Search (263 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Waschatz, B.: Schmökern ist schwierig : Viele Uni-Bibliotheken ordnen ihre Bücher nicht - Tipps für eine erfolgreiche Suche (2010) 0.05 
    0.053381264 = product of:
  0.10008986 = sum of:
    0.01391942 = weight(_text_:23 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01391942 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.11879592 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.01391942 = weight(_text_:23 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01391942 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.11879592 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.015055632 = weight(_text_:und in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015055632 = score(doc=3206,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.01391942 = weight(_text_:23 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01391942 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.11879592 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.010273662 = weight(_text_:zur in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010273662 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.10205954 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.00694547 = weight(_text_:in in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00694547 = score(doc=3206,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.021627497 = weight(_text_:der in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021627497 = score(doc=3206,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
    0.004429344 = product of:
      0.013288032 = sum of:
        0.013288032 = weight(_text_:22 in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013288032 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.53333336 = coord(8/15)
    Content
    "In einer öffentlichen Bücherei ist die Suche nach einem Werk recht einfach: Man geht einfach die Regale ab, bis man beim richtigen Buchstaben oder Thema angekommen ist. In vielen wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken ist das komplizierter. Denn dort müssen sich Studenten durch Datenbanken und Zettelkataloge wühlen. "Eine Ausnahme ist der Lesesaal, erklärt Marlene Grau, Sprecherin der Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek in Hamburg. Im Lesesaal stehen die Bücher wie in einer öffentlichen Bibliothek in Reih und Glied nach Fachgebieten wie Jura, Biologie oder Medizin sortiert. So können Studenten ein wenig schmökern und querbeet lesen. Wer jedoch ein bestimmtes Werk sucht, nutzt besser gleich den Katalog der Bibliothek. Darin lässt sich zum einen nach dem Autor oder einem Titelstichwort suchen - in der Biologie etwa "Fliege" oder "Insekt". "Dann kann man hoffen, dass Bücher zum Thema das Stichwort im Titel enthalten", sagt Grau. Die andere Variante ist, nach einem Schlagwort zu suchen. Um das passende zu finden, kann man im Schlagwort-Index blättern. Oder man sucht nach einem bekannten Buch, das zum Thema passt. Dann kann man mit dessen Schlagwörtern weitersuchen. Der Vorteil: Bücher müssen dieses Schlagwort nicht im Titel enthalten. Buchtitel wie 'Keine Angst vor Zahlen' oder 'Grundkurs Rechnen' findet man über die Schlagworte 'Mathematik' und 'Einführung', aber mit Stichworten eher nicht", erklärt Ulrich Hohoff. Er leitet die Universitätsbibliothek in Augsburg.
    Im Online-Katalog erfahren Studenten auch, ob das Buch verfügbar oder verliehen ist. Ist es gerade vergriffen, kann man es vormerken lassen, er- klärt Monika Ziller, Vorsitzen- de des Deutschen Bibliotheksverbands in Berlin. Dann werden die Studenten entsprechend benachrichtigt, wenn es zurückgegeben wurde. Außerdem könnten Studenten virtuelle Fachbibliotheken nutzen, erklärt Grau. Um das Thema Slavistik kümmert sich etwa die Staatsbibliothek in Berlin. Auf der Internetseite kann man über Suchbegriffe alle elektronischen Slavistik-Angebote wie Zeitschriften, E-Books oder Bibliografien durchforsten. Die virtuelle Fachbibliothek spuckt dann eine Titelliste aus. Bestenfalls können Studenten gleich auf einzelne Volltexte der Liste zugreifen. Oder sie müssen schauen, ob die eigene Bibliothek das gesuchte Werk hat. Vor allem Zeitschriften sind oft online im Volltext abrufbar, aber auch Enzyklopädien. "Die sind auch aktueller als der Brockhaus von 1990, der zu Hause im Regal steht" sagt Grau. Manchmal ließen sich die Texte aus Gründen des Urheberrechts aber nur auf den Rechnern auf dem Unicampus lesen, ergänzt Hohoff. Findet man ein Buch nicht, ist der Grund dafür oft ein Fehler, der sich bei der Suche eingeschlichen hat. Das fängt bei der Rechtschreibung an: "Bibliothekskataloge verfügen über keine fehlertolerante Suche wie Google", erklärt Ziller.
    "Ein häufiger Fehler ist auch, bei Google nach Büchern zu suchen", sagt Grau. Die Suchmaschine enthält keine Bibliotheksdaten. Außerdem sollten Studenten darauf achten, ob sie nach einem Zeitschriften-Artikel oder einer Monografie suchen. Benötigt man einen Aufsatz, muss man nach dem Titel der Zeitschrift und nicht nach dem Titel des Artikels suchen. Wichtig ist auch, den Suchschlüssel zu beachten. Wer nach dem Autor Johann Wolfgang von Goethe sucht, aber das Wort in der Titelsuche eingibt, bekommt andere Treffermengen. Studenten sollten die Suche auch nicht zu sehr eingrenzen. "Dann findet man nichts", warnt Grau. Andererseits darf man auch nicht zu allgemein suchen. Wer nach einem Buch zur deutschen Geschichte sucht, bekommt bei der Eingabe von "deutsche Geschichte" Tausende Treffer. "Da muss man den richtigen Suchschlüssel auswählen", erklärt Grau. Wer im Feld "Titelanfänge" etwa "deutsche Geschichte" eingibt, finde alle Titel mit diesen Wörtern in genau dieser Reihenfolge. Er lande also nicht beim Buch "Deutsche Naturlyrik: ihre Geschichte in Einzelanalysen". Das ist bei weit gefassten Begriffen sehr wichtig und hilfreich."
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    Series
    Magazin: Beruf und Bildung
    Source
    Bergische Landeszeitung. Nr.293 vom 16.12.2010, S.23
  2. English, W.: ¬A short primer in conducting searches (1998) 0.05 
    0.046680793 = product of:
  0.17505297 = sum of:
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 1669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=1669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1669)
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 1669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=1669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1669)
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 1669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=1669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1669)
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 1669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=1669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1669)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Date
    29.12.1998 11:23:26
  3. Bates, M.J.: Search techniques (1981) 0.04 
    0.044542145 = product of:
  0.22271073 = sum of:
    0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07423691 = score(doc=288,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
    0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07423691 = score(doc=288,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
    0.07423691 = weight(_text_:23 in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07423691 = score(doc=288,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.63357824 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:23:44
  4. Basch, R.: Secrets of the super searchers : planning search strategies (1993) 0.04 
    0.038974375 = product of:
  0.19487187 = sum of:
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 6637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=6637,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6637, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6637)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 6637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=6637,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6637, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6637)
    0.06495729 = weight(_text_:23 in 6637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06495729 = score(doc=6637,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6637, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6637)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Examines methods of formulating a search strategy from interviewing 23 expert searchers
  5. Pharo, N.: Web information search strategies : a model for classifying Web interaction (1999) 0.04 
    0.03890066 = product of:
  0.14587747 = sum of:
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=3831,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3831, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3831)
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=3831,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3831, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3831)
    0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 3831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046398066 = score(doc=3831,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 3831, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3831)
    0.0066832816 = weight(_text_:in in 3831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066832816 = score(doc=3831,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3831, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3831)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Source
    Vocabulary as a central concept in digital libraries: interdisciplinary concepts, challenges, and opportunities : proceedings of the Third International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Science (COLIS3), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 23-26 May 1999. Ed. by T. Arpanac et al
  6. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Research on Web-search behavior (2001) 0.04 
    0.03850969 = product of:
  0.14441133 = sum of:
    0.045931738 = weight(_text_:23 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045931738 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
    0.045931738 = weight(_text_:23 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045931738 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
    0.045931738 = weight(_text_:23 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045931738 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
    0.0066161114 = weight(_text_:in in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066161114 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    This article reviews studies, conducted between 1995 and 2000, on Web search behavior. These studies reported on children as well as on adults. Most of the studies on children described their interaction with the Web. Research on adult searchers focused on describing search patterns, and many studies investigated effects of selected factors on search behavior, including information organization and presentation, type of search task, Web experience, cognitive abilities, and affective states. What distinguishes the research on adult searchers is the use of multiple data-gathering methods. The research on Web search behavior reflects researchers' commitment to examine users in their information environment and exhibits rigor in design and data analysis. However, many studies lack external validity. Implications of this body of research are discussed.
    Date
    30.12.2008 12:51:23
    Source
    Library and information science research. 23(2001) no.2, S.167-185
  7. Crestani, F.; Du, H.: Written versus spoken queries : a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis (2006) 0.03 
    0.03378059 = product of:
  0.10134177 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
    0.008966564 = weight(_text_:in in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008966564 = score(doc=5047,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
    0.008858688 = product of:
      0.026576065 = sum of:
        0.026576065 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026576065 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Abstract
    The authors report on an experimental study on the differences between spoken and written queries. A set of written and spontaneous spoken queries are generated by users from written topics. These two sets of queries are compared in qualitative terms and in terms of their retrieval effectiveness. Written and spoken queries are compared in terms of length, duration, and part of speech. In addition, assuming perfect transcription of the spoken queries, written and spoken queries are compared in terms of their aptitude to describe relevant documents. The retrieval effectiveness of spoken and written queries is compared using three different information retrieval models. The results show that using speech to formulate one's information need provides a way to express it more naturally and encourages the formulation of longer queries. Despite that, longer spoken queries do not seem to significantly improve retrieval effectiveness compared with written queries.
    Date
    5. 6.2006 11:22:23
  8. Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2020) 0.03 
    0.033406608 = product of:
  0.16703303 = sum of:
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
    0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05567768 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Date
    23. 5.2020 14:31:15
  9. Ardito, S.C.: ¬The Internet : beginning or end of organized information? (1998) 0.03 
    0.031120533 = product of:
  0.11670199 = sum of:
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 1664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=1664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1664)
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 1664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=1664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1664)
    0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 1664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037118454 = score(doc=1664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 1664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1664)
    0.005346625 = weight(_text_:in in 1664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005346625 = score(doc=1664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1664)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Many information professionals still seem loathe to conduct searches on the Internet, preferring instead to continue to use commercial, proprietary systems. Compares the characteristics and advantages of search strategies for traditional databases with those for the Internet. Discusses future developments in Internet search engines and concludes that the merger of commercial database expertise with Internet technology and accessibility will enrich and simplify the end user's expectation
    Date
    29.12.1998 11:23:04
  10. Wilson, T.D.: Exploring models of information behaviour : the 'uncertainty' project (1999) 0.03 
    0.028143732 = product of:
  0.10553899 = sum of:
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=6785,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=6785,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
    0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032478645 = score(doc=6785,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
    0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008103048 = score(doc=6785,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    My original intention in this Keynote Paper was to talk about models of information behaviour, and I shall do that to some extent. However, both Carol Kuhlthau and Amanda Spink address this general conceptual level of research into information-seeking behaviour and I thought it would more appropriate to present my current research.
    Date
    23. 3.2002 9:29:18
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  11. Spink, A.; Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Foster, A.; Ellis, D.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 1: theoretical framework and research design (2002) 0.02 
    0.024890373 = product of:
  0.09333889 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5240,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5240,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5240,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
    0.009822378 = weight(_text_:in in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009822378 = score(doc=5240,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    In this issue we begin with the first of four parts of a five part series of papers by Spink, Wilson, Ford, Foster, and Ellis. Spink, et alia, in the first section of this report set forth the design of a project to test whether existing models of the information search process are appropriate for an environment of mediated successive searching which they believe characterizes much information seeking behavior. Their goal is to develop an integrated model of the process. Data were collected from 198 individuals, 87 in Texas and 111 in Sheffield in the U.K., with individuals with real information needs engaged in interaction with operational information retrieval systems by use of transaction logs, recordings of interactions with intermediaries, pre, and post search interviews, questionnaire responses, relevance judgments of retrieved text, and responses to a test of cognitive styles. Questionnaires were based upon the Kuhlthau model, the Saracevic model, the Ellis model, and incorporated a visual analog scale to avoid a consistency bias.
    Date
    21. 7.2006 14:23:51
  12. Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Ellis, D.; Foster, A.; Spink, A.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 2: uncertainty and Its correlates (2002) 0.02 
    0.024409723 = product of:
  0.091536455 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
    0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008019937 = score(doc=5232,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    In "Part 2. Uncertainty and Its Correlates,'' where Wilson is the primary author, after a review of uncertainty as a concept in information seeking and decision research, it is hypothesized that if the Kuhlthau problem solving stage model is appropriate the searchers will recognize the stage in which they currently are operating. Secondly to test Wilson's contention that operationalized uncertainty would be useful in characterizing users, it is hypothesized that uncertainty will decrease as the searcher proceeds through problem stages and after the completion of the search. A review of pre and post search interviews reveals that uncertainty can be operationalized, and that academic researchers have no difficulty with a stage model of the information seeking process. Uncertainty is unrelated to sex, age, or discipline, but is related to problem stage and domain knowledge. Both concepts appear robust.
    Date
    21. 7.2006 14:23:30
  13. Ferrández, O.; Izquierdo, R.; Ferrández, S.; Vicedo González, J.L.: Addressing ontology-based question answering with collections of user queries (2009) 0.02 
    0.024123197 = product of:
  0.090461984 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 4212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=4212,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4212, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4212)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 4212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=4212,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4212, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4212)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 4212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=4212,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4212, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4212)
    0.00694547 = weight(_text_:in in 4212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00694547 = score(doc=4212,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 4212, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4212)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    This paper presents QACID an ontology-based Question Answering system applied to the CInema Domain. This system allows users to retrieve information from formal ontologies by using as input queries formulated in natural language. The original characteristic of QACID is the strategy used to fill the gap between users' expressiveness and formal knowledge representation. This approach is based on collections of user queries and offers a simple adaptability to deal with multilingual capabilities, inter-domain portability and changes in user information requirements. All these capabilities permit developing Question Answering applications for actual users. This system has been developed and tested on the Spanish language and using an ontology modelling the cinema domain. The performance level achieved enables the use of the system in real environments.
    Date
    23. 1.2011 13:50:19
  14. Savolainen, R.: Information use as gap-bridging : the viewpoint of sense-making methodology (2006) 0.02 
    0.023783326 = product of:
  0.089187466 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5120,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5120, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5120)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5120,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5120, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5120)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5120,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5120, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5120)
    0.005670953 = weight(_text_:in in 5120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005670953 = score(doc=5120,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 5120, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5120)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    The conceptual issues of information use are discussed by reviewing the major ideas of sense-making methodology developed by Brenda Dervin. Sense-making methodology approaches the phenomena of information use by drawing on the metaphor of gap-bridging. The nature of this metaphor is explored by utilizing the ideas of metaphor analysis suggested by Lakoff and Johnson. First, the source domain of the metaphor is characterized by utilizing the graphical illustrations of sense-making metaphors. Second, the target domain of the metaphor is analyzed by scrutinizing Dervin's key writings on information seeking and use. The metaphor of gap-bridging does not suggest a substantive conception of information use; the metaphor gives methodological and heuristic guidance to posit contextual questions as to how people interpret information to make sense of it. Specifically, these questions focus on the ways in which cognitive, affective, and other elements useful for the sense-making process are constructed and shaped to bridge the gap. Ultimately, the key question of information use studies is how people design information in context.
    Date
    4. 7.2006 14:05:23
  15. Song, R.; Luo, Z.; Nie, J.-Y.; Yu, Y.; Hon, H.-W.: Identification of ambiguous queries in web search (2009) 0.02 
    0.023783326 = product of:
  0.089187466 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=2441,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2441, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2441)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=2441,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2441, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2441)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=2441,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2441, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2441)
    0.005670953 = weight(_text_:in in 2441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005670953 = score(doc=2441,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2441, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2441)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    It is widely believed that many queries submitted to search engines are inherently ambiguous (e.g., java and apple). However, few studies have tried to classify queries based on ambiguity and to answer "what the proportion of ambiguous queries is". This paper deals with these issues. First, we clarify the definition of ambiguous queries by constructing the taxonomy of queries from being ambiguous to specific. Second, we ask human annotators to manually classify queries. From manually labeled results, we observe that query ambiguity is to some extent predictable. Third, we propose a supervised learning approach to automatically identify ambiguous queries. Experimental results show that we can correctly identify 87% of labeled queries with the approach. Finally, by using our approach, we estimate that about 16% of queries in a real search log are ambiguous.
    Date
    23. 1.2011 13:50:09
  16. Jung, J.J.: Contextualized query sampling to discover semantic resource descriptions on the web (2009) 0.02 
    0.023783326 = product of:
  0.089187466 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
    0.005670953 = weight(_text_:in in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005670953 = score(doc=4216,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Resource description extracted by query-sampling method can be applied to determine which database sources a certain query should be firstly sent to. In this paper, we propose a contextualized query-sampling method to extract the resources which are most relevant to up-to-date context. Practically, the proposed approach is adopted to personal crawler systems (the so-called focused crawlers), which can support the corresponding user's web navigation tasks in real-time. By taking into account the user context (e.g., intentions or interests), the crawler can build the queries to evaluate candidate information sources. As a result, we can discover semantic associations (i) between user context and the sources, and (ii) between all pairs of the sources. These associations are applied to rank the sources, and transform the queries for the other sources. For evaluating the performance of contextualized query sampling on 53 information sources, we compared the ranking lists recommended by the proposed method with user feedbacks (i.e., ideal ranks), and also computed the precision of discovered subsumptions as semantic associations between the sources.
    Date
    23. 1.2011 13:57:05
  17. Sbaffi, L.; Zhao, C.: Modeling the online health information seeking process : information channel selection among university students (2020) 0.02 
    0.023783326 = product of:
  0.089187466 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
    0.005670953 = weight(_text_:in in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005670953 = score(doc=5618,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    This study investigates the influence of individual and information characteristics on university students' information channel selection (that is, search engines, social question & answer sites, online health websites, and social networking sites) of online health information (OHI) for three different types of search tasks (factual, exploratory, and personal experience). Quantitative data were collected via an online questionnaire distributed to students on various postgraduate programs at a large UK university. In total, 291 responses were processed for descriptive statistics, Principal Component Analysis, and Poisson regression. Search engines are the most frequently used among the four channels of information discussed in this study. Credibility, ease of use, style, usefulness, and recommendation are the key factors influencing users' judgments of information characteristics (explaining over 62% of the variance). Poisson regression indicated that individuals' channel experience, age, student status, health status, and triangulation (comparing sources) as well as style, credibility, usefulness, and recommendation are substantive predictors for channel selection of OHI.
    Date
    6. 1.2020 17:51:23
  18. Sanchiza, M.; Chinb, J.; Chevaliera, A.; Fuc, W.T.; Amadieua, F.; Hed, J.: Searching for information on the web : impact of cognitive aging, prior domain knowledge and complexity of the search problems (2017) 0.02 
    0.023340397 = product of:
  0.087526485 = sum of:
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
    0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02783884 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
    0.0040099686 = weight(_text_:in in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040099686 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    This study focuses on the impact of age, prior domain knowledge and cognitive abilities on performance, query production and navigation strategies during information searching. Twenty older adults and nineteen young adults had to answer 12 information search problems of varying nature within two domain knowledge: health and manga. In each domain, participants had to perform two simple fact-finding problems (keywords provided and answer directly accessible on the search engine results page), two difficult fact-finding problems (keywords had to be inferred) and two open-ended information search problems (multiple answers possible and navigation necessary). Results showed that prior domain knowledge helped older adults improve navigation (i.e. reduced the number of webpages visited and thus decreased the feeling of disorientation), query production and reformulation (i.e. they formulated semantically more specific queries, and they inferred a greater number of new keywords).
    Date
    23. 1.2017 14:07:21
  19. Mattmann, B.; Regenass, N.: ¬Eine neue Form der Recherche in Bibliotheken : "Suchschlitz" contra Exploration - Reduktion statt Orientierung? (2021) 0.02 
    0.022998234 = product of:
  0.086243376 = sum of:
    0.030423306 = weight(_text_:und in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030423306 = score(doc=432,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
    0.023971878 = weight(_text_:zur in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023971878 = score(doc=432,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.23813893 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
    0.0066161114 = weight(_text_:in in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066161114 = score(doc=432,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
    0.02523208 = weight(_text_:der in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02523208 = score(doc=432,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Suchportale von Bibliotheken haben im Laufe der Zeit immer stärker eine Reduktion auf einfachste Suchmöglichkeiten im Stile von Google erfahren. Das kommt zwar den Gewohnheiten der Nutzer:innen entgegen, schränkt aber die Möglichkeiten einer fundierten Recherche ein. Abhilfe schaffen explorative Suchinstrumente. Damit diese ökonomisch und bedarfsgerecht realisiert werden können, braucht es eine hohe Datenqualität und einen standardisierten Werkzeugkasten zur Umsetzung von Rechercheoberflächen. Anstelle eines Ausbaus der Funktionen von Suchportalen empfiehlt sich daher eine Ausrichtung und Individualisierung zusätzlicher Recherchetools auf konkrete Anwendungskontexte und Nutzertypen.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Schwerpunktheft: Transfer und Transformation - Bibliotheken als Vermittler im globalen Kontext. Kolloquium anlässlich des 80. Geburtstages von Elmar Mittler.
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 45(2021) H.2, S.304-316
  20. Pu, H.-T.; Chuang, S.-L.; Yang, C.: Subject categorization of query terms for exploring Web users' search interests (2002) 0.02 
    0.021377146 = product of:
  0.08016429 = sum of:
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
    0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023199033 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
    0.010567197 = weight(_text_:in in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010567197 = score(doc=587,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032692216 = queryNorm
        0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Subject content analysis of Web query terms is essential to understand Web searching interests. Such analysis includes exploring search topics and observing changes in their frequency distributions with time. To provide a basis for in-depth analysis of users' search interests on a larger scale, this article presents a query categorization approach to automatically classifying Web query terms into broad subject categories. Because a query is short in length and simple in structure, its intended subject(s) of search is difficult to judge. Our approach, therefore, combines the search processes of real-world search engines to obtain highly ranked Web documents based on each unknown query term. These documents are used to extract cooccurring terms and to create a feature set. An effective ranking function has also been developed to find the most appropriate categories. Three search engine logs in Taiwan were collected and tested. They contained over 5 million queries from different periods of time. The achieved performance is quite encouraging compared with that of human categorization. The experimental results demonstrate that the approach is efficient in dealing with large numbers of queries and adaptable to the dynamic Web environment. Through good integration of human and machine efforts, the frequency distributions of subject categories in response to changes in users' search interests can be systematically observed in real time. The approach has also shown potential for use in various information retrieval applications, and provides a basis for further Web searching studies.
    Date
    26. 5.2002 15:28:23

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 252
  • d 10
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 247
  • m 11
  • el 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications