutzerdaten nur im engen Rahmen der gesetzlichen Vorschriften zur Verfügung. - Wir erfüllen unsere beruflichen Aufgaben nach professionellen Gesichtspunkten unabhängig von unserer persönlichen Meinung und Einstellung.
    2. Ethische Grundsätze im weiteren Aufgabenspektrum - Wir setzen uns für die freie Meinungsbildung und für den freien Fluss von Informationen ein sowie für die Existenz von Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen als Garanten des ungehinderten Zugangs zu Informationsressourcen aller Art in unserer demokratischen Gesellschaft. Eine Zensur von Inhalten lehnen wir ab. - Wir bewahren das kulturelle Erbe im Rahmen des Sammelauftrages der Bibliotheken. - Wir unterstützen Wissenschaft und Forschung durch die Bereitstellung von Informationen, Quellen und damit im Zusammenhang stehenden Dienstleistungen. Weiterhin setzen wir uns für die Freiheit von Wissenschaft und Forschung ein. - Wir bekennen uns zum Prinzip des Lebenslangen Lernens - sowohl zur Verbesserung unserer eigenen Kompetenzen als auch zur Unterstützung der Kompetenzerweiterung der Bürgerinnen und Bürger. In diesem Zusammenhang sehen wir uns in einem kontinuierlichen Verbesserungsprozess, um unsere Dienstleistungen für Kundinnen und Kunden laufend optimieren zu können. - Wir bieten Veranstaltungsformen an, die das Lesen und die aktive Nutzung von Informationen fördern, auch in Kooperation mit Partnern. - Unser Verhältnis zu Lieferanten und anderen Geschäftspartnern zeichnet sich durch einen hohen ethischen Standard aus."
    Footnote
    Vgl. die Wiedergabe der vollständigen Fassung in: Bibliotheksdienst 41(2007) H.7, S.705-707.
  9. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.03
    0.032986097 = product of:
      0.09895828 = sum of:
        0.039833456 = weight(_text_:und in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039833456 = score(doc=462,freq=112.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.54974586 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              10.583005 = tf(freq=112.0), with freq of:
                112.0 = termFreq=112.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
        0.022972606 = weight(_text_:zur in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022972606 = score(doc=462,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.22821206 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
        0.00694547 = weight(_text_:in in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00694547 = score(doc=462,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
        0.02477741 = weight(_text_:der in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02477741 = score(doc=462,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3392921 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
        0.004429344 = product of:
          0.013288032 = sum of:
            0.013288032 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013288032 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Content
    "Ethik und Information - Ethische Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe (Stand: 15.3.2007) Bibliothek und Information Deutschland (BID e.V.) ist die Dachorganisation der Bibliotheks- und Informationsverbände in Deutschland. Die in den Mitgliedsverbänden der BID organisierten Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen richten ihre professionellen Aktivitäten nach ethischen Grundsätzen aus, die Verhaltensstandards bewirken, die Bestandteil des beruflichen Selbstverständnisses werden sollen. Die Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen engagieren sich nicht beruflich in Organisationen, deren Tätigkeit oder Ziele diesen ethischen Grundsätzen entgegenstehen. Die BID und ihre Mitgliedsverbände und Mitgliedsorganisationen setzen sich im beruflichen Umfeld für das Arbeiten nach diesen ethischen Grundsätzen ein. Das geschieht unter anderem durch laufende Information, durch berufliche Aus- und Fortbildung, durch Kooperation mit verwandten Organisationen und durch die Reaktion in der Öffentlichkeit auf bekannt werdende Verstöße gegen diese Grundsätze. Die Mitglieder der BID machen diese ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe im Berufsstand und in der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit bekannt.
    1. Ethische Grundsätze im Umgang mit Kundinnen und Kunden - Wir begegnen unseren Kundinnen und Kunden im Rahmen unseres Auftrags und unserer rechtlichen Grundlagen ohne Unterschied. Wir stellen für alle Kundinnen und Kunden Dienstleistungen in hoher Qualität bereit. - Wir ermöglichen unseren Kundinnen und Kunden den Zugang zu unseren Beständen und zu den öffentlich verfügbaren Informationsquellen. - Wir informieren und beraten unsere Kundinnen und Kunden sachlich, unparteiisch und höflich und unterstützen sie dabei, ihren Informationsbedarf zu decken. - Wir behandeln unsere Kundinnen und Kunden gleich, unabhängig von ihrer Herkunft, ihrer Hautfarbe, ihrem Alter, ihrer sozialen Stellung, ihrer Religion, ihrem Geschlecht oder ihrer sexuellen Orientierung. - Wir beachten die Prinzipien der Barrierefreiheit. - Wir setzen uns auf der Grundlage des Jugendschutzgesetzes und weiterer gesetzlicher Regelungen für den Schutz von Kindern und Jugendlichen vor Inhalten ein, die nicht für sie geeignet sind. - Wir respektieren die Privatsphäre unserer Kundinnen und Kunden. Wir speichern personenbezogene Daten nur zur Erbringung unserer Dienstleistung und nur im gesetzlichen Rahmen. Anderen Behörden stellen wir Benutzerdaten nur im engen Rahmen der gesetzlichen Vorschriften zur Verfügung. - Wir erfüllen unsere beruflichen Aufgaben nach professionellen Gesichtspunkten unabhängig von unserer persönlichen Meinung und Einstellung.
    2. Ethische Grundsätze im weiteren Aufgabenspektrum - Wir setzen uns für die freie Meinungsbildung und für den freien Fluss von Informationen ein sowie für die Existenz von Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen als Garanten des ungehinderten Zugangs zu Informationsressourcen aller Art in unserer demokratischen Gesellschaft. Eine Zensur von Inhalten lehnen wir ab. - Wir bewahren das kulturelle Erbe im Rahmen des Sammelauftrages der Bibliotheken. - Wir unterstützen Wissenschaft und Forschung durch die Bereitstellung von Informationen, Quellen und damit im Zusammenhang stehenden Dienstleistungen. Weiterhin setzen wir uns für die Freiheit von Wissenschaft und Forschung ein. - Wir bekennen uns zum Prinzip des Lebenslangen Lernens - sowohl zur Verbesserung unserer eigenen Kompetenzen als auch zur Unterstützung der Kompetenzerweiterung der Bürgerinnen und Bürger. In diesem Zusammenhang sehen wir uns in einem kontinuierlichen Verbesserungsprozess, um unsere Dienstleistungen für Kundinnen und Kunden laufend optimieren zu können. - Wir bieten Veranstaltungsformen an, die das Lesen und die aktive Nutzung von Informationen fördern, auch in Kooperation mit Partnern. - Unser Verhältnis zu Lieferanten und anderen Geschäftspartnern zeichnet sich durch einen hohen ethischen Standard aus.
    - Wir wählen die Informationsquellen nach rein fachlichen Kriterien, nach ihrer Qualität und ihrer Eignung für die Erfüllung der Bedarfe unserer Kundinnen und Kunden aus - unabhängig von persönlichen Vorlieben und von Einflüssen Dritter. Durch unsere Erschließungsleistungen und unsere Fachkompetenz bieten wir aktive Dienstleistungen zum Auffinden der benötigten Informationen an. - Wir machen unsere Dienstleistungen und Einrichtungen aktiv bekannt, damit die Bürgerinnen und Bürger alle Möglichkeiten kennen, um öffentlich zugängliche Informationen zu nutzen. - Wir stellen im Rahmen der gesetzlichen Regelungen Informationen als Daten und Volltexte im Internet bereit, um sie noch besser zugänglich zu machen. - Wir akzeptieren die Rechte der Kreativen und Urheber für gesetzlich geschützte Bibliotheks- und Informationsmaterialien. - Wir nutzen unsere professionellen Kompetenzen, um die historischen Bestände zu bewahren, damit sie auch künftigen Generationen zur Verfügung stehen. - Wir begegnen unseren Kolleginnen und Kollegen fair und mit Respekt und fördern eine Kultur der Kooperation, des selbst verantworteten Handelns und des gegenseitigen Vertrauens. - Fachliche Unabhängigkeit, Respekt, Fairness, Kooperationsbereitschaft und kritische Loyalität kennzeichnen unser Verhalten gegenüber unseren Führungskräften und vorgesetzten Dienststellen."
  10. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.03
    0.031117957 = product of:
      0.09335387 = sum of:
        0.017564904 = weight(_text_:und in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017564904 = score(doc=1697,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
        0.023971878 = weight(_text_:zur in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023971878 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23813893 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
        0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008103048 = score(doc=1697,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
        0.033378907 = weight(_text_:der in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033378907 = score(doc=1697,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.4570776 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
        0.010335136 = product of:
          0.031005409 = sum of:
            0.031005409 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031005409 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    
    Abstract
    Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es mit der Methodik der analytischen Rechtsethik die Plausibilität säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zum normativen Status biologischer Entitäten transparenter zu machen. Diese Untersuchung versucht daher vorrangig die weitgehend versteckten Wert- und Normprämissen bei bioethischen Diskursen herauszuarbeiten. Fundamental kritisiert wird die scheinbar weltanschaulich neutrale These einer verfügbaren "Würde des menschlichen Lebens" bei Embryonen.
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.10
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  11. Rösch, H.: Informationsethik (2023) 0.03
    0.028946603 = product of:
      0.10854975 = sum of:
        0.03073218 = weight(_text_:und in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03073218 = score(doc=821,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
        0.04194205 = weight(_text_:zur in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04194205 = score(doc=821,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.41665632 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
        0.008841151 = weight(_text_:in in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008841151 = score(doc=821,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
        0.027034372 = weight(_text_:der in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027034372 = score(doc=821,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.37019804 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Der Terminus Informationsethik (information ethics) wurde Ende der 1980er Jahre im bibliothekarischen Umfeld geprägt und tauchte etwa zeitgleich in den USA und Deutschland auf. Informationsethik umfasst alle ethisch relevanten Fragen, die im Zusammenhang mit Produktion, Speicherung, Erschließung, Verteilung und Nutzung von Informationen auftreten. Informationsethik gehört zu den angewandten oder Bereichsethiken, die sich in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten in großer Zahl gebildet haben. Dazu zählen etwa Wirtschaftsethik, Medizinethik, Technikethik, Computerethik oder Medienethik. Zu beobachten ist ein Trend zu immer spezifischeren Bereichsethiken wie z. B. der Lebensmittelethik oder der Algorithmenethik. Aufteilung und Abgrenzung der Bereichsethiken folgen keinem einheitlichen Prinzip. Daher schwanken ihre Anzahl und ihre Benennungen in der Fachliteratur erheblich. Bereichsethiken überlappen sich z. T. oder stehen bisweilen in einem komplementären Verhältnis. So hat die Informationsethik ohne Zweifel u. a. Bezüge zur Medienethik, zur Technikethik (Computerethik), zur Wirtschaftsethik, zur Wissenschaftsethik und natürlich zur Sozialethik. Im Unterschied zur Allgemeinen Ethik, die sich mit übergreifenden, allgemeinen Aspekten wie Freiheit, Gerechtigkeit oder Wahrhaftigkeit auseinandersetzt, übertragen angewandte Ethiken zum einen allgemeine ethische Prinzipien und Methoden auf bestimmte Lebensbereiche und Handlungsfelder. Zum anderen arbeiten sie spezifische Fragestellungen und Probleme heraus, die charakteristisch für den jeweiligen Bereich sind und die in der Allgemeinen Ethik keine Berücksichtigung finden. Angewandte Ethiken sind grundsätzlich praxisorientiert. Sie zielen darauf, die Akteure der jeweiligen Handlungsfelder für ethische Fragestellungen zu sensibilisieren und das Bewusstsein um eine gemeinsame Wertebasis, die idealerweise in einem Ethikkodex dokumentiert ist, zu stabilisieren.
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
  12. McGarry, K.: ¬The ethics of information : its relevance in the curriculum (Abstract) (1992) 0.03
    0.028459828 = product of:
      0.10672435 = sum of:
        0.030111264 = weight(_text_:und in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030111264 = score(doc=1908,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
        0.04109465 = weight(_text_:zur in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04109465 = score(doc=1908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.40823817 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
        0.01389094 = weight(_text_:in in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01389094 = score(doc=1908,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3123684 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
        0.021627497 = weight(_text_:der in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021627497 = score(doc=1908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Series
    Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.10
    Source
    Neue Techniken im Informationswesen - neue Trends in der Ausbildung: Beiträge zur Jubiläumsveranstaltung "10 Jahre Fachhochschule für Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen in Köln"
  13. Benedetto, C. di; Leone, L.; Seta, M. Della: Semantic approach to bioethics in the Ethicsweb project : building a semantic architecture for a European documentation system 0.03
    0.02510024 = product of:
      0.0941259 = sum of:
        0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02783884 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
        0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02783884 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
        0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02783884 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
        0.010609381 = weight(_text_:in in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010609381 = score(doc=3548,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to present the activities of the European project Ethicsweb, funded under the 7th Framework Program of the European Commission, placing special emphasis on the semantic approach provided by this project. The objectives of Ethicsweb are basically those of: (a) facilitating access to information on ethics in science through an integrated infrastructure; (b) developing sophisticated tools, both technical and semantic to establish the above mentioned infrastructure; (c) creating a European Reference Center for Bioethics, in order to collect the information provided by various local centers and international organizations; (d) developing multilingual tools (thesauri and ontologies) for indexing and searching of documents in bioethics. In this paper the authors will present the steps undertaken until now, such as application profiles, XML schemes and examples.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  14. Capurro, R.: Ethik im Cyberspace (1997) 0.02
    0.024542393 = product of:
      0.09203397 = sum of:
        0.021291878 = weight(_text_:und in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021291878 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
        0.04109465 = weight(_text_:zur in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04109465 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.40823817 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
        0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008019937 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
        0.021627497 = weight(_text_:der in 1559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021627497 = score(doc=1559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 1559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1559)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 4. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a
  15. Helbing, D.; Frey, B.S.; Gigerenzer, G.; Hafen, E.; Hagner, M.; Hofstetter, Y.; Hoven, J. van den; Zicari, R.V.; Zwitter, A.: Digitale Demokratie statt Datendiktatur : Digital-Manifest (2016) 0.02
    0.02373888 = product of:
      0.089020796 = sum of:
        0.030111264 = weight(_text_:und in 5600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030111264 = score(doc=5600,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5600, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5600)
        0.029058306 = weight(_text_:zur in 5600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029058306 = score(doc=5600,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.28866798 = fieldWeight in 5600, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5600)
        0.005670953 = weight(_text_:in in 5600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005670953 = score(doc=5600,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 5600, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5600)
        0.024180276 = weight(_text_:der in 5600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024180276 = score(doc=5600,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 5600, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5600)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Big Data, Nudging, Verhaltenssteuerung: Droht uns die Automatisierung der Gesellschaft durch Algorithmen und künstliche Intelligenz? Ein Appell zur Sicherung von Freiheit und Demokratie.
    Content
    Neun internationale Experten warnen vor der Aushöhlung unserer Bürgerrechte und der Demokratie im Zuge der digitalen Technikrevolution. Wir steuern demnach geradewegs auf die Automatisierung unserer Gesellschaft und die Fernsteuerung ihrer Bürger durch Algorithmen zu, in denen sich »Big Data« und »Nudging«-Methoden zu einem mächtigen Instrument vereinen. Erste Ansätze dazu lassen sich bereits in China und Singapur beobachten. Ein Zehnpunkteplan soll helfen, jetzt die richtigen Weichen zu stellen, um auch im digitalen Zeitalter Freiheitsrechte und Demokratie zu bewahren und die sich ergebenden Chancen zu nutzen. Vgl. auch das Interview mit D. Helbing zur Resonanz unter: http://www.spektrum.de/news/wie-social-bots-den-brexit-verursachten/1423912. Vgl. auch: https://www.spektrum.de/kolumne/das-grosse-scheitern/1685328.
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2016, H.1, S.50-60
  16. Informations- und Kommunikationsutopien (2008) 0.02
    0.023588985 = product of:
      0.08845869 = sum of:
        0.030111264 = weight(_text_:und in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030111264 = score(doc=213,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
        0.027396431 = weight(_text_:zur in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027396431 = score(doc=213,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27215877 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
        0.0059777093 = weight(_text_:in in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059777093 = score(doc=213,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.13442196 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
        0.024973284 = weight(_text_:der in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024973284 = score(doc=213,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Die Etablierung einer neuen Medientechnologie erzeugte zu jeder Zeit als Reaktion auf das bis dahin Unbekannte und Neue positive wie negative Zukunftsvisionen. So wurde und wird etwa an das Internet die Erwartung geknüpft, dass die Menschen sich zu neuen Communities zusammenschließen. Derzeit werden im Kontext der Informationstechnologien auch Utopien diskutiert, die von einem veränderten Verhältnis von Mensch und Technik bzw. Umwelt ausgehen. Welche Mythen und Utopien sind in der Geschichte der Informations- und Kommunikationsmedien entstanden und auch heute noch virulent? Was sagen sie über die Welt aus, in der wir leben? Und welche ethischen Perspektiven sind für eine zukünftige Gestaltung der Informations- und Wissensgesellschaften zu berücksichtigen? Der vorliegende Band mit den Beiträgen des sechsten Symposiums zur Medienethik der Stuttgarter Hochschule der Medien wirft einen kritischen Blick auf bestehende Informations- und Kommunikationsutopien und regt dazu an, diese (immer wieder) auf ihre positiven wie negativen Potentiale zu hinterfragen.
    BK
    05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    AP 14000 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Beziehungen, Ausstrahlungen, Einwirkungen / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Content
    Inhalt: Rafael Capurro: Einleitung Klaus Wiegerling: Ubiquitous Computing als konkrete Utopie Michael Nagenborg: Wenn Roboter alles wissen und Kühlschränke nicht lügen Tassilo Pellegrini: Semantic Web als konkrete Utopie - Eine praktische Annäherung Falko Blask: TV kontra Web: Mythos Medien - Medienmythen Hans Kräh: Filme als Zeitreisen: Medienszenarien in Zukunftsszenarien Uwe Jochum: Zur Zeit wird hier der Raum - Die digitale Inversion des Karfreitagszaubers Thomas Nisslmüller: Der cybergnostische Imperativ: Sich lesen in Zeiten virtueller Versuchsspiele Manfred Lang: Good Night, and Good Luck! Zur Geschichte informationspolitischer Utopien
    Footnote
    Beiträge des sechsten Symposiums zur Medienethik der Stuttgarter Hochschule der Medien. Rez. in: ZfBB 57(2010) H.1, S.65-66 (W. Gödert)
    RVK
    AP 14000 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Beziehungen, Ausstrahlungen, Einwirkungen / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
  17. Foundations of information ethics (2019) 0.02
    0.02288348 = product of:
      0.085813046 = sum of:
        0.02624671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02624671 = score(doc=5878,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.22400373 = fieldWeight in 5878, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5878)
        0.02624671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02624671 = score(doc=5878,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.22400373 = fieldWeight in 5878, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5878)
        0.02624671 = weight(_text_:23 in 5878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02624671 = score(doc=5878,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.22400373 = fieldWeight in 5878, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5878)
        0.007072921 = weight(_text_:in in 5878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007072921 = score(doc=5878,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.15905021 = fieldWeight in 5878, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5878)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    As discussions about the roles played by information in economic, political, and social arenas continue to evolve, the need for an intellectual primer on information ethics that also functions as a solid working casebook for LIS students and professionals has never been more urgent. This text, written by a stellar group of ethics scholars and contributors from around the globe, expertly fills that need. Organized into twelve chapters, making it ideal for use by instructors, this volume from editors Burgess and Knox thoroughly covers principles and concepts in information ethics, as well as the history of ethics in the information professions; examines human rights, information access, privacy, discourse, intellectual property, censorship, data and cybersecurity ethics, intercultural Information ethics, and global digital citizenship and responsibility; synthesizes the philosophical underpinnings of these key subjects with abundant primary source material to provide historical context along with timely and relevant case studies; features contributions from John M. Budd, Paul T. Jaeger, Rachel Fischer, Margaret Zimmerman, Kathrine A. Henderson, Peter Darch, Michael Zimmer, and Masooda Bashir, among others; and offers a special concluding chapter by Amelia Gibson that explores emerging issues in information ethics, including discussions ranging from the ethics of social media and social movements to AI decision making. This important survey will be a key text for LIS students and an essential reference work for practitioners.
    Content
    Inhalt: Principles and concepts in information ethics / John T.F. Burgess -- Human rights and information ethics / Paul T. Jaeger, Ursula Gorham, and Natalie Greene Taylor -- History of ethics in the information professions / John T.F. Burgess -- Information access / Emily J.M. Knox -- Privacy / Michael Zimmer -- Ethics of discourse / John M. Budd -- Intellectual property ethics / Kathrine Andrews Henderson -- Data ethics / Peter Darch -- Cybersecurity ethics / Jane Blanken-Webb, Imani Palmer, Roy H. Campbell, Nicholas C. Burbules, and Masooda Bashir -- Cognitive justice and intercultural communication ethics / Rachel Fischer and Erin Klazar -- Global digital citizenship / Margaret Zimmerman -- Emerging issues / Amelia Gibson.
    Date
    23. 5.2020 16:43:23
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASISI 71(2020) no.6, S.725-726 (Elizabeth A. Buchanan).
  18. Frohmann, B.: Subjectivity and information ethics (2008) 0.02
    0.020853592 = product of:
      0.104267955 = sum of:
        0.07266281 = weight(_text_:277 in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07266281 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23184395 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.0917172 = idf(docFreq=99, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31341258 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.0917172 = idf(docFreq=99, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
        0.022738772 = weight(_text_:software in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022738772 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
        0.008866375 = weight(_text_:in in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008866375 = score(doc=1360,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.19937998 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Abstract
    In A Brief History of Information Ethics, Thomas Froehlich (2004) quickly surveyed under several broad categories some of the many issues that constitute information ethics: under the category of librarianship - censorship, privacy, access, balance in collections, copyright, fair use, and codes of ethics; under information science, which Froehlich sees as closely related to librarianship - confidentiality, bias, and quality of information; under computer ethics - intellectual property, privacy, fair representation, nonmaleficence, computer crime, software reliability, artificial intelligence, and e-commerce; under cyberethics (issues related to the Internet, or cyberspace) - expert systems, artificial intelligence (again), and robotics; under media ethics - news, impartiality, journalistic ethics, deceit, lies, sexuality, censorship (again), and violence in the press; and under intercultural information ethics - digital divide, and the ethical role of the Internet for social, political, cultural, and economic development. Many of the debates in information ethics, on these and other issues, have to do with specific kinds of relationships between subjects. The most important subject and a familiar figure in information ethics is the ethical subject engaged in moral deliberation, whether appearing as the bearer of moral rights and obligations to other subjects, or as an agent whose actions are judged, whether by others or by oneself, according to the standards of various moral codes and ethical principles. Many debates in information ethics revolve around conflicts between those acting according to principles of unfettered access to information and those finding some information offensive or harmful. Subjectivity is at the heart of information ethics. But how is subjectivity understood? Can it be understood in ways that broaden ethical reflection to include problems that remain invisible when subjectivity is taken for granted and when how it is created remains unquestioned? This article proposes some answers by investigating the meaning and role of subjectivity in information ethics.[In an article on cyberethics (2000), I asserted that there was no information ethics in any special sense beyond the application of general ethical principles to information services. Here, I take a more expansive view.]
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.2, S.267-277
  19. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.02
    0.020831862 = product of:
      0.052079655 = sum of:
        0.0115995165 = weight(_text_:23 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0115995165 = score(doc=2392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.0989966 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
        0.0115995165 = weight(_text_:23 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0115995165 = score(doc=2392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.0989966 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
        0.00627318 = weight(_text_:und in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00627318 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.086576834 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
        0.0115995165 = weight(_text_:23 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0115995165 = score(doc=2392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.0989966 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
        0.0057878923 = weight(_text_:in in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057878923 = score(doc=2392,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
        0.0052200323 = product of:
          0.015660096 = sum of:
            0.015660096 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015660096 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(6/15)
    
    BK
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Date
    3. 3.2007 15:04:23
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.2, S.302 (L.A. Ennis):"This is an important and timely anthology of articles "on the normative issues surrounding information control" (p. 11). Using an interdisciplinary approach, Moore's work takes a broad look at the relatively new field of information ethics. Covering a variety of disciplines including applied ethics, intellectual property, privacy, free speech, and more, the book provides information professionals of all kinds with a valuable and thought-provoking resource. Information Ethics is divided into five parts and twenty chapters or articles. At the end of each of the five parts, the editor has included a few "discussion cases," which allows the users to apply what they just read to potential real life examples. Part I, "An Ethical Framework for Analysis," provides readers with an introduction to reasoning and ethics. This complex and philosophical section of the book contains five articles and four discussion cases. All five of the articles are really thought provoking and challenging writings on morality. For instance, in the first article, "Introduction to Moral Reasoning," Tom Regan examines how not to answer a moral question. For example, he thinks using what the majority believes as a means of determining what is and is not moral is flawed. "The Metaphysics of Morals" by Immanuel Kant looks at the reasons behind actions. According to Kant, to be moral one has to do the right thing for the right reasons. By including materials that force the reader to think more broadly and deeply about what is right and wrong, Moore has provided an important foundation and backdrop for the rest of the book. Part II, "Intellectual Property: Moral and Legal Concerns," contains five articles and three discussion cases for tackling issues like ownership, patents, copyright, and biopiracy. This section takes a probing look at intellectual and intangible property from a variety of viewpoints. For instance, in "Intellectual Property is Still Property," Judge Frank Easterbrook argues that intellectual property is no different than physical property and should not be treated any differently by law. Tom Palmer's article, "Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified," however, uses historical examples to show how intellectual and physical properties differ.
    Part III, "Privacy and Information Control," has four articles and three discussion cases beginning with an 1890 article from the Harvard Law Review, "The Right to Privacy," written by Samuel A Warren and Louis D. Brandeis. Moore then includes an article debating whether people own their genes, an article on caller I.D., and an article on computer surveillance. While all four articles pose some very interesting questions, Margaret Everett's article "The Social Life of Genes: Privacy, Property, and the New Genetics" is incredible. She does a great job of demonstrating how advances in genetics have led to increased concerns over ownership and privacy of genetic codes. For instance, if someone's genetic code predisposes them to a deadly disease, should insurance companies have access to that information? Part IV, "Freedom of Speech and Information Control," has three articles and two discussion cases that examine speech and photography issues. Moore begins this section with Kent Greenawalt's "Rationales for Freedom of Speech," which looks at a number of arguments favoring free speech. Then the notion of free speech is carried over into the digital world in "Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society" by Jack M. Balkin. At 59 pages, this is the work's longest article and demonstrates how complex the digital environment has made freedom of speech issues. Finally, Part V, "Governmental and Societal Control of Information," contains three articles and three discussion cases which provide an excellent view into the conflict between security and privacy. For instance, the first article, "Carnivore, the FBI's E-mail Surveillance System: Devouring Criminals, Not Privacy" by Griffin S. Durham, examines the FBI's e-mail surveillance program called Carnivore. Durham does an excellent job of demonstrating that Carnivore is a necessary and legitimate system used in limited circumstances and with a court order. Librarians will find the final article in the book, National Security at What Price? A Look into Civil Liberty Concerns in the Information Age under the USA Patriot Act by Jacob R. Lilly, of particular interest. In this article, Lilly uses historical examples of events that sacrificed civil liberties for national security such as the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II and the McCarthyism of the Cold War era to examine the PATRIOT Act.
    The book also includes an index, a selected bibliography, and endnotes for each article. More information on the authors of the articles would have been useful, however. One of the best features of Information Ethics is the discussion cases at the end of each chapter. For instance, in the discussion cases, Moore asks questions like: Would you allow one person to die to save nine? Should a scientist be allowed to experiment on people without their knowledge if there is no harm? Should marriages between people carrying a certain gene be outlawed? These discussion cases really add to the value of the readings. The only suggestion would be to have put them at the beginning of each section so the reader could have the questions floating in their heads as they read the material. Information Ethics is a well thought out and organized collection of articles. Moore has done an excellent job of finding articles to provide a fair and balanced look at a variety of complicated and far-reaching topics. Further, the work has breadth and depth. Moore is careful to include enough historical articles, like the 1890 Warren article, to give balance and perspective to new and modern topics like E-mail surveillance, biopiracy, and genetics. This provides a reader with just enough philosophy and history theory to work with the material. The articles are written by a variety of authors from differing fields so they range in length, tone, and style, creating a rich tapestry of ideas and arguments. However, this is not a quick or easy read. The subject matter is complex and one should plan to spend time with the book. The book is well worth the effort though. Overall, this is a highly recommended work for all libraries especially academic ones."
  20. Brellochs, A.: Aufbau von Datenbanken zur Informationsethik : ein Projektbericht (1995) 0.02
    0.020358363 = product of:
      0.101791814 = sum of:
        0.030111264 = weight(_text_:und in 2710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030111264 = score(doc=2710,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 2710, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2710)
        0.04109465 = weight(_text_:zur in 2710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04109465 = score(doc=2710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.40823817 = fieldWeight in 2710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2710)
        0.030585902 = weight(_text_:der in 2710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030585902 = score(doc=2710,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 2710, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2710)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Source
    Informationsspezialisten zwischen Technik und gesellschaftlicher Verantwortung: Internationaler Kongreß der Hochschule für Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen, Stuttgart, 4.-5.12.1995. Hrsg.: Projektgruppe Kongreß '95 der HBI Stuttgart

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 95
  • d 35
  • m 2
  • es 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 114
  • m 14
  • s 10
  • el 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…