-
Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005)
0.07
0.07431119 = product of:
0.15923826 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.021512525 = weight(_text_:und in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021512525 = score(doc=3276,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008103048 = score(doc=3276,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.021851625 = weight(_text_:der in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021851625 = score(doc=3276,freq=6.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.010335136 = product of:
0.031005409 = sum of:
0.031005409 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031005409 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.46666667 = coord(7/15)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des klassischen Information Retrieval wurden verschiedene Verfahren für das Ranking sowie die Suche in einer homogenen strukturlosen Dokumentenmenge entwickelt. Die Erfolge der Suchmaschine Google haben gezeigt dass die Suche in einer zwar inhomogenen aber zusammenhängenden Dokumentenmenge wie dem Internet unter Berücksichtigung der Dokumentenverbindungen (Links) sehr effektiv sein kann. Unter den von der Suchmaschine Google realisierten Konzepten ist ein Verfahren zum Ranking von Suchergebnissen (PageRank), das in diesem Artikel kurz erklärt wird. Darüber hinaus wird auf die Konzepte eines Systems namens CiteSeer eingegangen, welches automatisch bibliographische Angaben indexiert (engl. Autonomous Citation Indexing, ACI). Letzteres erzeugt aus einer Menge von nicht vernetzten wissenschaftlichen Dokumenten eine zusammenhängende Dokumentenmenge und ermöglicht den Einsatz von Banking-Verfahren, die auf den von Google genutzten Verfahren basieren.
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 16:23:22
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.2, S.87-92
-
Nagelschmidt, M.: Verfahren zur Anfragemodifikation im Information Retrieval (2008)
0.07
0.07217453 = product of:
0.18043631 = sum of:
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=2774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=2774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.033665415 = weight(_text_:und in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033665415 = score(doc=2774,freq=20.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=2774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.029058306 = weight(_text_:zur in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029058306 = score(doc=2774,freq=4.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.28866798 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.03419608 = weight(_text_:der in 2774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03419608 = score(doc=2774,freq=20.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.46826762 = fieldWeight in 2774, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2774)
0.4 = coord(6/15)
- Abstract
- Für das Modifizieren von Suchanfragen kennt das Information Retrieval vielfältige Möglichkeiten. Nach einer einleitenden Darstellung der Wechselwirkung zwischen Informationsbedarf und Suchanfrage wird eine konzeptuelle und typologische Annäherung an Verfahren zur Anfragemodifikation gegeben. Im Anschluss an eine kurze Charakterisierung des Fakten- und des Information Retrieval, sowie des Vektorraum- und des probabilistischen Modells, werden intellektuelle, automatische und interaktive Modifikationsverfahren vorgestellt. Neben klassischen intellektuellen Verfahren, wie der Blockstrategie und der "Citation Pearl Growing"-Strategie, umfasst die Darstellung der automatischen und interaktiven Verfahren Modifikationsmöglichkeiten auf den Ebenen der Morphologie, der Syntax und der Semantik von Suchtermen. Darüber hinaus werden das Relevance Feedback, der Nutzen informetrischer Analysen und die Idee eines assoziativen Retrievals auf der Basis von Clustering- und terminologischen Techniken, sowie zitationsanalytischen Verfahren verfolgt. Ein Eindruck für die praktischen Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten der behandelten Verfahren soll abschließend durch fünf Anwendungsbeispiele vermittelt werden.
- Date
- 23. 2.2005 10:27:09
-
Maylein, L.; Langenstein, A.: Neues vom Relevanz-Ranking im HEIDI-Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg : Perspektiven für bibliothekarische Dienstleistungen (2013)
0.07
0.066820376 = product of:
0.16705093 = sum of:
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.014194585 = weight(_text_:und in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014194585 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.009260627 = weight(_text_:in in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009260627 = score(doc=775,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.03224037 = weight(_text_:der in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03224037 = score(doc=775,freq=10.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.44148692 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
0.4 = coord(6/15)
- Abstract
- Das Relevanz-Ranking im Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg HEIDI, bereits 2009 in einem Beitrag in dieser Zeitschrift beschrieben, wurde in den letzten Jahren durch neue Entwicklungen und Methoden stark verbessert. Der Aufsatz beschreibt die Realisierung der bisherigen Rankingmaßnahmen unter der neu eingesetzten Suchmaschinenplattform SOLR. Weiter werden verschiedene neue Möglichkeiten für Rankinganpassungen unter SOLR sowie deren Einsatz im HEIDI-Katalog dargestellt.
- Date
- 29. 6.2013 18:06:23
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.07
0.06508095 = product of:
0.24405354 = sum of:
0.021291878 = weight(_text_:und in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021291878 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.04109465 = weight(_text_:zur in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04109465 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.40823817 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.030585902 = weight(_text_:der in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030585902 = score(doc=2051,freq=4.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.15108112 = product of:
0.22662166 = sum of:
0.17346953 = weight(_text_:datenverarbeitung in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17346953 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2068191 = queryWeight, product of:
6.326249 = idf(docFreq=214, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.83875 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.326249 = idf(docFreq=214, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.05315213 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05315213 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Der Beitrag enthält eine Darstellung zur Frage der Konzeption von Rankingalgorithmen auf Grundlage gewichteter Indexierung mittels statistischer Verfahren.
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
- Series
- Linguistische Datenverarbeitung; Bd.5
- Source
- Automatische Indexierung zwischen Forschung und Anwendung, Hrsg.: G. Lustig
-
Hora, M.: Methoden für das Ranking in Discovery-Systemen (2018)
0.06
0.057198223 = product of:
0.14299555 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
0.024840524 = weight(_text_:und in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024840524 = score(doc=4968,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008103048 = score(doc=4968,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
0.01261604 = weight(_text_:der in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01261604 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
0.4 = coord(6/15)
- Abstract
- Discovery-Systeme bieten meist als Standardeinstellung eine Sortierung nach Relevanz an. Wie die Relevanz ermittelt wird, ist häufig intransparent. Dabei wären Kenntnisse darüber aus Nutzersicht ein wichtiger Faktor in der Informationskompetenz, während Bibliotheken sicherstellen sollten, dass das Ranking zum eigenen Bestand und Publikum passt. In diesem Aufsatz wird dargestellt, wie Discovery-Systeme Treffer auswählen und bewerten. Dazu gehören Indexierung, Prozessierung, Text-Matching und weitere Relevanzkriterien, z. B. Popularität oder Verfügbarkeit. Schließlich müssen alle betrachteten Kriterien zu einem zentralen Score zusammengefasst werden. Ein besonderer Fokus wird auf das Ranking von EBSCO Discovery Service, Primo und Summon gelegt.
- Source
- Perspektive Bibliothek. 7(2018) H.2, S.2-23
-
Walz, J.: Analyse der Übertragbarkeit allgemeiner Rankingfaktoren von Web-Suchmaschinen auf Discovery-Systeme (2018)
0.06
0.055761706 = product of:
0.13940427 = sum of:
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=5744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5744)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=5744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5744)
0.021291878 = weight(_text_:und in 5744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021291878 = score(doc=5744,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5744, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5744)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=5744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5744)
0.0040099686 = weight(_text_:in in 5744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0040099686 = score(doc=5744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 5744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5744)
0.030585902 = weight(_text_:der in 5744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030585902 = score(doc=5744,freq=16.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 5744, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5744)
0.4 = coord(6/15)
- Abstract
- Ziel: Ziel dieser Bachelorarbeit war es, die Übertragbarkeit der allgemeinen Rankingfaktoren, wie sie von Web-Suchmaschinen verwendet werden, auf Discovery-Systeme zu analysieren. Dadurch könnte das bisher hauptsächlich auf dem textuellen Abgleich zwischen Suchanfrage und Dokumenten basierende bibliothekarische Ranking verbessert werden. Methode: Hierfür wurden Faktoren aus den Gruppen Popularität, Aktualität, Lokalität, Technische Faktoren, sowie dem personalisierten Ranking diskutiert. Die entsprechenden Rankingfaktoren wurden nach ihrer Vorkommenshäufigkeit in der analysierten Literatur und der daraus abgeleiteten Wichtigkeit, ausgewählt. Ergebnis: Von den 23 untersuchten Rankingfaktoren sind 14 (61 %) direkt vom Ranking der Web-Suchmaschinen auf das Ranking der Discovery-Systeme übertragbar. Zu diesen zählen unter anderem das Klickverhalten, das Erstellungsdatum, der Nutzerstandort, sowie die Sprache. Sechs (26%) der untersuchten Faktoren sind dagegen nicht übertragbar (z.B. Aktualisierungsfrequenz und Ladegeschwindigkeit). Die Linktopologie, die Nutzungshäufigkeit, sowie die Aktualisierungsfrequenz sind mit entsprechenden Modifikationen übertragbar.
- Imprint
- Köln : Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften
-
Tseng, Y.H.; Lin, Y.I.: Evaluation of fuzzy search, term suggestion, and term relevance feedback in an OPAC system (1998)
0.05
0.047566652 = product of:
0.17837493 = sum of:
0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 6430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05567768 = score(doc=6430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 6430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6430)
0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 6430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05567768 = score(doc=6430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 6430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6430)
0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 6430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05567768 = score(doc=6430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 6430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6430)
0.011341906 = weight(_text_:in in 6430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011341906 = score(doc=6430,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 6430, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6430)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Date
- 13. 5.1996 21:43:23
- Footnote
- [In Chinesisch]
-
Mayr, P.: Re-Ranking auf Basis von Bradfordizing für die verteilte Suche in Digitalen Bibliotheken (2009)
0.04
0.044816084 = product of:
0.13444825 = sum of:
0.06420939 = weight(_text_:monographien in 4302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06420939 = score(doc=4302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.217941 = queryWeight, product of:
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2946182 = fieldWeight in 4302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4302)
0.025589654 = weight(_text_:und in 4302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025589654 = score(doc=4302,freq=26.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3531656 = fieldWeight in 4302, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4302)
0.013698216 = weight(_text_:zur in 4302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013698216 = score(doc=4302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.13607939 = fieldWeight in 4302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4302)
0.0059777093 = weight(_text_:in in 4302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0059777093 = score(doc=4302,freq=10.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.13442196 = fieldWeight in 4302, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4302)
0.024973284 = weight(_text_:der in 4302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024973284 = score(doc=4302,freq=24.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 4302, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4302)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Trotz großer Dokumentmengen für datenbankübergreifende Literaturrecherchen erwarten akademische Nutzer einen möglichst hohen Anteil an relevanten und qualitativen Dokumenten in den Trefferergebnissen. Insbesondere die Reihenfolge und Struktur der gelisteten Ergebnisse (Ranking) spielt, neben dem direkten Volltextzugriff auf die Dokumente, inzwischen eine entscheidende Rolle beim Design von Suchsystemen. Nutzer erwarten weiterhin flexible Informationssysteme, die es unter anderem zulassen, Einfluss auf das Ranking der Dokumente zu nehmen bzw. alternative Rankingverfahren zu verwenden. In dieser Arbeit werden zwei Mehrwertverfahren für Suchsysteme vorgestellt, die die typischen Probleme bei der Recherche nach wissenschaftlicher Literatur behandeln und damit die Recherchesituation messbar verbessern können. Die beiden Mehrwertdienste semantische Heterogenitätsbehandlung am Beispiel Crosskonkordanzen und Re-Ranking auf Basis von Bradfordizing, die in unterschiedlichen Phasen der Suche zum Einsatz kommen, werden hier ausführlich beschrieben und im empirischen Teil der Arbeit bzgl. der Effektivität für typische fachbezogene Recherchen evaluiert. Vorrangiges Ziel der Promotion ist es, zu untersuchen, ob das hier vorgestellte alternative Re-Rankingverfahren Bradfordizing im Anwendungsbereich bibliographischer Datenbanken zum einen operabel ist und zum anderen voraussichtlich gewinnbringend in Informationssystemen eingesetzt und dem Nutzer angeboten werden kann. Für die Tests wurden Fragestellungen und Daten aus zwei Evaluationsprojekten (CLEF und KoMoHe) verwendet. Die intellektuell bewerteten Dokumente stammen aus insgesamt sieben wissenschaftlichen Fachdatenbanken der Fächer Sozialwissenschaften, Politikwissenschaft, Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Psychologie und Medizin. Die Evaluation der Crosskonkordanzen (insgesamt 82 Fragestellungen) zeigt, dass sich die Retrievalergebnisse signifikant für alle Crosskonkordanzen verbessern; es zeigt sich zudem, dass interdisziplinäre Crosskonkordanzen den stärksten (positiven) Effekt auf die Suchergebnisse haben. Die Evaluation des Re-Ranking nach Bradfordizing (insgesamt 164 Fragestellungen) zeigt, dass die Dokumente der Kernzone (Kernzeitschriften) für die meisten Testreihen eine signifikant höhere Precision als Dokumente der Zone 2 und Zone 3 (Peripheriezeitschriften) ergeben. Sowohl für Zeitschriften als auch für Monographien kann dieser Relevanzvorteil nach Bradfordizing auf einer sehr breiten Basis von Themen und Fragestellungen an zwei unabhängigen Dokumentkorpora empirisch nachgewiesen werden.
- Footnote
- Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor philosophiae (Dr. phil.) eingereicht an der Philosophischen Fakultät I
- Imprint
- Berlin : Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin / Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
-
Wu, H.; Salton, G.: ¬The estimation of term relevance weights using relevance feedback (1981)
0.04
0.044542145 = product of:
0.22271073 = sum of:
0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 4728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07423691 = score(doc=4728,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 4728, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4728)
0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 4728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07423691 = score(doc=4728,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 4728, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4728)
0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 4728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07423691 = score(doc=4728,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 4728, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4728)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:23:35
-
Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003)
0.04
0.04283786 = product of:
0.12851357 = sum of:
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.005346625 = weight(_text_:in in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005346625 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.011811584 = product of:
0.035434753 = sum of:
0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035434753 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:23
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval
-
Jones, K.: Linguistic searching versus relevance ranking : DR-LINK and TARGET (1999)
0.04
0.038974375 = product of:
0.19487187 = sum of:
0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 6423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06495729 = score(doc=6423,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6423, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6423)
0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 6423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06495729 = score(doc=6423,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6423, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6423)
0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 6423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06495729 = score(doc=6423,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6423, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6423)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Source
- Online and CD-ROM review. 23(1999) no.2, S.67-80
-
Courtois, M.P.; Berry, M.W.: Results ranking in Web search engines (1999)
0.04
0.03890066 = product of:
0.14587747 = sum of:
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066832816 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Source
- Online. 23(1999) no.3, S.39-46
-
Weinstein, A.: Hochprozentig : Tipps and tricks für ein Top-Ranking (2002)
0.04
0.03890066 = product of:
0.14587747 = sum of:
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066832816 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Die Suchmaschinen haben in den letzten Monaten an ihren Ranking-Algorithmen gefeilt, um Spamern das Handwerk zu erschweren. Internet Pro beleuchtet die Trends im Suchmaschinen-Marketing
- Date
- 23. 8.2002 9:48:37
-
Ruthven, I.; Lalmas, M.: Selective relevance feedback using term characteristics (1999)
0.04
0.03890066 = product of:
0.14587747 = sum of:
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=3824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3824)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=3824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3824)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=3824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3824)
0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 3824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066832816 = score(doc=3824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3824)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Source
- Vocabulary as a central concept in digital libraries: interdisciplinary concepts, challenges, and opportunities : proceedings of the Third International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Science (COLIS3), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 23-26 May 1999. Ed. by T. Arpanac et al
-
Mandl, T.: Web- und Multimedia-Dokumente : Neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen (2003)
0.04
0.035364468 = product of:
0.13261674 = sum of:
0.045477543 = weight(_text_:software in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045477543 = score(doc=1734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.03476949 = weight(_text_:und in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03476949 = score(doc=1734,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.47985753 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.027396431 = weight(_text_:zur in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027396431 = score(doc=1734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27215877 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.024973284 = weight(_text_:der in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024973284 = score(doc=1734,freq=6.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Die Menge an Daten im Internet steigt weiter rapide an. Damit wächst auch der Bedarf an qualitativ hochwertigen Information Retrieval Diensten zur Orientierung und problemorientierten Suche. Die Entscheidung für die Benutzung oder Beschaffung von Information Retrieval Software erfordert aussagekräftige Evaluierungsergebnisse. Dieser Beitrag stellt neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen vor und zeigt den Trend zu Spezialisierung und Diversifizierung von Evaluierungsstudien, die den Realitätsgrad derErgebnisse erhöhen. DerSchwerpunkt liegt auf dem Retrieval von Fachtexten, Internet-Seiten und Multimedia-Objekten.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 54(2003) H.4, S.203-210
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Fleet, C. van: Opening the black box of "relevance work" : a domain analysis (2012)
0.03
0.034116738 = product of:
0.102350205 = sum of:
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008019937 = score(doc=247,freq=8.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
0.010813748 = weight(_text_:der in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010813748 = score(doc=247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- In response to Hjørland's recent call for a reconceptualization of the foundations of relevance, we suggest that the sociocognitive aspects of intermediation by information agencies, such as archives and libraries, are a necessary and unexplored part of the infrastructure of the subject knowledge domains central to his recommended "view of relevance informed by a social paradigm" (2010, p. 217). From a comparative analysis of documents from 39 graduate-level introductory courses in archives, reference, and strategic/competitive intelligence taught in 13 American Library Association-accredited library and information science (LIS) programs, we identify four defining sociocognitive dimensions of "relevance work" in information agencies within Hjørland's proposed framework for relevance: tasks, time, systems, and assessors. This study is intended to supply sociocognitive content from within the relevance work domain to support further domain analytic research, and to emphasize the importance of intermediary relevance work for all subject knowledge domains.
- Date
- 11. 6.2012 14:23:00
-
Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996)
0.03
0.032128394 = product of:
0.09638517 = sum of:
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.0040099686 = weight(_text_:in in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0040099686 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.008858688 = product of:
0.026576065 = sum of:
0.026576065 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026576065 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Proposes that signature files be used as a viable alternative to other indexing strategies such as inverted files for searching through large volumes of text. Demonstrates through simulation, that search times can be further reduced by enhancing the basic signature file concept using deterministic partitioning algorithms which eliminate the need for an exhaustive search of the entire signature file. Reports research to evaluate the performance of some deterministic partitioning algorithms in a non simulated environment using 276 MB of raw newspaper text (taken from the Wall Street Journal) and real user queries. Presents a selection of results to illustrate trends and highlight important aspects of the performance of these methods under realistic rather than simulated operating conditions. As a result of the research reported here certain aspects of this approach to signature files are shown to be found wanting and require improvement. Suggests lines of future research on the partitioning of signature files
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Longshu, L.; Xia, Z.: On an aproximate fuzzy information retrieval agent (1998)
0.03
0.031120533 = product of:
0.11670199 = sum of:
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
0.005346625 = weight(_text_:in in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005346625 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Date
- 13. 5.1996 21:43:23
- Footnote
- [In Chinesisch]
-
Fuhr, N.: Zur Überwindung der Diskrepanz zwischen Retrievalforschung und -praxis (1990)
0.03
0.030233432 = product of:
0.113375366 = sum of:
0.03174006 = weight(_text_:und in 6625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03174006 = score(doc=6625,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.438048 = fieldWeight in 6625, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6625)
0.04745201 = weight(_text_:zur in 6625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04745201 = score(doc=6625,freq=6.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.4713928 = fieldWeight in 6625, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6625)
0.005346625 = weight(_text_:in in 6625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005346625 = score(doc=6625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 6625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6625)
0.028836664 = weight(_text_:der in 6625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028836664 = score(doc=6625,freq=8.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 6625, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6625)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- In diesem Beitrag werden einige Forschungsergebnisse des Information Retrieval vorgestellt, die unmittelbar zur Verbesserung der Retrievalqualität für bereits existierende Datenbanken eingesetzt werden können: Linguistische Algorithmen zur Grund- und Stammformreduktion unterstützen die Suche nach Flexions- und Derivationsformen von Suchtermen. Rankingalgorithmen, die Frage- und Dokumentterme gewichten, führen zu signifikant besseren Retrievalergebnissen als beim Booleschen Retrieval. Durch Relevance Feedback können die Retrievalqualität weiter gesteigert und außerdem der Benutzer bei der sukzessiven Modifikation seiner Frageformulierung unterstützt werden. Es wird eine benutzerfreundliche Bedienungsoberfläche für ein System vorgestellt, das auf diesen Konzepten basiert.
-
Klein, S.T.: On the use of negation in Boolean IR queries. (2009)
0.03
0.029725555 = product of:
0.111470826 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=3927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3927)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=3927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3927)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=3927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3927)
0.014034891 = weight(_text_:in in 3927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014034891 = score(doc=3927,freq=18.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31560543 = fieldWeight in 3927, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3927)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- The negation operator, in various forms in which it appears in Information Retrieval queries, is investigated. The applications include negated terms in Boolean queries, more specifically in the presence of metrical constraints, but also negated characters used in the definition of extended keywords by means of regular expressions. Exact definitions are suggested and their usefulness is shown on several examples. Finally, some implementation issues are discussed, in particular as to the order in which the terms of long queries, with or without negated keywords, should be processed, and efficient heuristics for choosing a good order are suggested.
- Date
- 23. 1.2011 13:59:51
