Search (160 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Schöne Literatur"
  1. Slade, E.M.: Thematische Erschließung der Schönen Literatur durch Kataloge und Aufstellung (1975) 0.09 
    0.09331219 = product of:
  0.27993655 = sum of:
    0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 3247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07423691 = score(doc=3247,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 3247, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3247)
    0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 3247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07423691 = score(doc=3247,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 3247, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3247)
    0.02838917 = weight(_text_:und in 3247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02838917 = score(doc=3247,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 3247, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3247)
    0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 3247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07423691 = score(doc=3247,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 3247, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3247)
    0.028836664 = weight(_text_:der in 3247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028836664 = score(doc=3247,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 3247, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3247)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:23:05
  2. Roth, C.: Konzepte zur Inhaltserschließung Schöner Literatur und ihre Benutzerbilder (1994) 0.09 
    0.09264849 = product of:
  0.27794546 = sum of:
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
    0.035129808 = weight(_text_:und in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035129808 = score(doc=3363,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
    0.047943756 = weight(_text_:zur in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047943756 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47627786 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Date
    23. 7.1996 17:29:45
    Imprint
    Hamburg : FH, Fb Bibliothek und Information
  3. Heinrich, G.: ¬Die "Allzweck-Annotation" und der annotierte Katalogzetteldienst : offene Fragen und mögliche Alternativen (1971) 0.09 
    0.08507793 = product of:
  0.25523376 = sum of:
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
    0.035129808 = weight(_text_:und in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035129808 = score(doc=4858,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
    0.02523208 = weight(_text_:der in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02523208 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Source
    BuB. 23(1971), S.233-238
  4. Velthoven, A.: 'Heeft u nog een mooi boek voor mij?' : het adviseren van romanlezers (1994) 0.05 
    0.04520691 = product of:
  0.13562073 = sum of:
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=8191,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=8191,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=8191,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
    0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00756127 = score(doc=8191,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
    0.016704103 = product of:
      0.050112307 = sum of:
        0.050112307 = weight(_text_:22 in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050112307 = score(doc=8191,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Abstract
    On 19 Aug 94 a group of readers' advisers met to discuss their problems in Utrecht Provincial Central Library in the Netherlands. The panel felt that too much emphasis had been placed on libraries' information role and that more effort should be devoted to recreational reading through organising lectures and reading groups. It was felt that training sessions should be organised and a network created for the exchange of ideas
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 22(1994) no.11, S.22-23
  5. Sträter, H.; Kloeden, E. von: Inhaltliche Erschließung Schöner Literatur (1988) 0.04 
    0.038974375 = product of:
  0.19487187 = sum of:
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 2967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=2967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 2967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2967)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 2967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=2967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 2967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2967)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 2967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=2967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 2967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2967)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:03:23
  6. Harrell, G.; Harrell, E.G.: ¬The classification and organisation of adult fiction in large American public libraries (1985) 0.03 
    0.032164264 = product of:
  0.12061599 = sum of:
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
    0.009260627 = weight(_text_:in in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009260627 = score(doc=5825,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Ways of classifying adult fiction vary from library to library in the absence of a standard or universal system. Describes a questionnaire survey of 67 libraries which attempted to identify the various method used by libraries in classifying, arranging and displaying their adult fiction collections. Stresses the need for an evaluation of the methods used and to explore user needs, genre categories, and techniques used by bookstores
    Date
    4. 8.2006 21:38:23
  7. Garcia-Marco, F.-J.; Moraes, J.-B.-E. de; Garcia-Marco, L.-F.; Chaves Guimaraes, J.A.: Knowledge organization of fiction and narrative documents : a challenge in the age of the multimedia revolution 0.03 
    0.029038768 = product of:
  0.10889538 = sum of:
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=3539,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3539, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3539)
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=3539,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3539, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3539)
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 3539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=3539,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 3539, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3539)
    0.011459442 = weight(_text_:in in 3539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011459442 = score(doc=3539,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 3539, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3539)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Knowledge organization (KO) research has been traditionally more oriented toward scientific documents. However, narrative, one of the oldest kinds of literature genre, is increasingly important in the multimedia culture of today, and is getting more important in applied social sciences as business administration, advertising, public relations, politics or education. This paper explores the key facets for KO in the field building on literature theory and faceted classification theory.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  8. Zyl, R.E. v.: Fiksieherwinning in openbare biblioteke (1993) 0.03 
    0.028143732 = product of:
  0.10553899 = sum of:
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
    0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008103048 = score(doc=5837,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Public libraries offer fiction readers various approaches to retrieve reading matter: shelving systems that facilityte browsing, knowledgable staff bibliographic aids and also user training and reader guidance. Despite these alternatives, readers often experience difficulty in identifying relevant fiction and no single factor can be isolated as the main cause. Classifies shelving systems and bibliographic aids do not take into account the fiction reader's approach. The nature of fiction does not allow for content to be moulded into any formal knowledge structure. The Analysis and Mediation of Publications (AMP) classification scheme, developed in Denmark, is a fiction classification scheme based on the relation between content and needs of fiction readers
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:23:44
  9. Lassak, L.: ¬Ein Versuch zur Repräsentation von Charakteren der Kinder- und Jugendbuchserie "Die drei ???" in einer Datenbank (2017) 0.03 
    0.025923543 = product of:
  0.09721328 = sum of:
    0.030423306 = weight(_text_:und in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030423306 = score(doc=1784,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
    0.033901356 = weight(_text_:zur in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033901356 = score(doc=1784,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3367793 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
    0.004678297 = weight(_text_:in in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004678297 = score(doc=1784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
    0.028210325 = weight(_text_:der in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028210325 = score(doc=1784,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Die vorliegende Masterarbeit setzt sich mit dem Information Retrieval anhand der Repräsentation von Charakteren der Kinder und Jugendbuchserie "Die drei ???" mit dem Datenbanksystem Access auseinander. Dabei werden sämtliche Aspekte von der Informations- und Datenbeschaffung aus 55 "Die drei ???"-Büchern über die Datenbankerstellung und -aufbereitung bis hin zu den abschließenden Evaluationen beschrieben. Insbesondere versucht die Arbeit die Nutzergruppe Autoren abzudecken, so dass die Datenbank ihnen eine erleichterte Figurenübersicht und eine Hilfestellung bei der Figurensuche geben soll.
    Footnote
    Masterarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Master of Arts (M. A.)
    Imprint
    Berlin : Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philosophische Fakultät, Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
  10. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A framework for indexing and representation of information based on work domain analysis : a fiction classification example (1994) 0.03 
    0.025295582 = product of:
  0.09485842 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
    0.011341906 = weight(_text_:in in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011341906 = score(doc=5838,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Information retrieval and exploration of work domains through databases and integrated information systems has become increasingly important in many modern work settings (as well as in libraries). The problem space of the users is defined on occasion by the dynamically changing requirements from their tasks and goals. it is argued that IR system design should be based on an analysis of the properties of the work domain, the task situation and the user characteristics. The paper describes a general framework for IR system design that has been used in the design of a library system. A special problem identified from use of the framework in domain analysis of fiction retrieval is treated in more detail: mapping the authors' domain structures to the domain structures expressed in users' needs in indexing and representation of fiction
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:23:13
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.4
  11. Tilley, C.L.; LaBarre, K.A.: New models from old tools : leveraging an understanding of information tasks and subject domain to support enhanced discovery and access to folktales 0.02 
    0.024409723 = product of:
  0.091536455 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=3535,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3535, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3535)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=3535,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3535, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3535)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=3535,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3535, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3535)
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 3535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=3535,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3535, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3535)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    This paper provides an introduction to an ongoing research project that aims to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency with which users discover and access folktales. Through systematic and rigorous research combining task analysis with facet analysis, the researchers intend to develop an enhanced bibliographic record prototype. The focus of the paper, however, is to discuss results from the preliminary phase of this project. In particular it will describe the information tasks, information seeking obstacles, and desired features for a discovery and access tool related to folktales for a group of scholarly users of folktales. Additionally the paper will address some of the bibliographic, cultural, and intellectual facets derived from a sample of folktale resources. Finally it proposes a provisional model for enhanced bibliographic records, comparing it with the one implicit in extant bibliographic discovery and access tools.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  12. Prohl, J.: Was ist Belletristik? (1985) 0.02 
    0.024339693 = product of:
  0.091273844 = sum of:
    0.044781893 = weight(_text_:und in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044781893 = score(doc=4373,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.6180398 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
    0.023971878 = weight(_text_:zur in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023971878 = score(doc=4373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23813893 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
    0.004678297 = weight(_text_:in in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004678297 = score(doc=4373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
    0.017841775 = weight(_text_:der in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017841775 = score(doc=4373,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Ein Beitrag zur Begriffsbestimmung von 'Literatur' und 'Belletristik' in der Fachwissenschaft und durch Bibliothekare
    Content
    "Was ist Belletristik? Haben Homer, Vergil, Dante, Shakespeare und Goethe, um nur einige europäische Klassiker zu nennen, Belletristik verfaßt? Ebenso Klopstock, Lessing und Wieland, um weitere deutsche Autoren zu nennen, Herder und Schiller oder Hölderlin und Kleist? Auch George, Hofmannsthal und Rilke oder Heinrich Mann, Döblin und Feuchtwanger? Kann man sie als Belletristen bezeichnen? Nach den Auffassungen einiger einflußreicher Bibliothekare und Bibliographen anscheinend ja! Und was ist Belletristik heute, einige Jahrzehnte nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg? Sind Böll, Grass, Uwe Johnson, der 1984 gestorben ist, Siegfried Lenz und Martin Walser, um wiederum nur einige stellvertretend zu nennen, wirklich Verfasser von Belletristik? Kann man Literatur von fachkundiger Seite so mißverstehen und herabwürdigen? Anscheinend ja!"
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 32(1985), S.15-18
  13. Nau, A.-C.: Begutachtungen zur Belletristik im ekz-Informationsdienst : Funktion und Qualität (2007) 0.02 
    0.0243209 = product of:
  0.09120337 = sum of:
    0.029423824 = weight(_text_:und in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029423824 = score(doc=1406,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
    0.038287677 = weight(_text_:zur in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038287677 = score(doc=1406,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.38035345 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
    0.0033416408 = weight(_text_:in in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033416408 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
    0.020150231 = weight(_text_:der in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020150231 = score(doc=1406,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27592933 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Die vorliegende Arbeit erläutert die Begriffe Belletristik und fiktionale Literatur und skizziert literaturwissenschaftliche Kategorisierungen fiktionaler Literatur sowie des Romans. Nach einem Kapitel, das historische Entwicklungen und Positionen der Literaturkritik erörtert, wird Heydebrands Modell zur Wertung literarischer Texte vorgestellt. Funktionen und Inhalte feuilletonistischer Literaturkritik sowie Analyseschritte zur Metakritik werden nach Anz referiert. Es folgt die Beschreibung von Arbeitsorganisation und Angebot des ID (Informationsdienst) der ekz (Einkaufszentrale für Bibliotheken). Funktionen der ID-Begutachtungen sowie die Arbeitsrichtlinien für Rezensenten Schöner Literatur werden dargelegt. Feuilleton-Rezensionen von Romanen Donna Leons, Henning Mankells, Michael Frayns und Ralf Rothmanns werden den entsprechenden Begutachtungen des ID gegenübergestellt. Daran schließt sich die Analyse von weiteren 80 ID-Rezensionen zur Belletristik aus den Jahren 2003-2005 an. Die Ergebnisse lassen sich folgendermaßen zusammenfassen: Feuilleton-Rezensionen bewerten in erster Linie die literarische Qualität der Romane. Die Unterhaltungsfunktion hat im Feuilleton Priorität, dann folgen Information, Beratung, Belehrung und Selbstdarstellung des Rezensenten. Die Begutachtungen des Informationsdienstes haben primär informierende Funktion für den Bestandsaufbau und sind nach den ID-Arbeitsrichtlinien für Rezensenten strukturiert. Inwieweit die 80 Rezensionen die einzelnen Aspekte der Arbeitsrichtlinien beachten, wird nach Genres differenziert untersucht und dargestellt. Insgesamt werden die analysierten ID-Rezensionen ihrer Informationsfunktion für Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare gerecht.
    Series
    Berliner Handreichungen zur Bibliothekswissenschaft ; 215
  14. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬The role of domain, task and users in providing subject access to information (1993) 0.02 
    0.024123197 = product of:
  0.090461984 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
    0.00694547 = weight(_text_:in in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00694547 = score(doc=5839,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Decribes the BookHouse, a system for the retrieval and indexing of fiction and non fiction literature developed for public and school libraries though cooperation between library and information science professionals. Discusses 3 aspects of the system: domain characteristic; task analysis; and user characteristics. Outlines the framework underlying the collection of field data with special emphasis on the work involved in transforming the empirical field studies of user behaviour in the library into computer system specifications and subsequent design of a retrieval system providing subject access to fiction. Describes a few of the many indexing policies, rules and practices which evolved for concept identification and book descriptions as well as the functionality and associated displays of the system for supporting the retrieval and indexing of fiction
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:23:33
  15. Schneider, A.: ¬Die Verzeichnung und sachliche Erschließung der Belletristik in Kaysers Bücherlexikon und im Schlagwortkatalog Georg/Ost (1980) 0.02 
    0.02410367 = product of:
  0.09038875 = sum of:
    0.035129808 = weight(_text_:und in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035129808 = score(doc=5309,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
    0.009356594 = weight(_text_:in in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009356594 = score(doc=5309,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
    0.02523208 = weight(_text_:der in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02523208 = score(doc=5309,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
    0.020670272 = product of:
      0.062010817 = sum of:
        0.062010817 = weight(_text_:22 in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062010817 = score(doc=5309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:07:22
  16. RSWK-Mitteilung Nr.4 : Diskussionsentwürfe zur Erschließung von Schöner Literatur, Kinder- und Jugendliteratur (1992) 0.02 
    0.02373989 = product of:
  0.08902458 = sum of:
    0.031987067 = weight(_text_:und in 5831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031987067 = score(doc=5831,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.441457 = fieldWeight in 5831, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5831)
    0.024215251 = weight(_text_:zur in 5831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024215251 = score(doc=5831,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.24055663 = fieldWeight in 5831, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5831)
    0.0057878923 = weight(_text_:in in 5831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057878923 = score(doc=5831,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 5831, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5831)
    0.027034372 = weight(_text_:der in 5831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027034372 = score(doc=5831,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.37019804 = fieldWeight in 5831, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5831)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Da das Interesse an den RSWK in den Öffentlichen Bibliotheken zunehmend größer wird, stellt sich die Frage nach der Anwendbarkeit der RSWK für die Erschließung der Schönen Literatur, Kinder- und Jugendliteratur. Das Regelwerk eröffnet im 3,2 prinzipiell diese Möglichkeit und biete auch bisher vier Formschlagwörter (Belletristische Darstellung, Anthologie, Bilderbuch und Kinderbuch) für die Erschließung dieser Literaturgruppen an. Die im folgenden vorgelegten Entwürfe sollen die Anwendung der RSWK für die Erschließung der genannten Literaturgruppen präzisieren und mit Beispielen veranschaulichen. Eine Erschließung Schöner Literatur und der erzählenden Kinder- und Jugendliteratur durch Genrebegriffe ist dabei nicht vorgesehen. Ein Entwurf für die Erschließung von Schul- und Berufsschulbüchern nach RSWK soll folgen. Die hier vorgelegten Entwürfe wurden von einer Arbeitsgruppe aus Vertretern Öffentlicher Bibliotheken, die bereits die RSWK anwenden, der Deutschen Bibliothek sowie von Kinder- und Jugendbibliotheken und -forschungseinrichtungen erarbeitet. Sie sollen hier in einer vorläufigen Fassung - noch ohne Bezug auf die Paragraphenzählung der RSWK - für eine breitere bibliothekarische Öffentlichkeit zur Diskussion gestellt werden. Die Deutsche Bibliothek möchte ab 1993 die Schöne Literatur und die Kinder- und Jugendliteratur auf der Basis dieser durch einen möglichst breiten Konsens getragenen Regeln erschließen
    Editor
    Kommission des DBI für Erschließung und Katalogmanagement
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch den Bericht in Bibliotheksdienst 27(1993) H.1, S.65
  17. Kloiber, M.: Umstellung der Belletristikabteilung einer kleineren öffentlichen Bibliothek : Von alphabetischer Aufstellung zu einer Aufstellung nach mit den Lesern in Workshops erarbeiteten Interessenkreisen (2012) 0.02 
    0.023690792 = product of:
  0.08884046 = sum of:
    0.026077118 = weight(_text_:und in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026077118 = score(doc=215,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
    0.020547325 = weight(_text_:zur in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020547325 = score(doc=215,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.20411909 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=215,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
    0.03419608 = weight(_text_:der in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03419608 = score(doc=215,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.46826762 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Die Aufstellung nach Interessenkreisen wurde in den 1980er und 1990er Jahren im Umfeld der Öffentlichen Bibliotheken viel diskutiert. Danach geriet das Thema aus dem Rampenlicht. Erst mit den sogenannten Themenbibliotheken und Themenwelten gewann es wieder an Bedeutung. Im Rahmen der vorliegenden Arbeit wird dargestellt, wie eine kleine Öffentliche Bibliothek die Umstellung ihres Belletristikbereichs nach Interessenkreisen realisiert und dabei ihre Nutzer "ins Boot holt". Der aus dem Marketing stammende Ansatz der User Driven Innovation wird dabei in die Tat umgesetzt. Die Arbeit zeigt, wie sich eine Befragung der Nutzer über die Methode der Gruppendiskussion auf die Erarbeitung eines Sets an Interessenkreisen für die Belletristik niederschlägt und erläutert die konkrete Umsetzung des Vorhabens. Vorher wird die Aufstellung nach Interessenkreisen konzeptionell erarbeitet und die Methode der Gruppendiskussion im Kontext der Befragung von Nutzern in Bibliotheken erläutert.
    Imprint
    Berlin : Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
    Series
    Berliner Handreichungen zur Bibliothekswissenschaft ; 322
  18. Rafferty, P.: Genre theory, knowledge organisation and fiction 0.02 
    0.020916866 = product of:
  0.078438245 = sum of:
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=3541,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=3541,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=3541,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
    0.008841151 = weight(_text_:in in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008841151 = score(doc=3541,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Where the institutionalised study of literature goes, knowledge organisation (KO) approaches to fictional works tend to follow. At the level of generic labelling and categorisation, theoretical conventions of the professional literary critical world appear to be adopted by the information science world, for example in the generic categorisation undertaken by the British National Bibliography. This paper, which is concerned with the epistemological assumptions underpinning fiction categorisation, explores current genre theory and argues for an approach to the understanding of genre, and ultimately the description of genre, that is based on a cultural-materialist, historical world-view. In addition, a novel framework for a genre mapping KO tool is described. Fiction information retrieval is still a fairly underdeveloped area of information science. There have been some developments, mainly in the 1980s and 1990s, which focused on user warrant as the basis for developing retrieval systems (e.g. Pejtersen 1992) but there is still space for a generic approach which can identify and describe novels at a micro-level while situating them within a broader systems view. In the current information retrieval context, any such tool, which would be developed for web use, should incorporate both informational fields and affective dimension indexing in the form of user derived tagging.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  19. Pogorelec, A.; Sauperl, A.: ¬The alternative model of classification of belles-lettres in libraries (2006) 0.02 
    0.020551795 = product of:
  0.07706923 = sum of:
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
    0.007472136 = weight(_text_:in in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007472136 = score(doc=405,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Several systems for the classification of fiction have been proposed to date, but experience shows that such classification partially depends on the culture and literary education in specific countries. Slovenian public libraries have traditionally used UDC as the only subject information on belles-lettres. Research has shown that users would prefer richer subject information. Therefore an attempt was made to enhance UDC by adding subject information, that should be helpful to users and librarians. The newly proposed Alternative Model system contains lists of verbal and alpha-numerical denotations for the basic groups of belles-lettres book material (main-genres: lyrics, drama, epics) and all other categorical criteria (language of the original literary work, literature to which the work belongs, genre, sub-genre) and half-categorical (accessibility of the content of literary works, origin within the periods of literary history, the century in which the literary work was written, the rhythm of the language). All these lists are available, but not included in this paper. The idea of the Alternative Model system is to show the possibilities of making the classification of belles-lettres in libraries more helpful, efficient and exact.
    Date
    23. 6.2007 19:51:44
  20. Bös, K.: Aspektorientierte Inhaltserschließung von Romanen und Bildern : ein Vergleich der Ansätze von Annelise Mark Pejtersen und Sara Shatford (2012) 0.02 
    0.02042979 = product of:
  0.076611705 = sum of:
    0.03073218 = weight(_text_:und in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03073218 = score(doc=400,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.01712277 = weight(_text_:zur in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01712277 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.17009923 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066832816 = score(doc=400,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.022073472 = weight(_text_:der in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022073472 = score(doc=400,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.30226544 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Für die inhaltliche Erschließung von Sach- und Fachliteratur stehen heutzutage etablierte Verfahren und Standards zur Verfügung. Anders verhält es sich dagegen mit der Erschließung von Schöner Literatur und Bildern. Beide Medien sind sehr verschieden und haben doch eines gemeinsam. Sie lassen sich mit den Regeln für Sach- und Fachliteratur nicht zufriedenstellend inhaltlich erschließen. Dieses Problem erkannten in den 1970er und 80er Jahren beide Autoren, deren Methoden ich hier verglichen habe. Annelise Mark Pejtersen bemühte sich um eine Lösung für die Schöne Literatur und wählte dabei einen empirischen Ansatz. Sara Shatford versuchte durch theoretische Überlegungen eine Lösung für Bilder zu erarbeiten. Der empirische wie der theoretische Ansatz führten zu Methoden, die das jeweilige Medium unter verschiedenen Aspekten betrachten. Diese Aspekten basieren in beiden Fällen auf denselben Fragen. Dennoch unterscheiden sie sich stark voneinander sowohl im Hinblick auf die Inhalte, die sie aufnehmen können, als auch hinsichtlich ihrer Struktur. Eine Anwendung einer der Methoden auf das jeweils andere Medium erscheint daher nicht sinnvoll. In dieser Arbeit werden die Methoden von Pejtersen und Shatford zunächst einzeln erläutert. Im Anschluss werden die Aspekte beider Methoden vergleichend gegenübergestellt. Dazu werden ausgewählte Beispiele mit beiden Methoden erschlossen. Abschließend wird geprüft, ob die wechselseitige Erschließung, wie sie im Vergleich angewendet wurde, in der Praxis sinnvoll ist und ob es Medien gibt, deren Erschließung mit beiden Methoden interessant wäre.
    Imprint
    Köln : Fachhochschule / Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 116
  • d 39
  • nl 2
  • ? 1
  • fi 1
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 126
  • x 17
  • m 11
  • r 3
  • el 2
  • ? 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications